Moody and monstrous menstruators: the Semiotics of the menstrual meme on social media

References

• Abedinifard, M. 2016. “Ridicule, Gender Hegemony, and the Disciplinary Function of Mainstream Gender Humor.” Social Semiotics 26 (3): 234–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrup, J. 2018. “Period Poverty: Tackling the Taboo.” Community Practitioner 90 (23): 40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bing, J. 2004. “Is Feminist Humour an Oxymoron?” Women and Language 27 (1): 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Boateng, S. 2020. Interview by Maria Tomlinson.
   Google Scholar
• Bobel, C., and B. Fahs. 2020. “The Messy Politics of Menstrual Activism.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies, edited by C. Bobel, I. Winkler, B. Fahs, K.A. Hasson, E.A. Kissling and T.A. Roberts, 1001–1018. Singapore: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bouvier, G. 2019. “How Journalists Source Trending Social Media Feeds.” Journalism Studies 20 (2): 212–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisler, J. 2013. “Teaching Taboo Topics: Menstruation, Menopause and the Psychology of Women.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 35: 202–214.
   Google Scholar
• De Cook, J. 2018. “Memes and Symbolic Violence: #Proudboys and the use of Memes for Propaganda and the Construction of Collective Identity.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (4): 485–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubriwny, N. 2005. “Consciousness-Raising as Collective Rhetoric: The Articulation of Experience in the Redstockings’ Abortion Speak-Out of 1969.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 91 (4): 395–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erchull, J. 2013. “Distancing Through Objectification? Depictions of Women’s Bodies in Menstrual Product Advertisements.” Sex Roles 68: 32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahs, B. 2016. Out for Blood: Essays on Menstruation and Resistance. New York: University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2016. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 80–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M., and M. Vasconcelos. 2019. “(De)Memetizing Antifeminist Ideology.” Bakhtiniana 14 (2): 46–64.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1975. Surveiller et Punir: Naissance de la Prison. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., and T. A. Roberts. 1997. “Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women’s Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 21: 173–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, N., L. Shifman, and Z. Kampf 2016. “It Gets Better: Internet Memes and the Construction of Collective Identity.” New Media & Society 18 (8): 1698–1714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, A. 2020. “Menstrual Taboos: Moving Beyond the Curse.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies, edited by C. Bobel, I. Winkler, B. Fahs, K.A. Hasson, E.A. Kissling and T.A. Roberts, 143–162. Singapore: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, E. 2020a. Interview with Maria Tomlinson.
   Google Scholar
• Grundlingh, L. 2018. “Memes as Speech Acts.” Social Semiotics 28 (2): 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highfield, T., and T. Leaver. 2016. “Instagrammatics and Digital Methods: Studying Visual Social Media, from Selfies and GIFs to Memes and Emoji.” Communication Research and Practice 2 (1): 47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. 2000. “Politeness, Power and Provocation.” Discourse Studies 2 (2): 159–185.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2018. “Challenging Menstrual Norms in Online Medical Advice: Deconstructing Stigma Through Entangled Art Practice.” Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 2 (2): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Irise International. 2020. “The Empower Period Podcast.” Episode 3. “Leading the Change: Menstrual Advocacy in Zimbabwe”. https://feeds.buzzsprout.com/1160294.rss.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. 2020. Interview by Maria Tomlinson.
   Google Scholar
• King, S. 2020a. Interview with Maria Tomlinson.
   Google Scholar
• King, S. 2020b. “Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) and the Myth of the Irrational Female.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies, edited by C. Bobel, I. Winkler, B. Fahs, K.A. Hasson, E.A. Kissling and T.A. Roberts, 287–302. Singapore: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kligler-Vilenchik, N., and K. Thorson. 2016. “Good Citizenship as a Frame Contest: Kony2012, Memes, and Critiques of the Networked Citizen.” New Media & Society 18 (9): 1993–2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. 1980. Les Pouvoirs de L’Horreur. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Leclerc, A. 1974. Parole de Femme. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., and D. Machin. 2018. Doing Visual Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Luzon, M. 2019. “Ru said my ORIGINAL Curves and Swerves Runway Look was in ‘bad taste’.” Accessed May 2019. https://www.instagram.com/p/BsUaPvenYcj/.
   Google Scholar
• Manica, D. 2017. “(In)Visible Blood: Menstrual Performances and Body Art.” Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology 14: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. 2020. “Menstrual Shame: Exploring the Role of ‘Menstrual Moaning’.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies, edited by C. Bobel, I. Winkler, B. Fahs, K.A. Hasson, E.A. Kissling and T.A. Roberts, 409–422. Singapore: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A. 2019. “Laughing at Injustice: #DistractinglySexy and #StayMadAbby as Counternarratives.” In Digital Dilemmas: Transforming Gender Identities and Power Relations in Everyday Life, edited by Diana Parry, 23–52. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Przybylo, E. and B. Fahs. 2020. “Empowered Bleeders and Cranky Menstruators: Menstrual Positivity and the “Liberated” Era of New Menstrual Product Advertisements.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies, edited by C. Bobel, I. Winkler, B. Fahs, K.A. Hasson, E.A. Kissling and T.A. Roberts, 375–394. Singapore: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Rosewarne, L. 2012. Periods in Popular Culture: Menstruation in Film and Television. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rydström, K. 2020. “Degendering Menstruation. Making Trans Menstruators Matter.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies, edited by C. Bobel, I. Winkler, B. Fahs, K.A. Hasson, E.A. Kissling and T.A. Roberts, 945–959. Singapore: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ussher, J. 2006. Managing the Monstrous Feminine: Regulating the Reproductive Body. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. 2009. ““Users Like you?” Theorizing Agency in User-Generated Content.” Media, Culture and Society 31 (41): 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, D. 2018. “You All Made Dank Memes: Using Internet Memes to Promote Critical Thinking.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (2): 240–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, B. 2019. The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics and Intertextuality. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. 2020. “In Visible Bleeding: The Menstrual Concealment Imperative.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies, edited by C. Bobel, I. Winkler, B. Fahs, K.A. Hasson, E.A. Kissling and T.A. Roberts, 316–336. Singapore: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. 2005. On Female Body Experience: “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar