Geography teachers' concepts of working with Thinking Through Geography strategies – results of an empirical reconstructive study

References

• Applis, S. (2012). Wertorientierter Geographieunterricht im Kontext Globales Lernen. Theoretische Fundierung und empirische Untersuchung mit Hilfe der dokumentarischen Methode [Value-orientated learning in the context of global learning. Theoretical foundation and qualitative-reconstructive research with the documentary method]. Weingarten: Hochschulverband für Geographie und ihre Didaktik.
   Google Scholar
• Applis, S. (2013). Erzählungen von globaler Gerechtigkeit – Untersuchung von Problemfeldern wertorientierten Lernens im Geographieunterricht mit der dokumentarischen Methode [Research on the challenges of introducing the dilemma discussion for the support of judgment competence in the geography classroom]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Gesellschaftswissenschaften (ZDG), 4(2), 175–195.
   Google Scholar
• Applis, S. (2014a). Ethische Persönlichkeitsbildung aus geisteswissenschaftlicher und geographiedidaktischer Perspektive. Vorstellungen von Geographielehrkräften zu geographischer und schulischer Bildungsarbeit – Ergebnisse eines Projektes empirisch-rekonstruktiver Forschung [Teachers' concepts of geographical and Educational Work – An empirical reconstructive study contributing to the discussion of ethical personal development in German geography didactics]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Gesellschaftswissenschaften (ZDG), 5(4), 175–195.
   Google Scholar
• Applis, S. (2014b). Global learning in a geography course using the mystery method as an approach to complex issues. Review of International Geography Education online (RIGEO), 4(2), 58–70.
   Google Scholar
• Applis, S., & Fögele, J. (2014). Professionalisierung als Aufgabe der dritten Ausbildungsphase in der Lehrerbildung zur Umsetzung der Bildungsstandards [Professionalizing teacher training for implementation of educational standards]. Zeitschrift für Geographiedidaktik (ZGD), 42(4), 193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Baumfield, V. (2002). Thinking through religious education. Cambridge: Chris Kingston.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. (2006). Qualitative Evaluation und Handlungspraxis [Introduction on qualitative evaluation]. Grundlagen dokumentarischer Evaluationsforschung [Qualitative evaluation research]. In U. Flick (Ed.), Qualitative Evaluationsforschung [Qualitative evaluation research](pp. 135–155). Reinbeck b. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. (2014). Habitus, Norm und Identität [Habitus, norm and identity]. In W. Helsper, R.-T. Kramer, & P. Thiersch (Eds.), Schülerhabitus: Theoretische und empirische Analysen zum Bourdieuschen Theorem der kulturellen Passung [Students' habitus. Theoretical and empirical analyses on bourdieus concept of cultural adaption] (pp. 33–55). Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R., & Nentwig-Geesemann, I. (Eds.) (2010). Dokumentarische Evaluationsforschung: Theoretische Grundlagen und Beispiele aus der Praxis. Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (2001). Becoming a constructivist teacher. In L.A. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds, a resource book for teaching thinking. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, L., Keown, P.A., & Kent, A. (2002). Exploring different ‘perspectives’ in secondary geography: Professional development options. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(4), 313–324.
   Google Scholar
• Corney, G. (2006). Education for sustainable development: An empirical study of the tensions and challenges faced by geography student teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(3), 224–240.
   Google Scholar
• DGfG – German Geographical Society (Ed.). 2012. Educational standards in geography for the intermediate school certificate – With sample assignments. Berlin: German Geographical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, P. (2002). Thinking through history. Cambridge: Chris Kingston.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, W., Kramer, R.-T., & Thiersch, P. (2014). Habitus – Schule – Schüler: Eine Einleitung [Habitus, school, students. An introducion]. In W. Helsper, R.-T. Kramer, & P. Thiersch (Eds.). Schülerhabitus. Theoretische und empirische Analysen zum Bourdieuschen Theorem der kulturellen Passung [Students' habitus. Theoretical and empirical analyses on Bourdieu's concept of cultural adaption] (pp. 7–29). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In: T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behaviour. Theory, research and social issuses (pp. 32–53). New York, NY: Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Leat, D. (1998). Thinking through geography. Cambridge: Chris Kingston Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Loader, C., & Kettler, D. (2001). Karl Mannheim's sociology as political education. New Brunswick: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Loos, P., & Schäffer, B. (2001). Das Gruppendiskussionsverfahren. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendung [The method of group discussion. Theoretical and empirical principles]. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1997). Theory of society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mangold, W. (1960). Gegenstand und Methode des Gruppendiskussionsverfahrens [The method of group discussion]. Aus der Arbeit des Instituts für Sozialforschung [From the work carried out by the Institute for Social Research]. Frankfurt/Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Meja, V., & Stehr, N (Eds) (1990). Knowledge and politics. The sociology of knowledge dispute. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. (2000). Utilization-focused evaluation. In D. Stufflebeam (Ed.), Evaluation models. Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 425–438). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T.A. (1997). Evaluation as practical hermeneutics. Evaluation, 3(1), 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T.A. (2001). Understanding dialogue as practice. Evaluation, 7(2), 228–237.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, P., Coen, A., Hoffmann, K.-W., Rohwer, G. & Vankan, L. (2012). Denken Lernen mit Geographie [Thinking through geography]. Diercke Methoden 1. Braunschweig: Westermann.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, P., Coen, A., Hoffmann, K.-W., Rohwer, G. & Vankan, L. (2013). Mehr Denken Lernen mit Geographie [More thinking through geography]. Diercke Methoden 2. Braunschweig: Westermann.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand. Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R.E. (2004). Standard-based & responsive evaluation.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Uphues, R., Höhnle, P., & Schubert, J.C. (2013). What are the constraints to GI(S) usage? Selected results from a teacher survey about constraints in the school context. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22(3), 226–240.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Schee, J. (2003). Geographical education and citizenship education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12(1), 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Schee, J., Leat, D., & Vankan, L. (2006). Effects of the use of thinking through geography strategies. Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(2), 124–133.
   Google Scholar
• Vankan, L. (2003). Towards a new way of learning and teaching in geographical education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12(1), 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Walshe, N. (2007). Understanding teachers' conceptualisations of geography. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 16(2), 97–119.
   Google Scholar