Assessment in geography education: a systematic review

References

• Akerlind, G. (2002, November). Principles and practice in phenomenographic research. Paper presented at the Current Issues in Phenomenography Conference, Australian National University, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. E., Tressler, K. D., & Mintzes, J. J. (2008). Assessing environmental understanding: An application of the concept mapping strategy. Environmental Education Research, 14(5), 519–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthamatten, P. (2010). Spatial thinking concepts in early grade-level geography standards. Journal of Geography, 109(5), 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antman, E. M., Lau, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C. (1992). A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts: Treatments for myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 268(2), 240–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atasoy, E. (2009). Eighth grade students’ associations of geographical and environmental concepts. New Educational Review, 17(1), 102–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atherton, R. (2011). Controlled assessment: Getting it right ? Teaching Geography, 36(1), 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. (2003). Teachers’ use of feedback comments to improve student achievement in standards-based assessment. International Journal of Learning, 10, 1197–1208.
   Google Scholar
• Battersby, S. E., Golledge, R. G., & Marsh, M. J. (2006). Incidental learning of geospatial concepts across grade levels: Map overlay. Journal of Geography, 105(4), 139–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennetts, T. (2005a). Progression in geographical understanding. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14(2), 112–132.
   Google Scholar
• Bennetts, T. (2005b). The links between understanding, progression and assessment in the secondary geography curriculum. Geography, 90(2), 152–170.
   Google Scholar
• Bettis, N. C. (2001). Assessment issues in geographic education for the twenty-first century. Journal of Geography, 100(4), 172.
   Google Scholar
• Bijsterbosch, E., van der Schee, J., & Kuiper, W. (2017). Meaningful learning and summative assessment in geography education: An analysis in secondary education in the Netherlands. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(1), 17–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budke, A., Schiefele, U., & Uhlenwinkel, A. (2010). ‘I think it's stupid’ is no argument: Investigating how students argue in writing. Teaching Geography, 35(2), 66–69.
   Google Scholar
• Butt, G., Weeden, P., Chubb, S., & Srokoszc, A. (2006). The state of geography education in English secondary schools: An insight into practice and performance in assessment. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(2), 134–148.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., & Cowie, B. (2010). Collaborative research for assessment for learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 979–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, V. (2008). Exploring the nature of examiner thinking during the process of examination marking. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(2), 247–264.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. (2002). Levels of attainment in geography. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9(2), 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., Durbin, C., Clarke, J., & Dale, J. (2004). Developing students’ conceptions of quality in geography. Curriculum Journal, 15(1), 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C., Shavelson, R. J., & Wertheim, J. A. (2013). A road map for 21st century geography education: Assessment. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., & Pearce, T. (2010). What we know, do not know, and need to know about climate change vulnerability in the western Canadian Arctic: A systematic literature review. Environmental Research Letters, 5(1). 1–9. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J., Clarke, J., Davies, P., & Durbin, C. (2002). Helping students to get better at geographical writing. Teaching Geography, 27(4), 156–160.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, D., & Rawlings, K. (2001). Assessing young children's freehand sketch maps of the world. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 10(1), 20–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, M., Hinkel, J., & Wrobel, M. (2011). Classifying knowledge on climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability in Europe for informing adaptation research and decision-making: A conceptual meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1106–1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh, N. T., & Sharpe, B. (2013). An assessment instrument to measure geospatial thinking expertise. Journal of Geography, 112(1), 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education (IGU-CGE). (2016). 2016 International charter on geographical education. Beijing: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jo, I., & Bednarz, S. (2009). Evaluating geography textbook questions from a spatial perspective: Using concepts of space, tools of representation, and cognitive processes to evaluate spatiality. Journal of Geography, 108(1), 4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (1996). Issues in assessment. In P. Bailey & P. Fox (Eds.), Geography teacher's handbook (pp. 187–201). Sheffield: Geographical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (2011). The lie of the land (revisited). Teaching Geography, 36(1), 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, R., & Bourke, T. (2016a). Possibilities for an international assessment in geography. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(1), 71–85. doi:10.1080/10382046.2016.1165920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, R., & Bourke, T. (2016b). The inclusion of geography in TIMSS: Can consensus be reached ? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(2), 166–176. doi:10.1080/10382046.2016.1178939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leat, D., & Nichols, A. (2000). Brains on the table: Diagnostic and formative assessment through observation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 7(1), 103–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Bednarz, R. (2012). Components of spatial thinking: Evidence from a spatial thinking ability test. Journal of Geography, 111(1), 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, G., & Barrett, R. (2002). Standards framework: Developing scales of achievement in post-compulsory education: A case study. Issues in Educational Research, 12(1), 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Marcello, J. S. (2009). A proposal for assessment in geography education. Journal of Geography, 108(4–5), 226–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, R. K. (2015). Mapping the knowledge topography: A critical appraisal of geography textbook questions. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(2), 118–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M. … PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1). 1–9. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munowenyu, E. (2007). Assessing the quality of essays using the SOLO taxonomy: Effects of field and classroom-based experiences by ‘A’ level geography students. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 16(1), 21–43.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S., Nuttall, J., & Mitchell, J. (2008). Research into initial teacher education in Australia: A survey of the literature 1995–2004. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education, 14(2), 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Oxman, A. D., & Guyatt, G. H. (1993). The science of reviewing research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 125–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panadero, E., Tapia, J. A., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, A. (2011). Geography teachers’ views on the assessment and evaluation instruments and methods used in the renewed geography curriculum. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(3), 334–341.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., de Loë, R., & Armitage, D. (2012). A systematic review of water vulnerability assessment instruments. Water Resources Management, 26, 4327–4346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudel, T. K. (2008). Meta-analyses of case studies: A method for studying regional and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 18, 18–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smothers, J. (2002). Geography standards: Instruction and assessment in action. Geographical Education, 15, 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Solem, M., Huynh, N. T., & Boehm, R. (Eds.). (2015). Learning progressions for maps, geospatial technology, and spatial thinking: A research handbook. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tánago Gonzales, I., Urquijo, J., Blauhut, V., Villarroya, F., & De Stefano, L. (2016). Learning from experience: A systematic review of assessments of vulnerability to drought. Natural Hazards, 80(2), 951–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiknaz, Y., & Sutton, A. (2006). Exploring the role of assessment tasks to promote formative assessment in Key Stage 3 Geography: Evidence from twelve teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 13(3), 327–343.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaszewski, B., Vodacek, A., Parody, R., & Holt, N. (2015). Spatial thinking ability assessment in Rwandan secondary schools: Baseline results. Journal of Geography, 114(2), 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Schee, J., & Kolkman, R. (2010). Multimedia tests and geographical education: The 2008 International Geography Olympiad. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 19(4), 283–293.
   Google Scholar
• Weeden, P. (2013). How do we link assessment to making progress in geography ? In D. Lambert & M. Jones (Eds.), Debates in geography education (pp.143–154). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weeden, P., & Lambert, D. (2006). Geography inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the geography classroom. London: Granada Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Wehry, S., Monroe-Ossi, H., Cobb, S., & Fountain, C. (2012). Concept mapping strategies: Content, tools and assessment for human geography. Journal of Geography, 111(3), 83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheim, J. A., Edelson, D. C., Hildebrant, B., Hinde, E., Kenney, M., Kolvoord, R., … Shavelson, R. (2013). A road map for improving geography assessment. Geography Teacher, 10(1), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D. (2013). Comparing assessments within junior geography textbooks used in mainland China. Journal of Geography, 112(2), 58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasar, O. (2009). A comparative analysis of assessment and evaluation exercises included in geography textbooks written according to the 2005 secondary education geography curriculum and textbooks of the former curriculum in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 5(1), 45–68.
   Google Scholar