GeoCapabilitiesFootnote¹

1. www.geocapabilities.org.

and curriculum leadership: balancing the priorities of aim-based and knowledge-led curriculum thinking in schools

References

• Béneker, T. (2012). Aardrijkskunde vecht voor positie. Geografie, 6, 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M. (2013). Where is the curriculum created? In D. Lambert & M. Jones (Eds.), Debates in geography education (pp. 129–142). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CA: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bladh, G. (2014). Geografilärare och geografiundervisning i den svenska grundskolan – några delresultat av en enkätstudie. Geografiska notiser, 72, 158–168.
   Google Scholar
• Bladh, G., & Molin, L. (2012). Skolämnet geografi och geografididaktisk forskning i Sverige och Norden. In N. Gericke & B. Schüllerqvist (Eds.), Ämnesdidaktisk komparation: Länder, ämnen, teorier, metoder, frågor och resultat; Studier i de samhällsvetenskapliga ämnenas didaktik (pp. 59–74). Karlstad: Karlstad University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. (2006). Geography teachers and making the school curriculum. Geography, 91, 79–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I., & Klette, K. (2008). Reconstructions of Nordic teachers: Reform policies and teachers’ work during the 1990s. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 117–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DGfG. (2007). Bildungsstandards im Fach Geographie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. Bonn: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (1998). Problematizing school subject content. In D. Roberts & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 13–14). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, R. (2011). Debates about knowledge and the curriculum: Some implications for geography education. In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 141–164). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Geographical Association. (2009). A different view: A manifesto from the Geographical Association. Sheffield: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gundem, B., & Hopmann, S. (Eds.). (1998). Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue. Didaktik and/or curriculum : An international dialogue /edited by In Bjørg B. Gundem & Stefan Hopmann. New York, NY: P. Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. S. (2009). Quo vadis? The capability space and new directions for the philosophy of education research. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28, 391–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, G. (2009). Capability and deliberation. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28, 403–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (2011). Reframing school geography: A capability approach. In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 127–140). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (2016). Geography. In D. Wyse, L. Harward, & J. Pandya (Eds), The sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp 391–408). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D., & Biddulph, M. (2014). The dialogic space offered by curriculum making in the process of learning to teach, and the creation of a progressive knowledge led curriculum. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D., & Morgan, J. (2010). Teaching geography 11–18: A conceptual approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D., Solem, M., & Tani, S. (2015). Achieving human potential through geography education: A capabilities approach to curriculum making in schools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105, 723–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, B. (1997). On taking the geography out of geography education: Some historical pointers. Geography, 82, 241–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, B. (2005). Reflections on geography: The worst taught subject? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2016). Geography teachers and curriculum making in “changing times”. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25, 121–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molin, L. (2006). Rum, frirum och moral: En studie av skolgeografins innehållsval. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Molin, L., & Grubbström, A. (2013). Are teachers and students ready for the new middle school geography syllabus in Sweden? Traditions in geography teaching, current teacher practices, and student achievement. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 67, 142–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllers, C. (2009). Demokratie – Zumutungen und Versprechen. Berlin: Wagenbach.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. (2014). Michael Young and the politics of the school curriculum. British Journal of Educational Studies, 63, 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, H. (2012). The societal factors contributing to education and schooling in Finland. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 19–38). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., & Kuiper, W. (2012). Balancing curriculum freedom and regulation in the Netherlands. European Educational Research Journal, 11, 357–368.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C., & Sen, A. (Eds.).(1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, D. (2009). Sind die traditionellen Lehrpläne überflüssig? Zur lehrplantheoretischen Problematik von Bildungsstandards und Kernlehrplänen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, F., Graves, N., & Lambert, D. (2016). Editorial. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25, 189–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solem, M., Lambert, D., & Tani, S. (2013). Geocapabilities: Toward an international framework for researching the purposes and values of geography education. RIGEO: Review of International Geographical Education Online, 3, 214–229.
   Google Scholar
• Standish, A. (2009). Global perspectives in the geography curriculum: Reviewing the moral case for geography. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stoltman, J., Lidstone, J., & Kidman, G. (2015). Powerful knowledge in geography: IRGEE editors interview Professor David Lambert, London Institute of Education, October 2014. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24, 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tani, S. (2014). Geography in the Finnish school curriculum: Part of the “success story”? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23, 90–101.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlenwinkel, A. (2015). Geographisches Wissen und geographische Argumentation. In A. Budke, M. Kuckuck, M. Meyer, F. Schäbitz, K. Schlüter, & G. Weiß (Eds.), Fachlich Argumentieren lernen (pp. 46–61). Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlenwinkel, A. (2016). Das Konzept der staatsbürgerlichen Verantwortung in der geographischen Bildung. In A., Budke & M. Kuckuck (Eds.), Politische Bildung im Geographieunterricht (pp. 37–45). Stuttgart: Steiner.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2012). World data on Education: Netherlands. Retrieved from www.ibe.unesco.org
   Google Scholar
• Wardenga, U., (2002). Alte und neue Raumkonzepte für den Geographieunterricht. Geographie heute, 23(200), 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., Lambert, D., Roberts, C., & Roberts, M. (2014). Knowledge and the future school: Curriculum and social justice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar