86
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Something to Hide: DNA, Surveillance and Self-Incrimination

Pages 168-184 | Published online: 03 Dec 2018

REFERENCES

  • Bucke, T & Brown, D (1997) Research Findings No. 62: Suspects in Police Custody and the Revised Pace Codes of Practice, Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate, London.
  • Commissioner of Police (1997) Code of Practice for Custody, Rights, Investigation, Management and Evidence, Sydney.
  • Consultative Committee on Police Powers of Investigation (1987) Identification Tests and Procedures—Fingerprinting, Melbourne.
  • Consultative Committee on Police Powers of Investigation (1989) Body Samples and Examinations, Melbourne.
  • Dix, G (1985) ‘Nonarrest Investigatory Detentions in Search and Seizure Law’, Duke Law Journal, vol 1985, pp 849–959.
  • Dixon, D (1997) Law in Policing, Clarendon, Oxford.
  • Dugandzic, N (2001) ‘Inmate Testing—Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000’ in Use of DNA in the Criminal Justice System, Sydney Institute of Criminology, Sydney, pp 7–10.
  • Easton, S (1991) ‘Bodily Samples and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination’, Criminal Law Review, vol 1991, pp 18–29.
  • Fox, R (2001) ‘Someone to Watch Over Us: Back to the Panopticon’, Criminal Justice, vol 1, pp 251–276.
  • Helmholz, R, Gray, C, Langbein, J, Moglen, E, Smith, H & Alschuler, A (1997) The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Its Origins and Development, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Inbau, F (1937) ‘Self-incrimination—What Can an Accused Person be Compelled to Do?’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol 89, pp 1329–1361.
  • Kennedy, L (2000) ‘Prime Suspect’, Sydney Morning Herald, 15th July 2000.
  • Leonard, J (2001) ‘Using DNA to Trawl for Killers’, Los Angeles Times, 10th March 2001.
  • Model Criminal Code Officers' Committee (2000) Final Draft: Model Forensic Procedures Bill and the Proposed National DNA Database, Attorney-General's Department (Cth), Canberra.
  • New South Wales Law Reform Commission (1997) Issues Paper 12: Surveillance, Sydney.
  • Strutt, M (2001) Consent by Coercion, Justice Action, Sydney.
  • Thomas, G & Bilder, M (1991) ‘Aristotle's Paradox and the Self-incrimination Puzzle’, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, vol 82, pp 243–282.
  • Thompson, S (2001) ‘Deputies: DNA in Trash Pinpoints Killer’, The Tampa Tribune, 19 April 2001.
  • Uviller, H (1990) ‘Self-Incrimination by Inference: Constitutional Restrictions on the Evidentiary Use of a Suspect's Refusal to Submit to a Search’, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology vol 81, pp 37–76.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.