The ‘ACA Effect’: Examining How Current Affairs Programs Shape Victim Understandings and Responses to Online Fraud

References

• Australian Bureau of Statistics (‘ABS’) (2008) Personal Fraud, ABS No 4528.0 <http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/866E0EF22EFC4608CA2574740015D234/$File/45280_2007.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (‘ACCC’) (2015) Targeting Scams: Report of the ACCC on Scam Activity 2014 <https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/targeting-scams-report-on-scam-activity/targeting-scams-report-of-the-accc-on-scam-activity-2014>
   Google Scholar
• Australian Securities and Investment Commission (‘ASIC’) (2002a) Hook, Line and Sinker: Who Takes the Bait in Cold Calling Scams?, ASIC Report 215 <http://download.asic.gov.au/media/1338350/HookLineSinker.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Australian Securities and Investment Commission (‘ASIC’) (2002b) International Cold Calling Investment Scams <http://download.asic.gov.au/media/1339370/International_Cold_Calling_report.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Baskin D and Sommers I (2010) ‘Crime-Show-Viewing Habits and Public Attitudes toward Forensic Evidence: The “CSI Effect” Revisited’, Justice System Journal 31(1), 97–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boda Z and Szabó G (2011) ‘The Media and Attitudes towards Crime and the Justice System: A Qualitative Approach’, European Journal of Criminology 8(4), 329–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button M (2012) ‘Cross-border Fraud and the Case for an “Interfraud”’, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 35(2), 285–303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button M, Lewis C and Tapley J (2009a) A Better Deal for Fraud Victims, Centre for Counter Fraud Studies
   Google Scholar
• Button M, Lewis C and Tapley J (2009b) A Better Dealfor Fraud Victims: Research into Victims' Needs Experiences, Working paper, National Fraud Authority
   Google Scholar
• Button M, Lewis C and Tapley J (2009c) Fraud Typologies and Victims of Fraud: Literature Review, Centre for Counter Fraud Studies
   Google Scholar
• Button M, Tapley J and Lewis C (2013) ‘The “Fraud Justice Network” and the Infrastructure of Support for Individual Fraud Victims in England and Wales’, Criminology and Criminal Justice 13(1), 37–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callanan V and Rosenberger J (2011) ‘Media and Public Perceptions of the Police: Examining the Impact of Race and Personal Experience’, Policing and Society 21(2), 167–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross C (2013) ‘Nobody's Holding a Gun to Your Head: Examining Current Discourses Surrounding Victims of Online Fraud’ in K Richards and J Tauri (eds) Crime, Justice and Social Democracy: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, Queensland University of Technology, 25–32
   Google Scholar
• Cross C (2015) ‘No Laughing Matter: Blaming the Victim of Online Fraud’, International Review of Victimology 21(2), 187–204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross C, Richards K and Smith R (forthcoming) Improving Responses to Online Fraud Victims: An Examination of Reporting and Support, Final Report, Australian Institute of Criminology
   Google Scholar
• Cross C, Smith R and Richards K (2014) ‘Challenges of Responding to Online Fraud Victimisation in Australia’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No 474, 1–6
   Google Scholar
• Deem D (2000) ‘Notes from the Field: Observations in Working with the Forgotten Victims of Personal Financial Crimes’, Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect 12(2), 33–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig A, Johnson S and Levi M (2001) ‘New Public Management, Old Populism and the Policing of Fraud’, Public Policy and Administration 16(1), 91–113
   Google Scholar
• Dowler K, Fleming T and Muzzatti S (2006) ‘Constructing Crime: Media, Crime, and Popular Culture’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 48(6), 837–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowler K and Zawilski V (2007) ‘Public Perceptions of Police Misconduct and Discrimination: Examining the Impact of Media Consumption’, Journal of Criminal Justice 35(2), 193–203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabosky P and Smith R (1998) Crime in the Digital Age: Controlling Telecommunications and Cyberspace Illegalities, Federation Press
   Google Scholar
• Graycar A and James M (2001) ‘Older People and Consumer Fraud’, Paper presented at 4th National Outlook Symposium on Crime in Australia: New Crimes or New Responses, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 21–22 July 2001
   Google Scholar
• Hayes R and Levett L (2012) ‘Community Members' Perceptions of the CSI Effect’, American Journal of Criminal Justice 38(2), 216–35
   Google Scholar
• Hohl K (2011) The Role of Mass Media And Police Communication in Trust in the Police: New Approaches to the Analysis of Survey and Media Data (PhD Thesis), The London School of Economics and Political Science <http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/213/>
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren J and Fordham J (2011) ‘The CSI Effect and the Canadian and the Australian Jury’, Journal of Forensic Sciences 56, S63—S71
   Google Scholar
• Huey L (2010) ‘“I've Seen This on CSI’: Criminal Investigators' Perceptions about the Management of Public Expectations in the Field’, Crime, Media, Culture 6(1), 49–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorna P and Hutchings A (2013) Australasian Consumer Fraud Taskforce: Results of the 2012 Online Consumer Fraud Survey, Technical and Background Paper No 56, Australian Institute of Criminology
   Google Scholar
• Kerley K and Copes H (2002) ‘Personal Fraud Victims and their Official Responses to Victimisation’, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 17(1), 19–35
   Google Scholar
• Levi M and Burrows J (2008) ‘Measuring the Impact of Fraud in the UK: A Conceptual and Empirical Journey’, British Journal of Criminology 48(3), 293–318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeder E and Corbett R (2015) ‘Beyond Frequency: Perceived Realism and the CSI Effect’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 57(1), 83–114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh I (2004) Criminal Justice: An Introduction to Philosophies, Theories and Practice, Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Mason K and Benson M (1996) ‘The Effect of Social Support on Fraud Victims' Reporting Behaviour: A Research Note’, Justice Quarterly 13(3), 511–24
   Google Scholar
• Mutz D and Nir L (2010) ‘Not Necessarily the News: Does Fictional Television Influence Real-World Policy Preferences?’, Mass Communication and Society 13(2), 196–217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noaks L and Wincup E (2004) Criminological Research: Understanding Qualitative Methods, Sage
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell M (2003) ‘White Collar Crime: A Victimological Perspective’ in R Sarre and J Tomaino (eds) Considering Crime and Justice, Crawford House Publishing, 243–75
   Google Scholar
• Rege A (2009) ‘What's Love Got to Do with It? Exploring Online Dating Scams and Identity’, International Journal of Cyber Criminology 3(2), 494–512
   Google Scholar
• Ross S and Smith R (2011) ‘Risk Factors for Advance Fee Fraud Victimisation’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No 420, 1–6
   Google Scholar
• Schoepfer A and Piquero N (2009) ‘Studying the Correlates of Fraud Victimisation and Reporting’, Journal of Criminal Justice 37, 209–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield T, Hepworth J, Jones M and Schofield E (2011) ‘Health and Community Services for Trafficked Women: An Exploratory Study of Policy and Practice’, Australian Journal of Social Issues 46(4), 391–410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shniderman A (2013) ‘Ripped from the Headlines: Juror Perceptions in the Law and Order Era’ <http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2318256>
   Google Scholar
• Smith RG (2007) ‘Consumer Scams in Australia: An Overview’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No 331, 1–6
   Google Scholar
• Smith RG (2008a) ‘Coordinating Individual and Organisational Responses to Fraud’, Crime, Law and Social Change 49(5), 379–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RG (2008b) ‘Raising Public Awareness of Consumer Fraud in Australia’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No 349, 1–6
   Google Scholar
• ‘Social Monster’, Head First (Directed by Aaron Smith, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 1 May 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Titus R (2001) ‘Personal Fraud and Its Victims’ in N Shover and J Wright (eds) Crimes of Privilege: Readings in White-Collar Crime, Oxford University Press, 57–74
   Google Scholar
• Titus R, Heinzelmann F and Boyle J (1995) ‘Victimisation of Persons By Fraud’, Crime and Delinquency 41(1), 54–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations (2013) Comprehensive Study on Cybercrime — Draft Report, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime <http://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/UNODC_CCPCJ_EG.4_2013/CYBERCRIME_STUDY_210213.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Turenen H and Bondas T (2013) ‘Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis: Implications for Conducting a Qualitative Descriptive Study’, Nursing and Health Sciences 15, 398–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wyk J and Mason K (2001) ‘Investigating Vulnerability and Reporting Behaviour for Consumer Fraud Victimisation: Opportunity as a Social Aspect For Age’, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 17(4), 328–45
   Google Scholar
• Weaver R, Salamonson Y, Koch J and Porter G (2012) ‘The CSI Effect at University: Forensic Science Students' Television Viewing and Perceptions of Ethical Issues’, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44(4) 381–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar