Identifying low‐progress readers: Comparing teacher judgment with a curriculum‐based measurement procedure

References

• Baker , SK and Good , R . (1995) . Curriculum‐based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second‐grade students . School Psychology Review , 24 : 561 – 578 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates , C and Nettlebeck , T . (2001) . Primary school teachers’ judgments of reading achievement . Educational Psychology , 21 : 179 – 189 .
   Google Scholar
• Coladarci , T . (1986) . Accuracy of teacher judgments of student responses to standardized test items . Journal of Educational Psychology , 78 : 141 – 146 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coladarci , T . (1992) . Teachers’ knowledge of what students’ know: The case of reading . Reading Improvement , 29 : 34 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Deno , SL . (1987) . Curriculum‐based measurement . Teaching Exceptional Children , 20 : 41 – 42 .
   Google Scholar
• Deno , SL , Mirkin , PK and Chiang , B . (1982) . Identifying valid measures of reading . Exceptional Children , 49 : 36 – 45 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan , O and Archer , P . (1985) . The accuracy of teachers’ ratings of ability: A regression model . American Educational Research Journal , 22 : 25 – 34 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher , J , Tannock , R and Bishop , DVM . (2001) . Utility of brief teacher rating scales to identify children with educational problems . Australian Journal of Psychology , 53 : 63 – 71 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn , JM and Rahbar , MH . (1998) . Improving teacher prediction of children at risk for reading failure . Psychology in the Schools , 35 : 163 – 172 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman , JG . (1993) . Two factors contributing to elementary school teachers’ predictions of students’ scores on the Gates–MacGinitie Reading Test, Level D . Perceptual and Motor Skills , 76 : 536 – 538 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs , LS and Deno , SL . (1992) . Effects of curriculum within curriculum‐based measurement . Exceptional Children , 58 : 232 – 242 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs , LS , Fuchs , D and Maxwell , L . (1988) . The validity of informal reading comprehension measures . Remedial and Special Education , 9 : 20 – 28 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines ML Davis M (1990, April) Accuracy of teacher prediction of elementary school achievement Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association Boston MA
   Google Scholar
• Gerber , MM and Semmel , MI . (1984) . Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process . Educational Psychologist , 19 : 137 – 148 .
   Google Scholar
• Gresham , FM , Reschly , DJ and Carey , MP . (1987) . Teachers as “tests”: Classification accuracy and concurrent validation in the identification of learning disabled children . School Psychology Review , 16 : 543 – 553 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman , JM and Fuller , ML . (1997) . The development of curriculum‐based measurement norms in literature‐based classrooms . Journal of School Psychology , 35 : 377 – 389 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasbrouk , JE and Tindal , G . (1992) . Curriculum‐based oral reading fluency norms for students in Grades 2 through 5 . Teaching Exceptional Children , 24 (3) : 41 – 44 .
   Google Scholar
• Hoge , RD and Coladarci , T . (1989) . Teacher‐based judgments of academic achievement: A review of the literature . Review of Educational Research , 59 : 297 – 313 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins , JR and Jewell , M . (1993) . Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and Maze . Exceptional Children , 59 : 421 – 432 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny , DT and Chekaluk , E . (1993) . Early reading performance: A comparison of teacher‐based and test‐based assessments . Journal of Learning Disabilities , 26 : 227 – 336 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madelaine , A and Wheldall , K . (1998) . Towards a curriculum‐based passage reading test for monitoring the performance of low‐progress readers using standardised passages: A validity study . Educational Psychology , 18 : 471 – 478 .
   Google Scholar
• Madelaine , A and Wheldall , K . (2002a) . A comparison of two quick methods for identifying low‐progress readers: Teacher judgment versus curriculum‐based measurement . Australiasion Journal of Special Education , 26 : 32 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Madelaine , A and Wheldall , K . (2002b) . A comparison of two quick methods for identifying low progress readers: Teacher judgment versus curriculum‐based measurement . Australasian Journal of Special Education , 26 : 32 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Madelaine , A and Wheldall , K . (2002c) . Establishing tentative norms and identifying gender differences in performance for a new passage reading test . Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities , 7 : 40 – 45 .
   Google Scholar
• Madelaine , A and Wheldall , K . (2002d) . Further progress towards a standardised curriculum‐based measure of reading: Calibrating a new passage reading test against the New South Wales Basic Skills Test . Educational Psychology , 22 : 461 – 471 .
   Google Scholar
• Marston , D , Mirkin , P and Deno , SL . (1984) . Curriculum‐based measurement: An alternative to traditional screening, referral and identification . The Journal of Special Education , 18 : 109 – 117 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrens , WA and Clarizio , HF . (1993) . Curriculum‐based measurement: Conceptual and psychometric considerations . Psychology in the Schools , 30 : 241 – 254 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan , SK and Bradley‐Johnson , S . (1995) . Technical adequacy of curriculum‐based measurement for Braille readers . School Psychology Review , 24 : 94 – 103 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale MD (1988) Neale Analysis of Reading Ability—Revised Melbourne Australian Council of Educational Research
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Council for Educational Research (1981) Burt Word Reading Test: New Zealand Revision Wellington NZ Lithoprint (NZ) Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Patton , CV . (1976) . Selecting special students: Who decides? . Teachers College Record , 78 : 101 – 124 .
   Google Scholar
• Rodden‐Nord , K and Shinn , MR . (1991) . The range of reading skills within and across general education classrooms: Contributions to understanding special education for students with mild handicaps . The Journal of Special Education , 24 : 441 – 453 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvesen , KA and Undheim , JO . (1994) . Screening for learning disabilities with teacher rating scales . Journal of Learning Disabilities , 27 : 60 – 66 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpley , CF and Edgar , E . (1986) . Teachers’ ratings vs standardized tests: An empirical investigation of agreement between two indices of achievement . Psychology in the Schools , 23 : 106 – 111 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn MR (Ed.) (1989) Curriculum‐based measurement: Assessing special children New York The Guilford Press
   Google Scholar
• Shinn , MR , Tindal , GA and Spira , DA . (1987) . Special education referrals as an index of teacher tolerance: Are teachers imperfect tests? . Exceptional Children , 54 : 32 – 40 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheldall K (1996) The Wheldall Assessment of Reading Passages (WARP): Experimental edition Unpublished manuscript Macquarie University Special Education Centre Sydney
   Google Scholar
• Wheldall , K and Madelaine , A . (2000) . A curriculum‐based passage reading test for monitoring the performance of low‐progress readers: The development of the WARP . International Journal of Disability, Development and Education , 47 : 371 – 382 .
   Google Scholar
• Wilson , MS , Schendel , JM and Ulman , JE . (1992) . Curriculum‐based measures, teachers’ ratings, and group achievement scores: Alternative screening measures . Journal of School Psychology , 30 : 59 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright , D and Wiese , MJ . (1988) . Teacher judgment in student evaluation: A comparison of grading methods . Journal of Educational Research , 82 : 10 – 14 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar