Evaluation of asphalt-aggregate adhesive characteristics using the binder bond strength device under variable curing conditions

References

• AASHTO T 361-16, 2016. Standard method of test for determining asphalt binder bond strength by means of the binder bond strength (BBS) test. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Aguiar-Moya, J. P., et al., 2015. Effect of aging on adhesion properties of asphalt mixtures with the use of bitumen bond strength and surface energy measurement tests. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2505, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.3141/2505-08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I. L., Elseifi, M., and Carpenter, S. H., 2007. Reclaimed asphalt pavement - a literature review. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 07, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Alhaddad, A., and Tareq, A., 2018. Predicted the pull off tensile strength of asphalt binder using modified BBS test. Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management, 5, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1407129.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Khasawneh, M., et al., 2020. Experimental and statistical evaluation of asphalt binders produced in Jordan treated with different modifiers. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsheyab, M. A., and Khasawneh, M. A., 2023. Statistical modeling of asphalt pavement surface friction based on aggregate fineness modulus and asphalt mix volumetrics. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-023-00289-9.
   Google Scholar
• Asif, S. A., et al., 2018. Study of adhesion characteristics of different bitumen–aggregate combinations using bitumen bond strength test. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 41 (5), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2018.1490205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D113-17, 2017. Standard test method for ductility of asphalt materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D2872-19, 2019. Standard test method for effect of heat and Air on a moving film of asphalt (rolling thin-film oven test). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D36 / D36M-14e1, 2014. Standard test method for softening point of bitumen (ring-and ball apparatus). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4402 / D4402M-15, 2015. Standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using a rotational viscometer. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4541-17, 2017. Standard test method for pull-off strength of coatings using portable adhesion testers. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6521-19a, 2019. Standard practice for accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized aging vessel (PAV). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D92 - 18, 2018. Standard test method for flash and fire points by Cleveland open cup tester. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• Bahia, H, Moraes, R., and Velásquez, R., 2010. Measuring asphalt-aggregate bond strength under different conditions. Conference: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on transport infrastructures (ICTI), August, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Bahia, Hussain, Moraes, R., and Velasquez, R., 2012. The effect of bitumen stiffness on the adhesive strength measured by the bitumen bond strength test. 5th Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, June 2012, 13–15. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12234.26565.
   Google Scholar
• Bhasin, A., et al., 2006. Limits on adhesive bond energy for improved resistance of hot-mix asphalt to moisture damage. Transportation Research Record, 1970, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3141/1970-03.
   Google Scholar
• Bionghi, R., et al., 2021. Correlation between bond strength and surface free energy parameters of asphalt binder-aggregate system. Construction and Building Materials, 303 (August), 124487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124487.
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F., et al., 2010. Adhesive and cohesive properties of asphalt-aggregate systems subjected to moisture damage. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 11 (October 2014), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2010.9690325.
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F., et al., 2015. Innovative testing protocol for evaluation of binder-reclaimed aggregate bond strength. Transportation Research Record, 1 (2444), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.3141/2444-07.
   Google Scholar
• Caro, S., et al., 2008. Moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures, part 1: mechanisms. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430701792128.
   Google Scholar
• Chaturabong, P., and Bahia, H. U., 2018. Effect of moisture on the cohesion of asphalt mastics and bonding with surface of aggregates. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 19 (3), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1267659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. W., Gibson, W. M., and Huang, H., 2008. High definition X-ray fluorescence: principles and techniques. X-Ray Optics and Instrumentation, 2008, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/318171.
   Google Scholar
• Cong, P., Guo, X., and Ge, W., 2021. Effects of moisture on the bonding performance of asphalt-aggregate system. Construction and Building Materials, 295, 123667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, A. R., Youtcheff, J., and Shenoy, A., 2007. Moisture sensitivity of modified asphalt binders factors influencing bond strength. Transportation Research Record, 1998, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.3141/1998-03.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, S., et al., 2014. Durability of asphalt mixtures: effect of aggregate type and adhesion promoters. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 54, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, A., Singh, D., and Pais, J. C., 2017. Moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixes: a literature eeview. 4th Conference of Transportation Research Group of India (CTRG), 17–20 December 2017 Mumbai, India. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321904870.
   Google Scholar
• Ghabchi, R., and Rajapaksha, B. P., 2019. Application of modified binder bond strength test for evaluating the effects of curing, moisture, and aging on tensile bond strength of tack coats. Airfield and highway pavements 2019: testing and characterization of pavement materials - selected papers from the international airfield and highway pavements conference 2019, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482469.032.
   Google Scholar
• Graziani, A., Virgili, A., and Cardone, F., 2018. Testing the bond strength between cold bitumen emulsion composites and aggregate substrate. Materials and Structures, 51 (1), https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1139-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greyling, A., et al., 2011. Development of a test method for determining emulsion bond strength using the bitumen bond strength test. Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA11), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Habal, A., and Singh, D., 2018. Influence of recycled asphalt pavement on interfacial energy and bond strength of asphalt binder for different types of aggregates. Transportation Research Record, 2672 (28), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118784377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgnies, M., et al., 2011. Influence of the interfacial composition on the adhesion between aggregates and bitumen: investigations by EDX, XPS and peel tests. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 31 (4), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingrassia, L. P., et al., 2019. Experimental investigation on the bond strength between sustainable road bio-binders and aggregate substrates. Materials and Structures, 52 (4). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1381-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameel, M. S., et al., 2022. Effect of aging on adhesion and moisture damage of asphalt: a perspective of rolling bottle and bitumen bond strength test. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 15 (1), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-021-00021-5.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K., et al., 2013. Binder adhesion testing using the bitumen bond strength test : state of the art. 15th International Flexible Pavements Conference of AAPA, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Júnior, J. L., Babadopulos, L., and Soares, J., 2019. Resistance to moisture-induced damage of asphalt mixtures and aggregate-binder interfaces. RILEM Bookseries, 20 (2016), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00476-7_39.
   Google Scholar
• Kanitpong, K., and Bahia, H., 2005. Relating adhesion and cohesion of asphalts to the effect of moisture on laboratory performance of asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 1901, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105190100105.
   Google Scholar
• Khasawneh, M. A., et al., 2021. Evaluation of aggregate-binder bond strength using the BBS device for different road materials and conditions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.1873332.
   Google Scholar
• Lachance-Tremblay, É., et al., 2019. Comparison of the moisture damage of bituminous binder coupled with glass and limestone substrate using pull-off test. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 46 (3), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, M. G., 2008. Analysis of variance. Circulation, 117 (1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.654335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, Vinamra, and Singh, D., 2019. Impact of short-term aging temperatures of asphalt binder and aggregate roughness levels on bond strength. Construction and Building Materials, 218, 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, V, and Singh, D., 2021. Investigation on effects of aggregate roughness on bond strength of aggregate-bitumen systems. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1075 (1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1075/1/012011.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, R., Velasquez, R., and Bahia, H., 2011. Measuring the effect of moisture on asphalt-aggregate bond with the bitumen bond strength test. Transportation Research Record, 2209, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.3141/2209-09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes, R., Velasquez, R., and Bahia, H., 2017. Using bond strength and surface energy to estimate moisture resistance of asphalt-aggregate systems. Construction and Building Materials, 130, 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar, H. A., et al., 2020. Effects of moisture damage on asphalt mixtures. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 7 (5), 600–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Pasandín, A. R., and Pérez, I., 2014. Effects of the asphalt penetration grade and the mineralogical composition on the asphalt-aggregate bond. Petroleum Science and Technology, 32 (22), 2730–2737. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2013.879175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, A., Thom, N., and Airey, G., 2019. Development of compression pull-off test (CPOT) to assess bond strength of bitumen. Construction and Building Materials, 207, 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santagata, F. A., et al., 2009. Modified PATTI Test for the characterization of adhesion and cohesion properties of asphalt binders. Sixth international conference on maintenance and rehabilitation of pavements and technological control (MAIREPAV6) Turin, Italy, Fromm.
   Google Scholar
• Tareq, A. M., and Abedali, A. H., 2019. Predicted affinity ratio between asphalt binder and aggregate. Journal of Engineering, 25 (7), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2019.07.08.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Yi, J., and Feng, D., 2014. Modelling and laboratory studies on the adhesion fatigue performance for thin-film asphalt and aggregate system. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/819083.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. C., Moore, J. R., and Zhang, J., 2006. Evaluating tack coat applications and the bond strength between pavement layers. Proceedings of the 2006 airfield and highway pavement specialty conference, 2006, 578–588. https://doi.org/10.1061/40838(191)49.
   Google Scholar
• You, L., et al., 2019. Investigation of adhesion and interface bond strength for pavements underlying chip-seal: effect of asphalt-aggregate combinations and freeze-thaw cycles on chip-seal. Construction and Building Materials, 203, 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., Zhu, X., and Chen, L., 2020. Relationship among cohesion, adhesion, and bond strength: from multi-scale investigation of asphalt-based composites subjected to laboratory-simulated aging. Materials & Design, 185, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaniewski, J. P., Knihtila, S. F., and Rashidi, H. N., 2015. Evaluation of the bond strength of asphalt overlays. Airfield and highway pavements 2015: innovative and cost-effective pavements for a sustainable future - Proceedings of the 2015 international airfield and highway pavements conference, 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479216.017.
   Google Scholar
• Zapata, C. E., et al., 2007. Incorporation of environmental effects in pavement design. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 8 (4), 667–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2007.9690094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2016. Experimental study of moisture sensitivity of aggregate-bitumen bonding strength using a new Pull-Off test. RILEM Bookseries, 11, 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_58.
   Google Scholar