The politics of international law: the life cycle of emerging norms on the use and regulation of private military and security companies

References

• Primary Legal Sources
   Google Scholar
• Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis, 82 UNTS 279, opened for signature 8 August 1945 (entered into force 8 August 1945).
   Google Scholar
• Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Malta) (Judgment) [1985] ICJ Rep 13.
   Google Scholar
• Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, opened for signature 10 December 1984, 1465 UNTS 85 (entered into force 26 June 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, opened for signature 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 31 (entered into force 21 October 1950).
   Google Scholar
• Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, opened for signature 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 85 (entered into force 21 October 1950).
   Google Scholar
• Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, opened for signature 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 287 (entered into force 21 October 1950).
   Google Scholar
• Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, opened for signature 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 135 (entered into force 21 October 1950).
   Google Scholar
• International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries, opened for signature 4 December 1989, 2163 UNTS 75 (entered into force 20 October 2001).
   Google Scholar
• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, opened for signature 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171 (entered into force 23 March 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion) [2004] ICJ Rep 136.
   Google Scholar
• Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion) [1996] ICJ Rep 226.
   Google Scholar
• Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America) (Merits) [1986] ICJ Rep 14.
   Google Scholar
• Organization of African Unity Convention for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa, opened for signature 3 July 1977, 1490 UNTS 95 (entered into force 22 April 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Prosecutor v Tadić (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Appeals Chamber, Case No IT-94-1-A, 2 October 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), opened for signature 8 June 1977, 1125 UNTS 3 (entered into force 7 December 1978).
   Google Scholar
• Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), opened for signature 8 June 1977, 1125 UNTS 609 (entered into force 7 December 1978).
   Google Scholar
• Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, opened for signature 17 July 1998, 2187 UNTS 90 (entered into force 1 July 2002).
   Google Scholar
• US v Slough (DC, 1:14-cr-107-RCL, 1:08-cr-360-RCL, 22 October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• UN Sources
   Google Scholar
• Reports
   Google Scholar
• Ad Hoc Committee on Drafting the Mercenaries Convention (1981) Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Drafting of an International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries, UN Doc A/36/43.
   Google Scholar
• Ad Hoc Committee on Drafting the Mercenaries Convention (1983) Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Drafting of an International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries, UN Doc A/38/43.
   Google Scholar
• Amada Benavides de Pérez (2007) Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/HRC/4/42.
   Google Scholar
• Enrique Bernales Ballesteros (1998) Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/53/338.
   Google Scholar
• Enrique Bernales Ballesteros (2003) Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination; Report Submitted by Mr Enrique Bernales Ballesteros, Special Rapporteur, UN Doc E/CN.4/2004/15.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Human Rights (2005) The Right of Peoples to Self-Determination and Its Application to Peoples Under Colonial or Alien Domination or Foreign Occupation, UN Doc E/CN.4/2005/23.
   Google Scholar
• Fifth Committee (2013) Programme Budget for the Biennium 2012–2013: Report of the Fifth Committee, UN Doc A/67/677/Add.1.
   Google Scholar
• José Luis Gómez del Prado (2010) Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/HRC/15/25.
   Google Scholar
• International Law Commission (2006) Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law – Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, Finalized by Martti Koskenniemi, UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul S Minty (2012) Report of the Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group to Consider the Possibility of Elaborating an International Regulatory Framework on the Regulation, Monitoring and Oversight of the Activities of Private Military and Security Companies on Its Second Session, UN Doc A/HRC/22/41.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul S Minty (2014) Summary of the Third Session of the Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group to Consider the Possibility of Elaborating an International Regulatory Framework on the Regulation, Monitoring and Oversight of the Activities of Private Military and Security Companies, UN Doc A/HRC/WG.10/3/2.
   Google Scholar
• Luvuyo L Ndimeni (2011) Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group to Consider the Possibility of Elaborating an International Regulatory Framework on the Regulation, Monitoring and Oversight of the Activities of Private Military and Security Companies: Summary of the First Session, UN Doc A/HRC/WG.10/1/CRP.2.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander Nikitin (2009) Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of the Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/HRC/10/14.
   Google Scholar
• Shaista Shameem (2005) Report on the Question of the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/60/263.
   Google Scholar
• UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries (2008) Report on the Question of the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/63/325.
   Google Scholar
• UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries (2012a) Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/67/340.
   Google Scholar
• UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries (2012b) Submission by the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/HRC/WG.10/2/CRP.1.
   Google Scholar
• UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries (2013) Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of People to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/68/339.
   Google Scholar
• UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries (2014) Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/69/338.
   Google Scholar
• UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries (2016) Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/HRC/33/43.
   Google Scholar
• Resolutions
   Google Scholar
• Basic Principles of the Legal Status of the Combatants Struggling Against Colonial and Alien Domination and Racist Regimes, GA Res 3103 (XXVIII), UN GAOR, 28th sess, 2197th plen mtg, Agenda Item 96, Supp No 30, UN Doc A/Res/3103(XXVIII) (12 December 1973).
   Google Scholar
• Declaration on the Activities of Mercenaries in Africa, OAU Res CM/St.6(XVII) (June 1971).
   Google Scholar
• Drafting of an International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries, GA Res 34/140, UN GAOR, 34th sess, 104th plen mtg, Agenda Item 129, Supp No 46, UN Doc A/RES/34/140 (14 December 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Drafting of an International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries, GA Res 35/48, UN GAOR, 35th sess, 81st plen mtg, Agenda Item 29, Supp No 48, UN Doc A/RES/35/48 (4 December 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Draft Resolution – Special Programme Budget for the Biennium 2012–2013, 5th Comm, 67th sess, UN Doc A/C.5/67/L.23 (28 March 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, GA Res 2465 (XXIII), UN GAOR, 23rd sess, 1751st plen mtg, Agenda Item 23, Supp No 18, UN Doc A/RES/2465(XXII) (20 December 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, GA Res 2548 (XXIV), UN GAOR, 24th sess, 1829th plen mtg, Agenda Item 23, Supp No 30, UN Doc A/RES/2548(XXIV) (11 December 1969).
   Google Scholar
• Importance of the Universal Realization of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination and of the Speedy Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples for the Effective Guarantee and Observance of Human Rights, GA Res 31/34, UN GAOR, 31st sess, 83rd plen mtg, Agenda Item 76, Supp No 39, UN Doc A/RES/31/34 (30 November 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Importance of the Universal Realization of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination and of the Speedy Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples for the Effective Guarantee and Observance of Human Rights, GA Res 35/35A, UN GAOR, 35th sess, 63rd plen mtg, Agenda Item 75, Supp No 48, UN Doc A/RES/35/35 (14 November 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group to Consider the Possibility of Elaborating an International Regulatory Framework on the Regulation, Monitoring and Oversight of the Activities of Private Military and Security Companies, HRC Res 15/26, UN GAOR, 15th sess, 34th mtg, Supp No 53A, A/HRC/RES/15/26 (1 October 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group to Consider the Possibility of Elaborating an International Regulatory Framework on the Regulation, Monitoring and Oversight of the Activities of Private Military and Security Companies, HRC Res 22/33, UN GAOR, 22nd sess, 50th mtg, Supp No 53, A/HRC/RES/22/33 (22 March 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Question of Territories Under Portuguese Administration, GA Res 2395 (XXIII), UN GAOR, 23rd sess, 1730th plen mtg, Agenda Item 65, Supp No 18, UN Doc A/RES/2395(XXIII) (29 November 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Renewal of the Mandate of the Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group to Consider the Possibility of Elaborating an International Regulatory Framework on the Regulation, Monitoring and Oversight of the Activities of Private Military and Security Companies, HRC Res 28/7, UN GAOR, 28th sess, 55th mtg, Supp No 53, A/HRC/RES/28/7 (26 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Resolution on Mercenaries, OAU Res AHG/49(IV) (September 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Security Council Res 161 (1961) UN SCOR, 16th sess, 942nd mtg, UN Doc S/RES/161(1961) (21 February 1961).
   Google Scholar
• Security Council Res 241 (1967) UN SCOR, 22nd sess, 1378th mtg, UN Doc S/RES/241(1967) (15 November 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Security Council Res 289 (1970) UN SCOR, 25th sess, 1558th mtg, UN Doc S/RES/289(1970) (23 November 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Security Council Res 405 (1977) UN SCOR, 32nd sess, 2005th mtg, UN Doc S/RES/405(1977) (14 April 1977).
   Google Scholar
• Special Subjects Relating to the Programme Budget for the Biennium 2012–2013, GA Res 67/254, UN GAOR, 67th sess, 73rd plen mtg, Agenda Item 130, Supp No 49, UN Doc A/RES/67/254 (7 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• The Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, CHR Res 1987/16, UN ESCOR, 43rd sess, 52nd mtg, Supp No 5, UN Doc E/CN.4/RES/1987/16 (9 March 1987).
   Google Scholar
• The Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, CHR Res 2005/2, UN ESCOR, 61st sess, 38th mtg, Supp No 3, UN Doc E/CN.4/RES/2005/2 (7 April 2005).
   Google Scholar
• The Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, HRC Res 27/10, UN GAOR, 27th sess, 39th mtg, Supp No 53A, UN Doc A/HRC/RES/27/10 (3 October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights, GA Res 217A (III), UN GAOR, 3rd sess, 183rd plen mtg, UN Doc A/180 (10 December 1948).
   Google Scholar
• Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, GA Res 62/145, UN GAOR, 62nd sess, 76th plen mtg, Agenda Item 69, Supp No 49, UN Doc A/RES/62/145 (18 December 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Meeting and Summary Records
   Google Scholar
• Summary Record of the 13th Meeting, UN GAOR, 6th Comm, 63rd sess, 13th mtg, Agenda Items 76 and 78, UN Doc A/C.6/63/SR.13 (7 November 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Summary Record of the 14th Meeting, UN GAOR, 6th Comm, 63rd sess, 14th mtg, Agenda Items 73, 76, 77 and 99, UN Doc A/C.6/63/SR.14 (18 November 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Summary Record of the 15th Meeting, UN GAOR, 6th Comm, 67th sess, 15th mtg, Agenda Items 80 and 81, UN Doc A/C.6/67/SR.15 (24 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Summary Record of the 34th mtg, UN GAOR, 4th Comm, 31st sess, 34th mtg, Agenda Item 85, UN Doc A/C.4/31/SR.34 (29 November 1976).
   Google Scholar
• UN GAOR, 34th sess, 104th plen mtg, UN Doc A/34/PV.104 (14 December 1979).
   Google Scholar
• UN GAOR, 44th sess, 72nd plen mtg, UN Doc A/44/PV.72 (4 December 1989).
   Google Scholar
• UN SCOR, 22nd sess, 1372nd mtg, UN Doc S/PV.1372(OR) (8 November 1967).
   Google Scholar
• UN SCOR, 32nd sess, 2004th mtg, UN Doc S/PV.2004(OR) (14 April 1977).
   Google Scholar
• UN SCOR, 32nd sess, 2048th mtg, UN Doc S/PV.2048(OR) (23 November 1977).
   Google Scholar
• Other
   Google Scholar
• Patricia Arias (2015) Annual Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, UN Doc A/HRC/27/50.
   Google Scholar
• International Seminar on Southern Africa (1967) Report of the International Seminar on Apartheid, Racial Discrimination and Colonialism in Southern Africa, UN Doc A/6818.
   Google Scholar
• Letter Dated 5 December 1979 from the Permanent Representative of Nigeria to the United Nations Addressed to the Secretary-General, UN Doc A/34/247.
   Google Scholar
• Letter Dated 2 October 2008 from the Permanent Representative of Switzerland to the United Nations Addressed to Secretary-General, UN Docs A/63/467 and S/2008/636.
   Google Scholar
• UN (1979) ‘Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials: Adopted by General Assembly Resolution 34/169 of 17 December 1979’, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/codeofconduct.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN (1990) ‘Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials: Adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September 1990’, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/firearms.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN Department of Safety and Security (2012) ‘Guidelines on the Use of Armed Security Services from Private Security Companies’, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Mercenaries/WG/StudyPMSC/GuidelinesOnUseOfArmedSecurityServices.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN Office for Project Services (2013) ‘2012 Annual Statistical Report on United Nations Procurement’, https://www.unops.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/ASR/2012_Annual-Statistical-Report-UN-Procurement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries (2015) ‘Concept Note Submitted by the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination’, In-session Document for the Fourth Session of the Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group to Consider the Possibility of Elaborating an International Regulatory Framework on the Regulation, Monitoring and Oversight of the Activities of Private Military and Security Companies, Palais des Nations, Geneva, 27 April–1 May, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/WGMilitary/Session4/WG_MercenariesCN_14April2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Secondary Sources
   Google Scholar
• Articles
   Google Scholar
• Amitav Acharya (2004) ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’ 58 International Organization 239. doi: 10.1017/S0020818304582024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert Axelrod (1986) ‘An Evolutionary Approach to Norms’ 80 American Political Science Review 1095. doi: 10.2307/1960858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark W Bina (2005) ‘Private Military Contractor Liability and Accountability After Abu Ghraib’ 38 John Marshall Law Review 1237.
   Google Scholar
• Annika Björkdahl (2002) ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’ 15 Cambridge Review of International Affairs 135. doi: 10.1080/09557570220126216
   Google Scholar
• Robert C Blitt (2012) ‘Beyond Ruggie’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Charting an Embracive Approach to Corporate Human Rights Compliance’ 48 Texas International Law Journal 33.
   Google Scholar
• Doug Brooks (2000) ‘Messiahs or Mercenaries? The Future of International Private Military Services’ 7 International Peacekeeping 129. doi: 10.1080/13533310008413867
   Google Scholar
• Doug Brooks and Fiona Mangan (2011) ‘The Modern Use of Contractors in Peace and Stability Operations’ 18 Brown Journal of World Affairs 181.
   Google Scholar
• HC Burmester (1978) ‘The Recruitment and Use of Mercenaries in Armed Conflicts’ 72 The American Journal of International Law 37. doi: 10.2307/2199702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonio Cassese (1980) ‘Mercenaries: Lawful Combatants or War Criminals?’ 40 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 1.
   Google Scholar
• Robert E Cesner and John W Brant (1977) ‘Law of the Mercenary: An International Dilemma’ 6 Capital University Law Review 339.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey T Checkel (1998) ‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’ 50 World Politics 32. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James Cockayne (2009) ‘Regulating Private Military and Security Companies: The Content, Negotiation, Weaknesses and Promise of the Montreux Document’ 13 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 401. doi: 10.1093/jcsl/krp006
   Google Scholar
• Molly Dunigan (2014) ‘The Future of US Military Contracting: Current Trends and Future Implications’ 69 International Journal 510. doi: 10.1177/0020702014549677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katherine Fallah (2006) ‘Corporate Actors: The Legal Status of Mercenaries in Armed Conflict’ 88 International Review of the Red Cross 599. doi: 10.1017/S1816383106000695
   Google Scholar
• Theo Farrell (2001) ‘Transnational Norms and Military Development: Constructing Ireland’s Professional Army’ 7 European Journal of International Relations 63. doi: 10.1177/1354066101007001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martha Finnemore (2000) ‘Are Legal Norms Distinctive?’ 32 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 699.
   Google Scholar
• Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink (1998) ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’ 52 International Organization 887. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink (2001) ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’ 4 Annual Review of Political Science 391. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen L Frye (2005) ‘Private Military Firms in the New World Order: How Redefining “Mercenary” Can Tame the “Dogs of War”’ 73 Fordham Law Review 2607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• José L Gómez del Prado (2009) ‘Private Military and Security Companies and the UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries’ 13 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 429. doi: 10.1093/jcsl/krp010
   Google Scholar
• José L Gómez del Prado (2011a) ‘A United Nations Instrument to Regulate and Monitor Private Military and Security Contractors’ 1 Notre Dame Journal of International, Comparative, and Human Rights Law 1.
   Google Scholar
• José L Gómez del Prado (2011b) ‘Impact on Human Rights of a New Non-State Actor: Private Military and Security Companies’ 18 Brown Journal of World Affairs 151.
   Google Scholar
• José L Gómez del Prado (2012) ‘A UN Convention to Regulate PMSCs?’ 31 Criminal Justice Ethics 262. doi: 10.1080/0731129X.2012.743337
   Google Scholar
• FJ Hampson (1991) ‘Mercenaries: Diagnosis Before Proscription’ 22 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 3. doi: 10.1017/S0167676800002324
   Google Scholar
• Mike J Hoover (1977) ‘The Laws of War and the Angolan Trial of Mercenaries: Death to the Dogs of War’ 9 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 323.
   Google Scholar
• Ted Hopf (1998) ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’ 23 International Security 171. doi: 10.1162/isec.23.1.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthew Hughes (2003) ‘Fighting for White Rule in Africa: The Central African Federation, Katanga, and the Congo Crisis, 1958–1965’ 25 The International History Review 592. doi: 10.1080/07075332.2003.9641007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver R Jones (2009) ‘Implausible Deniability: State Responsibility for the Actions of Private Military Firms’ 24 Connecticut Journal of International Law 255.
   Google Scholar
• Laurence Juma (2011) ‘Privatisation, Human Rights and Security: Reflections on the Draft International Convention on Regulation, Oversight and Monitoring of Private Military and Security Companies’ 15 Law, Democracy and Development 182.
   Google Scholar
• J Patrick Kelly (2000) ‘The Twilight of Customary International Law’ 40 Virginia Journal of International Law 449.
   Google Scholar
• David Kennedy (2006) ‘The Last Treatise: Project and Person. (Reflections on Martti Koskenniemi’s from Apology to Utopia)’ 7 German Law Journal 982.
   Google Scholar
• Jan Klabbers (1998) ‘The Undesirability of Soft Law’ 67 Nordic Journal of International Law 381. doi: 10.1163/15718109820295741
   Google Scholar
• Martti Koskenniemi (2005a) ‘International Law in Europe: Between Tradition and Renewal’ 16 European Journal of International Law 113. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chi105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martti Koskenniemi (2005b) ‘International Legislation Today: Limits and Possibilities’ 23 Wisconsin International Law Journal 61.
   Google Scholar
• Martti Koskenniemi (2012a) ‘Law, Teleology and International Relations: An Essay in Counterdisciplinarity’ 26 International Relations 3. doi: 10.1177/0047117811433080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martti Koskenniemi and Päivi Leino (2002) ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’ 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 553. doi: 10.1017/S0922156502000262
   Google Scholar
• Elke Krahmann (2013) ‘The United States, PMSCs and the State Monopoly on Violence: Leading the Way Towards Norm Change’ 44 Security Dialogue 53. doi: 10.1177/0967010612470292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elke Krahmann (2016) ‘Choice, Voice, and Exit: Consumer Power and the Self-Regulation of the Private Security Industry’ 1 European Journal of International Security 27. doi: 10.1017/eis.2015.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen D Krasner (2000) ‘International Law and International Relations: Together, Apart, Together?’ 1 Chicago Journal of International Law 93.
   Google Scholar
• Mona Lena Krook and Jacqui True (2012) ‘Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality’ 18 European Journal of International Relations 103. doi: 10.1177/1354066110380963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edward Kwakwa (1990) ‘The Current Status of Mercenaries in the Law of Armed Conflict’ 14 Hastings International and Comparative Law Journal 67.
   Google Scholar
• Anna Leander (2012) ‘What Do Codes of Conduct Do? Hybrid Constitutionalization and Militarization in Military Markets’ 1 Global Constitutionalism 91. doi: 10.1017/S2045381711000074
   Google Scholar
• George H Lockwood (1977) ‘Report on the Trial of Mercenaries: Luanda, Angola, June, 1976’ 7 Manitoba Law Journal 183.
   Google Scholar
• Radu Mares (2014) ‘Corporate and State Responsibilities in Conflict-Affected Areas’ 83 Nordic Journal of International Law 293. doi: 10.1163/15718107-08303004
   Google Scholar
• J Jeremy Marsh (2008) ‘Lex Lata or Lex Ferenda? Rule 45 of the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law’ 198 Military Law Review 116.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder McKeown (2009) ‘Norm Regress: US Revisionism and the Slow Death of the Torture Norm’ 23 International Relations 5. doi: 10.1177/0047117808100607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frédéric Mégret (2013) ‘The Apology of Utopia: Some Thoughts on Koskenniemian Themes, with Particular Emphasis on Massively Institutionalized International Human Rights Law’ 27 Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 455.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Moravcsik (1997) ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’ 51 International Organization 513. doi: 10.1162/002081897550447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leah M Nicholls (2006) ‘The Humanitarian Monarchy Legislates: The International Committee of the Red Cross and Its 161 Rules of Customary International Law’ 17 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 223.
   Google Scholar
• Holger Niemann and Henrik Schillinger (2017) ‘Contestation “All the Way Down”? The Grammar of Contestation in Norm Research’ 43 Review of International Studies 29. doi: 10.1017/S0260210516000188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana Panke and Ulrich Petersohn (2012) ‘Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes’ 18 European Journal of International Relations 719. doi: 10.1177/1354066111407690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana Panke and Ulrich Petersohn (2016) ‘Norm Challenges and Norm Death: The Inexplicable?’ 51 Cooperation and Conflict 3. doi: 10.1177/0010836715597948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelena Pejic (2011) ‘The Protective Scope of Common Article 3: More Than Meets the Eye’ 93 International Review of the Red Cross 189. doi: 10.1017/S1816383111000130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarah V Percy (2007a) ‘Mercenaries: Strong Norm, Weak Law’ 61 International Organization 367. doi: 10.1017/S0020818307070130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin Perrin (2006) ‘Promoting Compliance of Private Security and Military Companies with International Humanitarian Law’ 88 International Review of the Red Cross 613. doi: 10.1017/S1816383106000713
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin Perrin (2009) ‘Searching for Accountability: The Draft UN International Convention on the Regulation, Oversight and Monitoring of Private Military and Security Companies’ 47 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 299.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich Petersohn (2014) ‘Reframing the Anti-Mercenary Norm: Private Military and Security Companies and Mercenarism’ 69 International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 475. doi: 10.1177/0020702014544915
   Google Scholar
• Richard Price (1998) ‘Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines’ 52 International Organization 61. doi: 10.1162/002081898550671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian Reus-Smit (2001) ‘Human Rights and the Social Construction of Sovereignty’ 27 Review of International Studies 519. doi: 10.1017/S0260210501005198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Gerard Ruggie (1998) ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’ 52 International Organization 855. doi: 10.1162/002081898550770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Gerard Ruggie (2004) ‘Reconstituting the Global Public Domain – Issues, Actors, and Practices’ 10 European Journal of International Relations 499. doi: 10.1177/1354066104047847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yves Sandoz (1987) ‘The Red Cross and Peace: Realities and Limits’ 24 Journal of Peace Research 287. doi: 10.1177/002234338702400308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael Scheimer (2009) ‘Separating Private Military Companies from Illegal Mercenaries in International Law: Proposing an International Convention for Legitimate Military and Security Support that Reflects Customary International Law’ 24 American University International Law Review 609.
   Google Scholar
• Eran Shor (2008) ‘Conflict, Terrorism, and the Socialization of Human Rights Norms: The Spiral Model Revisited’ 55 Social Problems 117. doi: 10.1525/sp.2008.55.1.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PW Singer (2001/2002) ‘Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry and Its Ramifications for International Security’ 26(3) International Security 186. doi: 10.1162/016228801753399763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PW Singer (2004) ‘War, Profits, and the Vacuum of Law: Privatized Military Firms and International Law’ 24 Journal of Transnational Law 521.
   Google Scholar
• Henry W Van Deventer (1976) ‘Mercenaries at Geneva’ 70 American Journal of International Law 811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kees Van Kersbergen and Bertjan Verbeek (2007) ‘The Politics of International Norms: Subsidiarity and the Imperfect Competence Regime of the European Union’ 13 European Journal of International Relations 217. doi: 10.1177/1354066107076955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antje Wiener (2007) ‘The Dual Quality of Norms and Governance Beyond the State: Sociological and Normative Approaches to “Interaction”’ 10 Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 47. doi: 10.1080/13698230601122412
   Google Scholar
• Antje Wiener and Uwe Puetter (2009) ‘The Quality of Norms is What Actors Make of It: Critical Constructivist Research on Norms’ 5 Journal of International Law and International Relations 1.
   Google Scholar
• Juan Carlos Zarate (1998) ‘The Emergence of a New Dog of War: Private International Security Companies, International Law, and the New World Disorder’ 34 Stanford Journal of International Law 75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Books and Book Chapters
   Google Scholar
• John Austin (1954) The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence, The Noonday Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deborah D Avant (2005) The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geoffrey Best (1980) Humanity in Warfare: The Modern History of the International Law of Armed Conflict, Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander Betts and Phil Orchard (2014) ‘Introduction: The Normative Institutionalization-Implementation Gap’ in Alexander Betts and Phil Orchard (eds) Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alan Boyle and Christine Chinkin (2007) The Making of International Law, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jutta Brunnée and Stephen J Toope (2010) Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James Cockayne (2014) ‘Private Military and Security Companies’ in Andrew Clapham and Paola Gaeta (eds) The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jean de Preux (1978) ‘Article 47 – Mercenaries’ in Yves Sandoz, Christophe Swinarski and Bruno Zimmermann (eds) Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Laura A Dickinson (2008) ‘Mercenarism and Private Military Contractors’ in M Cherif Bassiouni (ed) International Criminal Law, 3rd edn, vol 1, Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Helen Duffy (2013) ‘Harmony or Conflict? The Interplay between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law in the Fight Against Terrorism’ in Larissa van den Herik and Nico Schrijver (eds) Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charlotte Epstein (2008) The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francesco Francioni (2011) ‘The Role of the Home State in Ensuring Compliance with Human Rights by Private Military Companies’ in Francesco Francioni and Natalino Ronzitti (eds) War by Contract: Human Rights, Humanitarian Law and Private Contractors, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan Goodman and Derek Jinks (2013) Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights Through International Law, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck (2005a) Customary International Humanitarian Law, vol 1, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck (eds) (2005b) Customary International Humanitarian Law, vol 2, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten Hoppe and Ottavio Quirico (2011) ‘Codes of Conduct for Private Military and Security Companies: The State of Self-Regulation in the Industry’ in Francesco Francioni and Natalino Ronzitti (eds) War by Contract: Human Rights, Humanitarian Law and Private Contractors, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Margaret E Keck and Kathryn Sikkink (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hans Kelsen (1966) Principles of International Law, 2nd edn, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Martti Koskenniemi (2001) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martti Koskenniemi (2005c) From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument, Reissue with a new epilogue, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martti Koskenniemi (2011) The Politics of International Law, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Martti Koskenniemi (2012b) ‘International Law in the World of Ideas’ in James Crawford and Martti Koskenniemi (eds) The Cambridge Companion to International Law, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martti Koskenniemi (2012c) ‘The Subjective Dangers of Projects of World Community’ in Antonio Cassese (ed) Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federico Lenzerini and Francesco Francioni (2011) ‘The Role of Human Rights in the Regulation of Private Military and Security Companies’ in Francesco Francioni and Natalino Ronzitti (eds) War by Contract: Human Rights, Humanitarian Law and Private Contractors, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hin-Yan Liu (2015) Law’s Impunity: Responsibility and the Modern Private Military Company, Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Sorcha MacLeod (2011) ‘The Role of International Regulatory Initiatives on Business and Human Rights for Holding Private Military and Security Contractors to Account’ in Francesco Francioni and Natalino Ronzitti (eds) War by Contract: Human Rights, Humanitarian Law and Private Contractors, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hans J Morgenthau (1985) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 6th edn, Alfred A Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Faustin Z Ntoubandi (2012) ‘South Africa: The Regulatory Context of Private Military and Security Companies’ in Christine Bakker and Mirko Sossai (eds) Multilevel Regulation of Military and Security Contractors: The Interplay Between International, European and Domestic Norms, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yasuaki Onuma (2012) ‘International Law and Power in the Multipolar and Multicivilizational World of the Twenty-First Century’ in Richard Falk, Mark Juergensmeyer and Vesselin Popovski (eds) Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James Pattison (2014) The Morality of Private War: The Challenge of Private Military and Security Companies, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarah Percy (2007b) Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarah Percy (2007c) ‘Morality and Regulation’ in Simon Chesterman and Chia Lehnardt (eds) From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies, Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Sarah Percy (2014) ‘The Unimplemented Norm: Anti-Mercenary Law and the Problems of Institutionalization’ in Alexander Betts and Phil Orchard (eds) Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ottavio Quirico (2011) ‘The Criminal Responsibility of Private Military and Security Company Personnel Under International Humanitarian Law’ in Francesco Francioni and Natalino Ronzitti (eds) War by Contract: Human Rights, Humanitarian Law and Private Contractors, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas Risse and Stephen C Ropp (1999) ‘International Human Rights Norms and Domestic Change: Conclusions’ in Thomas Risse, Stephen C Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink (eds) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas Risse and Stephen C Ropp (2013) ‘Introduction and Overview’ in Thomas Risse, Stephen C Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink (eds) The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas Risse and Kathryn Sikkink (1999) ‘The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction’ in Thomas Risse, Stephen C Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink (eds) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne Sandholtz (2009) Prohibiting Plunder: How Norms Change, Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne Sandholtz and Kendall Stiles (2008) International Norms and Cycles of Change, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corinna Seiberth (2014) Private Military and Security Companies in International Law – A Challenge for Non-Binding Norms: The Montreux Document and the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers, Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Dinah L Shelton (2000) ‘Introduction: Law, Non-Law and the Problem of “Soft Law”’ in Dinah Shelton (ed) Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• PW Singer (2003) Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry, Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janice E Thomson (1994) Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe, Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah Tonkin (2011) State Control Over Private Military and Security Companies in Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingo Venzke (2012) How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ana Filipa Vrdoljak (2011) ‘Women and Private Military and Security Companies’ in Francesco Francioni and Natalino Ronzitti (eds) War by Contract: Human