References
- Ball, S. (1993). Education, majorism and the ‘curriculum of the dead. Curriculum Studies, 1(2), 195–214.
- Bustin, R. (2017). An investigation into GeoCapability and Future 3 curriculum thinking in geography (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Institute of Education, University College London, London.
- Bustin, R. (2019). Geography education’s potential and the capabilities approach: GeoCapabilities and school. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bustin, R., & Speake, J. (2020). Third space. In A. Kobayashi (Ed.), International encyclopedia of human geography (2nd ed., pp. 259–264, vol. 13). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Hawley, D., & Lyon, J. (2019). Plate update: Refreshing ideas for teaching plate tectonics. Teaching Geography, 42(1), 30–32.
- Lambert, D. (2019). On the knotty question of ‘recontextualising’ knowledge: Editorial. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(4), 257–261.
- Lambert, D., Solem, M., & Tani, S. (2015). Achieving human potential through geography education: A capabilities approach to curriculum making in schools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 723–735.
- Mitchell, D. (2020). Hyper-socialised: How teachers enact the geography curriculum in late capitalism. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Young, M., & Lambert, D. (2014). Knowledge and the future school: Curriculum and social justice. London: Bloomsbury.
- Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three education scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27.