Student Collaboration in Group Work: Inclusion as Participation

References

• Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Oxford: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Chowne, A. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 663–680.10.1080/01411920701582231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black-Hawkins, K. (2010). The framework for participation: A research tool for exploring the relationship between achievement and inclusion in schools. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33, 21–40.10.1080/17437271003597907
   Google Scholar
• Black-Hawkins, K. (2013). Researching inclusive classroom practices: The framework for participation. In L. Florian (Ed.), The sage handbook of special education (pp. 389–403). London: Sage Education.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T. (1996). A perspective on inclusion from England. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 87–99.10.1080/0305764960260107
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T. (2002). Inclusion and exclusion in the city: Concepts and contexts. In P. Potts & T. Booth (Eds.), Inclusion in the city (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion. Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol, UK: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society (BPS). (2014). Code of human research ethics. Retrieved from https://www.bps.org.uk/system/files/Public%20files/code_of_human_research_ethics_dec_2014_inf180_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bruffee, K. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.10.3102/00346543064001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, N., & Major, C. H. (2014). Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning and problem-based learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25, 7–55.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.10.1177/001872674900200204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson, I., Haug, P., & Persson, B. (2005). Inclusion in some Western European countries. Different policy rhetorics and school realities. In D. Mitchel (Ed.), Contextualixing inclusive education. Evalutating old and new international perspecitvies (pp. 114–138). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flem, A., Moen, T., & Gudmundsdottir, S. (2004). Towards inclusive schools: A study of inclusive education in practice. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19, 85–98.10.1080/10885625032000167160
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L. (2008). Special or inclusive education: Future trends. British Journal of Special Education, 35, 202–208.10.1111/j.1467-8578.2008.00402.x
   Google Scholar
• Göransson, K., Nilholm, C., & Karlsson, K. (2011). Inclusive education in Sweden? A critical analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 541–555.10.1080/13603110903165141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac, E. (2014). Group work as an incentive for learning – Students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in Psychology, Educational Psychology, 5, Article 558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac, E., & Forslund Frykedal, K. (2016). Assessment in group work – Method and implementation of an intervention study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, P. (2010). Approaches to empirical research on inclusive education. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 12, 199–209.10.1080/15017410903385052
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22, 995–1005.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2013). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2008). Talk and development of reasoning and understanding. Human Development, 51, 90–100.10.1159/000113158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilholm, C. (2006). Special education, inclusion and democracy. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21, 432–445.
   Google Scholar
• Nilholm, C., & Göransson, K. (2013). Inkluderande undervisning–vad kan man lära av forskningen? [Including education – What can you learn from the research?]. (R&D publication No. 3). [FoU skriftserie nr 3]. Stockholm: National Agency for Special Needs Education and Schools [Specialpedagogiska skolmyndigheten].
   Google Scholar
• Roseth, C., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223–246.10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, J., & Pons, R. (2007). Cooperative learning: We can also do it without task structure. Interculture Education, 18, 215–230.10.1080/14675980701463562
   Google Scholar
• SFS. (2000). Swedish Education Act. [ Skollag]. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research [Utbildningsdepartementet].
   Google Scholar
• Sharan, Y. (2010). Cooperative learning for academic and social gains: Valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education, 45, 300–313.10.1111/(ISSN)1465-3435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, D. (2004). Inclusion: The dynamic of school development. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N., Franke, M., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, Cl, Shin, N., & Terrou, A. (2013). Engaging with other’s mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2007). Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge. Human Development, 50, 244–274.10.1159/000106414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar