Michael V. White: A Scholar’s Scholar and 2018 HETSA FellowFootnote^*

* H. Maas, J. Lodewijks, and A. Endres commented on a draft of this appraisal, but, as is customary, are absolved from any errors contained herein. White was deliberately kept at arm’s length during its writing but was given the opportunity to correct obvious errors in the penultimate draft, which he did with some grace. He did not fully accept every interpretation advanced in the appraisal and, as with all academics of worth, now disagrees with one or two of his own published contentions.

References

• Alford, R. 1956. ‘Marshall’s Demand Curve.’ Economica 23 (89): 23–48. doi:10.2307/2551267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, K. 1978. Classical Political Economy and Rise to Dominance of Supply and Demand Theories. Calcutta, India: Orient Longman Co.
   Google Scholar
• Black, R. D. C. 1970. ‘Introduction’ to W. Jevons’s The Theory of Political Economy, 7–40. Harmondsworth, UK: Chivers Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Black, R. D. C. 1977. ‘Preface.’ In Papers and Correspondence of William Stanley Jevons, Vol. 6, edited by R. D. C. Black, VI–VX. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Black, R. D. C. 1981. ‘W. S. Jevons.’ In Pioneers of Modern Economics in Britain, edited by D. O’Brien and J. Presley, 1–35. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bostaph, S. 1989a. ‘Jevons’s Antipodean Interlude.’ History of Political Economy 21 (4): 601–623. doi:10.1215/00182702-21-4-601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostaph, S. 1989b. ‘Response.’ History of Political Economy 21 (4): 631–633. doi:10.1215/00182702-21-4-631.
   Google Scholar
• Bostaph, S., and Y.-N. Shieh. 1986. ‘W. S. Jevons and Lardner’s Railway Economy.’ History of Political Economy 18 (1): 49–64. doi:10.1215/00182702-18-1-49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostaph, S., and Y.-N. Shieh. 1987. ‘Jevons’s Demand Curve.’ History of Political Economy 19 (1): 107–125. doi:10.1215/00182702-19-1-107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats, W. 2014. ‘T. W. Hutchison as a Historian of Economics.’ In The Historiography of Economics. British and American Economic Essays, Vol. 3, edited by R. Backhouse and B. Caldwell, 52–71. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, J. 1975. ‘William Whewell’s Mathematical Statements.’ The Manchester School 43 (4): 396–403. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1975.tb00875.x.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. 1979. Liberalism and Sociology. L.T. Hobhouse and Political Argument in England 1880–1914. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobb, M. 1973. Theories of Value and Distribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, P. 1983. ‘Consumer’s Surplus: Marshall and His Critics.’ The Canadian Journal of Economics 16 (1): 26–38. doi:10.2307/134973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, P. 1985. ‘Giffen’s Hint?’ Australian Economic Papers 24 (44): 201–205. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.1985.tb00105.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, P. 1988. ‘Porter’s Hint and Alternative Theories of the Giffen Paradox: A Reply.’ Australian Economic Papers 27 (50): 142–144. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.1988.tb00813.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, P. 1992. ‘Why Did Marshall Introduce the Giffen Paradox?’ History of Political Economy 24 (3): 749–752. doi:10.1215/00182702-24-3-749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, G., and C. Lindsey. 1984. ‘Robert Giffen and the Irish Potato.’ American Economics Review 74 (1): 188–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelund, R. 1997. ‘W. T. Thornton: Savant, Idiot, or Idiot-Savant?’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1017/S105383720000465X.
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund, R. 1998. ‘Reply to White.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (3): 375–378. doi:10.1017/S1053837200002194.
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund, R., and R. Hébert. 2014. A History of Economic Theory and Method. 6th ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund, R., and Y.-N. Shieh. 1989. ‘Jevons on Utility, Exchange and Demand Theory: A Reassessment.’ The Manchester School 57 (1): 17–33. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1989.tb00799.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelund, R., and S. Thommesen. 1989. ‘Disequilibrium Theory and Thornton’s Assault on the Laws of Supply and Demand.’ History of Political Economy 21 (4): 567–592. doi:10.1215/00182702-21-4-567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelund, R., and M. Thornton. 2001. ‘William T. Thornton and Nineteenth Century Economic Policy: A Review Essay.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (4): 513–531. doi:10.1080/10427710120096983.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1949. ‘The Marshallian Demand Curve.’ Journal of Political Economy 57 (6): 463–495. doi:10.1086/256879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, R. 2007. ‘Terence Wilmot Hutchison: My Reminiscences.’ History of Economics Review 46: 162–169.
   Google Scholar
• Grapard, U., and G. Hewitson. 2011. Robinson Crusoe’s Economic Man. A Construction and Deconstruction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, P. 1990. ‘Neoclassical Value and Distribution Theory: The English-Speaking Pioneers.’ In Neoclassical Economic Theory, 1870 to 1930, edited by K. Hennings and W. Samuels, 13–58. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. 1973. ‘William Whewell’s Mathematical Statement of Price Flexibility, Demand Elasticity and the Giffen Paradox.’ The Manchester School 41 (3): 329–342. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1973.tb00084.x.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. 1975. ‘Rejoinder.’ The Manchester School 43 (4): 401–403. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1975.tb01241.x.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. 1985. ‘The Whewell Group of Mathematical Economists.’ The Manchester School 53 (4): 404–431. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1985.tb00203.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. 1953. A Review of Economic Doctrines 1870–1929. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. 1982. ‘The Politics and Philosophy in Jevons’s Political Economy.’ The Manchester School 50 (4): 366–377. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1982.tb00187.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. 1984. ‘Mr. White on Jevons: A Rejoinder.’ The Manchester School 52 (1): 73–74. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1984.tb00769.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. 1994a. ‘White on the Irish Factor in Jevons’s Statistics: A Rebuttal.’ History of Economics Review 21 (1): 65–70. doi:10.1080/10370196.1994.11733150.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. 1994b. ‘Three Strikes against White.’ History of Economics Review 21 (1): 87–87. doi:10.1080/10370196.1994.11733152.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R., and N. Miller. 2008. ‘Giffen Behavior and Subsistence Consumption.’ American Economic Review 98 (4): 1553–1577. doi:10.1257/aer.98.4.1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevons, W. 1882. The State in Relation to Labour. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• La Nauze, J. 1949. Political Economy in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lardner, D. 1850. Railway Economy. London: Taylor, Walton, and Maberly.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D., and S. Peart. 2005. The Vanity of the Philosopher. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, H. 2005. William Stanley Jevons and the Making of Modern Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macintyre, S. 2012. ‘La Nauze, Andrew John (1911–1990).’ Australian Dictionary of Biography. Australian National University. http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/la-nauze-andrew-john-575/text25044 Accessed on 07/03/2020
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1895. Principles of Economics, 3rd ed. London: Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1908 [1926]. ‘Memorandum on the Fiscal Policy of International Trade.’ Reprinted in Official Papers of Alfred Marshall, edited by J. M. Keynes. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. 1989. Robert Giffen and the Giffen Paradox. Oxford: Philip Allan.
   Google Scholar
• Masuda, E., and P. Newman. 1981. ‘Gray and Giffen Goods.’ The Economic Journal 91 (364): 1011–1014. doi:10.2307/2232507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. 1983. ‘The Rhetoric of Economics.’ Journal of Economic Literature 21 (2): 481–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, T., and J. Eisenhauer. 1995. ‘Sir Robert Giffen and the Great Potato Famine: A Discussion of the Role of a Legend in Neoclassical Economics.’ Journal of Economic Issues 29 (3): 747–759. doi:10.1080/00213624.1995.11505707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 1988. Against Mechanism. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 1989. More Heat than Light. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 1990. ‘Smooth Operator; How Marshall’s Demand and Supply Theory Made Neoclassicism Safe for Public Consumption, But Unfit for Science.’ In Alfred Marshall in Retrospect, edited by R. Tullberg, 61–90. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., and S. Tradewell, eds. 1999. ‘Introduction’ to The Economic Writings of William Thornton, Vol. 1, 1–70. London: Pickering and Chatto.
   Google Scholar
• Mosselmans, B. 2017. ‘William Stanley Jevons.’ In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/william-jevons/
   Google Scholar
• Muth, J. 1961. ‘Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements.’ Econometrica 29 (3): 315–335. doi:10.2307/1909635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakano, S. 2009. ‘Jevons’s Market View through the Dynamic Trajectories of Bilateral Exchanges.’ In A History of Economic Theory: Essays in Honour of Takashi Negishi, edited by A. Ikeo and H. Kurz, 169–201. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Negishi, T. 1986. ‘Thornton’s Criticism of Equilibrium Theory and Mill.’ History of Political Economy 18 (4): 567–577. doi:10.1215/00182702-18-4-567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negishi, T. 1987. ‘Tâtonnement and Recontracting.’ In The New Palgrave, Vol. 4, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, 584–596. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Negishi, T. 1989. ‘On Equilibrium and Disequilibrium: A Reply to Ekelund and Thommesen.’ History of Political Economy 21 (4): 593–600. doi:10.1215/00182702-21-4-593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien D. 2009. ‘Terence Wilmot Hutchison.’ Proceedings of the British Academy 161: 178–203.
   Google Scholar
• Peart, S. 1990. ‘The Population Mechanism in W. S. Jevons’s Applied Economics.’ The Manchester School 58 (1): 32–53. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1990.tb00407.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peart, S. 1994. ‘Jevons and the Population Mechanism: A Reply.’ The Manchester School 62 (1): 103–108. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1994.tb00649.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peart, S. 1996. The Economics of W. S. Jevons. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. 1925. Memorials of Alfred Marshall. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, E. 1896. ‘Gray, John.’ In Dictionary of Political Economy, Vol. 2, edited by R. H. I. Palgrave, 257–256. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prest, A. 1948. ‘Notes on the History of the Giffen Paradox: Comment.’ Journal of Political Economy 56 (1): 58–60. doi:10.1086/256636.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, S. 1979. ‘The Beeke Good: A Note on the Origins of the “Giffen Good”.’ History of Political Economy 11 (4): 606–607. doi:10.1215/00182702-11-4-606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, W. 1991. ‘Comment by Warren J. Samuels.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13: 236–239.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. 1961. Economics, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schabas, M. 2000. ‘The Jevonsian Revolution Reappraised.’ In Contributions to the History of Economic Thought. Essays in Honour of R. D. C. Black, edited by A. Murphy and R. Prendergast, 141–153. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, H. 1938. The Theory and Measurement of Demand. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. 1947. ‘Notes on the History of the Giffen Paradox.’ Journal of Political Economy 55 (2): 152–156. doi:10.1086/256487.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. 1948. ‘Notes on the History of the Giffen Paradox: A Reply.’ Journal of Political Economy 56 (1): 61–62. doi:10.1086/256637.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. 1950. ‘The Development of Utility Theory.’ Journal of Political Economy 58 (4): 307–327.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, W. 1869. On Labour. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. 1993. ‘After Mirowski, What?’ In Non-Natural Science: Reflecting on the Enterprise of More Heat than Light, edited by N. de Marchi, 300–302. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whately, R. 1831. Introductory Lectures on Political Economy. London: B Fellowes.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1982a. ‘Jevons in Australia: A Reassessment.’ Economic Record 58 (1): 32–45. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.1982.tb00347.x.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1982b. ‘Reading and Rewriting. The Production of an Economic Robinson Crusoe.’ Reprinted in Robinson Crusoe’s Economic Man. A Construction and Deconstruction, edited by U. Grapard and G. Hewitson, 15–41. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1983. ‘Creative Statistics – the Laffer Curve and Taxation Incentives.’ Journal of Australian Political Economy 14: 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1984. ‘Jevons in Australia: Response to Professor Hutchison.’ The Manchester School 52 (1): 70–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1984.tb00768.x.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1987a. ‘The “Intangible and Fugitive Nature” of Consumption Demand: William Whewell and Giffen Goods.’ History of Economics Review 8 (1): 12–24. doi:10.1080/10370196.1987.11733040.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1987b. ‘Porter’s Hint? a Note.’ Australian Economic Papers 26 (49): 328–331. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.1987.tb00512.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 1987c. ‘Robinson Crusoe.’ In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 4, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, 217–218. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1988a. ‘Porter’s Hint and Alternative Theories of the Giffen Paradox: A Rejoinder.’ Australian Economic Papers 27 (50): 145–146. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.1988.tb00814.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 1988b. ‘That God-Forgotten Thornton and the Laws of Supply and Demand.’ History of Economics Review 9 (1): 16–29. doi:10.1080/10370196.1988.11733047.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1989a. ‘Why Are There No Supply and Demand Curves in Jevons?’ History of Political Economy 21 (3): 425–456. doi:10.1215/00182702-21-3-425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 1989b. ‘Jevons’s Antipodean Interlude: Rejoinder.’ History of Political Economy 21 (4): 623–631. doi:10.1215/00182702-21-4-623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 1990. ‘Invention in the Face of Necessity: Marshallian Rhetoric and the Giffen Good(s).’ Economic Record 66 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.1990.tb02080.x.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1991a. ‘Jevons on Utility, Exchange and Demand Theory: Comment.’ The Manchester School 59 (1): 80–83. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1991.tb00439.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 1991b. ‘A Biographical Puzzle: Why Did Jevons Write The Coal Question?’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13 (2): 222–235. doi:10.1017/S1053837200003588.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1991c. ‘Reply by Mike White.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13: 239–242.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1991d. ‘Frightening the “Landed Fogies”: Parliamentary Politics and The Coal Question.’ Utilitas 3 (2): 289–302. doi:10.1017/S0953820800001163.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1991e. ‘Where Did Jevons’ Energy Come from?’ Economics Review 15: 60–72.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1991f. ‘Jevons’ “Blunder” concerning Value and Distribution: An Explanation.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 15 (2): 149–160. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 1991g. ‘Perfidious Giffen.’ History of Economics Review 16 (1): 80–88. doi:10.1080/10370196.1991.11733091.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1992. ‘Diamonds Are Forever (?): Nassau Senior and Utility Theory.’ The Manchester School 60 (1): 64–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1992.tb00211.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 1993. ‘The Irish Factor in Jevons’ Statistics: A Note.’ History of Economics Review 19 (1): 79–85. doi:10.1080/10370196.1993.11733128.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1994a. ‘Jevons and the Population Mechanism: Comment.’ The Manchester School 62 (1): 97–102. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1994.tb00648.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 1994b. ‘Bridging the Natural and the Social: Science and Character in Jevons’s Political Economy.’ Economic Inquiry 32 (3): 429–444. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1994.tb01341.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 1994c. ‘A Five Per Cent Racist? Rejoinder to Professor Hutchison.’ History of Economics Review 21 (1): 71–86. doi:10.1080/10370196.1994.11733151.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1994d. ‘“That God-Forgotten Thornton”: Exorcising Higgling after On Labour.’ In Higgling: Transactors and Their Markets in the History of Economics, History of Political Economy (annual supplement), edited by N. de Marchi and M. Morgan, 148–183. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1994e. ‘“Following Strange Gods”: Women in Jevons’ Political Economy.’ In Feminism and Political Economy in Victorian England, edited by P. Groenewegen, 46–78. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1994f. ‘The Moment of Richard Jennings: The Production of the Marginalist Economic Agent.’ In Natural Images in Economics: Markets Read in Tooth and Claw, edited by P. Mirowski, 197–230. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1998. ‘A Comment on Ekelund on Thornton.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (3): 371–374. doi:10.1017/S1053837200002182.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 1999. ‘Obscure Objects of Desire? Nineteenth-Century British Economists and the Price(s) of Rare Art.’ In Economic Engagements with Art, History of Political Economy, edited by N. de Marchi and C. Goodwin, 57–84. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2001. ‘Indeterminacy in Exchange: Disinterring Jevons’ Trading Bodies.’ The Manchester School 69 (2): 208–226. doi:10.1111/1467-9957.00243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 2002. ‘Doctoring Adam Smith: The Fable of the Diamonds and Water Paradox.’ History of Political Economy 34 (4): 659–683. doi:10.1215/00182702-34-4-659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 2003. ‘Some Difficulties with Sunspots and Mr. Macleod: Adding to the Bibliography of W. S. Jevons.’ History of Economics Review 38 (1): 33–52. doi:10.1080/18386318.2003.11682095.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2004a. ‘In the Lobby of the Energy Hotel: W.S. Jevons’ Formulation of the Post-Classical Economic Problem.’ History of Political Economy 36 (2): 227–271. doi:10.1215/00182702-36-2-227.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2004b. ‘Sympathy for the Devil: H.D. Macleod and W.S. Jevons’ Theory of Political Economy.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (3): 311–329. doi:10.1080/1042771042000263812.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2004c. ‘A Grin without a Cat: W.S. Jevons’ Elusive Equilibrium.’ In History and Political Economy. Essays in Honour of P.D. Groenewegen, edited by T. Aspromourgos and J. Lodewijks, 97–117. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2005a. ‘Strange Brew: The Antinomies of Distribution in W.S. Jevons’ Theory of Political Economy.’ The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12 (4): 583–608. doi:10.1080/09672560500370227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 2005b. ‘Breaking New Ground: The Significance of W.S. Jevons’ Rent Theory.’ History of Economics Review 41 (1): 142–156. doi:10.1080/18386318.2005.11681207.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2006a. ‘Review of H. Maas.’ EH.Net. https://doi.org/https://eh.net/book_reviews/william-stanley-jevons-and-the-making-of-modern-economics/
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2006b. ‘Cultivated Circles of the Empire: Bibliographical Notes on W.S. Jevons’ Antipodean Interlude (1854–1859).’ History of Economics Review 43 (1): 101–122. doi:10.1080/18386318.2006.11681224.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2009. ‘Hunting a Precursor: The Limits of Mountifort Longfield on Utility and Value.’ The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 16 (1): 65–96. doi:10.1080/09672560802707423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 2010a. ‘Thirsting for the Fray: The Cambridge Dunning of Mr. Macleod.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 32 (3): 305–328. doi:10.1017/S1053837210000428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 2010b. ‘A Revised Bibliography of Publications by W. Stanley Jevons.’ History of Economics Review 51 (1): 106–128. doi:10.1080/18386318.2010.11682159.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2011. ‘Dear Prudence: W.F. Lloyd on Population Growth and the Natural Wage.’ History of Economics Review 53 (1): 73–90. doi:10.1080/18386318.2011.11682177.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2015. ‘A Peculiar Archaeology: Searching for Mr. Giffen’s Behaviour.’ The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (1): 26–50. doi:10.1080/09672567.2013.792368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 2018a. ‘Not So Dull? Simon Gray and Giffen Behaviour.’ History of Economics Review 70 (1): 23–39. doi:10.1080/10370196.2019.1571393.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2018b. ‘Searching for New Jerusalems: P.H. Wicksteed’s “Jevonian” Critique of Marx’s Capital.’ The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (5): 1113–1153. doi:10.1080/09672567.2018.1523938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M., and T. Inoue. 1993. ‘Bibliography of Published Works by W.S. Jevons.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 15 (1): 122–147.
   Google Scholar
• White, M., and T. Inoue. 2009. ‘Retailing Poisoned Milk? New Evidence on J.M. Keynes and Jevons’s Hostility to John Stuart Mill.’ History of Political Economy 41 (3): 419–444. doi:10.1215/00182702-2009-034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M., and K. Schuler. 2009. ‘Who Said “Debauch the Currency”: Keynes or Lenin?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (2): 213–222. doi:10.1257/jep.23.2.213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar