How do we build power in coalition? Rethinking union-community coalition types 12 years on

References

• ACTU. 1999. Unions@Work. Melbourne: Australian Council of Trade Unions.
   Google Scholar
• ACTU. 2008. Unions Organising and Working for a Fairer Australia. Melbourne: ACTU.
   Google Scholar
• AFL-CIO. 2001. AFL-CIO 24th Biennial Convention: Executive Council Report, 97. Washington, DC: AFL-CIO.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, A. 1992. “The Power and Promise of Community Unionism.” Labor Research Review 18: 16–31.
   Google Scholar
• Brecher, J., and T. Costello. 1990. Building Bridges: The Emerging Grassroots Coalition of Labor and Community. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, L. 2015. Resurrecting Democracy: Faith, Citizenship and the Politics of a Common Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CANA. 2016. Climate Action Network Australia Annual Report 2015-2016, 36. Sydney: Climate Action Network Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, E. 2003. Roots for Radicals: Organizing for Power, Action and Justice. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• CLC. 2005. “Labor in the Community: Report to 24ths CLC Constitutional Convention.” Report Doucment No 2 presented to CLC convention, June 13 to 17. Ottawa: Canadian Labour Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Flanders, A. 1970. Mangement and Unions: The Theory and Reform of Industrial Relations. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, C., E. Heery, and L. Turner. 2004. “The New Solidarity? Trade Union Coalition Building in Five Countries.” In Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalisation in a Globalising Economy, edited by C. Frege and J. Kelly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gecan, M. 2004. Going Public: An Organizer’s Guide to Citizen Action. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Heery, E., S. Williams, and B. Abbott. 2012. “Civil Society Organizations and Trade Unions: Cooperation, Conflict and Indifference.” Work, Employment and Society 26 (1): 145–160. doi:10.1177/0950017011426302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgate, J. 2015. “An International Study of Trade Union Involvement in Community Organizing: Same Model, Different Outcomes.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 53 (3): 460–483. doi:10.1111/bjir.2015.53.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, R. 2007. “How Can Trade Unions Act Strategically?” Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 16 (3): 315–331. doi:10.1177/1024258910373863.
   Google Scholar
• IAF. 2015. “Report on the IAF Global Lead Organisers Meeting.” July. Los Angeles: A. Tattersall. Email correspondence, Joe Chrastil.
   Google Scholar
• Iveson, K., and A. Tattersall. 2016. “Politicization and Organization in Urban-Scale Alliances.” Urban Citizenship and Participation - Is There a Crisis? April. Parramatta: Western Sydney University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. 1994. Success while Others Fail: Social Movement Unionism and the Public Workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., and G. Murray. 2006. “Innovation in Canadian Unions: Patterns, Causes and Consequences.” In Paths to Union Renewal: Canadian Experiences, edited by P. Kumar and C. Schenk. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, S. 2017. “Living Wages: A US Perspective.” Employee Relations 39 (6): 863–874. doi:10.1108/ER-07-2017-0153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlevey, J. 2016. No Shortcuts: Organising for Power in the New Guilded Age. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, K. 2008. Worth Fighting For: Inside the Your Rights at Work Campaign. Sydney: University of NSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, G. 2017. “Union Renewal: What Can We Learn from Three Decades of Research?” Transfer 23 (1): 9–29. doi:10.1177/1024258916681723.
   Google Scholar
• Obach, B. 2004. Labor and the Environment Movement: The Quest for Common Ground. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, F. 2000. Coalitions across the Class Divide: Lessons from the Labor,Peace and Environmental Movement. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Unviersity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D., and R. Fagan. 2004. “Australian Trade Unions and the Politics of Scale: Reconstructing the Spatiality of Industrial Relations.” Australian Geographer 80 (1): 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Simms, M., J. Holgate, and E. Heery. 2013. Union Voices: Tactics and Tensions in UK Organizing. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sneiderman, M. 1996. “AFL-CIO Central Labor Councils: Organizing for Social Justice.” Labor Research Resview 24: 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sydney_Alliance. 2015. “Sydney Alliance - About Our Districts.” Accessed 28 February 2015. http://www.sydneyalliance.org.au/out_districts.
   Google Scholar
• Sydney_Alliance. 2017. “Sydney Alliance: About Us.” Accessed 17 September 2017.http://www.sydneyalliance.org.au/about_us .
   Google Scholar
• Tapia, M. 2013. “Marching to Different Tunes: Commitment and Culture as Mobilizing Mechanisms for Trade Unions and Community Organizations.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 51 (4): 666–688. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2012.00893.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tattersall, A. 2005. “There is Power in Coalition.” Labour & Industry 16 (2): 97–112. doi:10.1080/10301763.2005.10669325.
   Google Scholar
• Tattersall, A. 2006. “Bringing the Community In: Possibilities for Public Sector Unionism through Community Unionism.” International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management 6 (2/3/4): 186–199. doi:10.1504/IJHRDM.2006.010394.
   Google Scholar
• Tattersall, A. 2010. Power in Coalition: Strategies for Strong Unions and Social Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tattersall, A. 2015. “The Global Spread of Community Organizing: How ‘Alinsky-Style’ Community Organizing Travelled to Australia and What We Learnt?” Community Development Journal 50 (3): 380–396. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsv018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, C. 2010. “Understanding Caring, Organizing Women: How Framing a Problem Shapes Union Strategy.” Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 16 (3): 399–410. doi:10.1177/1024258910373870.
   Google Scholar