Inside Facebook’s semiosphere. How social media influence digital hate and fuel cyber-polarization

References

• Alexandrov, Vladimir E. 2000. “Biology, Semiosis, and Cultural Difference in Lotman’s Semiosphere.” Comparative Literature 52 (4): 339–362. doi:10.1215/-52-4-339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, Gordon. 1947. The Psychology of Rumor: How a Rumor Starts, Travels & Can be Recognized. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Baetens, Jan. 2007. “Digitising Cultural Heritage. The Role of Interpretation in Cultural Preservation.” Image and Narrative. Online Magazine of the Visual Narrative, http://www.imageandnarrative.be/inarchive/digital_archive/baetens_vanlooy.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., S. Messing, and L. A. Adamic. 2015. “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348 (6239): 1130–1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankov, Kristian. 2022. The Digital Mind. Semiotic Explorations in Digital Culture. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 2007. Liquid Times. Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Tyler James. 2021a. “Detotalization and Retroactivity: Black Pyramid Semiotics.” PhD Diss., University of Tartu Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Tyler James. 2021b. “Second-Generation Semiology and Detotalization.” Linguistic Frontiers 4 (2): 44–53. doi:10.2478/lf-2021-0010.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Jonah, and Katherine Milkman. 2012. “What Makes Online Content Viral?” Journal of Marketing Research XLIX: 192–205. doi:10.1509/jmr.10.035.
   Google Scholar
• Bessi, A., F. Zollo, M. Del Vicario, M. Puliga, A. Scala, G. Caldarelli, et al. 2016. “Users Polarization on Facebook and Youtube.” PLoS ONE 11 (8): e0159641. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, Susan. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaim, Artur. 1992. “The Twain Shall Meet? Some Observations on Soviet Cultural Semiotics and Empirical Study of Literature and the Media.” Poetics 21 (1–2): 33–44. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(92)90020-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouissac, Paul. 1993. “Why do Memes die?” In Semiotics 1992, edited by J. Deely, 183–191. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Bouissac, Paul. 2001. “On Signs, Memes and MEMS: Toward Evolutionary Ecosemiotics.” Sign Systems Studies 29 (2): 624–646. doi:10.12697/SSS.2001.29.2.12.
   Google Scholar
• Bouissac, Paul. 2007. “How to Catch a Meme.” Semioticon.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., S. Golder, and G. Lotan. “Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter.” 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10, doi:10.1109/HICSS.2010.412.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, Richard. 1996. Viruses of the Mind. The New Science of the Meme. Seattle: Integral Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, Luis E. 2015. “Sustainability, Cognitive Technologies and the Digital Semiospere.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (1): 103–117. doi:10.1177/13678779145281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, Axel. 2019. Are Filter Bubbles Real? Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Buckner, H. Taylor. 1965. “A Theory of Rumor Transmission.” Public Opinion Quarterly 29 (1): 54–70. doi:10.1086/267297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, D. O., D. Greene, M. Conway, and J. Carthy. 2013. “The Extreme Right Filter Bubble.” arXiv:1308.6149v1, arXiv:1308.
   Google Scholar
• Cannizzaro, Sara. 2016. “Internet Memes as Internet Signs: A Semiotic View of Digital Culture.” Sign Systems Studies 44 (4): 562–586. doi:10.12697/SSS.2016.44.4.05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore, Pete. 2009. “You Tube: Why Do We Watch?” https://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/12/17/cashmore.youtube/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalli, Giulio. 2021. “L’ algoritomo dell’odio.” Left. October, 26 2021. https://left.it/2021/10/26/lalgoritmo-dellodio/.
   Google Scholar
• Chesterman, Andrew. 1997. Memes of Translation: The Spread of Ideas in Translation Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Wilma Anne. 2010. Lotman’s Semiosphere: A Systems Thinking Approach to Students’ Meaning-Making Practices with Digital Texts.” PhD Diss., University of London. (Unpublished Manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Conover, M., J. Ratkiewicz, M. Francisco, B. Gonçalves, A. Flammini, and F. Menezer. 2011. “Political Polarization on Twitter.” Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media Political 133 (26): 89–96. doi:10.1021/ja202932e.
   Google Scholar
• Crockett, M. J. 2017. “Moral Outrage in the Digital age.” Nature Human Behaviour 1: 769–771. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, Richard. 1994. “Viruses of the Mind.” In Dennett and his Critics. Demystifying Mind (Philosophers and Their Critics), edited by Bo Dahlbom, 13–27. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Degh, Linda, and Andrew Vazsyony. 1981. “La parola ‘cane’ morde? Dall’azione alla leggenda, dalla leggenda all’azione.” In Festa: Antropologia e Semiotica, edited by C. Bianco and M. Del Ninno, 58–71. Florence: Nuova Guaraldi Editrice.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca Picione, Raffaele. 2022. Lexia.Journal of Semiotics. Special Issue: Rethinking Juri Lotman in the Twenty-First Century 39-40: 279–301.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, Mattias. 2022. The Psychology of Totalitarianism. London: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DeVito, Michael. 2016. “From Editors to Algorithms. A Values-Based Approach to Understanding Story Selection in the Facebook News Feed.” Digital Journalism 5 (6): 1–21. doi:10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dredge, Stuart. 2014. “How Does Facebook Decide What to Show in My News Feed?” The Guardian, June, 30, 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/30/facebook-news-feed-filters-emotion-study.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1988. “An Ars Oblivionalis? Forget It!” PMLA 103 (3): 254–261. doi:10.2307/462374.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbri, Paolo. 1998. “La voce è matta.” Versus. Quaderni di studi semiotici 79: 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Fomin, Ivan. 2019. “Memes, Genes, and Signs: Semiotics in the Conceptual Interface of Evolutionary Biology and Memetics.” Semiotica 230: 327–340. doi:10.1515/sem-2018-0016.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Winifred. 2009. Rapt: Attention and the Focused Life. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gramigna, Remo. 2013. “Between Cultural Studies and Semiotics of Culture: The Case of Culture Jamming.” Lexia 13: 57–95. doi:10.4399/97888548605994.
   Google Scholar
• Griffero, Tonino, ed. 2000. “Contagio. Special Issue.” Rivista di Estetica 15 (2/2000), anno XL.
   Google Scholar
• Hagey, Keach, and Jeff Horwitz. 2021. “Facebook Tried to Make Its Platform a Healthier Place. It Got Angrier Instead. Internal Memos Show How a Big 2018 Change Rewarded Outrage and that CEO Mark Zuckerberg Resisted Proposed Fixes.” The Wall Street Journal. The Facebook Files, September 15, 2021. https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-algorithm-change-zuckerberg-11631654215?mod=article_inline.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, Jonathan, and Tobias Rose-Stockwell. 2019. “The Dark Psychology of Social Networks. Why It Feels Like Everything is Going Haywire.” The Atlantic, December 15, 2019. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/12/social-media-democracy/600763/.
   Google Scholar
• Harari, Yuval Noah. 2018. 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Michael. 2017. Solitude: In Pursuit of Singular Life in a Crowded World. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, John, Indrek Ibrus, and Maarja Ojamaa. 2021. On the Digital Semiosphere. Culture, Media and Science for the Anthropocene. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Ianneo, Francesco. 1999. Memetica. Genetica e virologia di idee, credenze e mode. Roma: Castelfranchi.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrus, Indrek. 2015. “Digital Control: Power in Media Evolution.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (1): 43–59. doi:10.1177/1367877914528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrus, Indrek and Ojamaa Maarja. 2022. “Lotman and Media Studies.” In The Companion to Juri Lotman: A Semiotic Theory of Culture, edited by Marek Tamm and Peeter Torop. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrus, Indrek, and Peeter Torop, eds. 2015a. “The Uses of Juri Lotman, Special Issue.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (1): 3–151. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrus, Indrek, and Peeter Torop. 2015b. “Remembering and Reinventing Juri Lotman for the Digital age, Special Issue.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (1): 3–9. doi:10.1177/136787791452811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpinen, Erkki. 2008. “Memes Versus Signs. On the use of Meaning Concepts about Nature and Culture.” Semiotica 171: 215–237. doi:10.1515/SEMI.2008.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochen, Manfred. 1989. The Small World. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kotov, Kaie. 2002. “Semiosphere: A Chemistry of Being.” Sign Systems Studies 30 (1): 41–55. doi:10.12697/SSS.2002.30.1.04.
   Google Scholar
• Kull, Kalevi. 2000. “Copy Versus Translate, Meme Versus Sign: Development of Biological Textuality.” European Journal for Semiotic Studies 12 (1): 101–120.
   Google Scholar
• Levchenko, J. 1999. Conceptual Dictionary of the Tart-Moscow Semiotic School. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorusso, Anna Maria. 2015. Cultural Semiotics. For a Cultural Perspective in Semiotics. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Iurii. (1970) 2000. “Stat’i po tipologii kul’tury.” In Semiosfera, edited by Iurii Lotman, 391–459. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo–SPB.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Jurij. 1975. “Introduzione.” In Tipologia della cultura (a cura di R. Faccani e M. Marzaduri), edited by J. Lotman and B. Uspenskij, 25–35. Milano: Bompiani.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Jurij. 1979a. “Proposte per il programma della ‘IV Scuola estiva sui sistemi modellizzanti secondari’.” In Carlo Prevignano (a cura di), La semiotica nei paesi slavi. Programmi, problemi, analisi, 191–193. Milano: Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Yu. M. 1979b. “Culture as Collective Intellect and the Problems of Artificial Intelligence (Translated by Ann Shukman).” In Dramatic Structure: Poetic and Cognitive Semantics (Russian Poetics in Translation 6), edited by Lawrence Michael O’Toole and Ann Shukman, 84–96. Colchester: University of Essex.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Jurij. 1980. “La cultura come intelletto collettivo e i problemi dell'intelligenza artificiale.” In Testo e contesto. Semiotica dell'arte e della cultura, edited by Simonetta Salvestroni, 29–44. Roma: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Jurij. 1982. “Il cervello, il testo, la cultura, l’intelletto artificiale.” Intersezioni 2 (1): 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Juri. (1984) 2005. “On the Semiosphere, Translated by W. Clark.” Sign Systems Studies 33 (1): 205–29. doi:10.12697/SSS.2005.33.1.09.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Yu. M. 1989. “The Semiosphere.” Soviet Psychology 27 (1): 40–61. doi:10.2753/RPO1061-0405270140.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, J. (1992) 2009. Culture and Explosion. Translated by W. Clark and edited by M. Grishakova. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Mihhail. 2001. “The Paradoxes of Semiosphere.” Sun Yat-sen Journal of Humanities 12: 97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Mihhail. 2002a. “Umwelt and Semiosphere.” Sign Systems Studies 30 (1): 33–40. doi:10.12697/SSS.2005.33.1.09.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Mihhail. 2002b. “Atomistic vs Holistic Semiotics.” Sign Systems Studies 30 (2): 513–527. doi:10.5840/signsystems200230216.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Juri. 2005. “On the Semiosphere, Translated by Wilma Clark.” Sign Systems Studies 33 (1): 215–239. doi:10.12697/SSS.2005.33.1.09.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Juri. 2019. “The Phenomenon of Culture, Translated by Brian James Baer.” In Culture, Memory, and History. Essays in Cultural Semiotics, edited by Marek Tamm, 33–48. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Jurij, and Uspenskji Boris. 1975. “Sul meccanismo semiotico della cultura.” In Tipologia della cultura, edited by Remo Faccani and Marzio Marzaduri, 39–62. Milano: Bompiani.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. M., A. M. Piatigorsky, and Ann Shukman. 1978. “Text and Function.” New Literary History 9 (2): 233. doi:10.2307/468572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotman, I. M., and B. A. Uspenskii. 2014. “Myth - Name - Culture.” Soviet Studies in Literature 11 (2-3): 17–46. doi:10.2753/RSL1061-197511020317.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman Yu, M., A. M. Piatigorsky, and Ann Shukman. 1978. “Text and Function.” New Literary History 9 (2): 233. doi:10.2307/468572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madisson, M.-L., and A. Ventsel. 2016. “Autocommunicative Meaning-Making in Online Communication of the Estonian Extreme Right.” Signs Systems Studies 44 (3): 326–354. doi:10.12697/SSS.2016.44.3.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madisson, Mari-Liis, and Andreas Ventsel. 2021. “Lotman and Social Media Studies.” In The Companion to Juri Lotman. A Semiotic Theory of Culture, edited by M. Tamm and P. Torop, 446–460. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelker, Amy. 1995. “Logosphere and Semiosphere: Bakhtin, Russian Organicism, and the Semiotics of Culture.” In Bakhtin in Contexts Across the Disciplines, edited by A. Mandelker, 177–190. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marino, Gabriele. 2015. “Semiotics of Spreadability: A Systematic Approach to Internet Memes and Virality.” Punctum 1 (1): 43-66. doi:10.18680/hss.2015.0004
   Google Scholar
• Marino, Gabriele. 2022. “Semiotics of Virality. From Contagion to Internet Memes.” Signata 13. doi:10.4000/signata.3936.
   Google Scholar
• Marino, Gabriele, and Thibault Mattia. 2016. “Virality. For an epidemiology of meaning.” In Lexia. Rivista di semiotica, edited by Marino Gabriele, 25–26. Roma: Aracne
   Google Scholar
• Markoš, Anton. 2014. “Biosphere as Semiosphere: Variations on Lotman.” Sign Systems Studies 42 (4): 487–498. doi:10.12697/SSS.2014.42.4.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrell, Floyd. 2008. “Lotman’s Semiosphere, Peirce’s Signs, and Cultural Processes.” Russian Journal of Communication 1 (4): 372–400. doi:10.1080/19409419.2008.10756726.
   Google Scholar
• Newport, Cal. 2019. Digital Minimalism. Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Nöth, Winfried. 2015. “The Topography of Yuri Lotman’s Semiosphere.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (1): 11–26. doi:10.1177/13678779145281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojamaa, Maarja, and Peeter Torop. 2015. “Transmediality and Cultural Autocommunication.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (1): 61–78. doi:10.1177/136787791452811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisier, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble. What the Internet is Hiding from you. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Patoine, Pierre-Louis, and Jonathan Hope. 2015. “The Semiosphere: Between Informational Modernity and Ecological Postmodernity.” Recherches Sémiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry 35 (1): 11–26. doi:10.7202/1050984ar.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzini, Isabella, and Franciscu Sedda. 2004. “Semiosfera.” In Dizionario degli studi culturali, edited by M. Cometa, 368–379. Meltemi: Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Piatigorsky, Alexander. 1962. “Nekotorye obščie zamečanija otnositel’no rassmotrenija teksta kak raznovidnosti signala.” Strukturno-tipologičeskie issledovanija.
   Google Scholar
• Pool, Ithiel de Sola, and Manfred Kochen. 1978. “Contacts and Influence.” Social Networks 1: 1–48. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90011-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portis-Winner, Irene. 1998. “Lotman’s Semiosphere: Some Comments.” In In the World of Signs: Essays in Honour of Professor Jerzy Pelc, edited by Jacek J. Jadacki and Witold Strawiński, 235–244. Amsterdam, Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Portis-Winner I., T. G. Winner 1976. “The Semiotics of Cultural Texts.” Semiotica 18 (2): 101–156. doi:10.1515/semi.1976.18.2.101.
   Google Scholar
• Postman, Neil, and Weingarten Charles. 1969. Teaching as a Subversive Activity. New York: Delta.
   Google Scholar
• Randviir, Anti. 2005. “Cultural Semiotics and Social Meanings.” In EFSS’2004 Culture and Text, edited by Kristian Bankov, 114–128. Sofia: New Bulgaria University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Randviir, Anti. 2007. “On Spatiality in Tartu-Moscow Cultural Semiotics: The Semiotic Subject.” Sign Systems Studies 35 (1/2): 137–159. doi:10.12697/SSS.2007.35.1-2.05.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, Anatol, and Lionel I. Rebhun. 1952. “On the Mathematical Theory of Rumor Spread.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 14: 375–383. doi:10.1007/BF02477853.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, Paolo. 1991. Il passato, la memoria, l’oblio. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Salupere, Silvi. 2005. “The Cybernetic Layer of Juri Lotman’s Metalanguage.” Recherches Sémiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry 35 (1): 63–84. doi:10.7202/1050987ar.
   Google Scholar
• Salvestroni, Simonetta. 1985. “Nuove chiavi di lettura del reale alla luce del pensiero di Lotman e dell'epistemologia contemporanea.” In La semiosfera. L'asimmetria e il dialogo nelle strutture pensanti, edited by Simonetta Salvestroni, 7–46. Venezia: Marsilio.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, Roger, and Robert P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schechner, Sam, and Jeff Horwitz. 2021. “How Many Users Does Facebook Have? The Company Struggles to Figure It Out.” The Wall Street Journal, October 21, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. L., F. Zollo, M. Del Vicario, A. Bessi, A. Scala, G. Caldarelli, H. E. Stanley, and W. Quattrociocchi. 2017. “Anatomy of News Consumption on Facebook.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (12): 3035–3039. doi:10.1073/pnas.1617052114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönle, Andreas, ed. 2006. Lotman and Cultural Studies: Encounters and Extensions. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedda, Franciscu. 2022. “La semiosfera nella specchio della vita.” Lexia. Rivista di semiotica. Special issue: Rethinking Juri Lotman in the Twenty-First Century 39-40: 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Semenenko, Aleksei. 2016. “Homo Polyglottus: Semiosphere as a Model of Human Cognition.” Sign Systems Studies 44 (4): 494–510. doi:10.12697/SSS.2016.44.4.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheck, Justin, Horwitza Jeff, and Purnell Newley. 2021. “Facebook Employees Flag Drug Cartels and Human Traffickers. The Company's Responde is Weak, Documents Show.” The Wall Street Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, Dan. 1996. Explaining Culture. A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, Lina. 2011. For Humanity’s Sake: The Bildungsroman in Russian Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sturrock, John. 1991. “Inside the Semiosphere.” Times Literary Supplement May 3: 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Andrew. 2016. “I Used to be a Human Being.” New York, September 18. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/09/andrew-sullivan-my-distraction-sickness-and-yours.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. 2007. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terren, Ludovic, and Rosa Borge. 2021. “Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Review of Communication Research 9: 99–118. doi:10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault, Mattia. 2017. “Ronzio, feed e diffondibilità online.” In Viralità. Per una epidemiologia del senso / Virality for an epydemiology of meaning, edited by G. Marino and M. Thibault, 103–117. Rome: Aracne.
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, Alvin. 1970. Future Shock. New York: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Torop, Peeter. 2004. “Semiospherical Understanding: Textuality.” Sign Systems Studies 31 (2): 323–339. doi:10.12697/SSS.2003.31.2.01.
   Google Scholar
• Torop, Peeter. 2005a. “Semiosphere.” In The Companion to Juri Lotman. A Semiotic Theory of Culture, edited by M. Tamm and P. Torop, 296–307. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Torop, Peeter. 2005b. “Semiosphere and/ as the Research Object of Semiotics of Culture.” Sign Systems Studies 33 (1): 159–173. doi:10.12697/SSS.2005.33.1.06.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Joshua, Andrew Guess, Pablo Barbera, Cristian Vaccari, Alexandra Siegel, Sergey Sanovich, Denis Stukal, and Brendan Nyhan. 2018. “Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformartion: A Review of the Scientific Literature.” Report. Hwelett Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, Sherry. 2009. Simulation and Its Discontents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uspenskij, B. A., V. V. Ivanov, V. N. Toporov, A. M. Piatigorskij e J. M. Lotman. 1973. “Tezisy k semiotičeskomu izučeniju kul’tur (v primenenii k slavjanskim taktstam).” In Semiotyka i struktura tekstu. Studia święcone VII międz. Kongresowi slawistów, edited by M. R. Mayenowa, Warszawa. English translation: “Thesis on the Semiotic Study of Culture (As Applied To Slavic Texts),” in J. van der Eng, M. Grygar (a cura di), Structure of Texts and Semiotics of Culture, De Gruyter Mouton, Amsterdam, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, Giorgia, Jeff Horwitz, and Deepa Seetharaman. 2021. “Facebook Knows Instagram is Toxic for Teen Girls, Company Documents Show.” The Wall Street Journal, September 14, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Ladd. 1966. “Toward a Theory of Behavioral Contagion.” Psychological Review 73: 179–192. doi:10.1037/h0023023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar