Temporality, disability and institutional violence: revisiting In re F

References

• Fleur Beaupert (2018) ‘Freedom of Opinion and Expression: From the Perspective of Psychosocial Disability and Madness’ 7(3) Laws. http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/1/3.
   Google Scholar
• Lauren Berlant (2007) ‘Slow Death (Sovereignty, Obesity, Lateral Agency)’ 33(4) Critical Inquiry 754. doi: 10.1086/521568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiona Kumari Campbell (2009) Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• William Carter QC (2006) Challenging Behaviour and Disability: A Targeted Response, Report to Warren Pitt MP, Minister for Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Kim Chandler et al (2016) ‘The Doctrine of Necessity and the Detention and Restraint of People with Intellectual Impairment: Is There any Justification?’ 23(3) Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 361. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2015.1055853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Chandler et al (2014) ‘Rethinking Restrictive Practices: A Comparative Analysis’ 14(2) QUT Law Review 90. doi: 10.5204/qutlr.v14i2.568
   Google Scholar
• Eli Clare (2017) Brilliant Imperfection: Grappling With Cure, Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beverley Clough (2017) ‘Vulnerability and Disability: Challenging the Capacity/Incapacity Binary in Mental Capacity Law’ 16(3) Social Policy and Society 469. doi: 10.1017/S1474746417000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliona de Bhailís and Eilionóir Flynn (2017) ‘Recognising Legal Capacity: Commentary & Analysis of Article 12 CRPD’ 13(1) International Journal of Law in Context 6. doi: 10.1017/S174455231600046X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nirmala Erevelles (2011) Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Enabling a Transformative Body Politic, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Erick Fabris (2011) Tranquil Prisons: Chemical Incarceration Under Community Treatment Orders, University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eilionóir Flynn and Anna Arstein-Kerslake (2014) ‘Legislating Personhood: Realising the Right to Support in Exercising Legal Capacity’ 10(1) The International Journal of Law in Context 81. doi: 10.1017/S1744552313000384
   Google Scholar
• Eilionóir Flynn and Anna Arstein-Kerslake (2017) ‘State Intervention in the Lives of People with Disabilities: The Case for a Disability Neutral Framework’ 13(2) The International Journal of Law in Context 39. doi: 10.1017/S1744552316000495
   Google Scholar
• Ben Golder (2012) ‘The Distribution of Death: Notes Towards a Bio-Politial Theory of Criminal Law’ in Matthew Stone et al (eds) New Critical Legal Thinking: Law and the Political, Birkbeck Law Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piers Gooding (2017) A New Era for Mental Health Law and Policy: Supported Decision-Making and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piers Gooding and Eilionóir Flynn (2015) ‘Querying the Call to Introduce Mental Capacity Testing to Mental Health Law: Does the Doctrine of Necessity Provide an Alternative?’ 4(2) Laws 245. doi: 10.3390/laws4020245
   Google Scholar
• Dan Goodley (2014) Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anand Grover (2009) United Nations Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, A/64/272.
   Google Scholar
• Margaret Hall (2014) ‘The Vulnerability Jurisdiction: Equity, Parens Patriae, and the Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court’ 2(1) Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law 185.
   Google Scholar
• Rosemary Hunter (2017) ‘Commentary: Re W [PPPR] (‘Re Williams[PPPR]’) (1993) 11 FRNZ 108’ in Elisabeth McDonald et al (eds), Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand: Te Rino: A Two-Stranded Rope, Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Alison Kafer (2013) Feminist, Queer, Crip, Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amanda Keeling (2017) ‘“Organising Objects”: Adult Safeguarding Practice and Article 16 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ 53 International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsty Keywood (1995) ‘Sterilising the Woman with Learning Difficulties — In Her Best Interests?’ in Jo Bridgeman and Susan Millns (eds), Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body, Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsty Keywood (2001) ‘“I’d Rather Keep Him Chaste”: Retelling the Story of Sterilisation, Learning Disability and (Non)Sexed Embodiment’ 9 Feminist Legal Studies 185. doi: 10.1023/A:1016748806196
   Google Scholar
• Eunjung Kim (2016) Curative Violence: Rehabilitating Disability, Gender, and Sexuality in Modern Korea, Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renisa Mawani (2014) ‘Law as Temporality: Colonial Politics and Indian Settlers’ 4 UC Irvine Law Review 65.
   Google Scholar
• Renisa Mawani (2015) ‘The Times of Law’ 40 Law & Social Inquiry 253. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernadette McSherry (2002) ‘The Doctrine of Necessity and Medical Treatment’ 10(1) Journal of Law and Medicine 10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juan Mendez (2013) Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Juan E Mendez, A/HRC/22/53.
   Google Scholar
• Juan E Mendez (n.d.) ‘Response by the Special Rapporteur to the Joint Statement by the American Psychiatric Association and the World Psychiatric Association’ in Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law: Anti-Torture Initiative (ed), Torture in Healthcare Settings: Reflections on the Special Rapporteur on Torture’s 2013 Thematic Report, American University Washington College of Law Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law.
   Google Scholar
• Tina Minkowitz (2017) ‘CRPD and Transformative Equality’ 13(2) The International Journal of Law in Context 77. doi: 10.1017/S1744552316000483
   Google Scholar
• Rob Nixon (2013) Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasbir K Puar (2009) ‘Prognosis Time: Towards a Geopolitics of Affect, Debility and Capacity’ 19(2) Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 161. doi: 10.1080/07407700903034147
   Google Scholar
• Jasbir K Puar (2017) The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability, Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jake Pyne (2017) ‘Arresting Ashley X: Trans Youth, Puberty Blockers and the Question of Whether Time is on Your Side’ 7(1) Somatechnics 95. doi: 10.3366/soma.2017.0208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul Ramcharan et al (2009) Experiences of Restrictive Practices: A View from People with Disabilities and Family Carers. A final research report to the Office of the Senior Practitioner.
   Google Scholar
• Sherene Razack (2015) Dying From Improvement: Inquests and Inquiries into Indigenous Deaths in Custody, University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carla Rice et al (2017) ‘Imagining Disability Futurities’ 32(2) Hypatia 213. doi: 10.1111/hypa.12321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucy Series (2013) ‘UN Special Rapporteur Calls for an End to Involuntary Treatment and Detention Justified by Mental Illness … or Does He?’ http://thesmallplaces.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/un-special-rapporteur-calls-for-end-to.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lucy Series (2015a) ‘Power and the Mental Capacity Act’ https://thesmallplaces.wordpress.com/2015/02/18/power-and-the-mental-capacity-act/.
   Google Scholar
• Lucy Series (2015b) ‘Relationships, Autonomy and Legal Capacity: Mental Capacity and Support Paradigms’ 40 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karen Soldatic (2013) ‘Appointment Time: Disability and Neoliberal Workfare Temporalities’ 39(3) Critical Sociology 405. doi: 10.1177/0896920511430168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claire Spivakovsky (2018) ‘The Impossibilities of ‘Bearing Witness’ to the Violence of Coercive Interventions in the Disability Sector’ in Claire Spivakovsky et al (eds), Critical Perspectives on Coercive Interventions: Law, Medicine and Society, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Linda Steele (Forthcoming) ‘Sterilisation, Disability and Wellbeing: The Curative Imaginary of the “Welfare Jurisdiction”’ in Claire Spivakovsky et al (eds), Critical Perspectives on Coercive Interventions: Law, Medicine and Society, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Linda Steele (2008) ‘Making Sense of the Family Court’s Decisions on the Non-Therapeutic Sterilisation of Girls with Intellectual Disability’ 22(1) Australian Family Law Journal 1.
   Google Scholar
• Linda Steele (2014) ‘Disability, Abnormality and Criminal Law: Sterilisation as Lawful and Good Violence’ 23(3) Griffith Law Review 467. doi: 10.1080/10383441.2014.1000223
   Google Scholar
• Linda Steele (2015) Submission to Senate Community Affairs References Committee Inquiry into Violence, Abuse and Neglect against People with Disability in Institutional and Residential Settings, including the Gender and Age Related Dimensions, and the Particular Situation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People with Disability, and Culturally and Linguistically Diverse People with Disability, submission no. 94, https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Violence_abuse_neglect/Submissions.
   Google Scholar
• Linda Steele (2016) ‘Court-Authorised Sterilisation and Human Rights: Inequality, Discrimination and Violence Against Women and Girls with Disability?’ 39(3) UNSW Law Journal 1002.
   Google Scholar
• Linda Steele (2017) ‘Policing Normalcy: Sexual Violence Against Women Offenders with Disability’ 31(3) Continuum 422. doi: 10.1080/10304312.2016.1275144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linda Steele and Leanne Dowse (2016) ‘Gender, Disability Rights and Violence Against Medical Bodies’ 31(88) Australian Feminist Studies 117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anita Stuhmcke (2014) ‘Tick Tock Goes the Clock: Rethinking Policy and Embryo Storage Limits’ 22 Feminist Legal Studies 285. doi: 10.1007/s10691-014-9273-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelley Tremain (2005) ‘Foucault, Governmentality, and Critical Disability Theory: An Introduction’ in Shelley Tremain (ed), Foucault and the Government of Disability, University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott Veitch (2007) Law and Irresponsibility: On the Legitimation of Human Suffering, Routledge-Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Dinesh Wadiwel (2017) ‘Disability and Torture: Exception, Epistemology and “Black Sites”’ 31(3) Continuum 388. doi: 10.1080/10304312.2016.1275134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael Williams et al (2014) ‘Consent Versus Scrutiny: Restricting Liberties in Post-Bournewood Victoria’ 21 Journal of Law & Medicine 641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slavoj Žižek (2008) Violence: Six Sideways Reflections, Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Primary Sources
   Google Scholar
• Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582
   Google Scholar
• Loughnan [1981] VR 443
   Google Scholar
• Re F (Mental Patient: Sterilization) [1990] 2 AC 1
   Google Scholar
• Re W [PPPR] (‘Re Williams[PPPR]’) (1993) 11 FRNZ 108
   Google Scholar
• R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust, ex parte L [1999] 1 AC 458
   Google Scholar