Experiences about Reading and Writing Development Narrated by Students with Severe Speech and Physical Impairment

References

• Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2009). Educational assessment issues. In G. Soto & C. Zangari (Eds.), Practically speaking. Language, literacy, & academic development for students with AAC needs (pp. 3–26). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). Arling ton: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg, E., Svensson, L., Alvegård, C., & Johansson, T. (2008). The epistemological role of language use in learning: A phenomenogaphic intentional-expressive approach. Educational Research Review, 3(1), 14–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aro, M., & Wimmer, H. (2003). Learning to read: English in comparison to six more regular orthographies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 621–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atterström, A. (2010). “Jag ska bli författare när jag blir stor”– Elever utan tal utvecklar sin skriftspråklighet [I will become a writer when I grow up” – Students without speech develop literacy]. Jönköping University, Sweden: Master’s thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006a). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1–44). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006b). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Mirenda, P., & Sturm, J. (2005). Literacy development of children who use AAC. In D. R. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (pp. 351–390). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Björck-Åkesson, E. (1992). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers – A longitudinal study [Samspel mellan små barn med rörelsehinder och talhandikapp och deras föräldrar – En longitudinell studie]. Dissertation. Gothenburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2019). Doing interviews (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., Tonsing, K., & Goldbart, J. (2020). Friendship experiences of young adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2020.1746246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (1998). Reading and spelling among nonvocal children with cerebral palsy: Influence of home and school literacy environment. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 23–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (2006). Reading and spelling abilities in children with severe speech impairments and cerebral palsy at 6, 9 and 12 years of age in relation to cognitive development: A longitudinal study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, K., & Clendon, S. (2009). Addressing the literacy demands of the curriculum for beginning readers and writers. In G. Soto & C. Zangari (Eds.), Practically speaking: Language, literacy, & academic development for students with AAC needs (pp. 195–215). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K., Koppenhaver, D., & Cunningham, J. (2006). Balanced reading intervention and assessment in augmentative communication. In R. McCauley & M. Fey (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 309–345). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K., & Sachse, S. (2010). Reading acquisition, AAC and the transferability of english research to languages with more consistent or transparent orthographies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26(3), 177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, K. A., & Katz, L. A. (2008). Augmentative and alternative communication and literacy teams: Facing the challenges, forging ahead. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 112–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J., Rönnberg, J., Gustafson, S., & Wengelin, Å. (2007). Reading, why not? Literacy skills in children with motor and speech impairments. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 28(4), 236–251.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. A., & Lorsbach, A. W. (2005). Writing self-efficacy in young children: Issues for the early grades environment. Learning Environment Research, 8, 157–175.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D., Foley, B., & Williams, A. (2009). Diagnostic reading assessment for students with AAC needs. In G. Soto & C. Zangari (Eds.), Practically speaking: Language, literacy, & academic development for students with AAC needs (pp. 71–92). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, M. (2008). Reading, spelling and silent speech: Exploring literacy in children with severe speech and physical impairment. Gothenburg University, Institutionen för psykologi.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, H. (2011). ICT and participation in school and outside school activities for children and youths with physical disabilities. Dissertation. Karolinska Institute: Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2009). Addressing the literacy demands of the curriculum for conventional and more advanced readers and writers who require AAC. In G. Soto & C. Zangari (Eds.), Practically speaking: Language, literacy, & academic development for students with AAC needs (pp. 217–245). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, S. (1993). Literacy and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): The expectations and priorities of parents and teachers. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, I., & Herrlin, K. (2005). God läsutveckling [good reading development]. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, I., & Reichenberg, M. (2008). Vad är lättläst? (What is easy to read?) Specialpedagogiska skolmyndigheten (The national authority of special needs education). Retrieved 7 February 2010: www.spsm.se/PageFiles/4882/Vad%20%c3%a4r%20I%c3%a4ttI%c3%a4st.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, J. (2001). Lärande med rörelsehinder. Studier av förutsättningar och möjligheter för kunskapsutveckling i skolan [Learning with motor disabilities. Studies of prerequisites and possibilities for knowledge development in school] (Special-educational reports, 19). Gothenburg University. Institution for pedagogy and didactic.
   Google Scholar
• Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2010). Reading motivation: Exploring the elementary gender gap. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(2), 129–141.
   Google Scholar
• Matthew, N., & Clow, S. (2007). Putting disabled children in the picture: Promoting inclusive children’s books and media. International Journal of Early Childhood, 39(2), 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1994). Fallstudien som forskningsmetod [case study research in education]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, C. (2007). “Please listen, it’s my turn”: Instructional approaches, curricula and contexts for supporting communication and increasing access to inclusion. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32(4), 263–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrberg, M. 2007. Läs- och skrivsvårigheter. In Skolverket Ed. Att läsa och skriva – Forskning och beprövad erfarenhet [Reading and writing difficulties. Stockholm: Liber. National School Board (Eds), To read and write – research and proved experience], 73-100.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M. (2014). What is inclusive research? London: Bloomsbury Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2003). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pickl, G. (2008). Children with complex communication needs: The parents’ perspective. Dissertation. Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Polychroni, F., Koukoura, K., & Anagnostou, I. (2006). Academic self-concept, reading attitudes and approaches to learning of children with dyslexia: Do they differ from their peers? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21, 415–430.
   Google Scholar
• Pufpaff, L. A. (2008). Barriers to participation in kindergarten literacy instruction for a student with augmentative and alternative communication needs. Psychology in the Schools, 45(7), 582–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindal, S. M. (2009). Disability, capability, and special education: Towards a capability-based theory. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(2), 155–168.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, A., & McGrail, E. (2015). Exploring children’s literature with authentic representations of disability. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51(1), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppar, A. L., Dymond, S. K., & Gaffney, J. S. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives on literacy instruction for students with severe disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3–4), 100–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, P. H. K. (2005). Early reading development in European orthographies. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 296–315). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, R. (2004). Participation in practice: Making it meaningful, effective and sustainable. Children & Society, 18, 106–118.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2014). Adolescence and AAC: Intervention challenges and possible solutions. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 36(2), 112–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, S., & Torrance, H. (2005). Case study. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 33–40). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, J., & Clendon, S. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication, language, and literacy: Fostering the relationship. Topics in Language Disorders, 24(1), 76–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm, J., Spadorcia, S., Cunningham, J., Calf, K., Staples, A., Erickson, K., … Koppenhaver, D. (2006). What happens to reading between first and third grade? Implications for students who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(1), 21–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, L. (2016). Kontextuell analys – En metodologi för skolnära forskning [contextual analysis – A methodology for school research]. In E. Anderberg (Ed.), Skolnära forskningsmetoder [school research methods] (pp. 191–216). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, L., & Doumas, K. (2013). Contextual and analytic qualities of research methods exemplified in research on teaching. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(6), 441–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swärd, A.-K. (2008) Att säkerställa skriftspråklighet genom medveten arrangering. Wittingmetodens tillämpning i några olika lärandemiljöer [Ensuring Literacy through ‘Didactic Arranging’]. Dissertation. Stockholm: Specialpedagogiska institutionen, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2002). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning [Ethical principles in research in humanities and social sciences]. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Swinehart-Jones, D., & Heller, K. W. (2009). Teaching students with severe speech and physical impairments a decoding strategy using internal speech and motoric indicators. The Journal of Special Education, 43(3), 131–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. (2008). Beyond the dilemma of difference: The capability approach to disability and special educational needs. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(3), 443–459.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, S. (1997). Toward a feminist theory of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 336–352). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Widerberg, K. (2002). Kvalitativ forskning i praktiken [qualitative research in practice]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J., & Ratajzcak, A. (2009). Developing students’ literacy skills using high-tech speech-generating augmentative and alternative communication devices. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(3), 167–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zascavage, V. T., & Keefe, C. H. (2004). Students with severe speech and physical impairments. Opportunity barriers to literacy. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19(4), 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Zascavage, V. T., & Keefe, C. H. (2007). Students with severe speech and physical impairments: Reflection of models of social construct in educational decisions for literacy instruction. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 18(1), 33–42.
   Google Scholar