The role of mitigation and strengthening cognitive operations in brand names design: a case study of Spanish and American wine brands

References

• Bagasheva, A. 2012. “Culture-Specific Lexical Items, Concepts and Word-Level Communicative Strategies in English-Bulgarian/Bulgarian-English Lexicography.” In English Dictionaries as Cultural Mines, edited by R. Facchinetti, 115–146. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, Yeqing, Alan T. Shao, and D. Rivers. 2008. “Creating New Brand Names: Effects of Relevance, Connotation, and Pronunciation.” Journal of Advertising Research 48 (1): 148–162. doi: 10.2501/S002184990808015X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcelona, A. 2003. “On the Plausibility of Claiming a Metonymic Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, edited by A. Barcelona, 31–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Beverland, M. B. 2005. “Crafting Brand Authenticity: The Case of Luxury Wines.” Journal of Management Studies 42 (5): 1003–1029. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00530.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boas, F. 1938. “Language.” In General Anthropology, edited by F. Boas, 124–145. Boston: Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero Rodríguez, M. del R., and E. Suarez-Toste. 2010. “A Genre Approach to Imaginary in Winespeak.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, edited by G. Low, Z. Todd, and A. Deignan, 265–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Creed, A. 2013. “Wine and Metaphor: Cross-cultural [Dis]Harmony.” In Metaphors for, in and of Education Research, edited by W. Midgley, K. Trimmer, and A. Davies, 10–25. Newcastle: CSP.
   Google Scholar
• Dressler, W. U., and L. Merlini Barbaresi. 1994. Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German and Other Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar, P. H. 1989. “Managing Brand Equity.” Marketing Research 1: 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Felices Lago, A. 1999. “Axiological Linguistics Applied to Branding: Analysis of Trade Names Related to Personal Care, Cloth and Footwear.” Unesco Alsed-LSP Newsletter 22 (2): 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fillis, I., and R. Rentschler. 2008. “Exploring Metaphor as an Alternative Marketing Language.” European Business Review 20 (6): 492–514. doi: 10.1108/09555340810913511
   Google Scholar
• Fjeldsted, M. D. 1991. “Sound Symbolism: Meaning Differences Between Americans and Japanese.” Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium 17 (1): Article 17.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, S. L., and D. Dean. 2013. “ Consumer Perceptions of Wine Brand Names.” Faculty of Commerce Working Papers 5: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gooch, A. 1970. Diminutives, Augmentatives and Pejorative Suffixes in Modern Spanish. A Guide to Their Use and Meaning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grandi, N. 2011. “Renewal and Innovation in the Emergence of Indo-European Evaluative Morphology.” In Diminutives and Augmentatives in the Languages of the World, edited by L. Körtvélyessy and P. Stekauer, 5–25. Lexis: E-Journal in English Lexicology 6.
   Google Scholar
• Guris, S., N. Metin, and E. Caglayan. 2007. “The Brand Choice Model of Wine Consumers: A Multinomial Logia Model.” Quality & Quantity 41: 447–460. doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9014-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollebeek, L. D., and R. J. Brodie. 2009. “Wine Service Marketing, Value Co-creation and Involvement: Research Issues.” International Journal of Wine Business Research 21 (4): 339–353. doi: 10.1108/17511060911004914
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, O. 1933. “Symbolic Value of the Vowel ‘i’.” In Linguistica, edited by O. Jespersen, 283–303. College Park, MD: McGrath.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, K. L., S. E. Heckler, and M. J. Houston. 1998. “The Effects of Brand Name Suggestiveness on Advertising Recall.” Journal of Marketing 62: 48–57. doi: 10.2307/1251802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klink, R. R. 2000. “Creating Brand Names with Meaning: The Use of Sound Symbolism.” Marketing Letters 11 (1): 5–20. doi: 10.1023/A:1008184423824
   Google Scholar
• Klink, R. R. 2001. “Creating Meaningful New Brand Names: A Study of Semantics and Sound Symbolism.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 9 (2): 27–34. doi: 10.1080/10696679.2001.11501889
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., and G. Amstrong. 2001. Principles of Marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lipski, J. M. 2012. “Geographical and Social Varieties of Spanish: An Overview.” In The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, edited by J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea, and E. O'Rourke, 1–26. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Nakata, K. 2013. “ Perception of Sound Symbolism in Mimetic Stimuli: The Voicing Contrast in Japanese and English.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Negro Alousque, I. 2015. “Visual Wine Metaphor and Metonymy in Ads.” Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences 173: 125–131. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.041
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, C., and E. Olofsson. 2013. “Describing Sensory Experience: The Language of Wine Reviews.” Metaphor and Symbol 28 (1): 22–40. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2013.742838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Hernández, L. 2011. “Cognitive Tools for Successful Branding.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 32 (4): 369–388. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr004
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Hernández, L. 2013a. “A Pragmatic-Cognitive Approach to Brand Names: A Case Study of Rioja Wine Brands.” Names 61 (1): 33–46. doi: 10.1179/0027773812Z.00000000038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Hernández, L. 2013b. “Approaching the Utopia of a Global Brand. The Relevance of Image-Schemas as Multimodal Resources for the Branding Industry.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11 (2): 285–302. doi: 10.1075/rcl.11.2.05per
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Sobrino, P. 2013. “Humanimals. What Do Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy Reveal about Meaning Creation in Environmental Advertising?” Proceedings of the XXX International Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics, 402–408, Lleida.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. J., and E. F. McQuarrie. 2004. “Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising.” Marketing Theory 4: 113–136. doi: 10.1177/1470593104044089
   Google Scholar
• Planelles Iváñez, M. 2011. “Metaphors as a Source of Lexical Creation in the Field of Wine Criticism.” In Spanish Word Formation and Lexical Creation, edited by J. L. Cifuentes Honrubia and S. Rodríguez Rosique, 409–424. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, K. R. 1989. “Strategically Desirable Brand Name Characteristics.” The Journal of Consumer Marketing 6 (4): 61–71. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000002563
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. 1996. “Some Notes on the Translation of Spanish -ito/-illo Diminutives into English.” Pragmalingüística 3–4: 155–172.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. 2000. “ El Modelo Idealizado Cognitivo de ‘Tamaño’ y la Formación de Aumentativos y Diminutivos en Español.” RESLA. Volumen monográfico titulado Estudios Cognoscitivos del Español 355–374.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. 2008. “The Case of Spanish Diminutives and Reflexive Constructions.” In Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar, edited by S. De Knop and T. De Rycher, 121–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. 2010. “Metonymy and Cognitive Operations.” In What Is Metonymy? An Attempt at Building a Consensus View on the Delimitation of the Notion of Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, 103–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., and A. Galera Masegosa. 2014. Cognitive Modeling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., and F. Santibáñez. 2003. “Content and Formal Cognitive Operations in Construing Meaning.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 15 (2): 293–320.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz Vega, A. V., and J. Azón Ramos. 2007. “Influencia de las Marcas de Vinos sobre la Calidad Percibida por Profesionales y Consumidores.” XIX AEDEM 2: 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Santibáñez, F. 1999. “Conceptual Interaction and Spanish Diminutives.” Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica 25: 173–190. doi: 10.18172/cif.2247
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, E. 1927. “Language as a Form of Human Behavior.” The English Journal 16: 413–433. doi: 10.2307/803262
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, E. 1929. “A Study in Phonetic Symbolism.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 12: 225–239. doi: 10.1037/h0070931
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, K. P. 2004. Diminutives in English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Shrum, L. J., and T. M. Lowrey. 2007. “Sounds Convey Meaning: The Implications of Phonetic Symbolism for Brand Name Construction.” In Psycholinguistic Phenomena in Marketing Communications, edited by T. M. Lowrey, 73–58. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sifianou, M. 1992. “The Use of Diminutives in Expressing Politeness: Modern Greek Versus English.” Journal of Pragmatics 17 (2): 155–173. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(92)90038-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares da Silva, A. 2008. “Size and (Inter)subjectivation. The Case of Portuguese Diminutive and Augmentative.” NRG 4. New Reflections on Grammaticalization 4. University of Leuven, July 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez-Toste, E. 2007. “Metaphor Inside the Wine Cellar: On the Ubiquity of Personification Schemas in Winespeak.” Metaphorik.de 12: 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Vanden Bergh, B. G., J. Collins, M. Schultz, and K. Adler. 1984. “Sound Advice on Brand Names.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 61 (4): 835–840. doi: 10.1177/107769908406100415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanden Bergh, B. G., K. Adler, and L. Oliver. 1987. “Linguistic Distinction among Top Brand Names.” Journal of Advertising Research 27 (5): 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Vrontis, D., and I. Papasolomou.  2007. “Brand and Product Building: The Case of the Cyprus Wine Industry.” Journal of Product and Brand Management 16 (3): 159–167. doi: 10.1108/10610420710751537
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, E. A., and G. Menon. 2004. “A Sound Idea: Phonetic Effects of Brand Names on Consumer Judgments.” Journal of Consumer Research 31: 43–51. doi: 10.1086/383422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, J. L. 2010. “Strategies for Distinctive Brands.” Journal of Brand Management 17 (8): 548–560. doi: 10.1057/bm.2010.12
   Google Scholar
• Zaltman, G., and L. H. Zaltman. 2008. Marketing Metaphoria: What Seven Deep Metaphors Reveal about the Minds of Consumers. Boston: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Zinkhan, G. M., and C. R. Martin. 1987. “New Brand Names and Inferential Beliefs: Some Insights on Naming New Products.” Journal of Business Research 15: 157–172. doi: 10.1016/0148-2963(84)90046-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar