Hermeneutic theory: Malaysian practices

References

• Andersen, J. 2020. “Understanding and Interpreting Algorithms: Toward a Hermeneutics of Algorithms.” Media, Culture and Society 42 (7–8): 1479–1494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720919373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J.L. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, M., and N. Friesen. 2018. “Phenomenology and Education.” In International Handbook of Philosophy of Education, edited by P. Smeyers, 591–608. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brita, Y.-A., and R. Das. 2018. “An Agenda in the Interest of Audiences: Facing the Challenges of Intrusive Media Technologies.” Television and New Media 20 (2): 184–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418759604i.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., and P. Duguid. 2001. “Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective.” Organization Science 12 (2): 198–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and A. Hepp. 2017. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and U. Mejias. 2018. “Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject.” Television and New Media 20 (4): 336–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. 2020. “Book Review. Consumption, Psychology and Practice Theories: A Hermeneutic Perspective.” New Media and Society 22 (4): 719–721. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819900506.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, N. 2006. Unquiet Understanding: Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dissanayake, W. 2003. “Asian Approaches to Human Communication: Retrospect and Prospect.” Intercultural Communication Studies 12 (4): 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fornas, J. 2008. “Bridging Gaps: Ten Crosscurrents in Media Studies.” Media, Culture and Society 30 (6): 895–905. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708096811.
   Google Scholar
• Frisina, W.G. 2002. The Unity of Knowledge and Action: Toward a Non-Representational Theory of Knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.G. 1975. Truth and Method. London: Sheed and Ward.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hepp, A., and U. Hasebrink. 2018. “Researching Transforming Communications in Times of Deep Mediatization: A Figurational Approach.” In Communicative Figurations: Transforming Communications in Times of Deep Mediatization, edited by A. Hepp, A. Breiter, and U. Hasebrinks, 15–48. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hermes, J. 2020. “Tracing Cultural Citizenship Online.” Continuum 34 (3): 314–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2020.1764776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. 1970. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. London: Temple Smith. [Published previously, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1949 and Boston: Beacon Press, 1955].
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1989. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K.B. 2013. “What’s Mobile in Mobile Communication?” Mobile Media and Communication 1 (1): 26–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, K.B. 2018. “The Double Hermeneutics of Communication Research.” Javnost - The Public 25 (1–2): 177–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418968.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K.B. 2002. “The Humanities in Media and Communication Research.” In A Handbook of Media and Communication Research Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies, edited by K.B. Jensen, 15–39. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, H. 1987. “Giddens Theory of Structuration: Introductory Remarks on a Sociological Transformation of the Philosophy of Praxis.” International Sociology 2 (1): 13–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/026858098700200102.
   Google Scholar
• Krajina, Z., S. Moores, and D. Morley. 2014. “Non-Media-Centric Media Studies: A Cross- Generational Conversation.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 17 (6): 682–700. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549414526733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers, G. 2018. “Communicative Figurations: Towards a New Paradigm for the Media Age?” In Communicative Figurations: Transforming Communications in Times of Deep Mediatization, edited by A. Hepp, A. Breiter, and U. Hasebrink, 425–436. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. [1689] 2008. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, T.S. 2009. Heidegger, Work, and Being. London: Continuum Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moores, S. 2009. “That Familiarity with the World Born of Habit: A Phenomenological Approach to the Study of Media Uses in Daily Living.” Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture 1 (3): 301–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc.1.3.301_1.
   Google Scholar
• Moores, S. 2014. “Digital Orientations: ‘Ways of the Hand’ and Practical Knowing in Media Uses and Other Manual Activities.” Mobile Media and Communication 2 (2): 196–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914521091.
   Google Scholar
• Moores, S. 2020. “The Everyday Skills that Get Us By: Non-Representational Theories for a Linealogy of Quotidian Cultures.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420919866.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, D. 2012. Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. 1986. Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure, 36. London: Comedia.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R. 1999. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. 2nd ed. New York: Marlowe and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1976. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1988. Time and Narrative. Vol. 3. Translated by K. Blarney and D. Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1991. “Phenomenology and Hermeneutics.” In From Text to Action Essays in Hermeneutics, 25–52. Vol. II. Edited and Translated by K. Blarney and J. B. Thompson Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1981a. “The Hermeneutical Function of Distanciation.” In Paul Ricoeur: Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, edited by J.B. Thompson, 131–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1981b. “The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text.” In Paul Ricoeur: Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, edited by J.B. Thompson, 197–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1981c. “A Response by Paul Ricoeur.” In Paul Ricoeur: Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, edited by J.B. Thompson, 32–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rofil, L.E.F., A. Hamzah, and Md A. Md Syed. 2015. “The Practice of Traditional Healthcare among Malay Women of Javanese Descent in Malaysia: Jamu, Cultural Identity and Sense of Belonging.” New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 17 (2): 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. 1949. Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Scannell, P. 1995. “For a Phenomenology of Radio and Television.” Journal of Communication 45 (3): 4–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scannell, P. 1996. Radio, Television and Modern Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. 1993. “Television, Ontological Security and the Transitional Object.” Media, Culture and Society 15 (4): 573–598. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/016344393015004004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. 1994. Television and Everyday Life. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. 1999. Why Study the Media? London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J.A., P. Flowers, and M. Larkin. 2009. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J.A. 2007. “Hermeneutics, Human Sciences and Health: Linking Theory and Practice.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 2 (1): 3–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620601016120.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2002. “Overcoming Representationalism.” In Perspectives on the Philosophy of Charles Taylor, edited by A. Laitinen and N.H. Smith, 29–43. Helsinki, Finland: Societas Philosophica Fennica.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S.L. 2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2014. “Reflections on Ideology: Lessons from Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski.” Thesis Eleven 124 (1): 90–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624.
   Google Scholar
• Syed, Md A. Md, and C. Runnel. 2014. “Malay Women, Non-Western Soap Operas and Watching Competencies.” Journal of Consumer Culture 14 (3): 304–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513488402.
   Google Scholar
• Todorova, I. 2011. “Explorations with Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in Different Sociocultural Contexts.” Health Psychology Review 5 (1): 34–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.520115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins, L., and V. Eatough. 2013. “Meanings and Manifestations of Care: A Celebration of Hermeneutic Multiplicity in Heidegger.” The Humanistic Psychologist 41 (1): 4–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2012.694123.
   Google Scholar
• Vessey, D. 2009. “Gadamer and the Fusion of Horizons.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (4): 531–542. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550903164459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warde, A. 2005. “Consumption and Theories of Practice.” Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (2): 131–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. 2009. Understanding Media Users: From Theory to Practice. Boston and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. 2019. Consumption, Psychology and Practice Theories: A Hermeneutic Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar