Legislators’ accountability for issue stances: evidence from Australia’s Marriage Law Postal Survey

References

• Abou-Chadi, Tarik, and Ryan Finnigan. 2019. “Rights for Same-Sex Couples and Public Attitudes Toward Gays and Lesbians in Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (6): 868–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018797947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitkin, Don. 1988. “‘Countrymindedness’: The Spread of an Idea.” In Australian Cultural History, edited by S. L. Goldberg and F. B. Smith, 50–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armenia, Amy, and Bailey Troia. 2017. “Evolving Opinions: Evidence on Marriage Equality Attitudes from Panel Data.” Social Science Quarterly 98 (1): 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, Emily. 2022. “Australians’ Most Important Election Issues, According to Vote Compass.” ABC News, April 21. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-04-22/vote-compass-federal-election-issues-data-climate-change-economy/101002116.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, Clive. 1990. “The Personal Vote in Australian Federal Elections.” Political Studies 38 (2): 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1990.tb01491.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, David M. Farrell, and Ian McAllister. 1996. “Constituency Campaigning in Parliamentary Systems with Preferential Voting: Is There a Paradox?” Electoral Studies 15 (4): 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(96)00036-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (1): 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner, Paul-Christian. 2017. “brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan.” Journal of Statistical Software 80 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, Sarah, and Ian McAllister. 2019. “The 2019 Australian Federal Election: Results from the Australian Election Study.” Australian National University. https://australianelectionstudy.org/wp-content/uploads/The-2019-AustralianFederal-Election-Results-from-the-Australian-Election-Study.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Canes-Wrone, Brandice, William Minozzi, and Jessica Bonney Reveley. 2011. “Issue Accountability and the Mass Public.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2010.00002.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, Andrea, Shaun Ratcliff, and Yannick Dufresne. 2018. “Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage in Australia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2017.1381944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnock, David. 1996. “National Uniformity, and State and Local Effects on Australian Voting: A Multilevel Approach.” Australian Journal of Political Science 31 (1): 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361149651274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnock, David. 2007. “Plus ça Change … ? Institutional, Political and Social Influences on Local Spatial Variations in Australian Federal Voting.” Australian Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140701595783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, Ben. 2014. “Partisan Attachments and Attitudes Towards Same-Sex Marriage in Britain.” Parliamentary Affairs 67 (1): 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gst003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, Philip E., and Roy Pierce. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, Todd. 2014. “The Irrelevance and (New) Relevance of Religion in Australian Elections.” Australian Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2014.963505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, Silvia, and Francisco Cribari-Neto. 2004. “Beta Regression for Modelling Rates and Proportions.” Journal of Applied Statistics 31 (7): 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000214501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David, and Nathan W. Monroe. 2020. “Agenda Control and Electoral Success in the US House.” British Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 1583–1592. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1990. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage Without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 1142–1164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt, and Jacek Stramski. 2010. “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravelle, Timothy B., and Andrea Carson. 2019. “Explaining the Australian Marriage Equality Vote: An Aggregate-Level Analysis.” Politics 39 (2): 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395718815786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanretty, Chris, Benjamin Lauderdale, and Nick Vivyan. 2017. “Dyadic Representation in a Westminster System.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42 (2): 235–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanretty, Chris, Jonathan Mellon, and Patrick English. 2021. “Members of Parliament Are Minimally Accountable for Their Issue Stances (and They Know It).” American Political Science Review 115 (4): 1275–1291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Kim Quaile, and Patricia A. Hurley. 1999. “Dyadic Representation Reappraised.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (1): 109–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollibaugh, Gary E., Lawrence S. Rothenberg, and Kristin K. Rulison. 2013. “Does It Really Hurt to Be Out of Step?” Political Research Quarterly 66 (4): 856–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913481407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honaker, James, Gary King, and Matthew Blackwell. 2011. “Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data.” Journal of Statistical Software 45 (7): 1–47. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v45/i07/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, Yusaku, and Andrew Leigh. 2009. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage: Evidence from Multiple Natural Experiments.” Unpublished Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary. 1996. “The 1994 House Elections in Perspective.” Political Science Quarterly 111 (2): 203–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/2152319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackerras, Malcolm. 2012. “The Results and the Pendulum.” In Julia 2010: The Caretaker Election, edited by Marian Simms and John Wanna, 315. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maley, Jacqueline. 2019. “‘We’ve Got a Dilemma’: Meet the ‘Liberal’ Backers of Zali Steggall Out to Retire Tony Abbot.” Sydney Morning Herald, May 2. https://www.smh.com.au/federal-election-2019/we-vegot-a-dilemma-meet-the-liberal-backers-of-zali-steggall-out-to-retire-tony-abbott-20190501-p51j37.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, Ian. 2015. “The Personalization of Politics in Australia.” Party Politics 21 (3): 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813487111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, Ian, Clive Bean, Rachel Gibson, Toni Makkai, Jill Sheppard, and Sarah Cameron. 2019. “Australian Election Study 2019 [Data File].” https://dataverse.ada.edu.au/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10 .26193/KMAMMW.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, Ian, and Feodor Snagovsky. 2018. “Explaining Voting in the 2017 Australian Same-Sex Marriage Plebiscite.” Australian Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2018.1504877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, Deirdre. 2018. “Chronology of Same-Sex Marriage Bills Introduced into the Federal Parliament: A Quick Guide.” Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1718/Quick_Guides/SSMarriageBills.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, Xiao-Li, and Donald Rubin. 1992. “Performing Likelihood Ratio Tests with Multiply-Imputed Data Sets.” Biometrika 79 (1): 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/79.1.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, Stephen L., and Christopher Winship. 2015. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, Brendan, Eric McGhee, John Sides, Seth Masket, and Steven Greene. 2012. “One Vote Out of Step? The Effects of Salient Roll Call Votes in the 2010 Election.” American Politics Research 40 (5): 844–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X11433768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packham, Colin, and Jonathan Barrett. 2019. “‘Time’s Up Tony’: Australian Conservatives Targeted in May Election.” Reuters, April 11. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-election-moderates/timesup-tony-australian-conservatives-targeted-in-may-election-idUSKCN1RM310.
   Google Scholar
• Perales, Francisco, Gary Bouma, and Alice Campbell. 2019. “Religion, Support of Equal Rights for Same-Sex Couples and the Australian National Vote on Marriage Equality.” Sociology of Religion 80 (1): 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/sry018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, A. 2006. “Towards a General Theory of Political Representation.” The Journal of Politics 68 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00365.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Geoff. 2015. “Regional Place-Based Identities and Party Strategies at the 2013 Federal Election.” In Abbott’s Gambit: The 2013 Australian Federal Election, edited by Carol Johnson, John Wanna, and Hsu-Ann Lee, 249–274. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Steven. 2017. “Electoral Accountability for State Legislative Roll-Calls and Ideological Representation.” American Political Science Review 111 (3): 555–571. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, Susanne, and Alexander Coppock. 2020. “What Have We Learned About Gender from Candidate Choice Experiments? A Meta-Analysis of 42 Factorial Survey Experiments.” https://alexandercoppock.com/projectpages_SC_gender.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., Michael Malecki, and Brian F. Crisp. 2010. “Candidate Gender and Electoral Success in Single Transferable Vote Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 693–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340999010X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevi, Semra. 2021. “Do Young Voters Vote for Young Leaders?” Electoral Studies 69:102200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studlar, Donley T., and Ian McAllister. 1994. “The Electoral Connection in Australia: Candidate Roles, Campaign Activity, and the Popular Vote.” Political Behavior 16 (3): 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498957.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, Hanneke, Rozemarijn Van der Ploeg, and Peer Scheepers. 2013. “Disapproval of Homosexuality: Comparative Research on Individual and National Determinants of Disapproval of Homosexuality in 20 European Countries.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25 (1): 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Tom, Fiona Shalley, and Francisco Perales. 2020. “The Geography of Australia’s Marriage Law Postal Survey Outcome.” Area 52 (1): 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkenstein, Fabio, and Christopher Wratil. 2021. “Multidimensional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 65 (4): 862–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar