Simpler is better? Analysis of a codesign session with elders

References

• Baerveldt, C., and T. Verheggen. 1999. “Enactivism and the Experiential Reality of Culture: Rethinking the Epistemological Basis of Cultural Psychology.” Culture & Psychology 5 (2): 183–206. doi: 10.1177/1354067X9952006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and W. Mackay. 2002. “Prototyping Tools and Techniques.” In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, edited by A. Jacko Julie, and L. Andrew Sears, 1006–1031. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., P. Ehn, J. Kammersgaard, M. Kyng, and Y. Sundblad. 1987. An Utopian Experience.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., and O. S. Iversen. 2002. “Staging a Professional Participatory Design Practice: Moving PD Beyond the Initial Fascination of User Involvement”. Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on human-computer interaction, 11–18. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, E., T. Binder, L. Malmborg, and T. Sokoler. 2010. “Communities of Everyday Practice and Situated Elderliness as an Approach to Co-design for Senior Interaction.” Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '10). 400–403.  New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crinnion, J. 1991. Evolutionary Systems Development, A Practical Guide to the use of Prototyping within a Structured Systems Methodology. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Alan M. 1992. Operational Prototyping: A New Development Approach. CA: IEEE Computer Society Press Los Alamitos.
   Google Scholar
• DSDM consortium. 2014. The DSDM Agile Project Framework Handbook, Ashford: Dynamic Systems Development Method Limited.
   Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., E. Di Paolo, and S. Gallagher. 2010. “Can Social Interaction Constitute Social Cognition?” Trends in cognitive sciences 14 (10): 441–447. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranti, A. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. 1976. A Theory of Semiotics (Vol. 217). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T., and H. De Jaegher. 2009. “Enactive Intersubjectivity: Participatory Sense-Making and Mutual Incorporation.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (4): 465–486. doi: 10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi, S., M. Ceriani, P. Bottoni, A. Talamo, and S. Ruggiero. 2013. “Keeping “InTOUCH”: An Ongoing Co-design Project to Share Memories, Skills and Demands through an Interactive Table.” In Human Factors in Computing and Informatics, edited by Andreas Holzinger, Martina Ziefle, Martin Hitz, and Matjaz Debevc, 633–640. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gronvall, E., M. Conci, L. Giusti, and C. Leonardi. 2010. “The Intrinsic Fragility of Elderly Care Networks: Five Challenges in Participatory Design Practices.” Proc. NordiCHI workshop: Therapeutic Strategies-a Challenge for User Involvement in Design, 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorn, D. 2007. “Interface Design and Engagement with Older People.” Behaviour & Information Technology 26 (4): 333–341. doi: 10.1080/01449290601176930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y. K., E. Stolterman, and J. Tenenberg. 2008. “The Anatomy of Prototypes: Prototypes as Filters, Prototypes as Manifestations of Design Ideas.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 15 (2): 7. doi: 10.1145/1375761.1375762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lymer, G. 2009. “Demonstrating Professional Vision: The Work of Critique in Architectural Education.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 16 (2): 145–171. doi: 10.1080/10749030802590580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1931–1966. “Division of Signs.” In Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur W. Burks, Vol. 2, 227–273. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. 2004. “Discourse Analysis as a Way of Analyzing Naturally Occurring Talk.” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, edited by D. Silverman, 200–221. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, J. 1989. “Harvey Sacks” Lectures on Conversation: An Introduction/Memoir.” Human Studies 12: 185–209. doi: 10.1007/BF00142761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen, J., and T. Robertson. 2012. “Participatory Design.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza, C. S., C. F. Leitão, R. O. Prates, S. Amélia Bim, and E. J. da Silva. 2010. “Can Inspection Methods Generate Valid new Knowledge in HCI? The Case of Semiotic Inspection.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68 (1): 22–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talamo, A., S. Giorgi, and B. Mellini. 2011. “Designing Technologies for Ageing: Is Simplicity Always a Leading Criterion?” In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity (CHItaly), edited by P. Marti, A. Soro, L. Gamberini, and S. Bagnara, 33–36. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, S., and T. Froese. 2011. “An Inter-Enactive Approach to Agency: Participatory Sense-Making, Dynamics, and Sociality.” Humana Mente 15: 21–53.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, eds. 2001. Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, B., A. Druin, J. Fails, S. Massey, E. Golub, S. Franckel, and K. Schneider. 2012. “Connecting Generations: Developing Co-design Methods for Older Adults and Children.” Behaviour & Information Technology 31 (4): 413–423. doi: 10.1080/01449291003793793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar