Gendered judicial discourse in the sentencing of sexual offenders: a new explanatory model

References

• Agger, B. (1991). Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: Their sociological relevance. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 105–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelides, S. (2008). Sexual offences against ‘children’ and the question of judicial gender bias. Australian Feminist Studies: The Child, 23(57), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164640802233302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 5(2), 272–281.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Australian and New Zealand standard offence classification (ANZSOC). Catalogue No. 1234.0. Retrieved from https://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/5CE97E870F7A29EDCA2578A200143125/$File/12340_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bagaric, M., & Pathinayake, A. (2013). The paradox of parity in sentencing in Australia: The pursuit of equal justice that highlights the futility of consistency in sentencing. The Journal of Criminal Law, 77(5), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1350/jcla.2013.77.5.866
   Google Scholar
• Beeby, A., Hobbs, L., Gross, J., Hayne, H., & Patterson, T. (2020). Gender disparities in sentencing outcomes for sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2020.1784476
   Google Scholar
• Bontrager Ryon, S. (2013). Gender as social threat: A study of offender sex, situational factors, gender dynamics and social control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(6), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butrus, N. (2018). Judicial sentencing considerations in cases of violent offenders versus sexual offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(5), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1473175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, C. M., Sample, L. L., & Anderson, A. L. (2017). Public opinion of the application of sex offender notification laws to female sex offenders: Why it is important to examine. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415572253
   Google Scholar
• Cameron v The Queen (2002) 209 CLR 339.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. S. (2018). Professionals’ perceptions of female child sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 886260518785377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518785377
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, H. (2010, September). ‘What is the justice system willing to offer?’ Understanding sexual assault victims/survivors’ criminal justice needs. Australian Institute of Family Studies. Retrieved from https://aifs.gov.au/publications/family-matters/issue-85/what-justice-system-willing-offer
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colson, M. H., Boyer, L., Baumstarck, K., & Loundou, A. D. (2013). Female sex offenders: A challenge to certain paradigmes. Meta-analysis. Sexologies, 22(4), e109–e117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2013.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Cortoni, F., Babchishin, K. M., & Rat, C. (2017). The proportion of sexual offenders who are female is higher than thought: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816658923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crimes Act 1961 (NZ). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/whole.html
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1899-009
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K., & Bouhours, B. (2008). Judicial censure and moral communication to youth sex offenders. Justice Quarterly, 25(3), 496–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701834584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deering, R., & Mellor, D. (2009). Sentencing of male and female child sex offenders: Australian study. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(3), 394–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710902930291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deering, R., & Mellor, D. (2011). An exploratory qualitative study of the self-reported impact of female-perpetrated childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 20(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2011.539964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Director of Public Prosecutions v Ellis (2005) VSCA 105.
   Google Scholar
• Dube, S. R., Anda, R. F., Whitfield, C. L., Brown, D. W., Felitti, V. J., Dong, M., & Giles, W. H. (2005). Long-term consequences of childhood sexual abuse by gender of victim. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(5), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Embry, R., & Lyons, P. M. (2012). Sex-based sentencing: Sentencing discrepancies between male and female sex offenders. Feminist Criminology, 7(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111430214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, M. A., & Stichman, A. (2002). Sex offender laws: Can treatment, punishment, incapacitation, and public safety be reconciled? Criminal Justice Review, 27, 256–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680202700204
   Google Scholar
• Faul. (2014). G*Power. Version 3.1.9.2. Faul.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando Rodriguez, S., Curry, T. R., & Lee, G. (2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, H. (2010). The treatment needs of female sexual offenders. In G. A. Theresa & F. Cortoni (Eds.), Female sexual offenders: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 101–117). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galdas, P. (2017). Revisiting bias in qualitative research: Reflections on its relationship with funding and impact. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748992
   Google Scholar
• Gannon, T. A., & Rose, M. R. (2008). Female child sexual offenders: Towards integrating theory and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(6), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethals, J., Maes, E., & Klinckhamers, P. (1997). Sex/gender-based decision-making in the criminal justice system as a possible (additional) explanation for the underrepresentation of women in official criminal statistics – A review of international literature. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 21(2), 207–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1997.9678596
   Google Scholar
• Goulette, N., Wooldredge, J., Frank, J., & Travis, L. (2015). From initial appearance to sentencing: Do female defendants experience disparate treatment? Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(5), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, A., & Turner, E. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ, 29(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
   Google Scholar
• Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough?. Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherton, J. (1999). The idealization of women: Its role in the minimization of child sexual abuse by females. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00119-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. (2010). Measuring offence seriousness. Crime and Justice Bulletin, 142, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• JADE. (2018). Welcome to JADE. Retrieved from https://jade.io/t/browse/byCustom
   Google Scholar
• Jeffries, S., & Bond, C. W. (2013). Gender, Indigeneity, and the criminal courts: A narrative exploration of women’s sentencing in Western Australia. Women & Criminal Justice, 23(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2013.743370
   Google Scholar
• Kite, D., & Tyson, G. A. (2004). The impact of perpetrator gender on male and female police officers’ perceptions of child sexual abuse. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11(2), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.2004.11.2.308
   Google Scholar
• Klein, V., Imhoff, R., Reininger, K. M., & Briken, P. (2019). Perceptions of sexual script deviation in women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(2), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1280-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. N. (2010). Views of sexual abuse professionals about sex offender notification policies. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X08327785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lexis Advance Research. (2018). Lexis advance. Retrieved from https://advance.lexis.com/pacificresearchhome?crid=271fd4dc-f181-4339-ac14-9f4291929509
   Google Scholar
• Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, G. (2007). The guilty plea discount: Does pragmatism win over proportionality and principle? Southern Cross University Law Review, 11, 205–223.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. A. (2015). Female offenders in child sexual abuse cases: A national picture. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2015.978925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, I. H., & Hagan, J. (1983). Gender and crime: Offense patterns and criminal court sanctions. Crime and Justice, 4, 91–144.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, P., & Ward, T. (2002). Female sex offenders: Clinical and demographic features. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600208413329
   Google Scholar
• Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/2017-10-27/act-1992-048
   Google Scholar
• Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, J., Watters, P. A., & Spiranovic, C. (2011). Internet subcultures and pathways to the use of child pornography. Computer Law and Security Review: The International Journal of Technology and Practice, 27(6), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2011.09.009
   Google Scholar
• QSR International. (2017). NVivo. Version 11. QSR International. Retrieved from https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/support-overview/downloads
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Courts. (2019). About the court of appeal. Queensland Courts. Retrieved from https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/courts/court-of-appeal/about-the-court-of-appeal
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council. (2019). Queensland sentencing guide. Retrieved from https://www.sentencingcouncil.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/572161/queensland-sentencing-guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. L., & Ferguson, C. J. (2011). Punishment and rehabilitation attitudes toward sex offenders versus nonsexual offenders. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.570287
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., & Freeman, N. J. (2011). Female sex offenders and the criminal justice system: A comparison of arrests and outcomes. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2010.537380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, R. T., & Cochran, J. C. (2019). The gender gap in sex offender punishment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09416-x
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, J., & Fix, R. L. (2019). Court outcomes among female juveniles with sexual offences. Journal of Sexual Aggression. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2019.1618932
   Google Scholar
• Siganto v The Queen (1998) HCA 74.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02701260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (2013). Women, crime, and criminology: A feminist critique, Routledge revivals. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• South, D. (1998). General deterrence and behaviour change: A comment on the Australian psychological society position paper on punishment and behaviour change. Australian Psychologist, 33(1), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050069808257269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamarit Sumalla, J. M., & Hernández-Hidalgo, P. (2018). Victims of child sexual abuse: Understanding their need for justice. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 54, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandiver, D. M. (2010). Assessing gender differences and co-offending patterns of a predominantly ‘male-oriented’ crime: A comparison of a cross-national sample of juvenile boys and girls arrested for a sexual offense. Violence and Victims, 25(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veen v The Queen (No.22) (1988) HCA 14.
   Google Scholar
• Wakslak, C. J. (2012). The experience of cognitive dissonance in important and trivial domains: A construal-level theory approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1361–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinsheimer, C. C., Woiwod, D. M., Coburn, P. I., Chong, K., & Connolly, D. A. (2017). The unusual suspects: Female versus male accused in child sexual abuse cases. Child Abuse & Neglect, 72, 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar