Pre-recorded expert evidence in intimate partner violence cases

• Case list
   Google Scholar
• Clark v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486.
   Google Scholar
• Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588.
   Google Scholar
• Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc, 509 US 579 (1993), 113 S Ct 2786.
   Google Scholar
• Ewert v Canada 2018 SCC 30.
   Google Scholar
• Heilig v Cabiness [2011] FMCAfam 97.
   Google Scholar
• Kalenik v Apostolidis [2009] VSC 208 [592].
   Google Scholar
• Liyanage v WA (Western Australia) [2017] WASCA 112.
   Google Scholar
• New Jersey v Kelly, 478 A 2d 364 (SC, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• R v Christie [1914] AC 545.
   Google Scholar
• R v D(D) 2000 SCC 43.
   Google Scholar
• R v Falls, Coupe, Cummin-Creed & Hoare (unreported, Queensland Supreme Court, Applegarth J, 26 May 2010) (‘R v Falls’)
   Google Scholar
• R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302.
   Google Scholar
• R v Jones [2015] QCA 161.
   Google Scholar
• R v Lalonde, 22 OR (3d) 275, 1995 CarswellOnt 9.
   Google Scholar
• R v Lavallee [1990] 1 SCR 852, 1990 CarswellMan 198.
   Google Scholar
• R v Li [2016] SASC 4.
   Google Scholar
• R v M(MA) [1998] 1 SCR 123, 1998 CarswellOnt 419 (L’Heureux-Dubé J).
   Google Scholar
• R v Mohan [1994] 2 SCR 9, 1994 CarswellOnt 66 [26].
   Google Scholar
• R v O’Neil-Shaw [2009] NSWDC 48.
   Google Scholar
• R v Osland (1998) 159 ALR 170 (Kirby J).
   Google Scholar
• R v Reid (2003) 18 CR (6th) 350.
   Google Scholar
• R v Runjanjic & Kontinnen (1991) 56 SASR 114 (‘Runjanjic’).
   Google Scholar
• R v Sica [2013] QCA 247.
   Google Scholar
• R v Silva [2015] NSWSC 148.
   Google Scholar
• R v S(JP) (2001) 50 WCB (2d) 161.
   Google Scholar
• R v Tarrant [2018] NSWSC 774.
   Google Scholar
• R v Young 2008 BCCA 393.
   Google Scholar
• State v Batangan, 799 P.2d 48 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• State v Guilbert, 49 A.3d 705 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• The Queen v Bonython (1984) 38 SASR 45.
   Google Scholar
• WA (Western Australia) v Carlino [2014] WASC 404.
   Google Scholar
• WA (Western Australia) v Liyanage [2016] WASC 12.
   Google Scholar
• White Burgess Langille Inman v Abbott and Haliburton Co, 2015 SCC 23.
   Google Scholar
• Legislation
   Google Scholar
• NSW (New South Wales). 1995. Evidence Act, No 25.
   Google Scholar
• US. Federal Rules of Evidence, 28 U.S.C.
   Google Scholar

References

• Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration (AIJA). (2018). National domestic and family violence bench book. Sydney: AIJA.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). (1985). Evidence, Report No 26.
   Google Scholar
• Blotvogel, J. E. (2017). The structural dynamics of flow [Patriot, Directed by Tucker Gates. Zaftig Films].
   Google Scholar
• Bradfield, R. (2002). Understanding the battered woman who kills her violent partner — The admissibility of expert evidence of domestic violence in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 9(2), 177–199.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., Dioso-Villa, R., & Rathus, Z. (2016). Judicial decision-making and ‘outside’ extra-legal knowledge: Breaking down silos. Griffith Law Review, 25(3), 283–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. K., & Nunn, G. A. (2019). Beyond the witness: Bringing a process perspective to modern evidence law. Texas Law Review, 97(6), 1077–1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, J. M., & Crozier, W. E. (2018). Rethinking the ken through the lens of psychological science. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 55, 625–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, J. M., Ribeiro, G., & Rairden, A. (2019). Open forensic science. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 6(1), 255–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, J. M., San Roque, M. S., & McFadden, R. (2020). The new psychology of expert witness procedure. Sydney Law Review, 42(1), 69–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, S. A. (2008). Out of the Daubert fire and into the Fryeing pan? Self-validation, meta-expertise and the admissibility of latent print evidence in Frye jurisdictions. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 9(2), 453–542.
   Google Scholar
• Edmond, G. (2015). A closer look at Honeysett: Enhancing our forensic science and medicine jurisprudence. Flinders Law Journal, 17, 287–329.
   Google Scholar
• Edmond, G., Found, B., Martire, K., Ballantyne, K., Hamer, D., Searston, R., … Roberts, A. (2006). Model forensic science. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 48(5), 496–537.
   Google Scholar
• Edmond, G., Martire, K., & San Roque, M. (2017). Expert reports and the forensic sciences. UNSW Law Journal, 40(2), 590–637.
   Google Scholar
• Faigman, D. L., Monahan, J., & Slobogin, C. (2014). Group to individual (G2i) inference in scientific expert testimony. University of Chicago Law Review, 81(2), 417–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faigman, D. L., Slobogin, C., & Monahan, J. (2016). Gatekeeping science: Using the structure of scientific research to distinguish between admissibility and weight in expert testimony. Northwestern University Law Review, 110(4), 859–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faigman, D. L., & Wright, A. J. (1997). The battered woman syndrome in the age of science. Arizona Law Review, 39(1), 67–116.
   Google Scholar
• Goss, C. (2020, this issue). Common knowledge in the common law: Challenges in domestic violence cases. Current Issues in Criminal Justice.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, S. R., & Mnookin, J. L. (2003). Expert information and expert evidence: A preliminary taxonomy. Seton Hall Law Review, 34, 141–189.
   Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N. R., Akl, E. A., Page, M. J., Welch, V. A., Keenan, C., & Lotfi, T. (2020). Open synthesis and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 126, 184–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, A. O. (2013). Factual precedents. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 162, 59–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKimmie, B., & Masser, B. (2020, this issue). Sexual assault in the context of intimate partner relationships. Current Issues in Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, M. (1999). Battered women and bad science: The limited validity and utility of battered woman syndrome. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 6(1), 23–49.
   Google Scholar
• Mnookin, J. L. (2015). Constructing evidence and educating juries: The case for modular, made-in-advance expert evidence about eyewitness identifications and false confessions. Texas Law Review, 93, 1811–1848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mnookin, J. L. (2008). Expert evidence and the confrontation clause after Crawford v. Washington. Journal of Law and Policy, 15(2), 791–862.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S., Dunn, A. G., Lagisz, M., Bannach-Brown, A., Grames, E. M., Sánchez-Tójar, A., … Barrow, S. (2020). A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(4), 498–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odgers, S. (2018). Uniform evidence law (13th ed.). Pyrmont: Thompson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, M. (2010). Sexual assault law, credibility, and ideal victims: Consent, resistance, and victim blaming. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 22(2), 397–433.
   Google Scholar
• Rathus, Z. (2018). The research says: Perceptions on the use of social science research in the family law system. Federal Law Review, 46, 85–111.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2019). The frailties of human memory and the accused’s right to accurate procedures. Criminal Law Review, 11, 912–933.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehy, E., Stubbs, J., & Tolmie, J. (1992). Defending battered women on trial: The battered woman syndrome and its limitations. Criminal Law Journal, 16, 369–394.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehy, E., Stubbs, J., & Tolmie, J. (2014). Securing fair outcomes for battered women charged with homicide: Analysing defence lawyering in R v Falls. Melbourne University Law Review, 38, 666–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, J., & Tolmie, J. (1995). Race, gender, and the battered woman syndrome: An Australian case study. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 8, 122–158.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, J., & Tolmie, J. (1999). Falling short of the challenge? A comparative assessment of the Australian use of expert evidence on the battered woman syndrome. Melbourne University Law Review, 23, 709–748.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice (US DOJ). (1996). The validity and use of evidence concerning battering and its effects in criminal trials: Report responding to Section 40507 of the Violence Against Women Act (Report No NCJ 160972).
   Google Scholar
• Vazire, S., & Holcombe, A. O. (2020). Where are the self-correcting mechanisms in science? Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/kgqzt/
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L., & Monahan, J. (1987). Social frameworks: A new use of social science in law. Virginia Law Review, 73, 559–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, L. E., Thyfault, R. K., & Brown, A. (1982). Symposium: Family violence in America – Part II: Beyond the juror’s ken: Battered women. Vermont Law Review, 7(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, K., Diemer, K., Honey, N., Mannix, S., Mickle, J., Morgan, J., … Ward, A. (2018). Australians’ attitudes to violence against women and gender equality (Findings from the 2017 National Community Attitudes towards Violence against Women Survey, NCAS, Research Report).
   Google Scholar
• Wootton, D. (2015). The invention of science: A new history of the scientific revolution. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar