Conceptualising humanitarian civil-military partnerships in the Asia-Pacific: (Re-)ordering cooperation

References

• Alagappa, M. 2001. “Military Professionalism: A Conceptual Perspective.” In Military Professionalism in Asia: Conceptual and Empirical Perspectives, edited by M. Alagappa, 1–18. Honolulu: East-West Center.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, D. E. 1980. “Comparative Conceptualisation of Civil-Military Relations.” World Politics 32 (4): 553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allié, M.-P. 2011. “Introduction: Acting At Any Price?” In Humanitarian Negotiations Revealed: The MSF Experience, edited by C. Magone, M. Neuman, and F. Weissman, 1–14. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. 2009. “ ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response.” Accessed September 26 2019. https://ahacentre.org/publication/asean-agreement-on-disaster-management-and-emergency-response-aadmer/.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. 2013. ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response Work Plan 2010–2015. (4th Reprint). https://www.asean.org/storage/images/resources/ASEAN%20Publication/2013%20(12.%20Dec)%20-%20AADMER%20Work%20Programme%20(4th%20Reprint).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Regional Forum. 2010. Strategic Guidance for Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief. Draft Version 8. Accessed April 12 2017. http://aseanregionalforum.asean.org/files/Archive/17th/17th-ARF-Hanoi-23July2010/5.3%20ARF%20Strategic%20Guidance_V8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, T. C., and A. Croissant. 2019. “Civil-Military Relations: Why Control Is Not Enough.” In Civil-Military Relations: Control and Effectiveness Across Regimes, edited by T. C. Bruneau and A. Croissant, 1–18. London: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Capie, D. 2013. “Structures, Shocks and Norm Change: Explaining the Late Rise of Asia’s Defence Diplomacy.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 35 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, A., and I. W. Lee. 2018. “Asia’s Security Competition by Proxy: Competitive HADR as a Respectable Arena?” In International Security in the Asia-Pacific: Transcending ASEAN Towards Transitional Polycentrism, edited by Alan Chong, 377–400. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K., K. Ko, and A. Zagorecki. 2004. “Coordination in Rapidly Evolving Disaster Response Systems: the Role of Information.” American Behavioral Scientist 48 (3): 295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K., Y. Sungu, D. Johnson, and M. Dunn. 2001. “Complex Systems in Crisis; Anticipation and Resilience in Dynamic Environments.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 9 (3): 144–158.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. D. B. 2013. “Globalization and East and Southeast Asia.” In East and Southeast Asia: International Relations and Security Perspectives, edited by Andrew T. H. Tan, 181–190. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. D. B. 2014. “Southeast Asian Perspectives on UN Peacekeeping: Indonesia and Malaysia.” Journal of International Peacekeeping 18: 154–174.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. D. B. 2018. “Siloes, Synergies and Prospects for Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief in Southeast Asia.” In International Security in the Asia-Pacific: Transcending ASEAN Towards Transitional Polycentrism, edited by Alan Chong, 357–376. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. J. 2018. International Humanitarian NGOS and State Relations: Politics, Principles and Identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, J. 2013. “Taking Disaster Seriously: East Asian Military Involvement in International Disaster Relief Operations and the Implications for Force Projection.” Asian Security 9 (1): 38–61.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, J. 2018. “Re-Conceptualising the Role of the Military for International Disaster Relief in East Asia.” In International Security in the Asia-Pacific: Transcending ASEAN Towards Transitional Polycentrism, edited by Alan Chong, 401–418. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Feaver, P. D. 1996. “The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control.” Armed Forces & Society 23 (2): 149–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IASC. 2004. “ Civil–Military Relationship in Complex Emergencies – An IASC Reference Paper”.
   Google Scholar
• IASC. 2006. Guidelines on the Use of Military and Civil Defense Assets to Support United Nations Humanitarian Activities in Complex Emergencies, Rev. 1, January.
   Google Scholar
• IASC. 2008. Civil–Military Guidelines & Reference for Complex Emergencies. OCHA/IASC.
   Google Scholar
• IASC. 2011a. “Challenges in Humanitarian Civil–Military Coordination.” 79th IASC Working Group Meeting, WO/1106/3732/7.
   Google Scholar
• IASC. 2011b. “Global Health Cluster: Civil–Military Coordination During Humanitarian Health Action Provisional Version – February 2011.” Accessed April 12 2017. http://www.who.int/hac/global_health_cluster, 2.
   Google Scholar
• IFRC. 2018. World Disaster Report 2018. Geneva: IFRC. Accessed September 26 2019. https://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/world-disaster-report-2018/.
   Google Scholar
• Keast, R., K. Brown, and M. Mandell. 2007. “Getting the Right mix: Unpacking Integration Meanings and Strategies.” International Public Management Journal 10 (1): 9–33.
   Google Scholar
• Malesic, M. 2015. “The Impact of Military Engagement in Disaster Management on Civil-Military Relations.” Current Sociology 63 (7): 980–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E., I. Nolte, and E. Vitolo. 2016. “The Four Cs of Disaster Partnering: Communication, Cooperation, Coordination and Collaboration.” Disasters 40 (4): 621–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, D. G., and K. Gersdorf. 2019. Understanding the Humanitarian World. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, V., S. Haysom, and S. Gordon. 2012. “Trends and Challenges in Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination.” HPG Working Paper May. London: ODI.
   Google Scholar
• MPAT (Multinational Planning and Augmentation Team). 2014. “ Multinational Force Standing Operating Procedures.” December. https://community.apan.org/cfs-file/__key/telligent-evolution-components-attachments/13-1847-00-00-00-14-11-59/MNFSOP-Ver2.9a-10-Dec-14-vb4.pdf?forcedownload=true.
   Google Scholar
• Najam, A. 2000. “The Four C’s of Third Sector-Government Relations: Cooperation, Confrontation, Complementarity, Co-optation.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 10 (4): 375–397.
   Google Scholar
• NMCG (NGO-Military Contact Group). 2011. Conference Proceedings: Civil–Military Relations in Natural Disasters: New Developments from the Field, October 12.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, B. and T. Steelman. 2014. “Communication Under Fire: The Role of Embeddedness in the Emergence and Efficacy of Disaster Response Communication Networks.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OCHA. 2004a. Civil–Military Relationship in Complex Emergencies. An IASC Reference Paper, June.
   Google Scholar
• OCHA. 2004b. Guidelines on the Use of Military and Civil Defence Assets to Support United Nations Humanitarian Activities in Complex Emergencies. Geneva: OCHA.
   Google Scholar
• OCHA. 2007. Guidelines on the Use of Foreign Military and Civil Defence Assets in Disaster Relief (‘Oslo Guidelines’), Rev. 1.1, November.
   Google Scholar
• OCHA. 2008. “Civil–Military Guidelines and Reference for Complex Emergencies.” OCHA and IASC: Guidelines on the Use of Military and Civil Defense Assets to Support United Nations Humanitarian Activities in Complex Emergencies, Rev. 1, January 2006.
   Google Scholar
• OCHA. 2011. Report of the Annual Meeting of the Consultative Group on the Use of Military and Civil Defense Assets (MCDA), OCHA: Geneva, 21–22 November. .
   Google Scholar
• OCHA. 2014. Asia-Pacific Regional Guidelines for the Use of Foreign Military Assets in Natural Disaster Response Options. Version 8.01, 14 January.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, M. 2001. “The Challenge of Civil-Military Relations in International Peace Operations.” Disasters 25 (4): 345–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff, R. 1995. “Civil-Military Relations Reconsidered: A Theory of Concordance.” Armed Forces & Society 22 (1): 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S. 2010. “Southeast Asian International Relations: Is There Institutional Traction?” In International Relations in Southeast Asia: Between Bilateralism and Multilateralism, edited by N. Ganesan and R. Amer, 37–64. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S. S. 2012. “‘Talking Their Walk?’ The Evolution of Defense Regionalism in Southeast Asia.” Asian Security 8 (3): 232–250.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh, W. L., and G. Streib. 2006. “Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management.” Public Administration Review 66 (S1): 131–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, T. G., and K. M. Campbell. 1991. “Military Humanitarianism.” Survival 33 (5): 451–465.
   Google Scholar
• Wiharta, S., et al. 2008. The Effectiveness of Foreign Military Assets in Natural Disaster Response, SIPRI. http://books.sipri.org/files/misc/FMA/SIPRI08FMAprelims.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Humanitarian Summit (WHS). 2016. Commitments to Action. World Humanitarian Summit: Istanbul, Turkey, August 16. https://www.agendaforhumanity.org/sites/default/files/resources/2017/Jul/WHS_Commitment_to_Action_8September2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar