Investigating the relation between mind and semiotic systems: a review Linguistic relativity today

References

• Barnden, J. A. 2006. “Artificial Intelligence, Figurative Language and Cognitive Linguistics.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, edited by G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, René Dirven, and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 431–460. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, B., and P. Kay. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, F. 1911. Handbook of American Indian Languages. Washington: Bureau of American Ethnology.
   Google Scholar
• Boroditsky, L. 2001. “Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time.” Cognitive Psychology 43 (1): 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. W., and E. H. Lenneberg. 1954. “A Study in Language and Cognition.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49 (3): 454–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danesi, M. 2018. “Habit in Peirce: A Review of Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit.” Biosemiotics 11: 447–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danesi, M. 2021. Linguistic Relativity Today: Language, Mind, Society, and the Foundations of Linguistic Anthropology. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. J., and S. C. Levinson. 1996. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• House, J. 2000. “Linguistic Relativity and Translation.” In Exploration in Linguistic Relativity, edited by M. Pütz, and M. H. Verspoor, 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. H. 1971. On Communicative Competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• January, D., and E. Kako. 2007. “Re-evaluating Evidence for Linguistic Relativity: Reply to Boroditsky (2001).” Cognition 104 (2): 417–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadvany, J. 2007. “Positional Value and Linguistic Recursion.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 35: 487–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2023. “The Effectiveness of Machine Translation in Foreign Language Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 36 (1–2): 103–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. 2006. “Neutrality of International Languages.” Journal of Universal Language 7 (2): 37–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lucy, J. A. 1992. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucy, J. A. 1997. “Linguistic Relativity.” Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 291–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. 1991. Natural Language and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malotki, E. 1983. Hopi Time: A Linguistic Analysis of the Temporal Concepts in the Hopi Language. Berlin: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. 1986. “Eskimo Words for Snow: A Case Study in the Genesis and Decay of an Anthropological Example.” American Anthropologist 88: 418–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A. 1983. “Intellectual Issues in the History of Artificial Intelligence.” In The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages, edited by F. Machlup, and U. Mansfields, 187–227. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, E. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
   Google Scholar
• Sharifian, F. 2017. “Cultural Linguistics and Linguistic Relativity.” Language Sciences 59: 83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 2007. The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window Into Human Nature. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum, G. K. 1991. The Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax and Other Irreverent Essays on the Study of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uexküll, J. V. 1909. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tierre. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1962. Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar