Dilemmas in the Construction of a Socialist Law-based State in Vietnam: Electoral Integrity and Reform

References

• Abrami, R., Malesky, E., & Zheng, Y. (2013). Vietnam through Chinese eyes: Divergent accountability in single-party regimes. In M. Dimitrov (Ed.), Why Communism did not collapse: Understanding authoritarian regime resilience in Asia and Europe (pp. 237–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaydes, L. (2011). Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boix, C., & Svolik, M. (2009). The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions and power-sharing in dictatorship. IDEAS Working Paper Series. Federal Reserve Bank: St Louis, US.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. J. et al. (2005). Chaos or coherence: Strengths, challenges and opportunities for Australia’s national integrity system. Brisbane: Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance & Transparency International Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bui, H. T. (2014). Deconstructing the “socialist” rule of law in Vietnam: The changing discourse on human rights in Vietnam’s constitutional reform process. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 36(1), 77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPV (ĐCSVN). (1994). Văn kiện Hội nghị đại biểu toàn quốc giữa nhiệm kỳ khóa VII (Lưu hành nội bộ), 1, 56.
   Google Scholar
• Dinh Xuan Ly. (2016, 25 February). Những điểm mới trong Hiến pháp 2013 về Nhà nước pháp quyền ở Việt Nam. Ly luan chinh tri online. Retrieved from http://lyluanchinhtri.vn/home/index.php/nguyen-cuu-ly-luan/item/1322-nhung-diem-moi-trong-hien-phap-2013-ve-nha-nuoc-phap-quyen-o-viet-nam.html
   Google Scholar
• Gainsborough, M. (2005). Party control: Electoral campaigning in Vietnam in the run-up to the May 2002 National Assembly elections. Pacific Affairs, 78(1), 57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainsborough, M. (2007). From patronage to “outcomes”: Vietnam’s Communist Party Congresses reconsidered. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 2(1), 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., & Przeworski, A. (2007). Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies, 40(1), 1279–1301.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. (1999). Authoritarian breakdown: Empirical test of a game theoretic argument. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, J. (2006). Transplanting commercial law reform: Developing a “rule of law” in Vietnam. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, D. (2008). Leadership changes at the 10th Congress of the Vietnamese Communist Party. Asian Survey, 48(4), 650–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2002). Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism. The Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2013). The durability of revolutionary regimes. Journal of Democracy, 4(3), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lockhart, G. (1997). Mass mobilization in contemporary Vietnam. Asian Studies Review, 21(2), 174–179.
   Google Scholar
• Lust-Okar, E. (2006). Elections under authoritarianism: Preliminary lessons from Jordan. Democratization, 13(3), 456–471.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for autocracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. (2008). Credible power sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4/5), 715–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., & Schuler, P. (2009). Paint-by-numbers democracy: The stakes, structure, and results of the 2007 Vietnamese National Assembly election. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 4(1), 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., & Schuler, P. (2011). The single-party dictator’s dilemma: Information in elections without opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 491–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., & Schuler, P. (2013). Star search: Do elections help non-democratic regimes identify new leaders? Journal of East Asian Studies, 13, 35–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen Duy Quy. (2005, December). Nhà nước pháp quyền xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam – Một số vấn đề lý luận và thực tiễn. Communist Review, 23. Retrieved from http://tapchicongsan.org.vn/data/tcc/Html_Data/So_96.html
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen Thanh Tuan. (2015, 3 December). Bảo đảm công lý trong xây dựng nhà nước pháp quyền xã hội chủ nghĩa. Communist Review online. Retrieved from http://www.tapchicongsan.org.vn/Home/Xay-dung-nha-nuoc-phap-quyen/2015/36486/Bao-dam-cong-ly-trong-xay-dung-Nha-nuoc-phap-quyen-xa.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen Viet Thong. (2015, 30 September). Văn kiện Đại hội XI về xây dựng Nhà nước pháp quyền xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam. Dang Cong san Viet Nam online. Retrieved from http://dangcongsan.vn/tu-lieu-van-kien/tu-lieu-ve-dang/lich-su-dang/doc-0930201511195846.html
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2014). Why electoral integrity matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, M. (2007). Power and representation at the Vietnamese National Assembly: The scope and limits of political Doi moi. In S. Balme & M. Sidel (Eds.), Vietnam’s new order (pp. 198–216). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sampford, C. (2005). From Greek temple to bird’s nest: Towards a theory of coherence and mutual accountability for national integrity systems. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(2), 96–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: Volume 1. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidel, M. (2008). A contextual analysis of Vietnam’s constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (1996). Introduction. In R. Taylor (Ed.), The politics of elections in Southeast Asia (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer, C. (1993). Recent political developments: Constitutional change and the 1992 elections. In D. Marr & C. Thayer (Eds.), Vietnam and the rule of law (pp. 50–80). Canberra: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Tran Kim Cuc. (2014, 16 January). Xây dựng nhà nước pháp quyền xã hội chủ nghĩa ở Việt Nam hiện nay - Từ lý luận đến thực tiễn. Communist Review online. Retrieved from http://www.tapchicongsan.org.vn/Home/Xay-dung-nha-nuoc-phap-quyen/2014/25460/Xay-dung-nha-nuoc-phap-quyen-xa-hoi-chu-nghia-o-Viet.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2005). Corruption Index. Berlin: Transparency International. Retrieved from www.transparency.org/research/cpi
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. (1997, November/December). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 22–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingerli, C. (2003). Politics in mountain communes: Exploring Vietnamese grassroots democracy. In D. McCargo (Ed.), Rethinking Vietnam (pp. 53–66). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar