Teachers’ understanding of the interconnectedness of soil and climate change when developing a systems thinking concept map for teaching and learning

References

• Anon. (2005). Township. Encarta Dictionary. [CD-ROM.], Product ID: 75967-442-3798177-01694, Version: 14.0.0.0603.
   Google Scholar
• Anyanwu, R., & Le Grange, L. (2017). The influence of teacher variables on climate change science literacy of Geography teachers in the Western Cape, South Africa. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 26(3), 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. H., & Pascua, L. (2016). Singapore students' misconceptions of climate change. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 25(1), 84–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud, J. (2005). Some systems thinking concepts for environmental educators during the decades of education for sustainable development. Applied environmental educations and communication. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 4(3), 225–228.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M., Elen, J., & Steegen, A. (2019). Systems thinking in geography: Can high school students do it? International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 28(1), 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. P., Dent, E. B. & Wharff, D. M. (2015). A conceptual model of systems thinking leadership in community colleges. Systemic Practice And Action Research, 28(4), 333–335.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. C., & Stroink, M. L. (2016). The relationship between systems thinking and the new ecological paradigm. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 33, 575–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sousa, L. O. (2013). Promoting education for sustainable development: An environmental management systems framework for South African primary schools (Unpublished PhD thesis). Potchefstroom, NWU.
   Google Scholar
• Echarri, F., & Baguer, J. P. I. (2008). Environmental education and meaningful learning. Seguridad Medio Ambiente, 28(112), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genc, M. (2015). The project-based learning approach in environmental education. The project-based learning approach in environmental education. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 24(2), 105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, S., & McKay, R. (2001). What constructivist theory and brain research may offer social studies. Retrieved from http://www2.education.ualberta.ca/css/Css_35_4/ARconstructionist_theory.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hassmiller Lich, K., Urban, J., Frerichs, L., & Dave, G. (2017). Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems. Evaluation & Program Planning, 60, 254–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghuis, F., van der Schee, J., van der Velde, M., Imants, J., & Volman, M. (2014). The adoption of thinking through geography strategies and their impact on teaching geographical reasoning in Dutch secondary schools. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 23(3), 242–258.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K., & Tilbury, D. (2004). Whole-school approaches to sustainability: An international review of sustainable school programs. Retrieved from http://aries.mq.edu.au/projects/whole_school/files/international_review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Henning, P. B., Wilmshurst, J., & Yearworth, M. (2012). Understanding systems thinking: An agenda for applied research in industry. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2012, San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. P. (2008). A fresh look at brain-based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(6), 408–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littledyke, M., Taylor, N., & Eames, C. (2009). Why do we need to teach education for sustainability at the primary level? In M. Littledyke, N. Taylor & C. Eames (Eds.), Education for sustainability in the primary curriculum: A guide for teachers (pp. 1–7). South Yarra: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, I. K., & Walinga, J. (2017). The creative imperative: The role of creativity, creative problem solving and insight as key drivers for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1872–1884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. A. (1977). Theory of education. Ithaca: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19(1), 29–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1991). Clarifying with concept maps: A tool for students and teachers alike. Science Teaching, 58(7), 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Florida. Retrieved from http://www.ssu.ac.ir/fileadmin/templates/fa/Moavenatha/Moavenate-Amozeshi/edicupload/olymp-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raath, S. P., & Hay, E. A. (2019). Preservice geography students’ exposure to systems thinking and cooperative learning in environmental education. Journal of Geography, 28(1), 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkränzer, F., Hörsch, C., Schuler, S., & Riess, W. (2017). Student teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching systems thinking: Effects of different interventions. International Journal of Science Education, 39(14), 1932–1951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler, S., Fanta, D., Rosenkraenzer, F., & Riess, W. (2018). Systems thinking within the scope of education for sustainable development (ESD): A heuristic competence model as a basis for (science) teacher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(2), 192–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuell, T. J. (1990). Phases of meaningful learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 531–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman, A. A. (2005). Systems and creative thinking. Cairo: Pathways to Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change, Schumacher briefings. Bristol, England: ERIC, Institute of Education Sciences, Schumacher UK, CREATE Environment Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, S. (2003). Whole systems thinking as a basis for paradigm change in education: Explorations in the context of sustainability (p. 477) (Unpublished thesis – PhD). University of Bath, Bath.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, S. (2005). Whole systems thinking as a basis for paradigm change in education: Explorations in the context of sustainability (Unpublished PhD thesis), Centre for Research in Education and the Environment, University of Bath, Bath.
   Google Scholar
• South Africa Department of Basic Education (SADBE) (2011). National curriculum statement (NCS). Curriculum and assessment policy statement. Social sciences, intermediate phase grades 4–6. Pretoria: Government Printing Works.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, G. (2009). Systems thinking: The ability to recognise and analyse the interconnections within and between systems. In A. Stibbe (Ed.), The handbook of sustainability literacy: Skills for a changing world (pp. 84–88) Devon, UK: Green Books.
   Google Scholar
• Treml, A. K. (1995). Systems theory pedagogics. In P. Higgs (Ed.), Methatheories in philosophy of education (pp. 264–284). Johannesburg: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (2012). The future we want: Outcome document adopted at Rio + 20. New York, NY, USA: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2014). Roadmap for implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. Paris, France: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO-UNEP. (1978). Final report, Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education (p. 101), Tbilisi (USSR), 14–26 October 1977(ED/MD/49). Paris: UNESCO-UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• University of Waterloo. (2016). Centre of teaching excellence: Rubric for assessing concept maps. Retrieved from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/sites/ca.centre-for-teaching-excellence/files/uploads/files/rubric_for_assessing_concept_maps.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooyen, H. (2006). Are we environmentally friendly science teachers? The role of environmental education in science. In H. Van Rooyen & J. de Beer (Eds.), Teaching science in the OBE classroom. Pietermaritzburg: MacMillan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooyen, H. G., & De Beer, J. (2007). Taking apart or putting together? Systems teaching-learning in ESD. Paper Presented at the 4th World Environmental Education Congress in Durban, 2–6 July. pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Mind in society; collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology, trans. Norris Minick. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Walinga, H. (2017). From barriers to breakthroughs: Leading others past wicked problems to inclusive practice using integrated focus. In A. B. de Moras, R. L. Dutra & H. E. Schockman (Eds.), Breaking the zero-sum game: Transforming societies through inclusive leadership (Building Leadership Bridges) (pp. 395–417). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, K. J. (2013). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19(3), 321–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2017). Introduction to special issue: Models and tools for systems learning and instruction. Instructional Science, 45(1), 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinser, R. (2012). A curriculum model of a foundation for educating the global citizens of the future. On the Horizon, 20(1), 64–73.
   Google Scholar