Advanced search
Publication Cover
Continuum
Journal of Media & Cultural Studies
Volume 28, 2014 - Issue 3: Rethinking media space
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,905
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General papers

What is interactivity for? The social dimension of web-documentary participation

Kate NashSchool of Social Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 383-395 | Published online: 21 Mar 2014

REFERENCES

  • Aston, J., and S.Gaudenzie. 2012. “Interactive Documentary: Setting the Field.” Studies in Documentary Film6 (2): 125–139.
  • Beattie, D.2008. The Wrong Crowd: Theory and Practice in Producing Documentary Online. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr Muller.
  • Carpentier, N.2011. “Contextualising Author-Audience Convergences.” Cultural Studies25 (4–5): 517–533.
  • Chanan, M.2007. The Politics of Documentary. London: BFI.
  • Corner, J.2002. “Performing the Real: Documentary Diversions.” Television and New Media3 (3): 255–269. 10.1177/152747640200300302.
  • Daniel, S.2012. “On Politics and Aesthetics: A Case Study of ‘Public Secrets’ and ‘Blood Sugar’.” Studies in Documentary Film6 (2): 215–227.
  • Dovey, J., and M.Rose. 2012. “We're Happy and We Know It: Documentary, Data, Montage.” Studies in Documentary Film6 (2): 159–173.
  • Dovey, J., and M.Rose. 2013. “This Great Mapping of Ourselves: New Documentary Forms Online.” In The BFI Companion to Documentary, edited by BrianWinston, 366–375. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • FitzSimons, T.2009. “Braided Channels: A Genealogy of the Voice of Documentary.” Studies in Documentary Film3 (2): 131–147.
  • Gaines, J. M.1999. “Political Mimesis.” In Collecting Visible Evidence, edited by J.Gaines and M.Renov, 84–102. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gaudenzi, S.2011. “The I-Doc as a Relational Object.” Accessed April 20, 2013. http://i-docs.org/2011/09/08/the-i-doc-as-a-relational-object/.
  • Gaudenzi, S.January 2013. “The Living Documentary: From Representing Reality to Co-creating Reality in Digital Interactive Documentary.” PhD thesis Goldsmiths (Centre for Cultural Studies), University of London.
  • Gibson, S.2012. “Imagining Documentary Spaces.” Conference Presentation Visible Evidence, Canberra, December.
  • Hudson, D.2008. “Undisclosed Recipients: Database Documentaries and the Internet.” Studies in Documentary Film2 (1): 79–98. 10.1386/sdf.2.1.79/1.
  • Jenkins, H., and N. Carpentier. 2013. “Theorizing Participatory Intensities: A Conversation About Participation and Politics.” Convergence. Published online 23 April 2013. 10.1177/1354856513482090.
  • Jenkins, H., S.Ford, and J.Green. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press.
  • Manovich, L.2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Miles, A.2008. “Programmatic Statements for a Facetted Videography.” In Video Vortext Reader: Responses to YouTube, edited by G.Lovink, and S.Niederer, 223–229. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
  • Nash, K.2010. “Exploring Power and Trust in Documentary: A Study of Tom Zubrycki's Molly and Mobarak.” Studies in Documentary Film4 (1): 21–33.
  • Nash, K.2012a. “Modes of Interactivity: Analyzing the Web-Doc.” Media, Culture and Society34 (2): 195–210.
  • Nash, K.2012b. “Goa Hippy Tribe: Theorising Documentary Content on a Social Network Site.” Media International Australia142: 30–41.
  • Nash, K., C.Hight, and C.Summerhayes. 2014. New Documentary Ecologies: Emerging Platforms, Practices and Discourses. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nichols, B.1983. “The Voice of Documentary.” Film Quarterly36 (3): 17–30.
  • Nichols, B.1991. Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Nichols, B.2001. Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Odorico, S.2011. “Documentary on the Web Between Realism and Interaction: A Case Study: From Zero – People Rebuilding Life After the Emergency (2009).” Studies in Documentary Film5 (2/3): 235–246.
  • Quiring, O.2009. “What Do Users Associate with Interactivity? A Qualitative Study on User Schemata.” New Media and Society11 (6): 899–920. 10.1177/1461444809336511.
  • Renov, M., ed. 1993. “Toward a Poetics of Documentary.” In Theorizing Documentary, 12–36. New York: Routledge.
  • Renov, M.2004. The Subject of Documentary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ruby, J.1992. “Speaking for, Speaking About, Speaking with or Speaking Alongside: An Anthropological and Documentary Dilemma.” Journal of Film and Video44 (1/2): 42–66.
  • Skartveit, H. L.2007. “Representing the Real Through Play and Interaction: Changing Forms of Nonfiction.” PhD, University of Bergen.
  • Sobchack, V.2004. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and the Moving Image. Berkley: University of California Press.
  • Waugh, T.2011. The Right to Play Oneself: Looking Back on Documentary Film. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Whiteman, D.2004. “Out of the Theatres and into the Streets: A Coalition Model of the Political Impact of Documentary Film and Video.” Political Communication21 (1): 51–69.
  • Winston, B.1995. Claiming the Real: The Documentary Film Revisited. London: BFI.
  • Winston, B.2000. Lies, Damn Lies and Documentary. London: BFI.
  • Zimmerman, P.2008. “Public Domains: Engaging Iraq Through Experimental Documentary Digitalities.” In Rethinking Documentary: New Perspectives, New Practices, edited by Austin, and de Jong, 284–298. Berkshire: Open University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.