The Paradoxes of “Vernacularised” Liberalism in Southeast Asia

References

• Anek, L. (1996). A tale of two democracies: Conflicting perceptions of elections and democracy in Thailand. In R. H. Taylor (Ed.), The politics of elections in Southeast Asia (pp. 201–223). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anwar, I. (1996). The Asian renaissance. Times Books International.
   Google Scholar
• Ardeth, M. T., & Khun, N. (2021). Myanmar’s military coup and the elevation of the minority agenda? Critical Asian Studies, 53(2), 297–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat. (2019). ASEAN Key Figures 2019. ASEAN Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. (2005). Opposing Suharto: Compromise, resistance, and regime change in Indonesia. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. (2019, 22 April). Indonesia’s election and the return of ideological competition. New Mandala. https://www.newmandala.org/indonesias-election-and-the-return-of-ideological-competition/
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Southeast Asia’s troubling elections: Nondemocratic pluralism in Indonesia. Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 104–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, K.-H. (2018). Seeing ASEAN as a platform for spreading liberalism. International Journal, 73(1), 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, M. D. (2000). Lee Kuan Yew and the “Asian values” debate. Asian Studies Review, 24(3), 309–334.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, M. D. (2010). Marxists in Singapore? Critical Asian Studies, 42(3), 335–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, C. M. (2006). The limits of conservative church reformism in the Philippines. In T.-J. Cheng & D. A. Brown (Eds.), Religious organizations and democratization: Case studies from contemporary Asia (pp. 157–179). M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, G. (2002). Abdurrahman Wahid: Muslim democrat, Indonesian president. University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. (2014). What is liberalism? Political Theory, 42(6), 682–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, B. (2020). Man of contradictions: Joko Widodo and the struggle to remake Indonesia. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bourchier, D. M. (2019). Two decades of ideological contestation in Indonesia: From democratic cosmopolitanism to religious nationalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(5), 713–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, R. (2009). Nahdlatul Ulama and the struggle for power within Islam and politics in Indonesia. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, W. A. (1998). Imagining democracy: Reading “the events of May” in Thailand. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, T. C. (2018). Democratic breakthrough in Malaysia – Political opportunities and the role of Bersih. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 109–137.
   Google Scholar
• Chehabi, H. E., & Linz, J. J. (Eds.). (1998). Sultanistic regimes. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, J. (2020). Race and religion in command: Malaysia returns to identity politics. Global Asia, 15(1), 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, B. H. (2017). Liberalism disavowed: Communitarianism and state capitalism in Singapore. NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Claudio, L. E. (2013). Taming people’s power: The EDSA revolutions and their contradictions. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connors, M. K. (2002). Framing the “people’s” constitution. In D. McCargo (Ed.), Reforming Thai politics (pp. 37–56). NIAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connors, M. K. (2008). Article of faith: The failure of royal liberalism in Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 143–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, M. K. (2016). Political ideologies and liberalism in Southeast Asia: A review article. Asian Review, 29(1), 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Connors, M. K., & Thompson, M. R. (2023). Locating liberalisms in Southeast Asia: An introductory essay. Asian Studies Review, 47(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Curaming, R. A. (2020). Power and knowledge in Southeast Asia: State and scholars in Indonesia and the Philippines. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Curato, N. (2016). Politics of anxiety, politics of hope: Penal populism and Duterte’s rise to power. Journal of Southeast Asian Contemporary Affairs, 35(3), 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• David, R. (2019, 16 May). Is Myanmar’s National League for Democracy a liberal political party? Paper presented to the workshop “Localizing Liberalisms in Southeast Asia”, City University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• David, R., & Holliday, I. (2019). Liberalism and democracy in Myanmar. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. S. (2018). Indonesia: Twenty years of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, B., & Tiojanco, B. D. G. (2018). The Philippine people power constitution: Social cohesion through integrated diversity. In J. L. Neo & N. S. Bui (Eds.), Pluralist constitutions in Southeast Asia (pp. 251–282). Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Emmerson, D. K. (1995). Singapore and the “Asian values” debate. Journal of Democracy, 6(4), 95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerson, D. K. (2013). Kishore’s world. Journal of Democracy, 24(3), 166–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, F. (2015). The political development of Thailand. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, F. (2019, 16 May). Thai Liberalism in comparative-historical focus: Democracy, dictatorship, and the “revolting” middle class. Paper presented to the workshop “Localizing Liberalisms in Southeast Asia”, City University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Fleschenberg, A. (2013). Min Laung or fighting peacock? Aung San Suu Kyi’s political leadership via moral capital (1988–2000). In C. Derichs & M. R. Thompson (Eds.), Dynasties and female political leaders in Asia: Gender, power and pedigree (pp. 191–246). LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fossati, D., & Morgenbesser, L. (2017, 7 December). The troubling reality of Southeast Asia’s “democratic recession”. Griffith News. https://app.secure.griffith.edu.au/news/2-17-12-07/the-troubling-reality-of-southeast-asias-democratic-recession/
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (2005). Liberal languages: Ideological imaginations and twentieth-century progressive thought. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (2015). Liberalism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gatmaytan, D. B. (2006). It’s all the rage: Popular uprisings and Philippine democracy. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 15(1), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, E. T., & Osman, M. N. M. (Eds.). (2020). 14^th general election and UMNO’s fall: Intra-elite feuding in the pursuit of power. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, J., & Ramcharan, R. (2014). Introduction: Democracy and human rights in Southeast Asia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 33(3), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hadiz, V. R. (2015). Islamic populism in Indonesia and the Middle East. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamid, A. F. A. (2018). The Islamist factor in Malaysia’s fourteenth general election. The Round Table, 107(6), 683–701.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, S. (2015). The double-edged sword of “Buddhist democracy” in Myanmar. Review of Faith and International Affairs, 13(4), 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedman, E.-L. (2001). The spectre of populism in Philippine politics and society: Artista, masa, eraption! South East Asia Research, 9(1), 5–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hedman, E.-L. (2006). In the name of civil society: From free election movements to people power in the Philippines. University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hefner, R. W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hefner, R. W. (2019). Whatever happened to civil Islam? Islam and democratisation in Indonesia, 20 years on. Asian Studies Review, 43(3), 375–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, W. W. (2018, 18 December). Himpunan 812 and a new rivalry in Malay politics. New Mandala. https://www.newmandala.org/himpunan-812-and-a-new-rivalry-in-malay-politics/
   Google Scholar
• Hewison, K. (2003, May). The politics of neoliberalism: Class and capitalism in contemporary Thailand. Southeast Asia Research Centre (SEARC) Working Paper Series, 45. http://www.cityu.edu.hk/searc/Resources/Paper/WP45_03_Hewison.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hewison, K., & Kengkij, K. (2010). “Thai-style democracy”: The royalist struggle for Thailand’s politics. In S. Ivarsson & L. Isager (Eds.), Saying the unsayable: Monarchy and democracy in Thailand (pp. 179–202). Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, R., & Hutchcroft, P. (2020, 4 April). A failure of execution. Inside Story. http://insidestory.org.au/A-FAILURE-OF-EXECUTION/
   Google Scholar
• Houtman, G. (1999). Mental culture in Burmese crisis politics: Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, R. L. (2020). The paradox of Myanmar’s regime change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (2019). Myanmar: Events of 2018. http://www.hrw.org/world-report/2019/country-chapters/burma
   Google Scholar
• Ileto, R. C. (1985). The past in the present crisis. In R. J. May & F. Nemenzo (Eds.), The Philippines after Marcos (pp. 7–17). Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Philippine Culture. (2005). The vote of the poor: Modernity and tradition in people’s views of leadership and elections. Institute of Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, J. (2001). The politics of moral capital. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. J. (1994). Is culture destiny? The myth of Asia’s anti-democratic values. Foreign Affairs, 73(6), 189–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lousurdo, D. (2011). Liberalism: A counter-history. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lubina, M. (2018). The moral democracy: The political thought of Aung San Suu Kyi. Scholar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marcos, F. A. (1971). Today’s revolution: Democracy. Ferdinand Marcos.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, B. (1993). Buddhism under a military regime: The iron heel in Burma. Asian Survey, 33(4), 408–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCargo, D. (1993). The three paths of Major-General Chamlong Srimuang. South East Asia Research, 1(1), 27–67.
   Google Scholar
• McCargo, D. (1998). Chamlong Srimuang and the new Thai politics. C. Hurst & Co.
   Google Scholar
• McCargo, D. (2021). Disruptors’ dilemma? Thailand’s 2020 Gen Z protests. Critical Asian Studies, 53(2), 175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, S. (2004). The Buddhist political rhetoric of Aung San Suu Kyi. Contemporary Buddhism, 5(2), 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, S., & Thompson, M. (2020). Making sense of democracy and governance in the Asia–Pacific. In S. McCarthy & M. Thompson (Eds.), Governance and democracy in the Asia–Pacific (pp. 1–26). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, W. (2012, 17 September). Aung San Suu Kyi’s Buddhism problem. Foreign Policy. http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/09/17/aung-san-suu-kyis-buddhism-problem/
   Google Scholar
• Napisa, W., & Chambers, P. (2019, 7 June). Battlefield transformed: Deciphering Thailand’s divisive 2019 poll in Bangkok. Thai Data Points. http://www.thaidatapoints.com/post/battlefield-transformed-deciphering-thailand-s-divisive-2019-poll-in-bangkok
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortmann, S. (2019). The growing challenge of pluralism and political activism: Shifts in hegemonic discourse in Singapore. In L. Z. Rahim & M. D. Barr (Eds.), The limits of authoritarian governance in Singapore’s developmental state (pp. 173–194). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parmanand, S. (2020). Duterte as the macho messiah: Chauvinist populism and the feminisation of human rights in the Philippines. Review of Women’s Studies, 29(2), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pasuk, P., & Baker, C. (2008). Thaksin’s populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 62–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prajak, K. (2019). Overview: Political earthquakes. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 163–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinault, R. (2009). Gladstone and slavery. The Historical Journal, 52(2), 363–383.
   Google Scholar
• Rajah, J. (2019). Governing authoritarian law: Law as security. In L. Z. Rahim & M. D. Barr (Eds.), The limits of authoritarian governance in Singapore’s developmental state (pp. 277–304). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ramage, D. E. (1995). Politics in Indonesia: Democracy, Islam, and the ideology of tolerance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, R. (1996). The politics of “Asian values”. Pacific Review, 9(3), 309–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochmat, S. (2017). Abdurrahman Wahid on the public role of Islam and theory of secularization. Asian Social Science, 13(11), 170–176.
   Google Scholar
• Rodan, G. (1996). State–society relations and political opposition in Singapore. In G. Rodan (Ed.), Political oppositions in industrialising Asia (pp. 95–127). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodan, G. (2004). International capital, Singapore’s state companies, and security. Critical Asian Studies, 36(3), 479–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodan, G., & Hughes, C. (2014). The politics of accountability in Southeast Asia: The dominance of moral ideologies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, I. S. (1995). On pragmatism and politics in Thailand: Major General Chamlong Srimuang. Asian Survey, 35(11), 1042–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schock, K. (2004). Unarmed insurrections: People power movements in nondemocracies. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1997). Human rights and Asian values. Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. (2009). Revolutions, crackdowns, and quiescence: Communal elites and democratic mobilization in Southeast Asia. American Journal of Sociology, 115(1), 203–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M. (1993). Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The multiple traditions in America. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 549–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. (2000). From voting to violence: Democratization and nationalist conflict. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, D. I. (2018, 26 September). Aung San Suu Kyi: From Myanmar’s icon of democracy to collaborator in the Rohingya Muslim genocide. South China Morning Post. http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/asia/article/2165763/aung-san-suu-kyi-myanmars-icon-democracy-collaborator
   Google Scholar
• Surin, M. (1993). Thailand 1992: Repression and return of democracy. Southeast Asian Affairs, 327–349.
   Google Scholar
• Suu Kyi, A. S. (1991). Freedom from fear. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Suu Kyi, A. S. (1997). Letters from Burma. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, N. (2013). Manipulating electoral laws in Singapore. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 632–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. H. (2012). Myanmar: From army rule to constitutional rule? Asian Affairs, 43(2), 221–236.
   Google Scholar
• Teehankee, J. C. (2020, 9 August). Rodrigo Duterte’s war on many fronts. East Asia Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Teehankee, J. C., & Thompson, M. R. (2016). The vote in the Philippines: Electing a strongman. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 124–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thak, C. (2007). Thailand: The politics of despotic paternalism (2nd edn.). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (1995). The anti-Marcos struggle: Personalistic rule and democratic transition in the Philippines. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2001). Whatever happened to “Asian values”? Journal of Democracy, 12(4), 154–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2004). Democratic revolutions: Asia and Eastern Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2007). The dialectic of good governance and democracy in Southeast Asia: Globalized discourse and local response. Globality Studies, 10. http://gsj.stonybrook.edu/article/the-dialectic-of-good-governance-and-democracy-in-southeast-asia-globalized-discourses-and-local-responses
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2015). Democracy with Asian characteristics. Journal of Asian Studies, 74(4), 875–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2016). The moral economy of electoralism and the rise of populism in the Philippines and Thailand. Journal of Developing Societies, 32(3), 246–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2019). Southeast Asia’s troubling elections: Is there a silver lining? Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlin, A. (1997). Indonesia and the “third wave of democratization”: The Indonesian pro-democracy movement in a changing world. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ungpakorn, G. J. (2007). A coup for the rich: Thailand’s political crisis. Workers Democracy Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vasil, R. (1995). Asianising Singapore: The PAP’s management of ethnicity. Heinemann Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, M. J. (2016). Buddhist monks and democratic politics in contemporary Myanmar. In H. Kawanami (Ed.), Buddhism and the political process (pp. 56–77). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton, E. (2019, 16 April). Polarisation in Indonesia: What if perception is reality? New Mandala. http://www.newmandala.org/how-polarised-is-indonesia/
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. L. (2004). The changing shape of Islamic politics in Malaysia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(1), 139–173.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C.-H., & Ooi, K. B. (2018). Introduction: How did Malaysia end UMNO’s 61 years of one-party rule? What’s next? The Round Table, 107(6), 661–667.
   Google Scholar