Exploring legal discourse: a sociosemiotic (re)construction

References

• Caballero-Anthony, Mely. 2016. “Understanding Non-traditional Security.” In An Introduction to Non-Traditional Security Studies: A Translational Approach, edited by Mely Caballero-Anthony, 3–19. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le. 2010. “A Semiotic Interpretation of Genre: Court Judgments as an Example.” Semiotica 182: 89–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and Winnie Cheng. 2012. “Legal Interpretation: Meaning as Social Construction.” Semiotica 191: 427–448.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and Winnie Cheng. 2014. “Documentary Evidence as Hegemonic Reconstruction.” Semiotica 200: 17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, Winnie Cheng, and King Kui Sin. 2014. “Revisiting Legal Terms: A Semiotic Perspective.” Semiotica 202: 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, Mingyu Gong, and Jian Li. 2017. “Conceptualizing Cultural Discrepancies in Legal Translation: A Case-based Study.” Semiotica 216: 131–149.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and Jiamin Pei. 2018. “Interpreting Cybersecurity Law: A Semiotic Perspective.” Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 48 (6): 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and King Kui Sin. 2008a. “A Court Judgment as Dialogue.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, edited by Edda Weigand, 267–281. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and King Kui Sin. 2008b. “Terminological Equivalence in Legal Translation: A Semiotic Approach.” Semiotica 172: 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, Pok, and S. Yin. 2018. Cultural Rights in International Law and Discourse: Contemporary Challenges and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Cobley, Paul, ed. 2001. The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, Drucilla. 2016. The Philosophy of the Limit. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, Malcolm, ed. [1992] 2013. Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danesi, Marcel. 2009. “Explaining Change in Language: A Cybersemiotic Perspective.” Entropy 11: 1055–1072. doi: 10.3390/e11041055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ervo, Laura. 2016. “Facing People through Language Use: Linguistic Tools to Make Proceedings Fair.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 1 (2): 277–293. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2016-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon Jr, Richard. 2015. “The Meaning of Legal Meaning and its Implications for Theories of Legal Interpretation.” The University of Chicago Law Review 82 (3): 1235–1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Walter. 1984. “Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument.” Communication Monographs 51 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1080/03637758409390180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Walter. 1987. Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Randy. 2011. Rehumanizing Law: A Theory of Law and Democracy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Alan. 2017. “The Ideology of Law: Advances and Problems in Recent Applications of the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law.” In Consciousness and Ideology, edited by Patricia Ewick, 3–29. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kittichaisaree, Kriangsak. 2017. Public International Law of Cyberspace. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Bernard. 2018. “Strategies for the Reinterpretation of Normative Texts within the Hebrew Bible.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 3 (1): 1–31. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2018-2001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mey, Jacob. 2016. “Discourse, Interests, and the Law: Some Pragma-Legal Reflections.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 2 (1): 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrilli, Susan. 2016. “Justice, Fairness and Juridical Perfectibility.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 1 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2016-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponzio, Augusto. 2016. “Justice and the Right to Non-functionality.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 1 (1): 23–48. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2016-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Jacob. 2009. “Codified Canons and the Common Law of Interpretation.” The Georgetown Law Journal 98: 341–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solan, Lawrence, and Tammy Gales. 2016. “Finding Ordinary Meaning in Law: The Judge, the Dictionary or the Corpus?” International Journal of Legal Discourse 1 (2): 253–276. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2016-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Xiao Lu, and Yanjun Tu. 2018. “The Conceptual Metaphors in law—a Case Analysis of PRC Company Law.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 3 (2): 269–285. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2018-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar