Party development in the early decades of the Australian parliament: a new perspective

References

• Barbalet, J.M. 1975. Tri-partism in Australia: The role of the Australian country party. Politics 10(1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington, H. 1968. Partisanship and dissidence in the nineteenth-century house of commons. Parliamentary Affairs 21(4): 338–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., David, M.F. and Katz, R.S. 1999. Party cohesion, party discipline and parliaments. In S. Bowler, D.M. Farrell and R.S. Katz, eds. Party discipline and parliamentary government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brett, J. 2009. Australian liberals and the moral middle class: From Alfred Deakin to John Howard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. 2007. Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting. American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 92–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, C. 2011. House rules: Their heritage, operation and future. Parliamentary Studies Research Paper. Canberra: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G.W. 1987. The efficient secret: The cabinet and the development of political parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G.W. and McCubbins, M.D. 2005. Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the U.S. house of representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, L.F. 1955. The Australian federal labour party 1901–1951. London: Longmans Green.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers, A.C. and Spirling, A. 2014. Party cohesion in Westminster systems. Inducements, replacement and discipline in the house of commons, 1836–1910. British Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000362
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. and McAllister, I. 2003. Electoral Systems. In I. McAllister, S. Dowrick and R. Hassan, eds. The Cambridge handbook of the social sciences in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godbout, J.-F. and Høyland, B. 2013. The emergence of parties in the Canadian house of commons (1867–1908). Canadian Journal of Political Science 46(4): 773–97. doi: 10.1017/S0008423913000632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godbout, J.-F. and Høyland, B. 2015. Unity in diversity? The development of political parties in the parliament of Canada (1867–2011). British Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000368
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham, B.D. 1966. The formation of the Australian country parties. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. 1966. The standing committee system in the commonwealth parliament from 1901 to 1950. The Australian Quarterly 38(4): 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Jackman, S. 2003. Political parties and electoral behaviour. In I. McAllister, S. Dowrick and R. Hassan, eds. The Cambridge handbook of the social sciences in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kam, C.J. 2009. Party discipline and parliamentary politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loveday, P. 1970a. Grouping M.P.s: The use of cluster analysis. Politics 5(2): 180–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveday, P. 1970b. Support in return for concessions I – the theory examined. Historical Studies 14(55): 376–405. doi: 10.1080/10314617008595431
   Google Scholar
• Loveday, P. and Martin, A.W. 1966. Parliament factions and parties: The first thirty years of responsible government in New South Wales, 1856-1889. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loveday, P., Parker, R.S. and Martin, A.W. 1977. The emergence of the Australian party system. Neutral Bay: Ale & Iremonger.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, H. 1956. Some conceptions of the Australian party system, 1910–1950. Historical Studies of Australia and New Zealand 27: 253–70. doi: 10.1080/10314615608595066
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, I. 2002. Political parties in Australia: Party stability in a utilitarian society. In P. Webb, D. Farrell and I. Holliday, eds. Political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J.D.B. 1953. Historical survey: The development of party discipline in Australia (I). Political Science 5(1): 3–15. doi: 10.1177/003231875300500101
   Google Scholar
• Miragliotta, N.L. and Sharman, C. 2012. Federalism and new party insurgency in Australia. Regional & Federal Studies 22(5): 577–94. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2012.733943
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T., Bourke, S. and Maddox, G. 1998. Australia and the emergence of the modern two-party system. Australian Journal of Politics and History 44(1): 17–31. doi: 10.1111/1467-8497.00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, W.C. and K. Strøm. 1999. Policy, office, or votes: How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, G.S. 1963. Australia’s commonwealth parliament and the Westminster model. Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies 2(2): 89–101. doi: 10.1080/14662046308446992
   Google Scholar
• Sawer, G. 1956. Australian federal politics and law 1901–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharman, C. 2003. Legislative institutions. In I. McAllister, S. Dowrick and R. Hassan, eds. The Cambridge handbook of the social sciences in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sieberer, U. 2010. Behavioral consequences of mixed electoral systems: Deviating voting behavior of district and list MPs in the German bundestag. Electoral Studies 29(3): 484–96. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 1994. Parliament. In J. Brett, J.A. Gillepsie and M. Goot, eds. Developments in Australian politics. Melbourne: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Strangio, P. 2009. Introduction: From confusion to stability. In P. Stangio and N. Dyrenfurth, eds. Confusion: The making of the Australian two-party system. Carlton: Melbourne University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, P.M. 1971. Disciplined party voting: A labor innovation? Labor History 21: 17–23. doi: 10.2307/27508024
   Google Scholar
• Weller, P. 2004. Parliamentary democracy in Australia. Parliamentary Affairs 57(3): 630–45. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsh049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1961. Party discipline under federalism: Implications of Australian experience. Social Research 28(4): 437–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar