Advanced search
Publication Cover
Griffith Law Review Volume 25, 2016 - Issue 1: Gender, Health and the Law
Submit an article Journal homepage
324
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Protecting the future well: access to preconception genetic screening and testing and the right not to use it

Isabel Ann KarpinFaculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 71-86 | Published online: 03 Jul 2016

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

  • Gary Albrecht and Patrick Devlieger (1999) ‘The Disability Paradox: High Quality of Life Against all Odds’ 48 Social Science and Medicine 977. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00411-0
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics ACOG (2011) ‘Committee Opinion No. 486: Update on Carrier Screening for Cystic Fibrosis’ 117 Obstetrics and Gynecology 1028. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821922c2
  • Kyle Anstey (2008) ‘A Critique of Arguments Supporting Disability Avoidance’ 23(2) Disability and Society 235. doi: 10.1080/09687590801954000
  • Adrienne Asch (2003) ‘Disability Equality and Prenatal Testing: Contradictory or Compatible?’ 30 Florida State University Law Review 315.
  • Autism Speaks (date unknown) ‘What is Autism - DSM-5 DiagnosticCriteria’ http://www.autismspeaks.org/what-autism/diagnosis/dsm-5-diagnostic-criteria.
  • Komal Bajaj and Susan Gross (2014) ‘Carrier Screening: Past, Present and Future’ 3(3) Journal of Clinical Medicine 1033. doi: 10.3390/jcm3031033
  • Kevin Beaver et al (2008) ‘The Intersection of Genes and Neuropsychological Deficits in the Prediction of Adolescent Delinquency and Low Self-Control’ 54(1) International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 22. doi: 10.1177/0306624X08325349
  • Maria Berghs et al (2015) ‘Resignifying the Sickle Cell Gene: Narratives of Genetic Risk, Impairment and Repair’ Health 1. doi:10.1177/1363459315595850
  • Nancy Bombaci (2012) ‘Popular Discourses on the Neurotypical Woman: Conformity, Authority and Post-War Femininities’ 23(2) Women: A Cultural Review 139, 144.
  • Pieter Bonte et al (2014) ‘Is There a Moral Obligation to Conceive Children under the Best Possible Conditions? A Preliminary Framework for Identifying the Preconception Responsibilities of Potential Parents’ 15(5) BMC Medical Ethics 2.
  • Alana Cattapan et al (2015). ‘Notions of Reproductive Harm in Canadian Law: Addressing Exposures to Household Chemicals as Reproductive Tools’ 1 CJCCL 79.
  • John Constantino and Tony Charman (2012) ‘Gender Bias, Female Resilience, and the Sex Ratio in Autism’ 51(8) Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 756. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.05.017
  • Will Courtenay (2000) ‘Constructions of Masculinity and Their Influence on Men’s Well-Being: A Theory of Gender and Health’ 50(10) Social Science & Medicine 1385. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00390-1
  • Martin Delatycki et al (2014) ‘Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Population-based Carrier Screening for Cystic Fibrosis’ 17(6) Twin Research and Human Genetics 578. doi: 10.1017/thg.2014.65
  • Janice Edwards et al (2015) ‘Expanded Carrier Screening in Reproductive Medicine—Points to Consider: A Joint Statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine’ 125(3) Obstetrics & Gynecology 653. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000666
  • Thalia Elev et al (2003) ‘A Longitudinal Behavioral Genetic Analysis of the Etiology of Aggressive and Nonaggressive Antisocial Behavior’ 15(2) Development and Psychopathology 383.
  • Elizabeth Ettorre (2002) Reproductive Genetics, Gender and the Body, Routledge.
  • Arline Geronimus (2013) ‘Deep Integration: Letting the Epigenome Out of the Bottle Without Losing Sight of the Structural Origins of Population Health’ 103(S1) American Journal of Public Health S56. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301380
  • Eva Gillis-Buck and Sarah Richardson (2014) ‘Autism as a Biomedical Platform for Sex Differences Research’ 9 BioSocieties 262. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2014.17
  • Sylvie Goldman (2013) ‘Opinion: Sex, Gender and the Diagnosis of Autism — A Biosocial View of the Male Preponderance’ 7(6) Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 675. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2013.02.006
  • Bridget Goosby and Chelsea Heidbring (2013) ‘The Transgenerational Consequences of Discrimination on African-American Health Outcomes’ 7(8) Sociology Compass 630. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12054
  • Brendan Gough (2006) ‘Try to Be Healthy, But Don’t Forgo Your Masculinity: Deconstructing Men’s Health Discourse in the Media’ 63(9) Social Science & Medicine 2476. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.004
  • Health Council of the Netherlands (2007) ‘Preconception Care: A Good Beginning’ http://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/200719e.pdf
  • MR Herbert et al (2006) ‘Autism and Environmental Genomics’ 27 NeuroToxicology 671. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.03.017
  • Human Genetics Commission UK (2011) ‘Increasing Options, Informing Choice: A Report on Preconception Genetic Testing and Screening’ http://f.hypotheses.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/257/files/2011/04/2011.HGC_.-Increasing-options-informing-choice-final2.pdf.
  • Julia Inthorn (2014) ‘Fuzzy Logic and Preconceptional Genetic Carrier Screening’ 1 Archives for the Philosophy and History of Soft Computing 5.
  • Joy Johnson et al (2004) ‘Othering and Being Othered in the Context of Health Care Services’ 16(2) Health Communication 255. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1602_7
  • Isabel Karpin (2010) ‘Taking Care of the Health of the Preconceived Embryos or Constructing Legal Harm’ in J Nisker, F Baylis, I Karpin, C McLeod & R Mykitiuk (eds), The Healthy Embryo, Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–150.
  • Isabel Karpin and Karen O’Connell (2015) ‘Stigmatising the Normal: The Regulation of Behavior as a Disability’ 38(4) University of New South Wales Law Journal 9.
  • Isabel Karpin and Kristin Savell (2012) Perfecting Pregnancy: Law Disability and the Future of Reproduction, Cambridge University Press.
  • Louise Keogh and Margaret Otlowski (2013) ‘Life Insurance and Genetic Test Results: A Mutation Carrier's Fight to Achieve Full Cover’ 199(5) The Medical Journal of Australia 363. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10202
  • Hannah Landecker and Aaron Panofsky (2013) ‘From Social Structure to Gene Regulation, and Back: A Critical Introduction to Environmental Epigenetics for Sociology’ 39 Annual Review of Sociology 333. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145707
  • Sol Levine (1987) ‘The Changing Terrains in Medical Sociology: Emergent Concern with Quality of Life’ 28 Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1. doi: 10.2307/2137136
  • Raelia M. Lew et al (2015) ‘Tay-Sachs Disease: Current Perspectives from Australia’ 8 The Application of Clinical Genetics 19. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S49628
  • Abby Lippman (1991) ‘Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequities’ 17(1–2) American Journal of Law and Medicine 15.
  • Abby Lippman (2006) ‘The Inclusion of Women in Clinical Trials: Are We Asking the Right Questions?’ http://www.whp-apsf.ca/pdf/clinicalTrialsEN.pdf.
  • Michelle McGowan et al (2013) ‘The Changing Landscape of Carrier Screening: Expanding Technology and Options?’ 23(1) Health Matrix Clevel 15.
  • Maurizio Meloni (2015) ‘Heredity 2.0: The Epigenetics Effect’ 34(2) New Genetics and Society 117. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2015.1036156
  • Lucy Modra et al (2010) ‘Ethical Considerations in Choosing a Model for Population-based Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Screening’ 193(3) Medical Journal of Australia 157.
  • National Council on Disability (2012) ‘Rocking the Cradle: Ensuring the Rights of Parents with Disabilities and Their Children Chapter 11’ https://www.ncd.gov/publications/2012/Sep272012/Ch11.
  • Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch (2003) ‘Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic Testing: Reflections and Recommendations’ 9 Mental Retardations and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 40. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10056
  • Jo C. Phelan et al (2013) ‘The Genomic Revolution and Beliefs about Essential Racial Differences: A Backdoor to Eugenics?’ 78(2) American Sociological Review 167. doi: 10.1177/0003122413476034
  • Neil Risch et al (1999) ‘A Genomic Screen of Autism: Evidence for a Multilocus Etiology’ 65(2) The American Journal of Human Genetics 493. doi: 10.1086/302497
  • Mark Rothstein et al (2009) ‘The Ghost in Our Genes: Legal and Ethical Implications of Epigenetics’ 19(1) Health matrix 1.
  • Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Gynaecologists and Human Genetics Society of Australasia (2015) ‘Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis of Chromosomal and Genetic Abnormalities in the Fetus in Pregnancy: C-Obs 59’.
  • Michael Rutter (2012) ‘Gene–Environment Interdependence’ 9(4) European Journal of Developmental Psychology 391. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2012.661174
  • Rosamund Scott (2007) Choosing Between Possible Lives: Law and Ethics of Prenatal and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Hart Publishing.
  • Jackie Leach Scully (2008) ‘Disability and Genetics in the Era of Genomic Medicine’ 9 Nature Reviews Genetics 797. doi: 10.1038/nrg2453
  • Shannon Sullivan (2013) ‘Inheriting Racist Disparities in Health: Epigenetics and the Transgenerational Effects of White Racism’ 1(2) Critical Philosophy of Race 190. doi: 10.5325/critphilrace.1.2.0190
  • Sannie Tang et al (2008) ‘Race’ Matters: Racialization and Egalitarian Discourses Involving Aboriginal People in the Canadian Health Care Context’ 13(2) Ethnicity and Health 109. doi: 10.1080/13557850701830307
  • Deborah Tolman et al (2003) ‘Gender Matters: Constructing a Model of Adolescent Sexual Health’ 40(1) Journal of Sex Research 4. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552162
  • Essi Viding et al (2005) ‘Evidence for Substantial Genetic Risk for Psychopathy in 7-Year-Olds’ 46(6) Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 592. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00393.x
  • Miranda R Waggoner and Tobias Uller (2015) ‘Epigenetic Determinism in Science and Society’ 34(2) New Genetics and Society 177. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2015.1033052
  • Megan Warin et al (2015) ‘Epigenetics and Obesity the Reproduction of Habitus Through Intracellular and Social Environments’ Body & Society. doi:10.1177/1357034X15590485.
  • Sara Wienke et al (2014) ‘Expanded Carrier Screening Panels - Does Bigger Mean Better?’ 5 Journal of Community Genetics 191. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0169-6
  • Ryan Yuen et al (2015) ‘Whole-genome Sequencing of Quartet Families with Autism Spectrum Disorder’ 21(2) Nature Medicine 185. doi: 10.1038/nm.3792

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.