Rational, reverential or experimental? The politics of electoral reform in Oceania

References

• Bennett, S.C. 1992. Affairs of state: Politics in the Australian states and territories. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. and Lundie, R. 2007. Australian electoral systems. Research paper, Parliamentary Library. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. 2004. Models of electoral system change. Electoral Studies 23: 363–89. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(03)00020-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. 2007. Electoral laws as political consequences: Explaining the origins and change of electoral institutions. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 363–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.101608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A. and Massicotte, L. 1997. Electoral formulas: A macroscopic perspective. European Journal of Political Research 32: 107–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, C. 1999. Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies. American Political Science Review 93: 609–24. doi: 10.2307/2585577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomer, J.M. ed. 2004. Handbook of electoral system choice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Colomer, J.M. 2005. It's parties that choose electoral systems (or, Duverger's law's upside down). Political Studies 53: 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constitutional and Electoral Commission [CEC]. 2009. Report of the Constitutional and Electoral Commission. Tonga: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• Constitution Commission of Victoria. 2001. A house of review: The role of the Victorian Legislative Council in the democratic process. Melbourne: Constitution Commission of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Costar, B. and Gardiner, G. 2003. From breaking governments to a brake on government: A new bicameralism in Victoria. Australasian Parliamentary Review 18: 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Economou, N. 2008. Changing the rules to change the house: Electoral reform and the 2006 electoral contest for the Victorian Legislative Council. Australian Journal of Political Science 43: 635–48. doi: 10.1080/10361140802429254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D.M. and McAllister, I. 2006. The Australian electoral system: Origins, variations and consequences. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. 2001. The alternative vote system in Fiji: Electoral engineering or ballot-rigging? Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 39: 1–31. doi: 10.1080/713999545
   Google Scholar
• Heatley, A.J. 1979. The government of the Northern Territory. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Homeshaw, J. 2001. Inventing Hare–Clark: The model arithmetocracy. In M. Sawer, ed. Elections: Full, free and fair. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance [International IDEA]. 2005. Electoral system design: The new international IDEA handbook. Stockholm: International IDEA.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. and Leyenaar, M. 2011. A conceptual framework for major, minor and technical electoral reform. West European Politics 34: 495–513. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.555977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaensch, D. 1977. The government of South Australia. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R.S. 2005. Why are there so many (or so few) electoral reforms? In M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell, eds. The politics of electoral systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamare, J.W. and Vowles, J. 1996. Party interests, public opinion and institutional preferences: Electoral system change in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Political Science 31: 321–46. doi: 10.1080/10361149651085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larmour, P. 2002. Westminster constitutions in the South Pacific: A ‘policy transfer’ approach. Asian Journal of Political Science 10: 39–54. doi: 10.1080/02185370208434201
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S. and Roberts, N.S. 1994. The New Zealand electoral referendum and general election of 1993. Electoral Studies 13: 240–53. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)90022-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, S. and Roberts, N.S. 2005. The constitutional structures and electoral systems of Pacific Island states. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 43: 276–95. doi: 10.1080/14662040500304866
   Google Scholar
• MacSporran, P.H. 2007. Nauru: The Constitution. Westlakes, South Australia: Seaview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maley, M. 2001. Exporting expertise in democratic electoral administration. In M. Sawer, ed. Elections: Full, free and fair. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, J.H. 2004. New Zealand: Reform by (nearly) immaculate design. In J.M. Colomer, ed. Handbook of electoral system choice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R.S. 1978. The government of New South Wales. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahat, G. 2006. The study of the politics of electoral reform in the 1990s: Theoretical and methodological lessons. Comparative Politics 36: 461–79. doi: 10.2307/4150171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratuva, S. 2006. Primordial politics? Political parties and tradition in Melanesia. In R. Rich, L. Hambly and M.G. Morgan, eds. Political parties in the Pacific Islands. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 1996. The effects of the electoral system in Papua New Guinea. In Y. Saffu, ed. The 1992 PNG election: Change and continuity in electoral politics. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 2001. Preferential voting and its political consequences. In M. Sawer, ed. Elections: Full, free and fair. Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 2002. Social choice in the South Seas: Electoral innovation and the Borda count in the Pacific Island countries. International Political Science Review 23: 355–72. doi: 10.1177/0192512102023004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 2004. The global spread of preferential voting: Australian institutional imperialism? Australian Journal of Political Science 39: 253–66. doi: 10.1080/1036114042000238500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 2006. Democracy and diversity: Political engineering in the Asia–Pacific. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 2007. Democratisation and electoral reform in the Asia-Pacific region: Is there an ‘Asian model’ of democracy? Comparative Political Studies 40: 1350–71. doi: 10.1177/0010414006299097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick, A. 2010. The politics of electoral reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rokkan, S., Campbell, A., Torsvik, P. and Valen, H. 1970. Citizens, elections, parties: Approaches to the comparative study of the processes of development. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, C. and Taichi, I. 1994. Electoral reform in New Zealand and Japan: A shared experience. Palmerston North, NZ: Massey University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rydon, J. 2001. Fiji and the export of electoral systems. Australasian Parliamentary Review 16: 45–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sawer, M. 2004. Australia: Replacing plurality rule with majority-preferential voting. In J.M. Colomer, ed. Handbook of electoral system choice. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Simms, M. 2010. Oceania: An introduction. In L. Sindjoun, M. Simms and K. Lawson, eds. Political parties and democracy, Volume IV: Africa and Oceania. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 2006. Against the machines: Minor parties and independents in New South Wales, 1910–2006. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell, R. 2005. An assessment of the alternative vote system in Fiji. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 43: 382–93. doi: 10.1080/14662040500304965
   Google Scholar
• Uhr, J. 1999. Why we chose proportional representation. In M. Sawer and S. Miskin, eds. Representation and institutional change: 50 years of proportional representation in the Senate. Canberra: Department of the Senate.
   Google Scholar