Using geography’s conceptual ways of thinking to teach about sustainable development

References

• Bagoly-Simó, P. (2014). Tracing sustainability: Education for sustainable development in the lower secondary geography curricula of Germany, Romania, and Mexico. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(2), 126–141.
   Google Scholar
• Bagoly-Simó, P. (2017). Exploring comparative curricular research in geography education. Documents D’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 63(3), 561–573.
   Google Scholar
• Béneker, T. (2018). Powerful knowledge in geography education. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, C., Gericke, N., Höglund, H.-O., & Bergman, E. (2014). Subject- and experience-bound differences in teachers’ conceptual understanding of sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 20(4), 526–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. (2018). Understanding conceptual development in school geography. In M. Jones & D. Lambert (Eds.), Debates in geography education (2nd ed., pp. 103–114). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casinader, N., & Kidman, G. (2018). Fieldwork, sustainability, and environmental education: The centrality of geographical inquiry. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 34(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, G. N. (2003). Moving beyond postdevelopment: Facilitating Indigenous alternatives for “development”. Economic Geography, 79(4), 405–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekins, P. (2011). Environmental sustainability: From environmental valuation to the sustainability gap. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 35(5), 629–651.
   Google Scholar
• Haubrich, H., Reinfried, S., & Schleicher, Y. (2007). Lucerne declaration on geographical education for sustainable development. In S. Reinfried, Y. Schleicher, & A. Remplfer (Eds.), Geographical views on education for sustainable development: Proceedings (pp. 243–250). International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. (1991). The green economy: Environment, sustainable development and the politics of the future. Concord, MA: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., & Ross, A. (2016). National sustainabilities. Political Geography, 51, 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanemoto, K., Moran, D., Lenzen, M., & Geschke, A. (2014). International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: New evidence from air pollution. Global Environmental Change, 24, 52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (2017). Thinking geographically. In M. Jones (Ed.), The handbook of secondary geography. Sheffield: Geographical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., Foran, B., Lobefaro, L., & Geschke, A. (2012). International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature, 486(7401), 109–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, C. (2005). Integrating sustainable development into Structural Funds programmes: An evaluation of the Scottish experience. European Environment, 15(5), 313–331.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. E. (2021). The new climate war: The fight to take back our planet. Brunswick: Scribe.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, B. (1997). On taking the geography out of geographical education. Geography, 82(3), 241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Maude, A. (2011). Integrating environmental and social objectives into regional development programmes: What could we learn from Scotland and Sweden? Sustaining Regions, the Newsletter of ANZRSAI, 1(1), 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Maude, A. (2014). A sustainable view of sustainability. Geography, 99(1), 47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Maude, A. (2020). The role of geography’s concepts and powerful knowledge in a future 3 curriculum. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(3), 232–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maude, A. (2021). Recontextualisation: Selecting and expressing geography’s “big ideas. In M., Fargher, D. Mitchell, & E. Till, (Eds.), Recontextualising geography in education (pp. 25–39). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, M. E. (2020). Geography education for sustainable development. Geography and Sustainability, 1(1), 88–92.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J. (2022). Powerful knowledge, disciplinary knowledge, curriculum knowledge: Educational knowledge in question. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2022.2058349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, E. (2015). What sort of geographical education for the Anthropocene? Geographical Research, 53(3), 306–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendrill, F., Persson, U. M., Godar, J., & Kastner, T. (2019). Deforestation displaced: Trade in forest-risk commodities and the prospects for a global forest transition. Environmental Research Letters, 14(5), 055003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porritt, J. (2005). Capitalism as if the world mattered. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future, 5, 1169–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A. (2018). The received curriculum: Nature as understood by students. In A. Sharma & C. Buxton (Eds.), The natural world and science education in the United States (pp. 149–166). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, V., & Arora, S. (2015). Land degradation processes and factors affecting crop production in Foothills of Jammu Shivaliks. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 14(4), 295–300.
   Google Scholar
• Stoknes, P. E. (2021). Tomorrow’s economy: A guide to creating healthy green growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, P. (2004). A perspective on environmental sustainability? A paper for the Victorian Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability. Retrieved August 04, 2021, from https://www.donboscogozo.org/images/pdfs/energy/A-Perspective-on-Environmental-Sustainability.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, M., & Rhoads, B. (2003). Conceptions of nature: Implications for an integrated geography. In S. Trudgill & A. Roy (Eds.), Contemporary meanings in physical geography: From what to why? (pp. 211–231). London: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. (2007). Spaces of sustainability: Geographical perspectives on the sustainable society. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T. O., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Suh, S., West, J., & Kanemoto, K. (2015). The material footprint of nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(20), 6271–6276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2018). The inner level: How more equal societies reduce stress, restore sanity and improve everyone’s well-being. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar