Cyber asset in judicial discourses: a socio-semiotic interpretation

References

• Banks, William. 2017. “State Responsibility and Attribution of Cyber Intrusions After Tallinn 2.0.” Texas Law Review 95: 1487–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barfield, Woodrow. 2015. “Intellectual Property Rights in Virtual Environments: Considering the Rights of Owners, Programmers and Virtual Avatars.” Akron Law Review 39 (3): 649–700.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, John Perry. 1996. “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.” Accessed February 23, 2018. http://pages.uoregon.edu/koopman/courses_readings/phil123-net/intro/barlow_declaration.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. 1986. Elements of Semiology. 11th ed. Translated by Annettes Lavers and Colin Smith. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Bartle, Richard A. 2004. Pitfalls of Virtual Property, 1–23. The Themis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Benta, Natalie M. 2017. “Property Interests in Digital Assets: The Rise of Digital Feudalism.” Cardozo Law Review 38: 1099–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Blazer, Charles. 2006. “The Five Indicia of Virtual Property.” Pierce Law Review 5 (1): 137–161.
   Google Scholar
• Bomse, Amy Lynne. 2001. “The Dependence of Cyberspace.” Duke Law Journal 50 (6): 1717–1749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonar-Bridges, James. 2016. “Regulating Virtual Property with EULAS.” Wisconsin Law Review 79: 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, Hugo. 1995. “Why are Newspaper Law Reports So Hard to Understand?” English for Specific Purposes 14: 201–222.
   Google Scholar
• Brecher, Aaron P. 2012. “Cyberattacks and the Covert Action Statute: Toward a Domestic Legal Framework for Offensive Cyberoperations.” Michigan Law Review 111 (3): 423–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brier, Søren. 2008. Cybersemiotics: Why Information Is Not Enough!. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camerini, Luca, Nicola Diviani, and Stefano Tardini. 2010. “Health Virtual Communities: Is the Self Lost in the Net?” Social Semiotics 20 (1): 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Charnock, Ross. 2009. “Overruling as a Speech Act: Performativity and Normative Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (3): 401–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Xing Liang. 2017. “The Criminal Nature of Virtual Property and its Protection.” China Legal Science 2: 146–172.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le. 2010. “Discourse and Judicial Thinking: A Corpus-based Study of Court Judgments in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China.” PhD diss., City University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Winnie, and Le Cheng. 2014. “Epistemic Modality in Court Judgments: A Corpus-driven Comparison of Civil Cases in Hong Kong and Scotland.” English for Specific Purposes 33 (1): 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and King Kui Sin. 2007. “Contrastive Analysis of Chinese and American Court Judgments.” In Language and the Law: International Outlooks, edited by Krzysztof Kredens and Stanislaw Gozdz-Roszkowski, 325–356. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Chesney, Thomas, Swee-Hoon Chuah, Robert Hoffmann, Wendy Hui, and Jeremy Larner. 2014. “A Study of Gamer Experience and Virtual World Behaviour.” Interacting with Computers 26 (1): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, Matthew M. 2011. “Virtual Property in China: The Emergence of Gamer Rights Awareness and the Reaction of Game Corporations.” New Media & Society 13 (5): 722–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, Shiao-Yun. 2009. “Interformative Meaning of Signs: Brand Naming and Globalization in China.” Social Semiotics 19 (3): 329–344.
   Google Scholar
• Cifrino, Christopher J. 2014. “Virtual Property, Virtual Rights: Why Contract Law, Not Property Law, Must be the Governing Paradigm in the Law of Virtual Worlds.” Boston College Law Review 55: 235–264.
   Google Scholar
• Cobley, Paul. 2010. “Cybersemiotics and Human Modelling.” Entropy 12 (9): 2045–2066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cover, Rob. 2004. “New Media Theory: Electronic Games, Democracy and Reconfiguring the Author–Audience Relationship.” Social Semiotics 14 (2): 173–191.
   Google Scholar
• Dyehouse, Jeremiah. 2009. “The Cyberspace: Technology Development for Communicative Abundance.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 39 (3): 281–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eades, Diana. 2000. “I Don’t Think It’s An Answer to the Question: Silencing Aboriginal Witnesses in Court.” Language in Society 29 (2): 161–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1976. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairfield, J. 2005. “Virtual Property.” Boston University Law Review 85 (4): 1047–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finegan, Edward. 2010. “Legal Writing: Attitude and Emphasis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard and Alisson Johnson, 65–77. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1994. Power. Translated by Robert Hurley, Colin Gordon, Graham Burchell, Peter Miller, Helen Lane, Mark Seem, Luther H. Martin, et al. and edited by James D. Faubion. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriels, Katleen, Karolien Poels, and Johan Braeckman. 2014. “Morality and Involvement in Social Virtual Worlds: The Intensity of Moral Emotions in Response to Virtual Versus Real Life Cheating.” New Media & Society 16 (3): 451–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, David, Danielle Keats Citron, and Liz Clark Rinehart. 2013. “Fighting Cyber-crime After ‘United States v. Jones’.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 103 (3): 745–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. [1978] 2001. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press & Edward Arnold (Publishers) Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, Oona A., Rebecca Crootof, Phillip Levitz, Nix Haley, Aileen Elizabeth Nowlan, William Perdue, and Julia Spiegel. 2012. “The Law of Cyber-attack.” California Law Review 100 (4): 817–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, Pamela. 2007. “Judges’ Use of Humor as a Social Corrective.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (1): 50–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, Pamela. 2011. “Defining the Law: (Mis)using the Dictionary to Decide Cases.” Discourse Studies 13 (3): 327–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Eric Talbot, and Sean Watts. 2017. “A Cyber Duty of Due Diligence: Gentle Civilizer or Crude Destabilizer?” Texas Law Review 95: 1555–1577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, David R., and David Post. 1996. “Law and Borders: The Rise of Law in Cyberspace.” Stanford Law Review 48 (5): 1367–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Yoonhyuk, and Hyunmee Kang. 2010. “User Goals in Social Virtual Worlds: A Means-end Chain Approach.” Computers in Human Behavior 26: 218–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 1993. “Against Arbitrariness: The Social Production of the Sign as a Foundational Issue in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 169–191.
   Google Scholar
• Kull, Kalevi. 2010. “Umwelt and Modelling.” In The Routledge Companion to Semiotics, edited by Paul Cobley, 43–56. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzon, Dennis. 2001. “The Politeness of Judges: American and English Judicial Behaviour.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (1): 61–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastowka, F. Gregory. 2010. Virtual Justice: The New Laws of Online Worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lastowka, F. Gregory, and Dan Hunter. 2004. “Virtual Crimes.” New York Law School Law Review 49: 293–316.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, Leandra. 2009. “Ebay’s Second Life: When Should Virtual Earnings Bear Real Taxes?” Yale Law Journal 118: 136–141.
   Google Scholar
• Leone, Massimo. 2011. “The Semiotics of Religious Space in Second Life®.” Social Semiotics 21 (3): 337–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessig, Lawrence. 1996. “The Zones of Cyberspace.” Stanford Law Review 48 (5): 1403–1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessig, Lawrence. 2006. Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Yan. 2013. “On Legislating the Succession of ‘Virtual Property’.” Law Science 4: 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Qi Guang. 2017. “On Recognizing the Criminal Liability of Stealing Virtual Property from the View of Criminal-civil Interaction.” Wuhan University Journal (Social Science) 70 (2): 85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Jian, Le Cheng, and Winnie Cheng. 2016. “Deontic Meaning Making in Legislative Discourse.” Semiotica 209: 323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Yee Fen. 2010. “Virtual World, Virtual Land but Real Property.” Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 2010: 304–327.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Xu Xia. 2009. “On the Nature of Virtual-property Right.” China Legal Science 10: 88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Ming Xiang. 2016. “Exploring the Nature of Stealing Virtual Property.” Law Science 1: 151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Yi De. 2013. “Analyzing Issues Concerning the Succession of ‘Virtual Property’.” ZUEL Law Journal 5: 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Maley, Yon. 1985. “Judicial Discourse: The Case of the Legal Judgment.” Beiträge Zur Phonetik Und Linguistik 48: 159–173.
   Google Scholar
• Maley, Yon. 1995. “From Adjudication to Mediation: Third Party Discourse in Conflict Resolution.” Journal of Pragmatics 23 (1): 93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, Kobus. 2017. “‘What Does Development Stand For?’ A Socio-semiotic Conceptualisation.” Social Semiotics, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2017.1392129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, Tim. 2011. Cyber Norm Emergence at the United Nations: An Analysis of the Activities at the UN Regarding Cyber-security. Explorations in Cyber International Relations Discussion Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, Xia Ying, and Ke Xu. 2013. “Theories of Succeeding Virtual Property and the Issues Concerning its Legislation.” The Jurist 1 (6): 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, Katrin Nyman. 2018. “A Legal View on Outer Space and Cyberspace: Similarities and Differences.” Tallinn Paper (10): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Latorre, Óliver, Mercè Oliva, and Reinald Besalú. 2017. “Videogame Analysis: A Social-semiotic Approach.” Social Semiotics 27 (5): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randviir, Anti, and Paul Cobley. 2010. “Sociosemiotics.” In The Routledge Companion to Semiotics, edited by Paul Cobley, 118–134. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reud, Mikk. 2016. “China and Cyber: Attitudes, Strategies, Organization.” Tallinn Paper: 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rumbles, Wayne. 2011. “Theft in the Digital: Can You Steal Virtual Property?” Canterbury Law Review 17 (2): 354–374.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Chen. 2016. “The Change of the Route in the Construction of Virtual Property Rule: From the Perspective of Paradigm Transformation.” The Jurist 2016 (1): 84–94.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, Donhee. 2018. “Empathy and Embodied Experience in Virtual Environment: To What Extent Can Virtual Reality Stimulate Empathy and Embodied Experience?” Computers in Human Behavior 78: 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoup, Phillip. 2008. “The Development and Failure of Social Norms in Second Life.” Duke Law Journal 58 (2): 311–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, Hui-fang. 2003. “A Study of Penal Provisions for Obtaining Unauthorized Electronic Records.” NCCU Law Journal 13: 97–196.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Westbrook, Theoredore J. 2006. “Owned: Finding a Place for Virtual World Property Rights.” Michigan State Law Review 779: 779–812.
   Google Scholar
• Wilken, Rowan. 2013. “An Exploratory Comparative Analysis of the Use of Metaphors in Writing on the Internet and Mobile Phones.” Social Semiotics 23 (5): 632–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Zhang. 2016. “The Consideration About Online Virtual Assets Theft not Constituting Larceny in the Angle of Criminal and Civil Law.” Legal Forum 3 (164): 152–160.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Christopher S. 2012. “Beyond Coase: Emerging Technologies and Property Theory.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160 (7): 2189–2225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Ming Kai. 2015. “The Nature of Illegally Acquiring Virtual Property.” Law Science 3: 12–25.
   Google Scholar