The Interactional Nature of Emotion Work in Thai Marriages: Anger, Romance and Guilt

References

• Amara, S., & Kamolchanok, K. (2014). Thai family formation in the context of the second demographic transition. In W. Yupin, R. Jongjit, C. Sutida, & K. Potchana (Eds.) Population and society 2014: Birth and stability in population and society (pp. 43–58). Nakhon Pathom: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, H., & Fite, R. (1993). Becoming married. Kentucky: Westminster/John Knox Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azuma, H. (1984). Secondary control as a heterogeneous category. American Psychologist, 39, 970–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, W. (1974). Christian understanding of the meaning and dynamics of guilt as related to sexual problems within marriage (PhD thesis). Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology, California.
   Google Scholar
• Boiger, M., & Mesquita, B. (2012). The construction of emotion in interactions, relationships, and cultures. Emotion Review, 4(3), 221–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broude, G. J. (1994). Marriage, family, and relationships: A cross-cultural encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. (1997). Social relationships and emotions. Sociology, 31(1), 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. (2012). Emotional reflexivity: Feeling, emotion and imagination in reflexive dialogues. Sociology, 46(3), 458–472.
   Google Scholar
• Cancian, F. (1986). The feminization of love. Signs, 11(4), 692–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassaniti, J. (2009). Control in a world of change: Emotion and morality in a northern Thai town (PhD thesis). University of Chicago, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Cherlin, A. (2004). The deinstitutionalisation of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darunee, T. (1997). Changing gender relations in Thailand: A historical and cultural analysis. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 4(2), 167–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncombe, J., & Marsden, D. (1993). Love and intimacy: The gender division of emotion and “emotion work”: A neglected aspect of sociological discussion of heterosexual relationships. Sociology, 27(2), 221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, B. (1999). Family: The making of an idea, an institution, and a controversy in American culture. Colorado: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowers, B. (2000). Beyond the myth of marital happiness: How embracing the virtues of loyalty, generosity, justice, and courage can strengthen your relationship. California: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, D. (2003). Emotion. In L. T. Reynolds & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 787–809). Oxford: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelles, R. (1995). Contemporary families: A sociological view. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, L., La Valley, A., & Farinelli, L. (2008). The experience and expression of anger, guilt, and sadness in marriage: An equity theory explanation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(5), 699–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structures. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Illouz, E. (1997). Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingoldsby, B., Horlacher, G., Schvaneveldt, P., & Matthews, M. (2005). Emotional expressiveness and marital adjustment in Ecuador. Marriage & Family Review, 38(1), 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societies. Cambridge & Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, L. (1999). Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the “pure relationship”. Sociology, 33(3), 477–494.
   Google Scholar
• Kaseam, T., & Kulaya, T. (1996). Mental health in the family. Bangkok: The Committee for Family Affairs, The Office of the Permanent Secretary, The Prime Minister’s Office (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy-Moore, E., & Watson, J. (1999). Expressing emotion: Myths, realities, and therapeutic strategies. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladda, K. (1987). Communication and interaction styles in Thai-American cross-cultural marriages ( PhD thesis). United States International University, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Lashley, S. (1998). The experience and expression of anger in marriage. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 59(4–8), 1858.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, J., & Dempsey, D. (2009). Families, relationships and intimate life. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lively, K. (2008). Emotional segues and the management of emotion by women and men. Social Forces, 87(2), 911–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lystra, K. (1989). Searching the heart: Women, men, and romantic love in nineteenth-century America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Methinin, P., & Gray, L. (1997). Understanding Thai families: A cultural context for therapists using a structural approach. Contemporary Family Therapy, 19(2), 209–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mole, R. (1973). Thai values and behavior patterns. Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle Company.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1991). Ideologies of marriage and family life. In D. Clark (Ed.), Marriage, domestic life and social change (pp. 114–138). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nock, S. (1992). Sociology of the family (2nd edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pilapa, E. (2007). Changing marriage, changing society: Contradictions of gender, class and identity in Bangkok, Thailand ( PhD thesis). Brown University, Providence.
   Google Scholar
• Sarnoff, I., & Sarnoff, S. (1989). Love-centered marriage in a self-centered world. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Sasipat, Y. (1997). Family in changing society: Thailand perspective. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, S. (1979). Emotion and social life: A symbolic interactionist analysis. The American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1317–1334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, R., & Lively, K. (2010). Sex, anger and depression. Social Forces, 88(4), 1543–1568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumalee, B. (1995). Love and marriage: Mate selection in twentieth-century central Thailand. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J., & Stets, J. (2006). Handbook of the sociology of emotions. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weigert, A., & Gecas, V. (2003). Self. In L. T. Reynolds & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 267–288). California: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, M., & LeVine, R. (1986). What is an iiko (good child)? In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 55–62). New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar