Disability and domestic violence: protecting survivors' human rights

Primary sources

Secondary sources

• Peter Adams et al (1995) ‘Dominance and Entitlement: The Rhetoric Men Use to Discuss Their Violence Towards Women’ 6 Discourse and Society 387.
   Google Scholar
• Frank Ascione et al (2007) ‘Battered Pets and Domestic Violence: Animal Abuse Reported by Women Experiencing Intimate Violence and Non Abused Women’ 13 Violence Against Women 354.
   Google Scholar
• Maria Attard and Sonya Price-Kelly (2010) ‘Accommodating Violence: The Experience of Domestic Violence of People with Disability Living in Licensed Boarding Houses’ People With Disability Australia, http://www.pwd.org.au/documents/pubs/Accommodating%20Violence%20Report.pdf. 17 January 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Attorney General’s Department (SA) (2007) ‘South Australian Domestic Violence Laws: Discussion and Options for Reform’ Discussion Paper, Policy Planning and Legislation Division, SA Government.
   Google Scholar
• Attorney General’s Department (SA) (2014) ‘Discussion Paper: Improving the Criminal Justice System for People Living With a Disability’ Government of South Australia, http://www.agd.sa.gov.au/sites/agd.sa.gov.au/files/documents/Initiatives%20Announcements%20and%20News/DJP%20Submissions/Julia%20Farr%20Association%20Purple%20Orange.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission (2010) Family Violence: A National Legal Response, ALRC.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel Bagenstos (2009) Law and the Contradictions of the Disability Rights Movement, Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eileen Baldry et al (2013) ‘Reducing Vulnerability to Harm in Adults With Cognitive Disabilities in the Australian Criminal Justice System’ 10 Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 222.
   Google Scholar
• Helen Bartlett and Elaine Mears (2011) Sexual Violence Against People With Disabilities, Rape Crisis Network Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Burton Blatt (1970) Exodus from Pandemonium, Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth Broderick (2012) ‘Violence Against Women With a Disability in Rural Australia’, paper presented at the 56th session of the Commission on the Status of Women Rural Women and Girls with Disabilities: Economic Empowerment and Political Participation, United Nations 28 February 2012, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas Brownridge (2006) ‘Partner Violence Against Women With Disabilities: Prevalence, Risk and Explanations’12 Violence Against Women 805.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas Brownridge (2009) ‘Situating Research on Safety Promoting Behaviours Among Disabled and Deaf Victims of Interpersonal Violence’ 15 Violence Against Women 1075.
   Google Scholar
• Willie V Bryan (2010) The Social Perspectives and Political History of Disabilities and Rehabilitation in the United States, Charles C Thomas Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fiona Campbell (2009) Frontiers of Ableism, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lesley Chenoweth and Sandy Cook (eds) (2001) ‘Violence Against Women With Disabilities: Special Issue’ 7 Violence Against Women 363.
   Google Scholar
• Philippa Clarke et al (2008) ‘Mobility Disability and the Urban Built Environment’ 168 American Journal of Epidemiology 506.
   Google Scholar
• Kimberley Crenshaw (1991) ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color’ 43 Stanford Law Review 1241.
   Google Scholar
• Crime and Misconduct Commission (2005) Policing Domestic Violence in Queensland: Meeting the Challenges, Crime and Misconduct Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Mary Ann Curry et al (2001) ‘Abuse of Women With Disabilities: An Ecological Model and Review’ 7 Violence Against Women 60.
   Google Scholar
• Michael D’Antonio (2004) The State Boys Rebellion, Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Janine Dillon (2010) Violence Against People With Cognitive Impairments, Office of the Public Advocate.
   Google Scholar
• Heather Douglas (2008) ‘The Criminal Law’s Response to Domestic Violence: What’s Going On?’ 30 Sydney Law Review 439.
   Google Scholar
• Heather Douglas (2012) ‘Battered Women’s Experiences of the Criminal Justice System: Decentring the Law’ 20 Feminist Legal Studies 121.
   Google Scholar
• Heather Douglas and Robin Fitzgerald (2013) ‘Legal Processes and Gendered Violence: Cross-Applications for Domestic Violence Protection Orders’ 36 University of New South Wales Law Journal 56.
   Google Scholar
• Heather Douglas and Tanja Stark (2010) ‘Stories from Survivors: Domestic Violence and Criminal Justice Interventions’ University of Queensland, http://www.law.uq.edu.au/documents/publications/douglas/Stories-From-Survivors-Douglas-Stark.pdf. 17 January 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Leanne Dowse et al (2009) ‘Disability Criminology: Conceptualising the Intersections of Critical Disability Studies and Critical Criminology for People With Mental Health and Cognitive Disabilities in the Criminal Justice System’ 15 Australian Journal of Human Rights 29.
   Google Scholar
• Leanne Dowse et al (2013) Stop the Violence: Addressing Violence Against Women and Girls With Disabilities in Australia, Women With Disabilities Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Vic Finkelstein (1980) Attitudes and Disabled People: Issues for Discussion, World Rehabilitation Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Sandra Fredman (2011) Discrimination Law 2nd edn, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosemarie Garland-Thomson (2006) ‘Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory’ in LJ Davis (ed) The Disability Studies Reader 2nd edn, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dan Goodley (2001) ‘“Learning Difficulties”, the Social Model of Disability and Impairment: Challenging Epistemologies’ 16 Disability & Society 207.
   Google Scholar
• Dan Goodley (2014) ‘Markets, Cruel Optimism and Civil Society: Producing Dis/ability’ in D Goodley (ed) Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dan Goodley et al (2012) ‘Introducing Disability and Social Theory’ in D Goodley et al (eds), Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jan Gordon (1997) ‘The “Talking Cure” (Again): Gossip and the Paralyzed Patriarchy’ in S Snyder and D Mitchell (eds) The Body and Physical Difference: Discourses of Disability, University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emily Grabham et al (2009) ‘Introduction’ in E Grabham et al (eds) Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Regina Graycar and Jenny Morgan (2000) The Hidden Gender of Law 2nd edn, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ian Hacking (1999) The Social Construction of What? Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill Hague et al (2011) ‘Disabled Women, Domestic Violence and Social Care: The Risk of Isolation, Vulnerability and Neglect’ 41 British Journal of Social Work 148.
   Google Scholar
• Lynne Harne and Jill Radford (2008) Tackling Domestic Violence: Theories, Policies and Practice, Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul Harpur (2010) ‘The Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities and Australian Anti-Discrimination Laws: What Happened to the Legal Protections for People Using Guide or Assistance Dogs?’ 29 University of Tasmania Law Review 49.
   Google Scholar
• Paul Harpur (2011) ‘Time to Be Heard: How Advocates Can Use the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities to Drive Change’ 45 Valparaiso University Law Review 1.
   Google Scholar
• Paul Harpur (2012a) ‘Embracing the New Disability Rights Paradigm: The Importance of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ 27 Disability & Society 1.
   Google Scholar
• Paul Harpur (2012b) ‘From Disability to Ability: Changing the Phrasing of the Debate’ 27 Disability & Society 325.
   Google Scholar
• Paul Harpur (2013) ‘From Universal Exclusion to Universal Equality: Regulating Ableism in a Digital Age’ 40 Northern Kentucky Law Review 529.
   Google Scholar
• Paul Harpur (2014) ‘The Gap Between Law and Practice When Workers are Silent Witnesses to Workplace Violence: Evidence from the Health Sector’ 30 Journal of Health, Safety and Environment 1 (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Lucy Healey et al (2013) ‘Inclusive Domestic Violence Standards: Strategies to Improve Interventions for Women with Disabilities?’ 28 Violence and Victims 50.
   Google Scholar
• Jody Heymann et al (2014) ‘Disability, Employment and Inclusion Worldwide’ in J Heymann et al (eds) Disability and Equity at Work, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karen Hughes et al (2012) ‘Prevalence and Risk of Violence Against Adults With Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies’ 379 The Lancet 9826.
   Google Scholar
• Cathy Humphreys and Ravi Thiara (2003) ‘Mental Health and Domestic Violence: “I Call It Symptoms of Abuse”’ 33 British Journal of Social Work 209.
   Google Scholar
• Rosemary Hunter (2006) ‘Law’s (Masculine) Violence: Reshaping Jurisprudence’ 17 Law and Critique 27.
   Google Scholar
• Jennifer Keilty and Georgina Connelly (2001) ‘Making a Statement: An Exploratory Study of Barriers Facing Women With an Intellectual Disability When Making a Statement About Sexual Assault to Police’ 16 Disability & Society 2.
   Google Scholar
• Nicola Lacey (2004) ‘Feminist Legal Theory and the Rights of Women’ in K Knop (ed) Gender and Human Rights, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendy Larcombe and Mary Heath (2012) ‘Developing the Common Law and Rewriting the History of Rape in Marriage in Australia: PGA v The Queen’ 34 Sydney Law Review 785.
   Google Scholar
• Carin Lefkowitz et al (2005) ‘Animal-Assisted Prolonged Exposure: A Treatment for Survivors of Sexual Assault Suffering Posttraumatic Stress Disorder’ 13 Society & Animals 275.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas Lemke (2013) Perspectives on Genetic Discrimination, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nancy Lemon (2001) Domestic Violence Law, West Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley Lewis (2006) ‘A Mad Fight: Psychiatry and Disability Activism’ in LJ Davis (ed) The Disability Studies Reader 2nd edn, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jin-Ding Lin et al (2010) ‘Domestic Violence Against People With Disabilities: Prevalence and Trend Analyses’ 31 Research in Developmental Disabilities 1264.
   Google Scholar
• Emily Lund (2012) ‘Violence Against People With Disabilities: New Developments and Important Implications’ Spotlight on Disability Newsletter. http://www.apa.org/pi/disability/resources/publications/newsletter/2012/12/disabilities-violence.aspx. 17 January 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy Mack (2014) ‘Psychiatric Survivors/Consumers Die and Nothing is Done: An Examination of the Discriminatory Nature of the Ontario Coroner’s Act’ 3 Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 36.
   Google Scholar
• Sandra Martin et al (2006) ‘Physical and Sexual Assault of Women With Disabilities’ 12 Violence Against Women 823.
   Google Scholar
• Jennifer Mays (2006) ‘Feminist Disability Theory: Domestic Violence Against Women With a Disability’ 21 Disability & Society 147.
   Google Scholar
• Suzanne McDermott (2012) ‘Crime Risk Associated with Disability’ Disability and Health Journal 211.
   Google Scholar
• Ronagh McQuigg (2011) Human Rights Law, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sally Engle Merry (2003) ‘Constructing a Global Law: Violence Against Women and the Human Rights System’ 28 Law and Social Inquiry 941.
   Google Scholar
• Bonita Meyersfeld (2010) Domestic Violence and International Law, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenny Morris (1991) Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability, The Women’s Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Suellen Murray and Melanie Heenan (2012) ‘Reported Rapes in Victoria: Police Responses to Victims With a Psychiatric Disability or Mental Health Issue’ 23 Current Issues in Criminal Justice 3.
   Google Scholar
• NCRVWC (National Council to Reduce Violence Against Women and their Children) (2009) Time for Action: The National Council’s Plan for Australia to Reduce Violence Against Women and their Children, 2009–2021, NCRVWC.
   Google Scholar
• Lisa Nerenberg (2008) Elder Abuse Prevention: Emerging Trends and Promising Strategies, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• NSW LRC (New South Wales Law Reform Commission) (1994) People With an Intellectual Disability and the Criminal Justice System: Courts and Sentencing Issues, Discussion Paper 35, NSW LRC.
   Google Scholar
• Jennifer Nixon (2009) ‘Domestic Violence and Women With Disabilities: Locating the Issue on the Periphery of Social Movements’ 24 Disability & Society 77.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Oliver (1990) The Politics of Disablement, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Oliver (1994) ‘Capitalism, Disability and Ideology: A Materialist Critique of the Normalization Principle’, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Oliver (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Oliver and Colin Barnes (2012) The New Politics of Disablement 2nd edn, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nick O’Neill and Carmelle Peisah (2011) ‘Sterilisation’ Sydney University Press Law Book Number 17, Capacity and the Law, http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/SydUPLawBk/2011/17.html
   Google Scholar
• Bob Pease (2010) Undoing Privilege: Unearned Advantage in a Divided World, Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sara-Beth Plummer and Patricia A Findley (2012) ‘Women With Disabilities Experience With Physical and Sexual Abuse: Review of the Literature and Implications for the Field’ 13 Trauma Violence and Abuse 15.
   Google Scholar
• PWDA (People With Disability Australia) (2013) ‘Stop The Violence: Facts & Figures’, http://www.stvp.org.au/stats.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Maurine Pyke (2007) South Australian Domestic Violence Laws: Discussion and Options for Reform, Discussion Paper, Attorney General’s Department (SA).
   Google Scholar
• Jill Radford et al (2006) ‘Disabled Women and Domestic Violence as Violent Crime’ 18 Practice: Social Work in Action 233.
   Google Scholar
• Neil Rees et al (2008) Australian Anti-Discrimination Law, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neil Rees et al (2014) Australian Anti-Discrimination Law 2nd edn, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sally Robinson (2013) Stopping Insult and Injury: Preventing the Emotional Abuse and Neglect of People with Mental Disability, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kaley Maureen Roosen (2009) ‘From Tragedy to “Crip” to Human: The Need for Multiple Understandings of Disability in Psychotherapy’ 1 Critical Disability Discourse 1.
   Google Scholar
• Sue Salthouse and Carolyn Frohmader (2004) ‘Double the Odds: Domestic Violence and Women With Disabilities’, paper presented to the Home Truths Conference, 15–17 September, Melbourne, http://wwda.org.au/issues/viol/viol2001/odds/.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas Seddon (1993) Domestic Violence in Australia: The Legal Response 2nd edn, Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tom Shakespeare (2014) Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited 2nd edn, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tom Shakespeare and Nicholas Watson (2002) ‘The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology’ 2 Research In Social Science and Disability 9.
   Google Scholar
• Mark Sherry (2010) Does Anyone Really Hate Disabled People?, Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Margrit Shildrick (2012) ‘Critical Disability Studies: Rethinking the Conventions for the Age of Postmodernity’ in N Watson et al (eds) Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin Siebers (2008) Disability Theory, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Chih Hoong Sin (2013) ‘Making Disablist Hate Crime Visible: Addressing the Challenges of Improving Reporting’ in A Roulstone and H Mason-Bish (eds) Disability, Hate Crime and Violence, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Angela M Smith (2011) Hideous Progeny: Disability Eugenics and Classic Horror Cinema, Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dick Sobsey (1994) Violence and Abuse in the Lives of People With Disabilities: The End of Silent Acceptance? Paul H Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Natalie Sokoloff and Ida Dupont (2005) ‘Domestic Violence at the Intersections of Race, Class and Gender: Challenges and Contributions to Understanding Violence Against Marginalized Women in Diverse Communities’ 11 Violence Against Women 38.
   Google Scholar
• Evan Stark (2004) ‘Insults, Injury and Injustice: Rethinking State Intervention in Domestic Violence Cases’ 10 Violence Against Women 1302.
   Google Scholar
• Evan Stark (2007) Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Ashley Stein and Penelope JS Stein (2007) ‘Beyond Disability Civil Rights’ 58 Hastings Law Journal 1203.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Ashley Stein et al (2012) ‘Accommodating Every Body’ 82 Chicago Law Review 689.
   Google Scholar
• Eleanor Tan et al (2012) ‘GPs’ Communication Skills: A Study into Women’s Comfort to Disclose Intimate Partner Violence’ 41 Australian Family Physician 513.
   Google Scholar
• Philip Tedeschi et al (2010) ‘Assistance Animals: Their Evolving Role in Psychiatric Service Applications for Practice’ in A Fine (ed) Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy: Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice 3rd edn, Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravi Thiara et al (2001) ‘Losing Out on Both Counts: Disabled Women and Domestic Violence’ 26 Disability & Society 757.
   Google Scholar
• Ravi Thiara et al (2012) Disabled Women and Domestic Violence: Responding to the Experiences of Survivors, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tanya Titchkosky and Rod Michalko (2012) ‘The Body as the Problem of Individuality: A Phenomenological Disability Studies Approach’ in D Goodley et al (eds) Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marius Turda (2010) Modernism and Eugenics, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• UN DESA/DAW (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for the Advancement of Women) (2009) Handbook for Legislation on Violence Against Women, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission (2006) Review of Family Violence Laws Report, Victorian Law Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Lisa Waddington and Matthew Diller (2002) ‘Tensions and Coherence in Disability Policy: The Uneasy Relationship Between Social Welfare and Civil Rights Models of Disability in American, European and International Employment Law’ in M Breslin and S Yee (eds) Disability Rights Law and Policy: International and National Perspectives, Transnational Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Alison Walter-Brice et al (2012) ‘What Do Women With Learning Disabilities Say About Their Experiences of Domestic Abuse Within the Context of Their Intimate Partner Relationships?’ 27 Disability & Society 503.
   Google Scholar
• Neil Websdale and Byron Johnson (1997) ‘The Policing of Domestic Violence in Rural and Urban Areas: The Voices of Battered Women in Kentucky’ 6 Policing and Society 297.
   Google Scholar
• Deborah L Wells et al (2008) ‘Canine Responses to Hypoglycemia in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes’ 14 The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 1235.
   Google Scholar
• Deborah L Wells (2009) ‘The Effects of Animals on Human Health and Well-Being’ 65 Journal of Social Issues 523.
   Google Scholar
• Karen Wilcox (2010) Recent Innovations in Australian Protection Order Law – A Comparative Discussion: Topic Paper 19, Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• James C Wilson (2006) ‘Re-Writing the Genetic Body-Text: Disability, Textuality, and the Human Genome Project’8 in L Davis (ed) The Disability Studies Reader 2nd edn, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• WWDA (Women With Disabilities Australia) (2007) ‘Review of South Australian Domestic Violence Laws’ submission to the South Australian Government, http://wwda.org.au/issues/viol/viol2006/sthaustviol07/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization and World Bank (2011) World Report on Disability, World Health Organization and World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Rick Yount et al (2012) ‘Service Dog Training Program for Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress in Service Members’ US Army Medical Department Journal 63.
   Google Scholar