References
- Bazalgette, C., and D. Buckingham. 2013. “Literacy, Media and Multimodality: A Critical Response.” Literacy 47 (2): 95–102. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4369.2012.00666.x.
- Berney, S., and M. Bétrancourt. 2016. “Does Animation Enhance Learning? A Meta-analysis.” Computers and Education 101: 150–167. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.005.
- Djonov, E., and T. van Leeuwen. 2011. “The Semiotics of Texture: From Tactile to Visual.” Visual Communication 10 (4): 541–564. doi:10.1177/1470357211415786.
- Djonov, E., and T. van Leeuwen. 2012. “Normativity and Software: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach.” In Multimodality in Practice – Investigating Theory-in-Practice-through-Methodology, 119–138. London: Routledge.
- Djonov, E., and T. van Leeuwen. 2017. “The Power of Semiotic Software: A Critical Multimodal Perspective.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by J. Flowerdew and J. E. Richardson, 566–581. Milton Park: Routledge.
- Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K., and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Hodder Arnold.
- He, X. 2017. “Transitivity of Kinetic Typography: Theory and Application to a Case Study of a Public Service Advertisement.” Visual Communication 16 (2): 165–194. doi:10.1177/1470357216684080.
- Hjelmslev, L. 1947. “Structural Analysis of Language.” Studia Linguistica 1 (1–3): 69–78.
- Höffler, T. N., and D. Leutner. 2007. “Instructional Animation Versus Static Pictures: A Meta-analysis.” Learning and Instruction 17 (6): 722–738.
- Hood, S. 2011. “Body Language in Face-to-face Teaching: A Focus on Textual and Interpersonal Metafunctions.” In Semiotic Margins: Meaning in Multimodalities, edited by Shoshana Dreyfus, Susan Hood, and Maree Stenglin, 31–52. London: Continuum.
- Hood, S., and P. Maggiora. 2016. “The Lecturer at Work: Language, the Body and Space in the Structuring of Disciplinary Knowledge in Law.” In Language at Work, 108–128. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Jewitt, C. 2006. Technology, Literacy and Learning–A Multimodal Approach. London: Routledge.
- Khoo, K. Y. 2016. “Enacting Viewing Skills With Apps to Promote Collaborative Mathematics Learning.” Educational Technology and Society 19 (2): 378–390.
- Koning, B., and H. K. Tabbers. 2011. “Facilitating Understanding of Movements in Dynamic Visualizations.” Educational Psychology Review 23 (4): 501–521.
- Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
- Kvåle, G. 2016. “Software as Ideology: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of Microsoft Word and SmartArt.” Journal of Language and Politics 15 (3): 259–273.
- Leão, G. 2012a. “Movement in Film Titles: An Analytical Approach.” Unpublished PhD, University of Technology, Sydney.
- Leão, G. 2012b. “A Systemic Functional Approach to the Analysis of Animation in Film Opening Titles.” University of Technology, Sydney.
- Lowe, R. K. 2003. “Animation and Learning: Selective Processing of Information in Dynamic Graphics.” Learning and Instruction 13 (2): 157–176. doi:10.1016/S0959-47520200018-X.
- Lowe, R. 2004. “Interrogation of a Dynamic Visualization During Learning.” Learning and Instruction 14 (3): 257–274.
- Martin, J. R., P. Wang, and Y. Zhu. 2013. Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step Into the Theory – Axial Relations.pdf. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
- Martin, J. R., and M. Zappavigna. 2018. “Embodied Meaning: A Systemic Functional Perspective on Paralanguage.” Contemporary Rhetoric 1: 2–33.
- Martinec, R. 2002. “Rhythmic Hierarchy in Monologue and Dialogue.” Functions of Language 9 (1): 39–59.
- Martinez, O. O. L. 2015. “Criteria for Defining Animation: A Revision of the Definition of Animation in the Advent of Digital Moving Images.” Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 10 (1): 42–57.
- Münzer, S. 2012. “Facilitating Spatial Perspective Taking Through Animation: Evidence from an Aptitude-Treatment-Interaction.” Learning and Individual Differences 22 (4): 505–510.
- Painter, C., J. R. Martin, and L. Unsworth. 2012. Reading Visual Narratives. London: Equinox.
- Ploetzner, R., and R. Lowe. 2012. “A Systematic Characterisation of Expository Animations.” Computers in Human Behavior 28 (3): 781–794.
- Poulsen, S. V., G. Kvåle, and T. van Leeuwen. 2018. “Special Issue: Social Media as Semiotic Technology.” Social Semiotics 28 (5): 593–600. doi:10.1080/10350330.2018.1509815.
- Ravelli, L. J. 2000. “Beyond Shopping: Constructing the Sydney Olympics in Three-dimensional Text.” Text 20 (4): 489–515.
- Stenglin, M. (2004). “Packaging Curiosities: Towards a Grammar of Three-dimensional Space.” PhD diss., University of Sydney.
- Tversky, B., J. B. Morrison, and M. Betrancourt. 2002. “Animation: Can It Facilitate?” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57 (4): 247–262. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.
- van Der Ventel, B., R. Newman, L. Botes, and A. Goldberg. 2016. “The Role of the IPad in Collaborative Learning in a Large-enrollment First-year Physics Module.” Physics Education 51 (4): 045017. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/51/4/045017.
- van Leeuwen, T. 1999. Speech, Music, Sound. Houndmills: Macmillan.
- van Leeuwen, T., and E. Djonov. 2015. “Notes Towards a Semiotics of Kinetic Typography.” Social Semiotics 25 (2): 244–253. doi:10.1080/10350330.2015.1010324.
- Zhao, S., E. Djonov, and T. van Leeuwen. 2014. “Semiotic Technology and Practice: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach to PowerPoint.” Text and Talk 34 (3): 349–375. doi:10.1515/text-2014-0005.