559
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The model of educational reconstruction – a powerful strategy to teach for conceptual development in physical geography: the case of water springs

, , &
Pages 237-257 | Received 30 Dec 2013, Accepted 08 Aug 2014, Published online: 22 Apr 2015

References

  • Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333, 1096–1097.
  • Bar, V. (1989). Children's views about the water cycle. Science Education, 73(4), 481–500.
  • Bar, V., & Galili, I. (1994). Stages of children's views about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 157–174.
  • Barquin, J., & Scarsbrook, M. (2008). Management and conservation strategies for coldwater springs. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18, 580–591.
  • Batzli, S., Gutmann, B., Hobi, P., & Rempfler, A. (2007). Das Geobuch [The geo-book] (Vol. 2). Zug: Klett & Balmer.
  • Bauer, J., Englert, W., Meier, U., Morgeneyer, F., & Waldeck, W. (2002). Physische Geographie kompakt [Physical geography compact]. Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
  • Baumgartner, A., & Liebscher, H.-J. (Eds.). (1990). Allgemeine Hydrologie [General hydrology]. Berlin: Bornträger.
  • Ben-zvi-Assarf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). A study of junior high students' perceptions of the water cycle. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 366–373.
  • Chang, J.-Y. (1999). Teachers college students’ conceptions about evaporation, condensation, and boiling. Science Education, 83(5), 511–526.
  • Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., & Preece, P. F. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 485–498.
  • Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., & Kattmann, U. (2005). Towards science education research that is relevant for improving practice: The model of educational reconstruction. In H. E. Fischer (Ed.), Developing standards in research on science education: The ESERA Summer School 2004 (pp. 1–9). London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction – a framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research practice in Europe – retrospective and prospective (pp. 13–37). Boston, MA: Sense.
  • Duit, R., Treagust, D., & Widodo, A. (2008). Teaching science for conceptual change – theory and practice. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.). International handbook of research on conceptual change (1st ed.) (pp. 629–646). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Essig, M., Flury, P., Frey-Auf der Maur, D., Hauri, S., Held, S., Lin, L., … Stuck, H. (2011). Diercke Geografie [Diercke geography]. Braunschweig: Westermann.
  • Ford, D. J. (2005). The challenges of observing geologically: Third graders’ description of rock and mineral properties. Science Education, 89(2), 276–295.
  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.
  • Hölting, B., & Coldewey, W. G. (2013). Hydrogeologie – Einführung in die Allgemeine und Angewandte Hydrogeologie [Hydrogeology – an introduction into the general and applied hydrogeology]. München: Elsevier.
  • Kattmann, U. (2005). Lernen mit anthropomorphen Vorstellungen? – Ergebnisse von Untersuchungen zur Didaktischen Rekonstruktion in der Biologie [Learning with anthropomorphic conceptions? – results of studies on educational reconstruction in biology]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 3(3), 165–174.
  • Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., & Komorek, M. (1997). Das Modell der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion – Ein Rahmen für naturwissenschaftsdidaktische Forschung und Entwicklung [The model of educational reconstruction – a framework for science education research and development]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 3(3), 3–18.
  • Kresic, N., & Stevanovic, Z. (Eds.). (2010). Groundwater hydrology of springs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Kugler, A. (1999). Die Erde – unser Lebensraum [The Earth – our living environment]. Zürich: Lehrmittelverlag.
  • Küry, D. (2009). Quellen als Lebensräume [Spring habitats]. In Kommission für das Baselbieter Heimatbuch (Ed.), Wasser lebendig, faszinierend, gefährlich: Baselbieter Heimatbuch. (Vol. 27, pp. 81–93). Liestal: Verlag des Kantons Basel-Landschaft.
  • Lane, R. & Coutts, P. (2012). Students’ alternative conceptions of tropical cyclone causes and processes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(3), 205–222.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2009). Constructivism as a theory of learning versus constructivism as a prescription for instruction. In S. Tobias, & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction. Success or failure? (pp. 184–200). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Mitchell, C., Theron, L., Stuart, J., Smith, A., & Campbell, U. (2011). Drawing as research method. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith, & J. Stuart (Eds.), Picturing research: Drawing as visual methodology (pp. 19–36). Boston, MA: Sense.
  • Oser, F. K., & Baeriswyl, F. J. (2001). Choreographies of teaching: Bridging instruction to learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.) (pp. 1031–1065). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Österlind, K., & Halldén, O. (2007). Linking theory to practice: A case study of pupils’ course work on freshwater pollution. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 16(1), 73–89.
  • Phillips, D. C. (Ed.). (2000). Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Press, F., & Siever, R. (1995). Allgemeine Geologie [General geology]. Heidelberg: Spektrum.
  • Reinfried, S. (2006). Conceptual change in physical geography and environmental sciences through mental model building – the example of groundwater. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(1), 41–61.
  • Reinfried, S., Aeschbacher, U., & Rottermann, B. (2012). Improving students’ conceptual understanding of the greenhouse effect using theory-based learning materials that promote deep learning. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(2), 155–178.
  • Reinfried, S., Tempelmann, S., & Aeschbacher, U. (2012). Addressing secondary school students’ everyday ideas about freshwater springs in order to develop an instructional tool to promote conceptual reconstruction. Hydrology and Earth System Science, 16, 1365–1377.
  • Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen [A questionnaire to measure the current motivation in learning and test situations]. Diagnostica, 2, 57–66.
  • Sczucińska, A. M., & Wasielewski, H. (2013). Seasonal water temperature variability of spings from porous sediments in Gryzynka Valley, Western Poland. Quaestiones Geographicae, 32(3). Retrieved November 12, 2013, from http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/quageo.2013.32.issue-3/quageo-2013-0019/quageo-2013-0019.xml
  • Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M., Schellenberg, L., & Harbor, J. (2009). Water transformation and storage in the mountains and at the coast: Midwest students’ disconnected conceptions of the hydrologic cycle. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1147–1471.
  • Siegmund, A., & Frankenberg, P. (2013). Klimakunde [Climatology]. Braunschweig: Westermann.
  • Springer, A. E., & Stevens, L. E. (2009). Spheres of discharge of springs. Hydrogeology Journal, 17, 83–93.
  • Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 687–715.
  • Tarbuck, E. J., & Lutgens, F. K. (2009). Earth science. Upper Saddle River, NY: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Peterson, S. (2007). Representational issues in students learning about evaporation. Research in Science Education, 37, 313–331.
  • Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2013). International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. New York, NY: Falmer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.