Rights, Humanitarian Law and Private Contractors, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• RBJ Walker (1984) ‘East Wind, West Wind: Civilizations, Hegemonies, and World Orders’ in RBJ Walker (ed) Culture, Ideology, and World Order, Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Max Weber (1946) ‘Politics as a Vocation’ in HH Gerth and C Wright Mills (eds and trans) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Max Weber (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, ed and trans Ephriam Fischoff et al, University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nigel D White (2012) ‘Regulatory Initiatives at the International Level’ in Christine Bakker and Mirko Sossai (eds) Multilevel Regulation of Military and Security Contractors: The Interplay Between International, European and Domestic Norms, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Antje Wiener (2008) The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth Wilmhurst and Susan Breau (2007) ‘Preface’ in Elizabeth Wilmhurst and Susan Breau (eds) Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmen Wunderlich (2013) ‘Theoretical Approaches to Norm Dynamics’ in Harald Müller and Carmen Wunderlich (eds) Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control: Interests, Conflicts, and Justice, University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reports
   Google Scholar
• James Cockayne and Emily Speers Mears (2009) ‘Private Military and Security Companies: A Framework for Regulation’, International Peace Institute, http://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/pmsc_epub.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) (2011) ‘The Montreux Document on Private Military and Security Companies: Proceedings of the Regional Workshop for North East and Central Asia; Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia – 12 & 13 October 2011’, http://www.dcaf.ch/content/download/87531/1345368/file/07.05_Regional_Seminar_MD_English.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) (2014) ‘Annual Report 2013’, http://www.dcaf.ch/content/download/170992/2665829/file/Annual-Report-2013_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• David Isenberg (2009) ‘Private Military Contractors and US Grand Strategy’, Peace Research Institute Oslo, http://file.prio.no/Publication_files/Prio/Isenberg%20Private%20Military%20Contractors%20PRIO%20Report%201-2009.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lou Pingeot (2014) ‘Contracting Insecurity: Private Military and Security Companies and the Future of the United Nations’, Global Policy Forum and Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, http://www.rosalux-nyc.org/wp-content/files_mf/pmsc2014contractinginsecurityweb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Other Sources
   Google Scholar
• Campaign Against Arms Trade, U.K., et al (2013) ‘Civil Society Statement on the Articles of Association of the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers’, http://psm.du.edu/media/documents/regulations/global_instruments/multi_stakeholder/icoc/icoc_civil_society_comment_oversight_mechanism.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• James Cockayne (2012) ‘The Option of Elaborating a Legally Binding Instrument’, Submission to Second Session of the UN Human Rights Council’s Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group to Consider the Possibility of Elaborating an International Regulatory Framework on the Regulation, Monitoring and Oversight of the Activities of Private Military and Security Companies, 10 August 2012, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/WGMilitary/Session2/JamesCockayne.doc.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2014) ‘EU Concept for Contractor Support to EU-Led Military Operations’, http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%208628%202014%20INIT.
   Google Scholar
• Diplomatic Conference on International Humanitarian Law (1978a) Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva (1974–1977), vol 3, http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC-records_Vol-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Diplomatic Conference on International Humanitarian Law (1978b) Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva (1974–1977), vol 15, http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC-records_Vol-15.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Code of Conduct Association (ICoCA) (2013) ‘Second Draft of the Charter for the Oversight Mechanism of the ICoC’, http://psm.du.edu/media/documents/regulations/global_instruments/multi_stakeholder/icoc/icoc_second_draft_charter.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of the Red Cross (2013) ‘Statutes of the International Committee of the Red Cross’, https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/icrc-statutes-080503.htm.
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of the Red Cross and the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (2008) The Montreux Document on Pertinent International Legal Obligations and Good Practices for States Related to Operations of Private Military and Security Companies During Armed Conflict, https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0996.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Elke Krahmann and Cornelius Friesendorf (2011) ‘The Role of Private Security Companies (PSCs) in CSDP Missions and Operations’, Directorate-General for External Policies, Policy Department, European Parliament, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2011/433829/EXPO-SEDE_ET%282011%29433829_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Åse Gilje Østensen (2011) ‘UN Use of Private Military and Security Companies: Practices and Policies’, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, http://www.dcaf.ch/content/download/45662/678940/file/SSR_PAPER3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Swiss Government (2010) ‘International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers’, http://www.icoca.ch/sites/all/themes/icoca/assets/icoc_english3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Sarajevo Client Guidelines for the Procurement of Private Security Companies (2006) http://www.seesac.org/res/files/publication/545.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (2000) http://www.voluntaryprinciples.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/voluntary_principles_english.pdf.
   Google Scholar