Sacrosanct or Flawed: Risk, Accountability and Gender- Responsive Penal Politics

References

• Arbour L (1998) Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Certain Events at the Prison for Women in Kingston, Public Works and Government Services, Ottawa, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Beck J (2006), ‘Recovering Selves: Women and the Governance of Conduct in a Residential Drug Treatment Program’ Women and Therapy, vol 29 no 3, 239–59
   Google Scholar
• Blanchette K and Brown SL (2006) The Assessment and Treatment of Women Offenders: An Integrative Perspective, Wiley, New York
   Google Scholar
• Bloom B (1996) ‘Triple Jeopardy: Race, Class, and Gender as Factors in Women's Imprisonment’, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Riverside
   Google Scholar
• Bloom B (2003) Gendered Justice: Addressing Female Offenders, Carolina Academic Press, North Carolina
   Google Scholar
• Bloom B, Owen B and Covington S (2006) ‘A Summary of Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders. The Gender-Responsive Strategies Project: Approach and Findings’, National Institute of Corrections, Washington DC, accessed online at <http://nicic.org/Library/020418>
   Google Scholar
• Bloom B, Owen B and Covington S (2004) ‘Women Offenders and the Gendered Effects of Public Policy’, Review of Policy Research, vol 21 no 1, 31–48
   Google Scholar
• Bloom B, Owen B and Covington S (2003) Gender Responsive Strategies: Research, Practice and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders, National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington DC
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth M (2007) ‘Creating the Responsible Prisoner: Federal Admission and Orientation Packs’, Punishment and Society, vol 9 no 1, 67–85
   Google Scholar
• Brennan T (1998) ‘Institutional Classification of Female Offenders’, in Zaplan R (ed) Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions, Aspen Publishers, Gaithersberg MD
   Google Scholar
• Brown M and Bloom B (2009) ‘Re-entry and Renegotiating Motherhood: Maternal Identity and Success on Parole’, Crime and Delinquency, vol 55, 313–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) (2003) Protecting their Rights: a Systematic Review of Human Rights in Correctional Services for Federally Sentenced Women, accessed online at <http://www.chrcccdp.ca/legislation_policies/consultation_report-eng.aspx>
   Google Scholar
• Carlen P (2002) ‘New Discourses of Justification and Reform for Women's Imprisonment in England’, in Carlen P (ed) Women and Punishment: A Struggle for Justice, Willan Publishing, UK
   Google Scholar
• Carp SV and Schade L (August 1992) ‘Tailoring Facility Programming to Suit Female Offender's Needs’, Corrections Today, 154–58
   Google Scholar
• Christian J and Thomas SS (2009) ‘Examining the Intersections of Race, Gender and Mass Imprisonment’, Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, vol 7 no 1, 69–84
   Google Scholar
• Cicero, Honorable JH and DeCostanzo ET (2000) Sentencing Women Offenders: a Training Curriculum for Judges: A Project of the National Association of Women Judges Washington DC, National Institute of Corrections, US Department of Justice
   Google Scholar
• Collins PH (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment, Routledge, New York
   Google Scholar
• Connell RW (1987) Gender and Power, Stanford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Covington S (1998) ‘The Relational Theory of Women's Psychological Development: Implications for the Criminal Justice System’, in Zaplin RT (ed) Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions, Aspen Publishing, Gaithersburg MD, 113–28
   Google Scholar
• Covington S and Bloom B (2006) ‘Gender Responsive Treatment and Services in Correctional Settings’, Women and Therapy, vol 29, 3–4, 9
   Google Scholar
• Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) (1996) Woman Offender — Revised Intake Assessment, Ottawa
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw K (1991) ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence against Women of Color’, Stanford Law Review, vol 43, 1241–99
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw K (1989) ‘De-marginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–67
   Google Scholar
• Crocker D (2005) ‘Regulating Intimacy: Judicial Discourse in Cases of Wife Assault (1970–2000)’, Violence against Women: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, vol 11 no 2, 197–226
   Google Scholar
• Daly K (1997) ‘Different Ways of Conceptualizing Sex/Gender in Feminist Theory and their Implications for Criminology’, Theoretical Criminology, vol 1 no 1, 25–51
   Google Scholar
• Daly K (1989) ‘Criminal Justice Ideologies and Practices in Different Voices: Some Feminist Questions about Justice’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, vol 17 no 1, 1–18, 25–51
