Meaning construction in legislative discourse: a sociosemiotic interpretation on supervision system reform in China

References

• Alvarez, Sonia. 2018. Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultures: Revisioning Latin American Social Movements. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, Mikhail. 2008. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. 17th ed. Edited by Michael Holquist. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, Ron, and Marcel Danesi. 2010. Persuasive Signs: The Semiotics of Advertising. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, Jeff, and Gunther Kress. 2015. Multimodality, Learning and Communication: A Social Semiotic Frame. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, Vijay Kumar. 2013. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowcher, Wendy, ed. 2012. Multimodal Texts from Around the World: Cultural and Linguistic Insights. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, Paula. 2015. “Social Representations of Sustainability: Researching Time, Institution, Conflict and Communication.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations, edited by Gordon Sammut, Eleni Andreouli, Milton Keynes, George Gaskell, and Jaan Valsiner, 29–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The Basics. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Yuefeng. 2017. “Study on the Legality of Supervision Measures.” [In Chinese]. Global Law Review 2: 93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Guangzhong, and Dan Jiang. 2017. “Eight Suggestions on ‘Supervision Law (Draft)’.” [In Chinese]. Journal of Comparative Law 6: 164–173.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le. 2010. “A Semiotic Interpretation of Genre: Court Judgments as an Example.” Semiotica 182: 89–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le. 2012. “Attribution and Judicial Control in Chinese Court Judgments: A Corpus-based Study.” International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19 (1): 27–49. doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v19i1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and Winnie Cheng. 2012. “Legal Interpretation: Meaning as Social Construction.” Semiotica 192: 427–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and Winnie Cheng. 2014. “Documentary Evidence as Hegemonic Reconstruction.” Semiotica 200: 17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and Winnie Cheng. 2016. “Defamation Case Law in Hong Kong: A Corpus-based Study.” Semiotica 208: 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, Winnie Cheng, and Jian Li. 2015. “Jury Instructions in Hong Kong: A Gricean Perspective.” International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 22 (2): 35–56. doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v22i1.15400
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, Shifeng Ni, King Kui Sin, and Winnie Cheng. 2012. “A Sociosemiotic Approach to Fundamental Rights in China.” Semiotica 190: 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and Jiamin Pei. 2018. “Interpreting Cybersecurity Law: A Semiotic Perspective.” Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 48 (6): 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and King Kui Sin. 2008. “A Court Judgment as Dialogue.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, edited by Edda Weigand, 267–281. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and King Kui Sin. 2011. “A Sociosemiotic Interpretation of Linguistic Modality in Legal Settings.” Semiotica 185: 123–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and Xin Wang. 2018. “Cyber Asset in Judicial Discourses: A Socio-semiotic Interpretation.” Social Semiotics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10350330.2018.1487110.
   Google Scholar
• Cobley, Paul, ed. 2001. The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danesi, Marcel. 2018. Understanding Media Semiotics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• De Linde, Zoé, and Neil Kay. 2016. The Semiotics of Subtitling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1983. Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Perry Meisel and Haun Saussy. Translated by Wade Baskin. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Dickovick, James, and Jonathan Eastwood. 2016. Comparative Politics: Integrating Theories, Methods, and Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, Alice. 1974. “Comprehensibility of Persuasive Arguments as a Determinant of Opinion Change.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29 (6): 758–773. doi:10.1037/h0036202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1984. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, Caryl. 1983. “The Outer Word and Inner Speech: Bakhtin, Vygotsky, and the Internalization of Language.” Critical Inquiry 10 (2): 245–264. doi: 10.1086/448245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 1992. “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 3 (2): 193–217. doi:10.1177/0957926592003002004.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael. 1978. Language as Social Semiotics: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Dayuan. 2017. “On Some Constitutional Issues in the Reform of the State Supervision System.” [In Chinese]. Law Review 203 (3): 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Holquist, Michael. 2002. Dialogism: Bakhtin and his World. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, Fredric. 2013. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Ming’an. 2017. “Discussion of Legislation of State Supervision Law.” [In Chinese]. Law Science Magazine 3: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 1993. “Against Arbitrariness: The Social Production of the Sign as a Foundational Issue in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 169–191. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002003.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 2001. “Sociolinguistics and Social Semiotics.” In The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics, edited by Paul Cobley, 66–82. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 2009. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Le Cornu, Alison. 2009. “Meaning, Internalization, and Externalization: Toward a Fuller Understanding of the Process of Reflection and its Role in the Construction of the Self.” Adult Education Quarterly 59 (4): 279–297. doi: 10.1177/0741713609331478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, Jay. 2005. Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Jian, and Yuxiu Sun. 2018. Presuppositions as Discourse Strategies in Court Examinations.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 3 (2): 197–212. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2018-2008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liszka, James. 1990. “Peirce’s Interpretant.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26 (1): 17–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Yanhong. 2016. “The Strategic Transformation and Systematic Construction of Anti-corruption Legislation in China.” [In Chinese]. China Legal Science 2: 218–244.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Yunan. 2018. “From ‘Two Regulation’ to ‘Lien’: A Significant Step Forward Towards the Society Ruled by Law.” [In Chinese]. Advances in Social Sciences 7 (3): 327–331. doi: 10.12677/ASS.2018.73053
   Google Scholar
• Lötscher, Andreas. 2016. “Conceptual and Textual Structure in Legislative Texts.” In Obscurity and Clarity in the Law: Prospects and Challenges, edited by Sophie Cacciaguidi-Fahy, 129–150. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lv, Yongxiaong, and Lifeng Wang. 2018. “The Practical Problems and Their Solution Paths of the Joint Office of the Discipline Inspection Commission and the Supervision Committee: From the Perspective of the Political System Theory.” [In Chinese]. Journal of Central South University (Social Science Edition) 24 (3): 15–122.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Huaide. 2017. “Legislative Intentions and Focuses of the National Supervision Law.” [In Chinese]. Global Law Review 2: 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Huaide. 2018. “Further Discussion on the Main Issues in the Legislation of National Supervision.” [In Chinese]. Administrative Law Review 1: 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, David, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2016. “Multimodality, Politics and Ideology.” Journal of Language and Politics 15 (3): 243–258. doi: 10.1075/jlp.15.3.01mac
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Sigrid. 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pei, Jiamin, and Jian Li. 2018. “A Corpus-based Investigation of Modal Verbs in Chinese Civil-commercial Legislation and its English Versions.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 3 (1): 77–102. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2018-2003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles. 1931–1935. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, Alastair. 2017. Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petrilli, Susan. 2016. “Justice, Fairness and Juridical Perfectibility.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 1 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2016-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrilli, Susan, and Augusto Ponzio. 2005. Semiotics Unbounded: Interpretive Routes Through the Open Network of Signs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzio, Augusto. 1993. Signs, Dialogue, and Ideology. Translated by Susan Petrilli. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzio, Augusto. 2016. “Justice and the Right to Non-functionality.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 1 (1): 23–48. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2016-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, Qianhong. 2017. “On the Logic and Method for the Reform of the Supervision System.” [In Chinese]. Global Law Review 2: 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Randviir, Anti, and Paul Cobley. 2010. “Sociosemiotics.” In The Routledge Companion to Semiotics, edited by Paul Cobley, 118–134. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riggins, Stephen, ed. [1994] 2012. The Socialness of Things: Essays on the Socio-semiotics of Objects. Reprint. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Jacob. 2009. “Codified Canons and the Common Law of Interpretation.” The Georgetown Law Journal 98: 341–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shively, Phillips. 2012. The Craft of Political Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanou, Constantin, and Helen Xanthaki, eds. 2016. Drafting Legislation: A Modern Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Yuxiu, and Le Cheng. 2017. “Linguistic Variation and Legal Representation in Legislative Discourse: A Corpus-based Multi-dimensional Study.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 2 (2): 397–421. doi: 10.1515/ijld-2017-0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Boston: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lier, Leo. 2006. The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. New York: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Matthew. 2018. How Language Works in Politics: The Impact of Vague Legislation on Policy. Bristal: Bristal University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer, eds. 2009. Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Fuhui. 2018. “On the Restriction of Procuratorial Organs on the Investigation of Duty Crimes by Supervisory Organs.” [In Chinese]. Law Review 209 (3): 13–21.
   Google Scholar