Growth of ‘Long Tail’ in Australian journalism supports new engaging approach to audiences

References

• Anderson, C. 2006. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. New York: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. 2001. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. San Francisco, CA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., C. J. Cunningham, G. M. De La Rosa, and J. Picano. 2007. “Coaching Leaders in Middle and Executive Management: Goals, Performance, Buy-in.” Leadership & Organization Development Journal 28 (5): 388–408.
   Google Scholar
• Cokley, J. 2005. “The Mirror-Ball Effect: Investigating Channels, Messages and Participation Levels.” Ejournalist 5 (1): 1–77.
   Google Scholar
• Cokley, J. 2012. “Review of the Reuters Institute’s Digital News Report 2012, by Nic Newman.” Digital Journalism 1 (2): 286–287. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2012.744561.
   Google Scholar
• Cokley, J. 2014. “Citizen Journalism.” In A Companion to the Australian Media. 1st ed. Vol. 1, edited by B. Griffen-Foley, 94–95. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cokley, J., and A. Ranke. 2011. “There’s a Long Tail in Journalism, Too.” In Journalism Education, Training and Employment, edited by B. Franklin and D. Mensing, 159–176. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Cokley, J., M. Edström, J. McBride, and A. Ranke. 2011. “Moving Away from ‘Big Media’: Students, Jobs and Long-Tail Theory.” Australian Journalism Review 33 (1): 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, D., A. Bryman, and N. Fenton. 1998. “Collision or Collusion? A Discussion and Case Study of the Unplanned Triangulation of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1 (1): 47–63.10.1080/13645579.1998.10846862
   Google Scholar
• Deuze, M. 2008. “The Changing Context of News Work: Liquid Journalism for a Monitorial Citizenry.” International Journal of Communication 2: 848–865.
   Google Scholar
• Deuze, M., A. Bruns, and C. Neuberger. 2007. “Preparing for an Age of Participatory News.” Journalism Practice 1 (3): 322–338.10.1080/17512780701504864
   Google Scholar
• Fried, J., and D. H. Hansson. 2010. Rework. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, M., and L. Wilson. 2013. Margaret Gee’s Australian Media Guide 2013. Melbourne: Crown Content.
   Google Scholar
• Graffigna, G., and R. C. Gambetti. 2015. “The Process of Consumer-brand Engagement: A Grounded Theory Approach.” In The Sustainable Global Marketplace, edited by M. Conway Dato-on, 119–122. Coral Gables, FL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, T. M., and B. Barthel. 2009. “Wielding New Media in Web 2.0: Exploring the History of Engagement with the Collaborative Construction of Media Products.” New Media & Society 11 (1–2): 155–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R. 2009. “Emotional Engagement: How Television Builds Big Brands at Low Attention.” Journal of Advertising Research 49 (1): 62–73.10.2501/S0021849909090060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. 1999. “New Media, New Audiences?” New Media & Society 1 (1): 59–66.10.1177/1461444899001001010
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J., X. Han, J. Yang, and J. Cheng. 2015. “Examining the Necessary Condition for Engagement in an Online Learning Environment Based on Learning Analytics Approach: The Role of the Instructor.” The Internet and Higher Education 24: 26–34.10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, S. 1998. “The Online Newspaper: A Postmodern Medium.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 4 (1). http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/idx/j/jep/3336451.0004.110/--online-newspaper-a-postmodern-medium?rgn=main;view=fulltext
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, E., and J. Cokley. 2008. “Deconstructing the Discourse of Citizen Journalism: Who Says What and Why It Matters.” Pacific Journalism Review 14 (1): 94–114.
   Google Scholar
• Trousset, S., K. Gupta, H. Jenkins‐Smith, C. L. Silva, and K. Herron. 2015. “Degrees of Engagement: Using Cultural Worldviews to Explain Variations in Public Preferences for Engagement in the Policy Process.” Policy Studies Journal 43 (1): 44–69.
   Google Scholar