   Google Scholar
• Davis K (2008) ‘Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful’, Feminist Theory, vol 9 no 1, 67–85
   Google Scholar
• Dell CA, Fillmore C and Kilty J (2009) ‘Looking Back 10 Years after the Arbour Inquiry: Ideology, Policy, Practice and the Federal Female Prisoner’, The Prison Journal, vol 89, 286–308
   Google Scholar
• Farr K (2000) ‘Classification for Female Inmates: Moving Forward’, Crime and Delinquency, vol 46 no 1, 3–17
   Google Scholar
• Fortin D (2004) Program Strategy for Women Offenders, Correctional Service of Canada, Ottawa
   Google Scholar
• Fowler L (1993) ‘What Classification for Women?’ in Classification: a Tool for Managing Today's Offenders, American Correctional Association, Laurel MD
   Google Scholar
• Garland D (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Goodkind S (2009) ‘You Can be Anything you Want, but you have to Believe it: Commercialized Feminism in Gender-Specific Programs for Girls’, Signs, vol 34 no 2, 39 7422
   Google Scholar
• Goodkind S (2005) ‘Gender-Specific Services in the Juvenile Justice System: a Critical Examination’, Affilia, vol 20 no 1, 52–70
   Google Scholar
• Grabham E, Cooper D, Krishnadas J and Herman D (2009) Intersectionality and Beyond: Law Power and the Politics of Location, Routledge Cavendish, London
   Google Scholar
• Haney C (2006) Reforming Punishment: Psychological Limits to the Pains of Imprisonment, American Psychological Association, Washington
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K (2009) ‘Gridlock or Mutability: Reconsidering ‘Gender’ and Risk Assessment’, Criminology and Public Policy, vol 8 no 1, 221–29
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K (2007) ‘Gendering Dynamic Risk: Assessing and Managing the Maternal Identities of Women Prisoners’, in Hannah-Moffat K and O'Malley P, Gendered Risks, Routledge Cavendish Publishing, London
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K (2004a) ‘Criminogenic Need and the Transformative Risk Subject: Hybridizations of Risk/Need in Penality’, Punishment and Society, vol 7 no 1, 29–51
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K (2004b) ‘Losing Ground: Gender, Responsibility and Parole Risk’, Social Politics, vol 11, 363–85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K (1995) ‘Feminine Fortresses: Woman-Centered Prisons?’ The Prison Journal, vol 75 no 2, 135–64
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K (2001) Punishment in Disguise: Penal Governance and Federal Imprisonment of Women in Canada, University Of Toronto Press
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K and O'Malley P (2007) Gendered Risks, Routledge Cavendish Publishing, London
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K and Shaw M (2001) Taking Risks: Incorporating Gender and Culture into the Assessment and Classification of Federally Sentenced Women in Canada, Status of Women, Ottawa, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K with Yule C (2011 — Forthcoming) ‘Gaining Insight, Changing Attitudes and Managing ‘Risk’: Parole Release Decisions for Women Convicted of Violent Crimes’, Punishment and Society
   Google Scholar
• Hardyman P L and van Voorhis P (2004) Developing Gender-Specific Classification Systems for Women Offenders, National Institute of Corrections, Washington DC USDOJ
   Google Scholar
• Hayman S (2006) Imprisoning our Sisters: The New Federal Women's Prisons in Canada, McGill-Queens University Press, Kingston
   Google Scholar
• Heidensohn F (1986) ‘Models of Justice: Portia or Persephone? Some Thoughts on Equality, Fairness and Gender in the Field of Criminal Justice’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, vol 14, 287–99
   Google Scholar
• Holtfreter K and Morash M (2003) ‘The Needs of Women Offenders: Implications for Correctional Programming’, Women and Criminal Justice, vol 14, 137–60
   Google Scholar
• Hooks B (1981) Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism, South End Press, Boston
   Google Scholar
• Hudson B and Bramhall G (2005) ‘Assessing the Other: Constructions of Asianness in Risk Assessment by Probation Officers’, British Journal of Criminology, vol 45 no 5, 721–40
   Google Scholar
• Kantola J and Nousiainen K (2009) ‘Institutionalising Intersectionality in Europe: Introducing the Theme’, International Journal of Feminist Politics, vol 11 no 4, 459–77
   Google Scholar
• Kendall K (2002) ‘Time to think again about Cognitive Behavioral Programs’, in Carlen P (ed) Women and Punishment: The Struggle for Justice, Willan c/o ISBS, Portland OR 182–98
   Google Scholar
• Kendall K and Pollack S (2003) ‘Cognitive Behavioralism in Women's Prisons: a Critical Analysis of Therapeutic Assumptions and Practices’, in Bloom BE (ed) Gendered Justice: Addressing Female Offenders, Carolina Academic Press, Durham NC
   Google Scholar
• Kilty JM (2006) ‘Under the Barred Umbrella: Is There Room for Women Centred Self- injury Policy in Canadian Corrections?’ Criminology and Public Policy, vol 5 no 1, 161–82
   Google Scholar
• Martel J (1999) Solitude and Cold Storage: Women's Journeys of Endurance in Segregation, Elizabeth Fry Society of Edmonton
   Google Scholar
• McCorkel J (2003) ‘Embodied Surveillance and the Gendering of Punishment’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, vol 32 no 1, 41–76
   Google Scholar
• McKim A (2008) ‘Getting Gut-Level: Punishment, Gender and Therapeutic Governance’, Gender and Society, vol 22, 303–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messerschmidt JW (1993) Masculinities and Crime, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham MD
   Google Scholar
• Messerschmidt JW (2002) ‘Men, Masculinities and Crime’, in Kimmel M, Connell RW and Hearn J (eds) Handbook on Men and Masculinities, Sage, Thousand Oaks CA
   Google Scholar
• Miller J (2002) ‘The Strengths and Limits of ‘Doing Gender’ for Understanding Street Crime’, Theoretical Criminology, vol 6, 433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monture-Angus P (1999) ‘Woman and Risk: Aboriginal Woman Colonialism and Correctional Practice’, Canadian Women's Studies, vol 19 no 1
   Google Scholar
• Moore D and Lyons T (2007) ‘Sentenced to Treatment/Sentenced to Harm: Women. Risk and the Drug Treatment Courts’, in Hannah-Moffat K and O'Malley P (eds) Gendered Risks Routledge-Cavendish, New York
   Google Scholar
• Morash M, Bynum TS and Koons BA (1998) Women Offenders: Programming Needs and Promising Approaches, National Institute of Justice, Washington DC USDOJ
   Google Scholar
• Native Women's Association (2007), Federally Sentenced Aboriginal Women Offenders: An Issue Paper (Paper prepared for the National Aboriginal Women's Summit 20–22 June 2007, Corner Brook NL), accessed online at <http://www.laa.gov.nl.ca/laa/naws/pdf/nwac-federally.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien P and Young DS (2006) ‘Challenges for Formerly Incarcerated Women: a Holistic Approach to Assessment’, Families in Society vol 87, 359–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Correctional Investigator (OCI) (2007) Annual Report of the Correction Investigator 2006–2007, Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Ottawa, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Owen B and Bloom B (1995) Profiling the Needs of California's Female Prisoners: a Needs Assessment, National Institute of Corrections, Washington DC USDOJ
   Google Scholar
• Parkes D and Pate K (April 2006) ‘Time for Accountability: Effective Oversight of Women's Prisons’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 251–85
   Google Scholar
• Perreault S (2009) ‘The Incarceration of Aboriginal People in Adult Correctional Services’, Juristat, vol 29 no 3, Statistics Canada, Ottawa
   Google Scholar
• Phillips C and Earle R (2010) ‘Reading Difference Differently? Identity, Epistemology and Prison Ethnography’, British Journal of Criminology, vol 50 no 2, 360–78
   Google Scholar
• Phillips C (2008) ‘Negotiating Identities: Ethnicity and Social Relations in a Young Offenders' Institution’, Theoretical Criminology, vol 12 no 3, 313–31
   Google Scholar
• Pitch T (1992) ‘A Sexual Difference Approach to the Criminal Question’, Social and Legal Studies, vol 1, 357–69
   Google Scholar
• Pollack S (2007) ‘I'm Just Not Good in Relationships: Victimisation Discourses and the Gendered Regulation of Criminalised Women’, Feminist Criminology, vol 2 no 2, 158–74
   Google Scholar
• Pollack S (2004) ‘Anti-oppressive Social Work Practice with Women in Prison: Discursive Reconstructions and Alternative Practices’, British Journal of Social Work, vol 34, 693–707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack S (2009) ‘You Can't Have it Both Ways: Punishment and Treatment of Imprisoned Women’, Journal of Progressive Human Services, vol 20 no 2, 112–28
   Google Scholar
• Pollack S and Kendall K (2005) ‘Taming the Shrew: Regulating Prisoners through Women-Centred Mental Health Programming’, Critical Criminology, vol 13 no 1, 71–87
   Google Scholar
• Richie B (1996) Compelled to Crime: The Gender Entrapment of Battered Black Women, Routledge, New York
   Google Scholar
• Richie B (2001) ‘Challenges Incarcerated Women Face as they Return to their Communities: Findings from Life History Interviews’, Crime and Delinquency, vol 47, 368–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose N (1999) Governing the Soul: the Shaping of the Private Self, Free Associations Books, London
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury EJ, van Voorhis P and Spiropoulos GV (2009) ‘The Predictive Validity of a Gender-Responsive Needs Assessment An Exploratory Study’, Crime and Delinquency, vol 55 no 4, 550–85
   Google Scholar
• Shankardass RD (2001) ‘Where the Mind is without Fear and the Head is Held High: Mental Health and Care of Women and Children in Prison’, in Andhra Pradesh—A Thematic Review. Report of the PRAJA Project ‘Mental Health and Care of Women and Children in Prisons in Andhra Pradesh, 2000–2001’, Andhra Pradesh: Penal Reform and Justice Association (PRAJA), Penal Reform International (PRI) and Andhra Pradesh Prisons Department, Hyderabad
   Google Scholar
• Sloan T (2004) Shifting the Orbit: Human Rights, Independent Review and Accountability in the Canadian Corrections System, Office of the Correctional Investigator, Ottawa
   Google Scholar
• Spader D (2002) ‘The Morality of Justice and the Morality of Care: Are there Distinct Moral Orientations for Males and Females?’ Criminal Justice Review, vol 27 no 1, 66–88
   Google Scholar
• Spjeldnes S and Goodkind S (2009) ‘Gender Differences and Offender Re-entry: A Review of the Literature’, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, vol 48 no 4, 314–35
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada (2008) accessed online at <www.statscan.gc.ca/pub/85-002x/2008001/article/10509-eng.htm>, 15
   Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier D and Allan E (1998) ‘The Nature of Female Offending: Patterns and Explanations’, in Zaplin RT (eds) The Female Offender: Critical Perspectives and Effective Treatment Intervention, Aspen MD, 5–29
   Google Scholar
• Sudbury J (ed) (2005) Global Lockdown: Race, Gender and the Prison-Industrial Complex, Routledge, New York
   Google Scholar
• Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women (1990) Creating Choices — Report of the Taskforce on Federally Sentenced Women, Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull S and Hannah-Moffat K (2009) ‘Under These Conditions: Gender, Parole and the Governance of Reintegration’, British Journal of Criminology, vol 49, 1–20
   Google Scholar
• Union of Canadian Correctional Officers (UCCO) (2008) ‘A Rush to Judgement: a Report on the Death in Custody of Ashley Smith, an Inmate at Grand Valley Institution for Women’
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN) (2008) Draft United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-Custodial Measures for Women Offenders, Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, Eighteenth Session, Vienna, accessed online at <http://zh.unrol.org/files/ECN152009_CRP8.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• van Voorihis P, Wright E, Salisbury E and Bauman A (2010) ‘Women's Risk Factors and their Contributions to Existing Risk/Needs Assessment: the Current Status of a Gender Responsive Supplement’, Criminal Justice Behaviour, vol 37, 261–288
   Google Scholar
• van Voorhis P and Presser L (2001) Classification of Women Offenders: A National Assessment of Current Practices (NIC Publication No. 017502) National Institute of Corrections, Washington DC
   Google Scholar
• van Wormer K and Kaplan L (2006) ‘Results of a National Survey of Wardens in Women's Prisons: the Case for Gender Specific Treatment’, Women and Therapy, vol 29 no 1 and 2, 133–51
   Google Scholar
• van Zyl Smit D (2006) ‘Humanising Imprisonment: a European Project?’ European Journal of Crime Policy Research vol 12, 107–120
   Google Scholar
• West C and Fenstermaker S (1995) ‘Doing Difference’, Gender and Society, vol 9, 8–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West C and Zimmerman DH (1987) ‘Doing Gender’, Gender and Society, vol 1, 125–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler PA, Trammell R, Thomas J and Findlay JR (1989) ‘Persephone Chained: Parity or Equality in Women's Prisons?’ The Prison Journal, vol 69, 88–102
   Google Scholar
• Williams T (2009) ‘Intersectionality Analysis in the Sentencing of Aboriginal Women in Canada’, in Grabham E, Cooper D, Krishnadas J and Herman D (eds) Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location, Routledge, UK
   Google Scholar
• Willison JS and Lutter Y (2009) ‘Contextualising Women's Violence: Risk assessment and Treatment’, in Andrade J (ed) Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment and Treatment: New Approaches for Mental Health Professionals, Springer Publishing, US
   Google Scholar
• Wright E, Salisbury E and van Voorhis P (2007) ‘Predicting the Prison Misconducts of Women Offenders: The Importance of Gender-Responsive Needs’, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, vol 23, 310–40
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis N (2006) ‘Intersectionality and Feminist Politics’, European Journal of Women's Studies, vol 13 no 3, 193–209
   Google Scholar