Can playing an “unfair game” promote ethical decision-making? The use of the “trading game” in secondary-school geography lessons

References

• Adalbjarnardottir, S., & Selman, R. L. (1989). How children propose to deal with the criticism of their teachers and classmates. Developmental and stylistic variations. Child Development, 60(3), 539–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applis, S. (2012). Wertorientierter Geographieunterricht im Kontext Globales Lernen. Weingarten: Selbstverlag des HGD.
   Google Scholar
• Applis, S. (2014). Global learning in a geography course using the mystery method as an approach to complex issues. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 4(1), 58–70.
   Google Scholar
• Applis, S. (2015). Analysis of the possibilities for discussing questions of global justice in geography classes on the use of methods of empirical social research when analyzing the teaching of geography in class. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(3), 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applis, S. (2016). Research on the challenges of introducing the dilemma discussion for the support of judgment competence in the geography classroom. Research in Geographic Education, 18(1), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (2006). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrowsky, P., Cronin, V., Di Capua, G., Kieffer, S., & Peppoloni, S. (2018). The emerging field of geoethics. In L. Gundersen (Ed.), Scientific integrity and ethics in the geosciences. Special publications (Vol. 73, pp. 1–42). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; American Geophysical Union.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. (2010). Documentary method and group discussions. In R. Bohnsack, N. Pfaff, & W. Weller (Eds.), Qualitative analysis and documentary method in international educational research (pp. 99–125). Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R., Pfaff, N., & Weller, W. (Eds.). (2010). Qualitative analysis and documentary method in international educational research. Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Christian Aid. (n.d.). The trading game. Retrieved from https://www.christianaid.org.uk/schools/trading-game
   Google Scholar
• DGfG. (2017). Bildungsstandards im Fach Geographie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss mit Aufgabenbeispielen. Bonn: Selbstverlag der DGfG. Retrieved from http://geographiedidaktik.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Bildungsstandards_Geographie_9.Aufl_._2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dörner, O., Loos, P., Schäffer, B., & Schondelmeyer, A.-C. (2019). Einleitung Dokumentarische Methode: Triangulation und blinde Flecken. In: O. Dörner, P. Loos, B. Schäffer, & A.-C. Schondelmeyer (Eds.), Dokumentarische Methode: Triangulation und blinde Flecken (pp. 7–15). Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory. The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. (2013). Moral tribes. Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind. Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics. How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hößle, C. (2000). Research on students` moral judgement on genetechnology in biology teaching. In H. Bayrhuber & U. Unterbruner (Eds.), Lehren und Lernen im Biologieunterricht (pp. 94–107). Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, J. (2018). Zur Eignung spielbasierter Unterrichtssettings für ethisches Urteilen im Geographieunterricht. Ein konzeptioneller Vergleich des Welthandelsspiels mit dem iterierten Gefangenendilemma. Zeitschrift für Geographiedidaktik (ZGD), 46(4), 33–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, J., Applis, S., & Mehren, R. (2019). Glokalisierte Lebenswelten. Ethisches Urteilen als Pro- und Antikooperative Argumentations- und Verhaltensweisen im Geographieunterricht. Exemplarisch rekonstruiert an den drei Methoden Mystery, Dilemmadiskussion und Welthandelsspiel. Zeitschrift für Geographiedidaktik (ZGD), 47(2), 3–45.
   Google Scholar
• Höttecke, D., Hößle, C., Eilks, I., Menthe, J., Feierabend, T., Mrochen, M., & Oelgeklaus, H. (2010). Judgement and decision-making about socio-scientific issues: A cross-faculty approach for learning about the climate change. In: I. Eilks & B. Ralle (Eds.), Contemporary science education (pp. 179–192). Aachen: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. (2014). Homo ludens. A study of the play-element in culture. Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• IGU CGE. (2016). International charter on geographical education. Retrieved from http://www.igu-cge.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/IGU_2016_eng_ver25Feb2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kater-Wettstädt, L. (2018). How secondary-school students deal with issues of sustainable development in class. Environmental Education Research, 24(11), 1565–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral development. A review of the theory. Theory into Practice, 16(2), 53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. (1982). Structures of thinking. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, H. (1987). Patterns, thinking, and cognition. A theory of judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehren, M., Mehren, R., Ohl, U., & Resenberger, C. (2015). Die doppelte Komplexität geographischer Themen. Geographie Aktuell & Schule, 37(216), 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, M. A., & Highfield, R. (2012). SuperCooperators. Altruism, evolution, and why we need each other to succeed. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills. Education 2030. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/E2030_Position_Paper_(05.04.2018).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In: M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Siege, H., & Schreiber, J.-R. (Eds.). (2016). Curriculum framework education for sustainable development. Berlin: KMK.
   Google Scholar
• Šorytė, D., & Pakalniškienė, V. (2019). Why it is important to protect the environment: Reasons given by children. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(3), 228–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich-Riedhammer, E. M. (2017). Ethisches Urteilen im Geographieunterricht. Münster: Readbox.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals. Learning objectives. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.de/sites/default/files/2018-08/unesco_education_for_sustainable_development_goals.pdf
   Google Scholar