Intentional structural violence? Weapons of the accountable and the administration of Wielangta

References

• Primary legal sources
   Google Scholar
• Brown v Forestry Tasmania (No 4) [2006] FCA 1729.
   Google Scholar
• Brown v Forestry Tasmania [2008] HCA Trans 202 (23 May 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Forestry Tasmania v Brown [2007] FCAFC 186 (30 November 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Secondary sources
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (1997) Tasmanian Pocket Year Book 1997, Australian Bureau of Statistics available at http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/free.nsf/0/280376AE9C822275CA257225000491BA/$File/13026_1997.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas Ian Baxter (2014) A Law unto Themselves? Australian Regulation of Forestry Operations, Faculty of Law. University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Jacqueline Best (2012) ‘Bureaucratic Ambiguity’ 41 Economy and Society 84. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.637333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jane Caplan and John Torpey (2001) ‘Introduction’ in Jane Caplan and John Torpey (eds) Documenting Individual Identity: The Development of State Practices in the Modern World, Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neil Carter (2001) The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy, University Press Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• R Collins (1999) ‘Ecopolitics and the Media’ in C Star (ed) Green Politics in Grey Times, Proceedings of the Ecopolitics XI Conference.
   Google Scholar
• John Dargavel (1995) Fashioning Australia’s Forests, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• John Dargavel (1998) ‘Politics, Policy and Process in the Forests’ 5 Australian Journal of Environmental Management 25. doi: 10.1080/14486563.1998.10648396
   Google Scholar
• Timothy Doyle (1994) ‘Direct Action in Environmental Conflict in Australia: A Re-Examination of Non-violent Action’ 28 Regional Journal of Social Issues 1.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick Eisenlohr (2011) ‘The Anthropology of Media and the Question of Ethnic and Religious Pluralism’ 19 Social Anthropology 40. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8676.2010.00136.x
   Google Scholar
• Arturo Escobar (1998) ‘Whose Knowledge, Whose Nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements’ 5 Journal of Political Ecology 53. doi: 10.2458/v5i1.21397
   Google Scholar
• Michel Foucault (1982) ‘The Subject and Power’ 8 Critical Inquiry 777. doi: 10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernd Frohmann (2008) ‘Documentary Ethics, Ontology, and Politics’ 8 Archival Science 165. doi: 10.1007/s10502-008-9073-y
   Google Scholar
• Johan Galtung (1969) ‘Violence, Peace, and Peace Research’ 6 Journal of Peace Research 167. doi: 10.1177/002234336900600301
   Google Scholar
• David Graeber (2015) The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy, Melville House.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Herzfeld (1993) The Social Production of Indifference, University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthew S Hull (2012) ‘Documents and Bureaucracy’ 41 Annual Review of Anthropology 251. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew Hutton and Libby Connors (1999) History of the Australian Environmental Movement, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias Kelly (2006) ‘Documented Lives: Fear and the Uncertainties of Law during the Second Palestinian Intifada’ 12 Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00282.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan Kennedy (2004) ‘The Disenchantment of Logically Formal Legal Rationality, or Max Weber’s Sociology in the Genealogy of the Contemporary Mode of Western Legal Thought’ 55 Hastings Law Journal 1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamie B Kirkpatrick (1987) ‘The Growthist/Greenie Ritual Conflict and the Nature of the Argument: The Example of the Woodchip Export EIS’ in A Conacher (ed) Readings in Australian Geography, IAG (WA) and Dept. of Geography, University of WA.
   Google Scholar
• Jamie B Kirkpatrick (1998) ‘Nature Conservation and the Regional Forest Agreement Process’ 5 Australian Journal of Environmental Management 31. doi: 10.1080/14486563.1998.10648397
   Google Scholar
• Marcus Lane (1999) ‘Regional Forest Agreements: Resolving Resource Conflicts or Managing Resource Politics?’ 37 Australian Geographical Studies 142. doi: 10.1111/1467-8470.00075
   Google Scholar
• Bruno Latour (2005) Reassembling the Social, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brian Leiter (2010) ‘Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What Is the Issue?’ 16 Legal Theory 111. doi: 10.1017/S1352325210000121
   Google Scholar
• Sharachchandra Lele (1991) ‘Sustainable Development: A Critical Review’ 19 World Development 607. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tania Murray Li (2007) ‘Practices of Assemblage and Community Forest Management’ 36 Economy and Society 263. doi: 10.1080/03085140701254308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael Lynch and David Bogen (1996) The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings, Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jan McDonald (1999) ‘Regional Dorest (Dis) Agreements: The RFA Process and Sustainable Forest Management’ 11 Bond Law Review 295.
   Google Scholar
• Linsey McGoey (2007) ‘On the Will to Ignorance in Bureaucracy’ 36 Economy and Society 212. doi: 10.1080/03085140701254282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joel S Migdal and Klaus Schlichte (2005) ‘Rethinking the State’ in Klaus Schlichte (ed) The Dynamics of States: The Formation and Crises of State Domination, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• David Mosse (2006) ‘Anti-Social Anthropology? Objectivity, Objection, and the Ethnography of Public Policy and Professional Communities’ 12 Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 935. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00371.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laura Nader (1972) ‘Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives Gained from Studying Up’ in DH Hymes (ed) Reinventing Anthropology, Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yael Navaro-Yashin (2003) ‘Legal-illegal counterpoints: Subjecthood and Subjectivity in an Unrecognized State’ in R Wilson and J Mitchell (eds). Human Rights in Global Perspective: Anthropological Studies of Rights, Claims and Entitlements, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michael Power (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul Rutherford (1999) ‘Ecological Modernization and Environmental Risk’ in Eric Darier (ed) Discourses of the Environment, Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• James C Scott (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James C Scott (1999) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marilyn Strathern (2000) Audit Cultures: Anthropoligical Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• James A Tyner and Stian Rice (2016) ‘To Live and Let Die: Food, Famine, and Administrative Violence in Democratic Kampuchea, 1975–1979’ 52 Political Geography 47. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torsten Wilholt (2009) ‘Bias and Values in Scientific Research’ 40 Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 92. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaf Zenker (2015) ‘De-judicialization, Outsourced Review and All-too-Flexible Bureaucracies in South African Land Restitution’ 33 The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 81. doi: 10.3167/ca.2015.330107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar