Validating a finite element model for rigid aircraft pavement load transfer against full scale testing

References

• AAA, 2017. Airport practice note 12 - airfield pavement essentials. Australia: Australian Airports Association.
   Google Scholar
• ACPA, 2010. R&T update concrete pavement research and technology - #10.01. American Concrete Pavement Association. ed. Skokie, IL: ACPA.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlvin, R.G., 1991. Origins of developments for structral design of pavements, technical report GI-91-26. Washington, DC: US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M., et al., 2021. Evaluation of concrete pavement joint performance at the FAA National Airport Pavement Test Facility. 12th International Conference on Concrete Pavements. Virtual Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Babuska, I. and Oden, J.T., 2004. Verification and validation in computational engineering and science: basic concepts. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 193, 4057–4066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brill, D.R., 1998. Development of advanced computational models for airport pavement design. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Brill, D.R. and Kawa, I., 2017. Advances in FAA pavement thickness design software: FAARFIELD 1.41. International Conference on Highway Pavements and Airfield Technology. Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Byrum, C.R., 2011a. Report IPRF-01-G-002-05-2 joint load transfer in concrete airfield pavements: appendix B: literature review summary. Rosemont: Innovative Pavement Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Byrum, C.R., 2011b. Report IPRF-01-G-002-05-2 joint load transfer in concrete airfield pavements: final report. Rosemont: Innovative Pavement Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cary, C., Ahmed, M., and Yin, H., 2020. 005 NAPTF Support Deliverable 4.9.2.5: CC8 Phase 3 Joint Comparison Traffic Test Report. United States: General Dynamics Information Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Colley, B.E. and Humphrey, H.A., 1967. Aggregate interlock at joints in concrete pavements. Highway Research Record, 189, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dassault Systemes, 2023a. Abaqus CAE 2023 [software].
   Google Scholar
• Dassault Systemes, 2023b. ABAQUS SIMULIA User Assistance online manual.
   Google Scholar
• Davids, W.G., Turkiyyah, G., and Mahoney, J.P, 1998. EverFE: rigid pavement three-dimensional finite element analysis tool. Transportation Research Record, 1629 (1), 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• FAA, 2016. FEAFAA 2.11 (Finite Element Analysis - FAA) [software]. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• FAA, 2021. AC 150/5320-6G - airport pavement design and evaluation. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Gkyrtis, K., et al., 2021. Structural performance assessment of airfield concrete pavements based on field and laboratory data. Infrastructures, 6, 173.
   Google Scholar
• Hammons, M.I. and Ioannides, A.M., 1997. Advanced pavement design: finite element modeling for rigid pavement joints. report 1: background investigation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.H., 1993. Pavement analysis and design. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, R.L., 1966. Miscellaneous paper No. 5-7. basis for rigid pavement design for military airfields. Cinicnnati: US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S. and White, G., 2021. Defining Australian rigid aircraft pavement design and detailing practice. ASCE International Airfield and Highway Pavements Conference 2021. Virtual Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S. and White, G., 2023. Review of rigid aircraft pavement joint types, effectiveness, distress, Maintenance and Analysis. International Airfield & Highway Pavment Conference. Austin, Texas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S. and White, G., 2024. Developing a thoeritical Model for Load Transfer of Common Joints in Rigid Airport Pavements. 13th International Conference on Concrete Pavements. Minneapolis, USA. Article-in-press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E.A., 2002. Investigation of cracking process and aggregate interlock properties of JPCP cracks. Thesis (Doctor of Philosphy (Civil Engineering)). Univeristy of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., et al., 2018. Effect of dowel bar arrangements on performance of jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP). International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 12, 39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G.R. and Quek, S.S., 2003. The finite element method: a practical course. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, F.M.H., et al., 2020. 3D-FE of jointed plain concrete pavement over continuum elastic foundation to obtain the edge stress. Revista de la Construccion, 19 (1), 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maaty, A., et al., 2018. Characteristics of jointed rigid airfield pavement using different material parameters and modelling techniques. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures, 66–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, P., 2015. Finite-Element analysis of stress concentration around dowel bars in jointed plain concrete pavement. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 141 (6), 06015001-1–06015001-8.
   Google Scholar
• MOD, UK, 2011. Design & maintenance guide 27 - a guide to airfield pavement design and evaluation. United Kingdom: Construction Support Team, Defence Estates, Ministry of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• PCI, 2010. PCI Design Handbook - 7th Edition. Precast and Prestressed Concrete. Chicago: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pradena, M. and Houben, L., 2018. Load transfer - crack width relation of non-dowelled jointed plain concrete short slabs. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 13 (1), 40–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena, P., et al., 2009. Laboratory and finite element evaluation of joint lockup. Transportation Research Record, 2095, 34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoukry, S.N., et al., 2003. Effect of bonding force on stresses in concrete slabs. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia Department of Transportation, and Mid Atlantic Universities Transportation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Sii, H.B., 2015. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of concrete pavement on weak foundation. Thesis (PhD). Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, S.M., et al., 1999. Bond interaction between concrete pavement and lean concrete base. Transportation Research Record, 1668, 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• TCS, 2016. Technical report 34: concrete industrial ground floors - fourth edition. Surrey, UK: The Concrete Society.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C., et al., 2018. Construction cycle 8 (CC8) Construction Report. Atlantic City, United States.
   Google Scholar
• White, G., 2018. Use of falling weight deflectometer for airport pavements. 5th GeoChina International Conference. HangZhou, China.
   Google Scholar
• White, G. and Jamieson, S, 2024. Analysis of the practical impact of mixing pavement thickness design methods: Study on rigid aircraft pavement concrete strength in Australia. Journal of Transportation Engineering Part B: Pavements, 150 (2), 04024007-1–04024007-11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, G. and Johnson, M., 2021. Investigating alternates to flexural beams for airport concrete strength compliance. 12th International Conference on Concrete Pavements. Virtual Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Zokaei, M., Fakhri, M., and Rahiminezhad, S., 2017. A parametric study of jointed plain concrete pavement using finite element modeling. Modern Applied Science, 11, 75.
   Google Scholar
• Zuzulova, A., Grosek, J., and Janku, M., 2020. Experimental laboratory testing on behavior of dowels in concrete pavements. Materials, 13 (10), 2343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar