377
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Symposium: Challenges in teaching politics and international relations

Engaging students and maintaining quality in the era of massification: strategies and approaches for teaching large first-year courses

Pages 568-582 | Accepted 15 May 2016, Published online: 15 Jul 2016

References

  • Baird, D.E. and Fisher, M. 2005. Neomillennial user experience design strategies: Utilizing social networking media to support ‘always on’ learning styles. Journal of Education Technology Systems 34(1): 5–32.
  • Biggs, J. and Tang, C. 2011. Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. 4th edition. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw Hill, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  • Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M. and Picci, P. 2012. Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers & Education 58: 797–807.
  • Castillo-Merino, D. and Serradell-López, E. 2014. An analysis of the determinants of students’ performance in e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior 30: 476–84.
  • Coates, H., Dobson, I., Edwards, D., Friedman, T., Goedegebuure, L. and Meek, L. 2009. The attractiveness of the Australian academic profession: A comparative analysis. Research Briefing: Changing Academic Profession, October, ACER, LH Martin Institute for Higher Education and Educational Policy Institute.
  • Crosling, G. and Heagney, M. 2009. Improving student retention in higher education. Australian Universities’ Review 51(2): 9–18.
  • Cunningham, A. 2010. Clarity in multimedia: The role of interactive media in teaching Political Science theories. Journal of Political Science Education 6: 297–309.
  • Damron, D. and Mott, J. 2005. Creating an interactive classroom: Enhancing student engagement and learning in Political Science courses. Journal of Political Science Education 1: 367–83.
  • Doiron, R. and Asselin, M. 2011. Exploring a new learning landscape in tertiary education. New Library World 112(5/6): 222–35.
  • Fleming, N. 2006. Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Christchurch, NZ: Neil D. Fleming.
  • Freudenberg, B. and Samarkovski, L. 2014. Enthusiasm and the effective modern academic. Australian Universities’ Review 56(1): 22–31.
  • Giovanello, S.P., Kirk, J.A. and Kromer, M.K. 2013. Student perceptions of a role-playing simulation in an introductory international relations course. Journal of Political Science Education 9: 197–208.
  • Gray, H.J., Davis, P. and Liu, X. 2012. Keeping up with the technologically savvy student: Student perceptions of audio books. Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education 26(2): 28–38.
  • Griffith University. 2013. Starting@Griffith 2013: Commencing students’ perceptions of challenging courses, April, Nathan, Brisbane.
  • Griffith University. 2014. Business intelligence planning & statistics portal. URL: <http://www.griffith.edu.au/planning-support/business-intelligence>. Consulted 31 July 2015.
  • Group of Eight Australia. 2014. Go8 submission to the review of demand-driven funding. URL: <https://go8.edu.au/article/go8-media-statement-governments-review-demand-driven-system>. Consulted 31 July 2015.
  • Jansen, E.P.W.A. 2004. The influence of the curriculum organization on study progress in higher education. Higher Education 47: 411–35.
  • Johnston, O. and Wildy, H. 2016. The effects of streaming in the secondary school on learning outcomes for Australian students – a review of the international literature. Australian Journal of Education 60(1): 42–59.
  • Jones, C. Ramanau, R., Cross, S. and Healing, G. 2010. Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education 54: 722–32.
  • Jones, J., Harris, A.C. and Putt, G.D. 1990. Streaming in first-year university classes. Studies in Higher Education 15(1): 21–30.
  • Kemp, D. and Norton, A. 2014. Review of the demand driven funding system report. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education.
  • Kennedy, G.E., Judd, T.S., Churchward, A., Gray, K. and Krause, K.-L. 2008. First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 24(1): 108–22.
  • Kent, M. 2006. Not dead, but maybe extinct: The university in Australia. Australian Quarterly 78(6): 4–10, 39–40.
  • Kille, K.J. 2002. Simulating the creation of a new International Human Rights Treaty: Active learning in the International Studies classroom. International Studies Perspectives 3: 271–90.
  • Kirschner, P.A. and Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. 2013. Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist 48(3): 169–83.
  • Lazrus, P.K. and McKay, G.K. 2013. The reacting to the past pedagogy and engaging the first-year student. In J.E. Groccia and L. Cruz, eds. To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
  • Lee-Koo, K. 2015. Textbooks and the teaching of international relations. Australian Journal of Political Science 50(2): 380–89.
  • Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A. and Vojt, G. 2011. Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education 56: 429–40.
  • Munro, L. 2011. ‘Go boldly, dream large!’ The challenges confronting non-traditional students at university. Australian Journal of Education 55(2): 115–31.
  • Murray, M.C. and Pérez, J. 2015. Informing and performing: A study comparing adaptive learning to traditional learning. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 18: 111–25.
  • Murray, N.L. 2010. Conceptualising the English language needs of first year university students. International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education 1(1): 55–64.
  • Nelson, K.J., Smith, J.E. and Clarke, J.A. 2012. Enhancing the transition of commencing students into university: An institution-wide approach. Higher Education Research & Development 31(2): 185–99.
  • Newson, J.A. 2004. Disrupting the ‘student as consumer’ model: The new emancipatory project. International Relations 18(2): 227–39.
  • NMC [New Media Consortium]. 2014. 2014 NMC technology outlook: Australian tertiary education. URL: <http://www.nmc.org/publications/2014-technology-outlook-au>. Consulted 31 July 2015.
  • Norton, A. 2013. Mapping Australian higher education: 2013 version. Grattan Institute Report No. 2013-1, January.
  • Parker, L. 2011. University corporatisation: Driving redefinition. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 22: 434–50.
  • Rogowsky, B.A., Calhoun, B.M. and Tallal, P. 2015. Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 107(1): 64–78.
  • Sammel, A., Weir, K. and Klopper, C. 2014. The pedagogical implications of implementing new technologies to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Creative Education 5(2): 104–13.
  • Shaw, C.M. 2004. Using role-play scenarios in the IR classroom: An examination of exercises on peacekeeping operations and foreign policy decision making, International Studies Perspectives 5: 1–22.
  • Shellman, S.M. and Turan, K. 2006. Do simulations enhance student learning? An empirical evaluation of an IR simulation. Journal of Political Science Education 2: 19–32.
  • Simpson, A.W. and Kaussler, B. 2009. IR teaching reloaded: Using films and simulations in the teaching of international relations. International Studies Perspectives 10: 413–27.
  • Slagter, T.H. and Scribner, D.L. 2014. Interteach and student engagement in Political Science. Journal of Political Science Education 10(1): 81–92.
  • Smith, C.B. 2003. How do textbooks represent the field of International Studies? International Studies Review 5: 421–41.
  • Stevens, P.A.J. and Vermeersch, H. 2010. Streaming in Flemish secondary schools: Exploring teachers’ perceptions of and adaptations to students in different streams. Oxford Review of Education 36(3): 267–84.
  • Tanggaard, L., Nielsen, K. and Jørgensen, C.H. 2015. Students’ experiences of ability-based streaming in vocational education. Education + Training 57: 723–37.
  • Taylor, J. 2013a. What is student-centredness and is it enough? International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education 4(2): 39–48.
  • Taylor, K. 2013b. Simulations inside and outside the IR classroom: A comparative analysis. International Studies Perspectives 14: 134–49.
  • Taylor, M.Z. 2009. Podcast lectures as a primary teaching technology: Results of a one-year trial. Journal of Political Science Education 5: 119–37.
  • Tessman, B.F. 2007. International relations in action: A world politics simulation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  • Thompson, P. 2015. How digital native learners describe themselves. Education and Information Technologies 20: 467–84.
  • Thomson, R. 2013. Implementation of criteria and standards-based assessment: An analysis of first-year learning guides. Higher Education Research & Development 32: 272–86.
  • Walker, E.A., Redmond, J. and Morris, R. 2010. Is financial reward overriding good pedagogical practices? People and Place 18(2): 1–9.
  • Waring, M. and Evans, C. 2015. Understanding pedagogy: Developing a critical approach to teaching and learning. London: Routledge.
  • Wheeler, S.M. 2006. Role-playing games and simulations for international issues courses. Journal of Political Science Education 2: 331–47.
  • Yorke, M. 2001. Formative assessment and its relevance to retention. Higher Education Research & Development 20(2): 115–26.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.