629
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Looking at and looking along: a conceptual framework for teaching different perspectives in geography

Pages 353-366 | Published online: 02 Sep 2013

References

  • Alexander, S. (1920). Space, time and deity: The Gifford Lectures at Galsgow. Glasgow: The Gifford Lectures.
  • Alkis, S. (2009). Turkish geography trainee teachers’ perceptions of geography. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22(4), 120–133.
  • Amin, A. (Ed.) (1994). Post-Fordism: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Banham, D. (1998). Getting ready for the Grand Prix: Learning how to build a substantiated argument in Year 7. Teaching History, 92, 6–15.
  • Banham, D. (2000). The return of King John: Using depth to strengthen overview in the teaching of political change. Teaching History, 99, 8–13.
  • Barfield, O., & Lewis, C.S. (1933). Abecedarium Philosophicum, The Oxford Magazine, LII, 298.
  • Barrett Hacking, E. (1996). Novice teachers and their geographical persuasions. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 5, 77–86.
  • Bonnett, A. (2003). Geography as the world discipline: Connecting popular and academic geographical imaginations. Area, 35, 55–63.
  • Brooks, C. (2006). Geographical knowledge and teaching geography. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(4), 353–369.
  • Brooks, C. (2010). Why geography teachers’ subject expertise matters. Geography, 95(3), 143–148.
  • Brooks, C. (Ed.). (2009). Studying PGCE geography at M level. Reflection, research and writing for professional development. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Bustin, R. (2011). The living city: Thirdspace and the contemporary geography curriculum. Geography, 96(2), 60–68.
  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Castree, N. (2006). Commentary – Geographical knowledges, universities, and academic freedom. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1189–1192.
  • Catling, S., & Martin, F. (2011). Contesting powerful knowledge: The primary geography curriculum as an articulation between academic and children's (ethno-) geographies. Curriculum Journal, 22(3), 317–335.
  • Catling, S. (2004). An understanding of geography: The perspectives of English primary trainee teachers. GeoJournal, 60, 149–158.
  • Chalmers, L., Keown, P., & Kent, A. (2002). Exploring different ‘perspectives’ in secondary geography: Professional development options. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(4), 313–324.
  • Clifford, N.J. (2002). The future of geography: When the whole is less than the sum of its parts. Geoforum, 33, 431–436.
  • Counsell, C. (2011). Disciplinary knowledge for all, the secondary history curriculum and history teachers’ achievement. Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 201–225.
  • Devall, W., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Salt Lake City: Peregrine Smith.
  • Driver, F. (1992). Geography's empire: Histories of geographical knowledge. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10, 23–40.
  • Fien, J. (1999). Towards a map of commitment: A socially critical approach to geographic education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8(2), 140–158.
  • Firth, R. (2007). Geography teachers, teaching and the issue of knowledge. Nottingham: The Nottingham Jubilee Press.
  • Firth, R. (2011a). Making geography visible as an object of study in the secondary school curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 22(3), 289–316.
  • Firth, R. (2011b). Debates about knowledge and the curriculum: Some implications for geography education. In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 141–161). London: Continuum.
  • Gibson, C., & Kong, L. (2005). Cultural economy: A critical review. Progress in Human Geography, 29(5), 541–561.
  • Goldstein, D.L., & Goldstein, J.R. (1996). Feynman's lost lecture: The motion of planets around the sun. London: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Goodwin, M., & Painter, M. (1996). Local governance, the crises of Fordism and the changing geographies of regulation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 21(4), 635–648.
  • Haggett, P. (1996). Geography into the next century: Personal reflections. In E. Rawling, & R. Daugherty (Eds.), Geography into the twenty-first century (pp. 11–18). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Harrison, D. (2002, November 24). Children “being brainwashed” by new green geography lessons. Sunday Telegraph. In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 30–41). London: Continuum.
  • Hopwood, N. (2006). Pupils’ conceptions of school geography: A classroom based investigation (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Oxford.
  • Huckle, J. (2002). Towards a critical school geography. In M. Smith (Ed.), Teaching geography in secondary schools: A reader (pp. 255–265). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Johnson, R.J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G., & Watts, M., (2000). The dictionary of human geography (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Johnson, R.J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G. & Watts, M., & Whatmore, S. (2009). The dictionary of human geography (5th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Johnston, R., & Sidaway, J. (2004). Geography and geographers: Anglo-American human geography since 1945 (6th ed.). London: Arnold.
  • Lambert, D. (2011). Reviewing the case for geography, and the ‘knowledge turn’ in the English National Curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 243–264.
  • Leopold, A., & Sewell, M. (2001). A Sand County Almanac: With essays on conservation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lewis, C.S. (1944). Democratic education. In C.S. Lewis (Ed.), Compelling reason (pp. 38–42). London: Fount.
  • Lewis, C.S. (1945). Meditations in a toolshed. In C.S. Lewis (Ed.), Compelling reason (pp. 52–55). London: Fount.
  • Lewis, C.S. (1947). On stories. In C.S. Lewis (Ed.), Of this and other worlds (pp. 15–33). London: Fount.
  • Lewis, C.S. (1948). God in the dock. London: Fount.
  • Lewis, C.S. (1950). The lion, the witch and the wardrobe. Middlesex: Penguin.
  • Lewis, C.S. (1952). The voyage of the dawn treader. London: HarperCollins.
  • Lewis, C.S. (1953). The silver chair. Middlesex: Penguin.
  • Lewis, C.S. (1956). The last battle. Middlesex: Penguin.
  • Lewis, C.S. (1964). The discarded image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Livingstone, D. (1992). The geographical tradition: Episodes in the history of a contested enterprise. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • MacLeod, G. (1997). Globalizing Parisian thought-waves: Recent advances in the study of social regulation, politics, discourse and space. Progress in Human Geography, 21(4), 530–553.
  • Martin, F. (2000). Postgraduate primary education students’ images of geography and the relationship between these and students’ teaching. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 9(3), 223–244.
  • Maton, K., & Moore, R. (2010). Social realism, knowledge and the sociology of education: Coalitions of the mind. London: Continuum.
  • Maton, K. (2004). The wrong kind of knower: education, expansion and the epistemic device. In J. Muller, B. Davies & A. Morais (Eds.), Reading Bernstein, researching Bernstein (pp. 218–231). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • McDowell, L. (1991). Life without father and Ford: The new gender order of post-Fordism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 16(4), 400–419.
  • Morgan, A. (2006). Developing geographical wisdom: Postformal thinking about, and relating to, the world. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(4), 336–352.
  • Morgan, A. (2010). The Lord of the Rings – A mythos applicable in unsustainable times? Environmental Education Research, 16(3–4), 383–399.
  • Morgan, J. (2001). Popular culture and geography education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 10(3), 284–297.
  • Muller, J., Davies, B., & Morais, A. (2004). Reading Bernstein, researching Bernstein. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.
  • Peet, R. (1998). Modern geographic thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.
  • Rawling, E. (2003). Connecting policy and practice: Research in geography education. British Educational Research Association. Retrieved from http://www.bera.ac.uk/files/reviews/geogpu1.pdf
  • Standish, A. (2007). Geography used to be about maps. In R. Whelan (Ed.), The corruption of the curriculum. London: Civitas.
  • Standish, A. (2009). Global perspectives in the geography curriculum: Reviewing the moral case for geography. London: Routledge.
  • Stengel, B.S. (1997). ‘Academic discipline’ and ‘school subject’: Contestable curricular concepts. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(5), 585–602.
  • Thomas, D., & Goudie, A. (2003). Dictionary of physical geography (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Tickell, A., & Peck, J.A. (1992). Accumulation, regulation and the geographies of post-Fordism: Missing links in regulationist research. Progress in Human Geography, 16(2), 190–218.
  • Walford, R. (1996). ‘What is geography?’ An analysis of definitions provided by prospective teachers of the subject. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 5, 69–76.
  • Ward, M. (2008). Planet Narnia: The seven heavens in the imagination of C.S. Lewis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • White, J. (2007). What schools are for and why. Impact, . vi-51. doi:10.1111/j.2048-416X.2007.tb00116.x.
  • White, J. (Ed.). (2004). Rethinking the school curriculum: Values, aims and purposes. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Winter, C. (2006). Doing justice to geography in the secondary school: Deconstruction, invention and the national curriculum. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(2), 212–229.
  • Winter, C. (2007). Just maps: the geography curriculum in English schools. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 349–366.
  • Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
  • Young, M. (2009). What are schools for? In H. Daniels, H. Lauder, & J. Porter (Eds.), Knowledge, values and educational policy. London: Routledge.
  • Young, M. (2011). The return to subjects: A sociological perspective on the UK coalition government's approach to the 14–19 curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 165–278.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.