References
- The Art Gallery of New South Wales (AGNSW) 2011, David Haines & Joyce Hinterding, unguided tours—Artists, David Haines & Joyce Hinterding on their work ‘The outlands’, video, YouTube, viewed 10 June 2016, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdstMcTGijE>.
- Association of Research Libraries 2019, Code of best practices in fair use for software preservation, Association of Research Libraries, Washington DC, viewed 26 April 2021, <https://www.arl.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2019.2.28-software-preservation-code-revised.pdf>.
- Barok D, Boschat Thorez J, Dekker A, Gauthier D & Roeck C 2019, ‘Archiving complex digital artworks’, Journal of the Institute of Conservation, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 94–113.
- Beerkens, L & Abraham, L 2012, The artist interview: for conservation and presentation of contemporary art, guidelines and practice, Stichting Behoud Moderne Kunst, Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed & Universiteit van Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Breenspace 2012, ‘David Haines and Joyce Hinterding’s, “The outlands”, has won the Anne Landa Award for video and new media arts’, viewed 19 September 2017, <https://www.breenspace.com/news/david-haines-and-joyce-hinterding-s-the-outlands-has-won-the-anne-landa-award-for-video-and-new-media-arts>.
- Cotte S, Tse N & Inglis A 2016, ‘Artists’ interviews and their use in conservation: reflections on issues and practices’, AICCM Bulletin, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 107–118.
- Dekker A 2013, ‘Enjoying the gap: comparing contemporary documentation strategies’, in J Noordegraaf, C Saba & B Le Maitre & V Hediger (eds.), Preserving and exhibiting media art, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp. 149–169.
- Engel D & Wharton G 2014, ‘Reading between the lines: source code documentation as a conservation strategy for software-based art’, Studies in Conservation, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 404–415.
- Falcao, P 2010, ‘Developing a risk assessment tool for the conservation of software-based artworks’, MA Thesis, Hochschule der Kunste, BERN (HKB).
- Falcão P 2019, ‘Preservation of software-based art at Tate’, in O Grau, J Hoth & E Wandl-Vogt (eds), Digital art through the looking glass: new strategies for archiving, collecting and preserving in digital humanities, Edition Donau-Universitä, Austria, pp. 285–286.
- Frost, A 2011, ‘A real pickle’, The Art Life, viewed 27 August 2017, <http://theartlife.com.au/2011/a-real-pickle/>.
- Gere C 2008, ‘New media art and the gallery in the digital Age’, in C Paul (ed.), New media in the white cube and beyond: Curatorial Models for Digital Art. University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 13–25.
- Guggenheim 2015, ‘Guggenheim: time-based media’, Guggenheim, New York, viewed 31 May 2017, <https://www.guggenheim.org/conservation/time-based-media>.
- Haines, D 2017, ‘Email correspondence on artwork’, The Outlands, Sydney, NSW, 13 June.
- Haines, D 2017, ‘Interview transcript on artwork’, The Outlands, Sydney, NSW, 9 August.
- Hinterding, J 2017, ‘Interview transcript on artwork’, The Outlands, Sydney, NSW, 9 August.
- Heydenreich G 2012, ‘Documentation of change—change of documentation’, in G Wharton & T Scholte (eds), Inside installations: theory and practice in the care of complex artworks, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp. 155–171.
- Holling H 2016, ‘The aesthetics of change: on the relative durations of the impermanent and critical thinking in conservation’, in E Hermens & F Robertson (eds), Authenticity in transition: changing practices in contemporary art making and conservation, Archetype Publishing, London, pp. 13–22.
- Irvin S 2005, ‘The artist's sanction in contemporary Art’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 315–326.
- Kramer, D 2019, ‘Preservation of virtual reality artworks Diagnosis to determine viable conservation strategies’, Master’s Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Laurenson P 2004, ‘Developing strategies for the conservation of installations incorporating time-based media with reference to Gary Hill’s between cinema and a hard place’, Tate Papers, no. 1, pp. 1–37, <http://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/01/developing-strategies-for-the-conservation-of-installations-incorporating-time-based-media-gary-hills-between-cinema-and-a-hard-place>.
- Laurenson, P 2005, ‘The management of display equipment in time-based media installations’, Tate Papers, no. 3, viewed 3 May 2021, <https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/03/the-management-of-display-equipment-in-time-based-media-installations>.
- Laurenson, P 2006, ‘Authenticity, change and loss in the conservation of time based media installations’, Tate Papers, no. 6, viewed 9 June 2017, <http://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tatepapers/06/authenticitychangeandlossconservationoftimebasedmediainstallations>.
- Laurenson P 2014, ‘Old media, new media? Significant difference and the conservation of software based artworks’, in B Graham (ed.), New collecting: Exhibiting and audiences after new media art, Taylor & Francis, Oxford, pp. 73–97.
- Mancusi-Ungaro C & Paul C 2008, ‘The variable media network interview of Super Mario Clouds’, viewed 22 September 2011, <http://variablemediaquestionnaire.net/ demo/#a=20> .
- Matthews N, Shaon A, Bicarregui J, Jones C, Woodcock J & Conway E, 2009, ‘Towards a methodology for software preservation’, in iPRES 2009: The Sixth International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects. San Francisco: California Digital Library, p. 132.
- Muñoz Viñas S 2005, Contemporary theory of conservation, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
- Murphy C & Treacy A 2019, ‘Drawings you can walk on—Mike Parr and the 20th Biennale of Sydney 2016’, AICCM Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 76–85.
- Nandy A & Chanda B 2016, Beginning Platino Game Engine, Apress, Berkeley, CA, USA.
- Phillips J 2010, ‘Shifting equipment significance in time-based media art’, Electronic Media Group Session, AIC 36th Annual Meeting May 11–14, 2010, Milwaukee, WI, viewed 28 July 2021, <http://resources.culturalheritage.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2016/07/Vol-1_2010_Ch-6_Phillips.pdf>.
- Phillips, J 2015, ‘Reporting iterations: A documentation model for time-based media art’, Revista de História Da Arte, vol. 4, pp. 168–179.
- Real WA 2001, ‘Toward guidelines for practice in the preservation and documentation of technology-based installation art’, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 211–231.
- Rechert T, Klaus E & Falcão P 2016, ‘Introduction to an emulation-based preservation strategy for software-based artworks’, viewed 2 August 2021, <https://www.tate.org.uk/about-us/projects/pericles/emulation-based-preservation-strategy-for-software-based-artworks>
- Scholte T & Wharton G 2011, Inside Installations: preservation and presentation of installation art, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
- Sherring, A 2017, ‘Email correspondence on conservation installation experiences of artwork’, The Outlands, Sydney, NSW, 9 August.
- Sherring A, Murphy C & Catt L 2018, ‘What is the object? Identifying and describing time-based artworks’, AICCM Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 86–95.
- Stigter S 2012, ‘Reflections on the artist interview and the conservator’s point of view by example of Ger van Elk’, in L Beerkens, P’ t Hoen, I Hummelen, V Van Saaze, T Scholte & S Stigter (eds), The artist interview. For conservation and presentation of contemporary art. guidelines and practice, Jap Sam Books, Heijningen, pp. 102–109.
- Technopedia 2021, ‘5.1 Surround sound’, viewed 28 July 2021, <https://www.techopedia.com/definition/214/51-surround-sound>
- Wain A & Sherring A 2020, ‘Changeability, variability, and malleability: sharing perspectives on the role of change in time-based art and utilitarian machinery conservation’, Studies in Conservation. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2020.1860672.
- Wharton G 2015, ‘Artist intention and the conservation of contemporary art’, AIC Objects Specialty Group Postprints, vol. 22, pp. 1–12, <http://resources.culturalheritage.org/osg-postprints/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2015/05/osg022-01.pdf>.
- Wijers G 2013, ‘Obsolete equipment: ethics and practices of Media art conservation’, in J Noordegraaf, C Saba, B Le Maitre & V Hediger (eds), Preserving and exhibiting media art, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp. 235–244.