Urban echoes of ubiquity

REFERENCES

• Allwinkle, S., and P.Cruickshank. 2011. “Creating Smarter Cities: An Overview.” Journal of Urban Technology18 (2): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 2006. “Politics in the Urban World.” Re-Public. http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p = 56.
   Google Scholar
• Aurigi, A., and F.De Cindio. 2008. Augmented Urban Spaces: Articulating the Physical and Electronic City. Aldershot, Hampshire; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Back, L., and M.Bull. 2003. The Auditory Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, T., and A.Loukaitou-Sideris, eds. 2011. Companion to Urban Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bassoli, A., J.Brewer, P.Dourish, K.Martin, and S.Mainwaring. 2007. “Underground Aesthetics: Rethinking Urban Computing.” IEEE Pervasive Computing6 (3): 39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogard, W.2007. “The Coils of a Serpent, Haptic Space and Control Societies.” C-Theory. http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=581.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, G.1995. Atmosphäre: Essays zur Neuen Ästhetik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, G.2001. Akustische Atmosphären ein Beitrag zur Ökologischen Ästhetik. Klang und Wahrnehmung. I. f. N. M. u. M. Darmstadt. Mainz, Schott: 38–48.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, G.2006. Architektur und Atmosphäre. Paderborn: Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Bolter, J. D., B.MacIntyre, M.Nitsche, and K.Farley. 2013. “Liveness, Presence, and Performance in Contemporary Digital Media.” In Throughout: Art and Culture Emerging with Ubiquitous Computing, edited by U.Ekman, 323–336. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., and S.Watson, eds. 2010. The Blackwell City Reader. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brodersen, C., and J. F.Kristensen. 2004. “Interaction Through Negotiation.” In Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, edited by R.Raisamo, 259–268. Tampere: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, M.2004. Sounds of the City: Mobile Technologies and Urban Experiences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, M.2007. Sound Moves: iPod Culture and Urban Experience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M.1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M., and P.Hall. 1994. Technopoles of the World: The Making of Twenty-First-Century Industrial Complexes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, E., and J. J.Lara, eds. 2013. Remaking Metropolis: Global Challenges of the Urban Landscape. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crang, M., and S.Graham. 2007. “SENTIENT CITIES Ambient Intelligence and the Politics of Urban Space.” Information, Communication & Society10 (6): 789–817.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G.1995. “Postscript on Control Societies.” In Negotiations, 1972–1990, edited by Lawrence D.Kritzman, 177–182. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P.2001. Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P.2006. “Re-Spaceing Place: ‘Place’ and ‘Space’ Ten Years on.”, http://www.dourish.com/publications/2006/cscw2006-space.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P., K.Anderson, and D.Nafus. 2007. “Cultural Issues in HCI – Cultural Mobilities: Diversity and Agency in Urban Computing.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science4663: 100–114.
   Google Scholar
• Droege, P.1990. The Intelligent City: Southeast Asian City of the Future?Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Droege, P.1997. Intelligent Environments: Spatial Aspects of the Information Revolution. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, A.2005. Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, F.2009. Sounding New Media: Immersion and Embodiment in the Arts and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, U.2011. “Editorial: Interaction Designs for Ubicomp Cultures.” Fibreculture, no. 19: 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, U., ed. 2013. Throughout: Art and Culture Emerging with Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, M., N. J.Thrift, and J.Urry. 2005. Automobilities. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, M.2009. Critical Play: Radical Game Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frohne, U., P.Weibel, T. Y.Levin, and Zentrum für Kunst und Medientechnologie, eds. 2002. CTRL Space: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gajos, K., D. B.Christianson, R.Hoffmann, T.Shaked, K.Henning, J. J.Long, and D. S.Weld. 2005. “Fast and Robust Interface Generation for Ubiquitous Applications.” In UbiComp 2005: Ubiquitous Computing: 6th International Conference: Proceedings, edited by M.Beigl, 37–55. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, A.2004. “Intimations of Everyday Life – Ubiquitous Computing and the City.” Cultural Studies18 (2–3): 384–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., and L.Hjorth, eds. 2009. Mobile Technologies: From Telecommunications to Media. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S.2004. The Cybercities Reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and S.Marvin. 1996. Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, A.2006. Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, A.2008. “Some Guidelines for the Ethical Development of Ubiquitous Computing.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A366: 3823–3831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guattari, F.2000. “The New Aesthetic Paradigm.” In The Continental Aesthetics Reader, edited by C.Cazeaux, 643–656. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, T., ed. 2008. New Urbanism and Beyond: Designing Cities for the Future. New York: Rizzoli.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K. D., and M.Samatas. 2010. Surveillance and Democracy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawk, B., D. M.Rieder, and O. O.Oviedo. 2008. Small Tech: The Culture of Digital Tools. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K.1999. How We Became Posthuman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemment, D.2006. “Locative Arts.” Leonardo39 (4): 348–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G.2008. “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up?” City12 (3): 303–320.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M.2007. “Portable Objects in Three Global Cities: The Personalization of Urban Places.” July 28. http://www.itofisher.com/mito/portableobjects.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., D.Okabe, and M.Matsuda. 2005. Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacko, J. A., and A.Sears. 2003. The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., and M.Dodge. 2011. Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Komninos, N.2002. Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems, and Digital Spaces. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Komninos, N.2008. Intelligent Cities and Globalisation of Innovation Networks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, R., and S.Sassen. 2005. Digital Formations: IT and New Architectures in the Global Realm. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H.1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H.2004. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• LeGates, R. T., and F.Stout, eds. 2011. The City Reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J., and C.Mele, eds. 2012. The Urban Sociology Reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D.2006. Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond. Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A.2006. Cutting Code: Software and Sociality. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A.2011. Wirelessness: Radical Empiricism in Network Cultures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L.2006. “The Poetics of Augmented Space.” Visual Communication5: 219–240.
   Google Scholar
• Marceau, J.2008. “Introduction: Innovation in the City and Innovative Cities.” Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice10 (2–3): 136–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M.2004. Digital Ground: Architecture, Pervasive Computing, and Environmental Knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McQuire, S.2008. The Media City: Media, Architecture and Urban Space. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, P., and F.Kishino. 1994. “Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays.” IEICE Transactions on Information and SystemsE77-D (12): 1321–1329.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J.1995. City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, T.2006. Surveillance and Security: Technological Politics and Power in Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Montola, M., J.Stenros, and A.Waern. 2009. Pervasive Games: Theory and Design. Amsterdam, London: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Nancy, J.-L.2000. Being Singular Plural. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A.1998. The Invisible Computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, P.2013. Anywhere or Not At All: Philosophy of Contemporary Art. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, C.2013. “Contexts as Moving Targets.” In Throughout: Art and Culture Emerging with Ubiquitous Computing, edited by U.Ekman, 399–418. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J.2006. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y.2006. “Moving on from Weiser's Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging Ubicomp Experiences.” In UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing: 8th International Conference: Proceedings, edited by P.Dourish, and A.Friday, 404–421. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S.1997. “The New Centrality: The Impact of Telematics and Globalization.” In Intelligent Environments: Spatial Aspects of the Information Revolution, edited by P.Droege, 19–27. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S.2003. “Reading the City in a Global Digital Age.” In Global Cities: Cinema, Architecture, and Urbanism in a Digital Age, edited by L.Krause, and P.Petro, 15–30. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S.2004. “Agglomeration in the Digital Era.” In The Cybercities Reader, edited by S.Graham, 195–198. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S.2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S.2011. “The Impact of the New Technologies and Globalization on Cities.” In The City Reader, edited by R. T.LeGates, and F.Stout, 554–562. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. M.1977. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester, VT: Destiny Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, G.1992. Die Erlebnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. New York: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, J., J.Simmie, P.Wood, and D.Hart. 2002. “Space, Linkages, and Successful Urban Regions: A Cross-National Comparison.” Journal of Urban Technology9 (3): 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serres, M.1995. Genesis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J.Urry. 2006. Mobile Technologies of the City. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. H.2009. “Ubiquitous City: Urban Technologies, Urban Infrastructure and Urban Informatics.” Journal of Information Science35 (5): 515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streitz, N. A., A.Kameas, and I.Mavrommati, eds. 2007. The Disappearing Computer: Interaction Design, Systems Infrastructures and Applications for Smart Environments. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tennenhouse, D.2000. “Proactive Computing.” Communications of the ACM43 (5): 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N., and S.French. 2002. “The Automatic Production of Space.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers27 (3): 309–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, A.2006. “Locative-Media Artists in the Contested-Aware City.” Leonardo39 (4): 345–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuters, M., and K.Varnelis. 2006. “Beyond Locative Media: Giving Shape to the Internet of Things.” Leonardo39 (4): 357–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnelis, K., ed. 2008. Networked Publics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, D.2011. “Smart Cities, Smart Places, Smart Democracy: Form-Based Codes, Electronic Governance and the Role of Place in Making Smart Cities.” Intelligent Buildings International3 (3): 198–218.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, B. K.2006. “Pervasive Gaming.” Fibreculture8. http://eight.fibreculturejournal.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., and M. A.Schnabel, eds. 2008. Mixed Reality in Architecture, Design, and Construction. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weibel, P.2006. “The Postmedial Condition.” Artecontexto6: 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser, M.1991. “The Computer for the 21st Century.” Scientific American265 (3): 94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiser, M.1994. “The World is Not a Desktop.” Interactions1 (1): 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser, M., and J. S. Brown. 1996. “The Coming Age of Calm Technology.” http://www.nano.xerox.com/hypertext/weiser/acmfuture2endnote.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser, M., R.Gold, and J. S.Brown. 1999. “The Origins of Ubiquitous Computing Research at PARC in the Late 1980s.” IBM Systems Journal38 (4): 693–696.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., and P.Dourish. 2006. “Imagining the City: The Cultural Dimensions of Urban Computing.” Computer – IEEE Computer Magazine39 (9): 38–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar