Perceived legitimacy or dull compulsion? Assessing why incarcerated offenders comply with correctional rules

References

• Akinlabi, O. M., & Murphy, K. (2018). Dull compulsion or perceived legitimacy? Assessing why People Comply with the law in Nigeria. Police Practice and Research, 19(2), 186–201. doi:10.1080/15614263.2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmont, A. (2014). Raped by the system: A comparison of prison rape in the United States and South Africa. Pace International Law Review, 26(2), 54–87.
   Google Scholar
• Barkworth, J. M., & Murphy, K. (2021). Procedural justice, posturing and defiant action: Exploring prisoner reactions to prison authority. Justice Quarterly, 38(3), 537–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijersbergen, K., Dirkzwager, A., Molleman, T., Van der Laan, P., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2015). Procedural justice in prison: The importance of staff characteristics. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(4), 337–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijersbergen, K., Dirkzwager, A., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2016). Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter? Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 43(1), 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello, P. O., & Matshaba, T. D. (2020). What predicts university students’ compliance with the law: Perceived legitimacy or dull compulsion? Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello, P. O., & Matshaba, T. D. (2022a). Factors influencing incarcerated offenders’ perceptions of correctional officers in South African correctional centres. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello, P. O., & Matshaba, T. D. (2022b). The effects of procedural justice on obligation to obey, and compliance among incarcerated offenders in South Africa. The Prison Journal, 102(6), 673–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernault, F. (2003) A history of prison and confinement in Africa. Janet L Roitman Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A. (2001). Compliance with community penalties. In A. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe, & S. Rex (Eds.), Community penalties: Change and challenges. Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, D. (2019). The use of less-lethal weapons in South African prisons and crowd management. Institute for Security Studies Monographs, 201, iii–i63.
   Google Scholar
• Brunton-Smith, I., & McCarthy, D. J. (2016). Prison legitimacy and procedural fairness: A multilevel examination of prisoners in England and Wales. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1029–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., Labrecque, R., Schaefer, R., Harvis, M., Zavita, K., Reddy, L., & Labranche, K. (2020). Do perceptions of legitimacy and fairness matter in prison? Examining how procedural and distributive justice relate to misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 47(12), 1630–1653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, M. S. (2020). Cycles of punishment: The constitutionality of restricting access to menstrual health products in prisons. Boston College Law Review, 61(7), 2541.
   Google Scholar
• Carrabine, E. (2004). Power, discourse and resistance. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Carrabine, E. (2005). Prison riots, social order and the problem of legitimacy. The British Journal of Criminology, 45(6), 896–913. doi:10.1093/bjc/azi052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers, C. H., & Cole, J. (1997). Penology. Pretoria: UNISA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crewe, B. (2013). Compliance in prisons. In What works in offender compliance (pp. 119–142). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dhami, M. K., Mantle, G., & Fox, D. (2009). Restorative justice in prisons. Contemporary Justice Review, 12(4), 433–448.
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, J. (2018). Optimising rehabilitation and unit management in the department of correctional services in the bethal area: A social work perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, D., Bierie, D., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2010). Legitimacy in corrections: A randomized experiment comparing a boot camp with a prison. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(1), 89–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M. (2019). Criminal justice policy: Origins and effectiveness. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, T. P., & Mendelson, S. E. (2008). Public experiences of police violence and corruption in contemporary Russia: A case of predatory policing? Law & Society Review, 42(1), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacin, R., & Meško, G. G. (2018). Prisoners’ perception of legitimacy of the prison staff: A qualitative study in Slovene prisons. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(13), 4332–4350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., Tyler, T. R., Bradford, B., Taylor, D., & Shiner, M. (2010). Legitimacy and procedural justice in prison. Prison Service Journal, 191, 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Jenness, V., & Calavita, K. (2018). It depends on the outcome: Prisoners, grievances, and perceptions of justice. Law & Society Review, 52(1), 41–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joh, E. (2010). The return of banishment: Punishment and policing, JOTWELL (May 24, 2010) (reviewing Katherine Beckett & Steve Herbert, Penal Boundaries: Banishment and the expansion of punishment, 35 Law & Social Inquiry 1 (2010)), Available at https://crim.jotwell.com/the-return-of-banishment-punishment-and-policing/.7.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kynoch, G. (2008). Urban violence in colonial Africa: A case for South African exceptionalism. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(3), 629–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lectric Law Library. (2017). Criminal law, compensation and punishment - Restitution in the Criminal Law. https://www.lectlaw.com/mjl/cl065.html.
   Google Scholar
• Luyt, W. F. (2007). Harm reduction within the framework of sexual activities in American prisons in the state of Ohio. South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(2), 182–205.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, E., Atkin-Plunk, C., & Wells, W. (2021). The effects of procedural justice on cooperation and compliance among inmates in a work release program. Justice Quarterly, 38(6), 1128–1153. doi:10.1080/07418825.2019.1634753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. (2017). Procedural justice and its role in promoting voluntary compliance. Regulatory Theory, P. Drahos, Editor, 43-58.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Tyler, T. R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law. Regulation & Governance, 3(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the 21st century. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 23, 1–42. doi:10.1086/449268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndlovu, I. (2010). An examination of prison criminality and power in selected contemporary Kenyan and South African narratives (Dissertation presented for the award for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English at the University of Stellenbosch).
   Google Scholar
• Nellis, M. (2013). Implant technology and the electronic monitoring of offenders: Old and new questions about compliance, control and legitimacy. In Legitimacy and compliance in criminal justice (pp. 168–189). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nuño, L., & Morrow, W. (2020). Assessing the process-based model of regulation within a jail setting: Arrestees’ perceptions of procedural justice, trust and obligation to obey. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(5), 676–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwolise, O. B. C. (2010). Bridging the funding gap in corrections: The urgent need for increased financial vitamins in African correction services. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the African Correctional Association, held in Accra, Ghana, September 13- 17, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Penal Reform International. (2021). The Issue. https://www.penalreform.org/issues/corruption/the-issue/.
   Google Scholar
• Postman, Z. (2020). COVID-19: Lockdown makes access to justice for prisoners even more difficult. The Daily Maverick.
   Google Scholar
• Rawoot, L. (2012). Report shows sorry state of South Africa’s prisons. Mail & Guardian, 14 October. http://mg.co.za/article/2012-10-14-report-shows-sorry-state-of-sa-prison.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. S. (1969). Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. In A. Milner (ed.). African penal systems. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, v. XIII, 111. 501 p.
   Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., & Meško, G. (2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy and prisoner misconduct. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(1), 41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., Tankebe, J., & Mesko, G. (2014). Compliance with the law in Slovenia: The role of procedural justice and police legitimacy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 20(2), 259–276. doi:10.1007/s10610-013-9211-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkin, J. (2008). Prisons in Africa: An evaluation from a human rights perspective. Sur. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, 5(9), 22–51.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, F. (2015). Prison assaults by officials increase. https://www.iol.co.za/news/prison-assaults-by-officials-increase-1835427.
   Google Scholar
• Shabangu, K,I. (2006). Prison overcrowding in the South African correctional services: A penological perspective. (Unpublished Dissertation. Pretoria: University of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. (2005). The historical development in prisons in South Africa: A penological perspective. Durban, South Africa: Department of History, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal.
   Google Scholar
• Souryal, S. S. (2009). Deterring corruption by prison personnel: A principle-based perspective. The Prison Journal, 89(1), 21–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, J. R., Bottoms, A. E., & Hay, W. (1996). Prisons and the problem of order. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, B., & Wooldredge, J. (2008). Inmate versus environmental effects on prison rule violations. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 35(4), 438–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, O. A. (2018). A comparative study of prison systems in African countries. (Unpublished PhD Thesis) University of South Africa (UNISA), Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symkovych, A. (2019). The legal and illegal use of force by prison officers in Ukraine. The Prison Journal, 99(1), 89–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural justice matter? Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 47(4), 1265–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 51(1), 103–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (2013). Legitimacy and compliance: The virtues of self-regulation. In A. Crawford, & A. Hucklesby (Eds.), Legitimacy and compliance in criminal justice. NY, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30 (pp. 431–505). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2009). Legitimacy and criminal justice: The benefits of self-regulation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 7(1), 307–359.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2010). “Legitimacy in corrections”. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(1), 127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2021). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. In Why people obey the Law (pp. 3-7). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ugwudike, P. (2012). Compliance with community penalties: The importance of interactional dynamics. In Offender supervision (pp. 351–369). Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hout, M. C., & Wessels, J. (2021). Human rights and the invisible nature of incarcerated women in post-apartheid South Africa: Prison system progress in adopting the Bangkok rules. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 18(3), 300–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zyl Smit, D. (1992). The South African prison law and practice. Durban: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldredge, J., & Steiner, B. (2016). The exercise of power in prison organizations and implications for legitimacy. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 106(1), 125–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar