References
- Abu‐Lughod, L. (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17(1), 41–55.
- Ahmed, S. (2006). Orientations: Toward a queer phenomenology. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 12(4), 543–574.
- Awasthi, P. (2020, 25 June). A draft policy for single women in India. The Week. https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2020/06/25/a-draft-policy-for-single-women-in-india.html.
- Baker, K. K. (2008). Bionormativity and the construction of parenthood. Georgia Law Review, 42, 649–716.
- Bernardes, J. (1985). ‘Family ideology’: Identification and exploration. Sociological Review, 33, 275–297.
- Bhandari, S., & Hughes, J. C. (2017). Lived experiences of women facing domestic violence in India. Journal of Social Work in the Global Community, 2(1), 2.
- Bhatt, S. (2019, 11 August). Despite a favourable law, why do single women and men struggle to adopt a child in India? Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/despite-a-favourable-law-why-do-single-women-and-men-struggle-to-adopt-a-child-in-india/articleshow/70621618.cms?from=mdr.
- Bloom, S. S., Wypij, D., & Das Gupta, M. (2001). Dimensions of women’s autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a north Indian city. Demography, 38, 67–78.
- Branscombe, N., Baron, R., & Kapur, P. (2017). Social psychology. Pearson India.
- Brook, H. (2002). Stalemate: Rethinking the politics of marriage. Feminist Theory, 3(1), 45–66.
- Cherlin, A. J. (2020). Degrees of change: An assessment of the deinstitutionalization of marriage thesis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 62–80.
- Ciolfi, S. (2016). Food and fasting: Representing the traditional role of women in Hindi cinema. In C. Pieruccini & P. M. Rossi (Eds.), A world of nourishment. Reflections on food in Indian culture. Ledizioni.
- Dales, L. (2014). Ohitorisama, singlehood, and agency in Japan. Asian Studies Review, 38(2), 224–242.
- Das, M. (2016). Mum’s the word: Heteronormative Indian society and the censorship of single unwed mothers. Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry, 2(2), 170–192.
- DePaulo, B. (2006). Singled out: How singles are stereotyped, stigmatized, and ignored, and still live happily ever after. St. Martin’s Press.
- DePaulo, B. (2019, 6 November). Emma Watson is ‘self-partnered’, I’m good with ‘single’. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/living-single/201911/emma-watson-is-self-partnered-i-m-good-single.
- DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2–3), 57–83.
- DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2006). The unrecognized stereotyping and discrimination against singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 251–254.
- Dyrdal, G. M., Røysamb, E., Nes, R. B., & Vittersø, J. (2011). Can a happy relationship predict a happy life? A population-based study of maternal well-being during the life transition of pregnancy, infancy, and toddlerhood. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 947–962.
- Fernandes, L. (2006). India’s new middle class: Democratic politics in an era of economic reform. University of Minnesota Press.
- Gandhi, K., Mander, H., Bhasin, A., Jha, R., & Dand, S. (2016). Living single: Being a single woman in India. India Exclusion Report 2016, 165–188.
- Gross, J., & Vostroknutov, A. (2022). Why do people follow social norms? Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 1–6.
- Iwashita, K. (2001). Ohitorisama [ Singlehood]. Chuokoron shinsha.
- Kressierer, D. K., & Bryant, C. D. (1996). Adoption as deviance: Socially constructed parent–child kinship as a stigmatized and legally burdened relationship. Deviant Behavior, 17, 391–415.
- Lahad, K. (2013). ‘Am I asking for too much?’ The selective single woman as a new social problem. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 23–32.
- Lahad, K. (2019). Stop waiting! Hegemonic and alternative scripts of single women’s subjectivity. Time & Society, 28(2), 499–520.
- Lahad, K., & Hazan, H. (2014). The terror of the single old maid: On the insolubility of a cultural category. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47, 127–136.
- Lamb, S. (2018). Being single in India: Gendered identities, class mobilities, and personhoods in flux. Ethos, 46(1), 49–69.
- Lamb, S. (2022). Being single in India: Stories of gender, exclusion, and possibility. University of California Press.
- Leboeuf, C. (2023). Phenomenology at the intersection of gender and race. In J. Yoshimi, P. Walsh, & P. Londen (Eds.), Horizons of phenomenology: Essays on the state of the field and its applications. Springer International Publishing.
- Levy, L. (2018). Feminist visions: Theater and women spectators. In S. C. Shabot & C. Landry (Eds.), Rethinking feminist phenomenology: Theoretical and applied perspectives. Rowman & Littlefield International.
- MacBeth, A., & Gumley, A. (2012). Exploring compassion: A meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(6), 545–552.
- Mandujano-Salazar, Y. Y. (2017). It is not that I can’t, it is that I won’t: The struggle of Japanese women to redefine female singlehood through television dramas. Asian Studies Review, 41(4), 526–543.
- Morris, W. L., DePaulo, B. M., Hertel, J., & Taylor, L. C. (2008). Singlism – another problem that has no name: Prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination against singles. In M. A. Morrison & T. G. Morrison (Eds.), The psychology of modern prejudice. Nova Science Publishers.
- Mutha, S. (2022, 7 September). Lesbian couple married in traditional Indian style, kudos to parents. SheThePeople TV. https://www.shethepeople.tv/home-top-video/lesbian-marriage-in-brahmin-style-chennai/.
- Naseera, M., & Kuruvilla, M. (2022). The sexual politics of the Manusmriti: A critical analysis with sexual and reproductive health rights perspectives. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 23(6).
- Pinto, S. (2014). Daughters of Parvati: Women and madness in contemporary India. University of Pennsylvania Press.
- PTI. (2022, 6 May). 25 % women aged 18–29, 15% men aged 21–29 married before reaching legal age: NFHS-5. ThePrint. https://theprint.in/india/25-women-aged-18-29-15-men-aged-21-29-married-before-reaching-legal-age-nfhs-5/945423/.
- Rammohan, A., & Johar, M. (2009). The determinants of married women’s autonomy in Indonesia. Feminist Economics, 15(4), 31–55.
- Reynolds, J., & Wetherell, M. (2003). The discursive climate of singleness: The consequences for women’s negotiation of a single identity. Feminism & Psychology, 13(4), 489–510.
- Rich, A. (2003). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Journal of Women’s History, 15(3), 11–48.
- Riessman, C. K. (2000). Stigma and everyday resistance practices: Childless women in South India. Gender & Society, 14(1), 111–135.
- Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140.
- Schües, C. (2018). Phenomenology and the political – injustice and prejudices. In S. Cohen & C. Landry (Eds.), Rethinking feminist phenomenology: Theoretical and applied perspectives. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Shabot, S. C., & Landry, C. (Eds.). (2018). Rethinking feminist phenomenology: Theoretical and applied perspectives. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Shaji, S. (2022, 28 November). A woman being single is actively discouraged in India – legally and socially. The News Minute. https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/woman-being-single-actively-discouraged-india-legally-and-socially-170371.
- Sharma, A. (2023, 17 October). List of countries where same-sex marriage is legalised. NDTV. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/list-of-countries-where-same-sex-marriage-is-legalised-4487885.
- Simms, E.-M., & Stawarska, B. (2013). Introduction: Concepts and methods in interdisciplinary feminist phenomenology. Janus Head, 13(1), 6–16.
- Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Sage.
- Sullivan, N. (2003). A critical introduction to queer theory. New York University Press.
- Taylor, A. (2011). Single women in popular culture: The limits of postfeminism. Springer.
- Thornton, P., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Choice Reviews Online, 50(4), 23–88.
- Troy-Pryde, J. (2024, 2 January). Emma Watson explains why she refers to herself as ‘self-partnered’. Marie Claire UK. https://www.marieclaire.co.uk/celebrity-news/emma-watson-self-partnered-relationship-status.
- Tufford, L., & Newman, P. (2010). Bracketing in qualitative social work. Qualitative Social Work, 11(1), 80–96.
- UN Women. (2019). Families in a changing world. https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/Library/Publications/2019/Progress-of-the-worlds-women-2019-2020-en.pdf
- Wang, H., & Abbott, D. A. (2013, September). Waiting for Mr. Right: The meaning of being a single educated Chinese female over 30 in Beijing and Guangzhou. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 222–229.
- Werner, K. (2024, 1 January). Emma Watson clarifies what being ‘self-partnered’ means to her. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/emma-watson-self-partnered-vogue-b2471880.h.